JTF.ORG Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Rubystars on July 13, 2013, 10:10:22 PM

Title: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Rubystars on July 13, 2013, 10:10:22 PM
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/07/13/george-zimmerman-found-not-guilty/2514163/
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on July 13, 2013, 10:12:48 PM
Yep, PyramidHead was the first to break it. He beat me by about .5 second.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Joe Gutfeld on July 13, 2013, 10:14:21 PM
Our prayers were answered tonight as Zimmerman was found not guilty!!  The jurors saw past the black and liberal agenda and saw this case for what it was.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: TruthSpreader on July 13, 2013, 10:15:35 PM
Our prayers were indeed answered. Baruch Hashem.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Binyamin Yisrael on July 13, 2013, 10:38:26 PM
Next time may Pollard be freed!

Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Binyamin Yisrael on July 13, 2013, 10:38:57 PM
Our prayers were indeed answered. Baruch Hashem.


Can you imagine how great it would have been if Obama lost?

Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Chaim Ben Pesach on July 13, 2013, 10:54:54 PM
בס''ד

Baruch Hashem, finally some justice. Finally, a defeat for the anti-white, anti-Semitic, politically correct, affirmative action beasts who are destroying all of Western civilization.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Rubystars on July 13, 2013, 11:10:09 PM
בס''ד

Baruch Hashem, finally some justice. Finally, a defeat for the anti-white, anti-Semitic, politically correct, affirmative action beasts who are destroying all of Western civilization.

We need some good news at least now and then.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: RussianLeo777 on July 13, 2013, 11:15:48 PM
Well said, Chaim.  This verdict also confirms that we are allowed to defend ourselves against black violent criminals.  A shout out to Mark O'Mara and Don West (Zimmerman's defense team) who did a wonderful job
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Dan on July 13, 2013, 11:26:42 PM
 :)
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: serbian army on July 13, 2013, 11:39:22 PM
You must be really dumb to attack or try to rob someone in Florida or Texas...
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Mishmaat on July 13, 2013, 11:43:35 PM
בס''ד

Baruch Hashem, finally some justice. Finally, a defeat for the anti-white, anti-Semitic, politically correct, affirmative action beasts who are destroying all of Western civilization.

Right on Chaim!
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Lisa on July 14, 2013, 12:10:56 AM
You put it perfectly Chaim.

Now I'm just worried about Zimmerman's safety.  Obama and Holder will no doubt still go after him for a snivel rights violation. 
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Binyamin Yisrael on July 14, 2013, 12:24:36 AM
בס''ד

Baruch Hashem, finally some justice. Finally, a defeat for the anti-white, anti-Semitic, politically correct, affirmative action beasts who are destroying all of Western civilization.


Obviously an all white woman jury would acquit him. I guess white women know what black men are capable of in the dark. Any self-respecting normal white woman would know that. Maybe white women named Hillary Clinton or Nancy Pelosi wouldn't but normal ones sure would.

Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Yotin on July 14, 2013, 12:40:45 AM
 :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance:
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Israel Chai on July 14, 2013, 12:43:20 AM
You don't think he should have got a "time-served" sentence for accidentally killing him instead of shooting him in the leg or something?
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Kahane-Was-Right BT on July 14, 2013, 12:58:53 AM
You don't think he should have got a "time-served" sentence for accidentally killing him instead of shooting him in the leg or something?

If a guy has mounted on top of him and is punching and slamming your head into the ground, how exactly do you expect him to make sure the shot he fires is non-fatal?   Silliness.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Binyamin Yisrael on July 14, 2013, 01:03:47 AM
You don't think he should have got a "time-served" sentence for accidentally killing him instead of shooting him in the leg or something?


He should be compensated for time served and the cost of his attorneys. If anything, they should sue Trayvon's family. Why was that animal banging his head on the ground? I guess because he wanted to make the cracker sound with Zimmerman's head. I heard some people on TV saying cracker originated from the sound slave owners made when they whipped their slaves.

Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: White Israelite on July 14, 2013, 01:06:35 AM
You don't think he should have got a "time-served" sentence for accidentally killing him instead of shooting him in the leg or something?

Absolutely not! He was having his head smashed in, he killed the guy in self defense, if someone was attacking you, wouldn't you defend yourself?
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Binyamin Yisrael on July 14, 2013, 01:11:12 AM
BOYS IN THE HOODIES

Police buried Trayvon's criminal history

Exclusive: Jack Cashill exposes fact 'good kid' Martin should have been arrested twice

Published: 04/16/2013 at 7:40 PM

Jack Cashill is an Emmy-award winning independent writer and producer with a Ph.D. in American Studies from Purdue. His latest book is the blockbuster "Deconstructing Obama."   

Some deaths are more politically useful than others.

Twenty years ago this week, the Clinton administration ordered a tank assault on the Mount Carmel community, killing 39 racial minorities, 26 of them black. The Clintons and the media suppressed the racial data so rigorously that I doubt even Al Sharpton knows about the black dead at Waco.

A year ago Feb. 26, neighborhood watch captain George Zimmerman shot and killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Fla., and within a month every sentient person on the planet knew “Trayvon” by name.

What they did not know was Martin’s background. Sanford Police Department (SPD) investigator Chris Serino, for instance, said publicly of Martin, “This child has no criminal record whatsoever.” He called Martin “a good kid, a mild-mannered kid.” The media almost universally sustained this tragically false narrative.

Martin had the seeming good fortune of attending school in the Miami-Dade School District, the fourth-largest district in the country and one of the few with its own police department.

For a variety of reasons, none of them good, elements within the SPD and the Miami-Dade School District Police Department, or M-DSPD, conspired to keep Martin’s criminal history buried.

See Jack Cashill’s stunning work, in “Deconstructing Obama,” “First Strike,” “Hoodwinked,” “Officer’s Oath” and more.

As part of its mission the M-DSPD was allegedly trying to divert offending students, especially black males, from the criminal justice system. As the Martin death would prove, the M-DSPD diverted offending students to nothing beyond its own statistical glory.

The exposure of M-DSPD practices began inadvertently on March 26, 2012, when the Miami Herald, the one mainstream outlet to do real reporting on the case, ran a story on Martin’s background.

The Herald’s headline, “Multiple suspensions paint complicated portrait of Trayvon Martin,” should have caused the other media to seek the truth about the very nearly sanctified Martin.

It did not. What it did do was to cause M-DSPD Police Chief Charles Hurley to launch a major Internal Affairs (IA) investigation into the possible leak of this information to the Herald.

At the end of the day, Hurley rather wished he had not. The detectives questioned told the truth about Martin and about the policies that kept him out of the justice system. Hurley would be demoted and forced out of the department within a year.

We now know what the detectives revealed thanks to a recently fulfilled Freedom of Information Act request filed by the dogged researchers at a blogging collective known as The Conservative Treehouse. The “Treepers” have literally done more good work on the Martin case than all the newsrooms in America combined.

On Feb. 15, 2012, 11 days before Martin’s death, the Miami-Dade County Public Schools put out a press release boasting of a 60 percent decline in school-based arrests, the largest decline by far in the state.

“While our work is not completed, we are making tremendous progress in moving toward a pure prevention model,” Hurley told the Tampa Bay Times, “with enforcement as a last resort and an emphasis on education.”

Hurley’s detectives, all of them veterans with excellent records, told a different story under oath when questioned by Internal Affairs. They knew the shell game was about to be exposed upon first learning that Martin was one of their students and outside agencies would be requesting his records.

“Oh, God, oh, my God, oh, God,” one major reportedly said when first looking at Martin’s data. He realized that Martin had been suspended twice already that school year for offenses that should have gotten him arrested – once for getting caught with a burglary tool and a dozen items of female jewelry, the second time for getting caught with marijuana and a marijuana pipe.

In each case, the case file on Martin was fudged to make the crime less serious than it was. As one detective told IA, the arrest statistics coming out of Martin’s school, Michael Krop Senior, had been “quite high,” and the detectives “needed to find some way to lower the stats.” This directive allegedly came from Hurley.

“Chief Hurley, for the past year, has been telling his command staff to lower the arrest rates,” confirmed another high-ranking detective.

When asked by IA whether the M-DSPD was avoiding making arrests, that detective replied, “What Chief Hurley said on the record is that he commends the officer for using his discretion. What Chief Hurley really meant is that he’s commended the officer for falsifying a police report.”

The IA interrogators seemed stunned by what they were hearing. They asked one female detective incredulously if she were actually ordered to “falsify reports.” She answered, “Pretty much, yes.”

Once the top brass understood that the Martin case had the potential to expose the reason for the department’s stunning drop in crime, they told the detectives “to make sure they start writing reports as is; don’t omit anything.”

“Oh, now, the chief wants us to write reports as is,” said a Hispanic detective sarcastically, “and not omit anything, as we have been advised in the past?”

The IA investigation delved into the paranoid concern that the M-DSPD was sharing information about Martin with other relevant police departments as it routinely did in other multi-jurisdictional cases.

The one detective who sent information to the Sanford PD came under heavy fire. He was appalled. “Currently, our department is functioning and operating out of fear,” he told the IA. “It is tragic to see that I’ve been disciplined at the direction of Chief Hurley.”

As it turned out, Hurley need not have worried about the SPD. As the Conservative Treehouse reports, the information sent by the M-DSPD “disappeared down the rabbit hole and was not included in the final victimology report filed by Sanford Detective Serino.”

Serino was the Martin-friendly detective who had insisted that Martin “has no criminal record whatsoever,” calling him, “a good kid, a mild-mannered kid.”

In Hurley’s defense, school districts across the country had been feeling pressure from the nation’s race hustlers to think twice before disciplining black students. Last year, the White House formalized the pressure with an executive order warning school districts to avoid “methods that result in disparate use of disciplinary tools.”

Jesse Jackson brought this nonsense home to Sanford during a large April 1, 2012, rally. He implied that Martin had been profiled by his high school for being a black male and suspended for the same reason. “We must stop suspending our children,” Jackson told the crowd.

In a way, Jackson was right. Martin should not have been suspended. He should have been arrested on both occasions. Had he been, his parents and his teachers would have known how desperately far he had gone astray.

Instead, Martin was “diverted” into nothing useful. Just days after his non-arrest, he was allowed to wander the streets of Sanford high and alone looking, in Zimmerman’s immortal words, “like he’s up to no good or he’s on drugs or something.”

At the end of the day, Martin had avoided becoming an arrest statistic, only to become a statistic of a much graver kind.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/police-buried-trayvons-criminal-history/#IGrb7eFpvwywlRT5.99

Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Secularbeliever on July 14, 2013, 01:12:32 AM
Well said, Chaim.  This verdict also confirms that we are allowed to defend ourselves against black violent criminals.  A shout out to Mark O'Mara and Don West (Zimmerman's defense team) who did a wonderful job

Sorry but this will give anyone pause about defending themselves.  Would you choose to go through what Zimmerman did even with the acquittal?  Just like in Israel we know that if a Jew defends himself against an Arab he will be in trouble.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: edu on July 14, 2013, 02:15:59 AM
Given the timing of the verdict which comes very close to the Hebrew date of Tisha B'av,
a day with a very bad record of tragedies for the Jewish people, I would suggest to my fellow Jews to be more cautious than usual for the next few days in coming even near people who are likely to be Trayvon Martin supporters.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Sveta on July 14, 2013, 02:25:21 AM
Given the timing of the verdict which comes very close to the Hebrew date of Tisha B'av,
a day with a very bad record of tragedies for the Jewish people, I would suggest to my fellow Jews to be more cautious than usual for the next few days in coming even near people who are likely to be Trayvon Martin supporters.

This is absolutely correct. It is not over and there are Martin supporters who have threatened to attack white people. As we recall the Al Sharpton motivated riots of Crown Heights that claimed the life of Yankel Rosenbaum.
Let's take Edu's advice and be more cautious.

Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: cjd on July 14, 2013, 04:26:43 AM


Obviously an all white woman jury would acquit him. I guess white women know what black men are capable of in the dark. Any self-respecting normal white woman would know that. Maybe white women named Hillary Clinton or Nancy Pelosi wouldn't but normal ones sure would.
Do you honestly believe that? I don't believe thinking like that works in today's world...  I don't believe white females today are as put off by the black man as they might have been 50 years ago...  The prossicution had  a very poor case aginst Zimmerman... The verdict was really the only one that could have any credibility.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: cjd on July 14, 2013, 05:12:26 AM
Sorry but this will give anyone pause about defending themselves.  Would you choose to go through what Zimmerman did even with the acquittal?  Just like in Israel we know that if a Jew defends himself against an Arab he will be in trouble.
Quite true and his problems are only starting... Zimmerman's life will never be what it once was... I said in a prior post that people taking on this sort of community watch work really need to give what they are doing a great deal of thought... The problematic and criminal part of black society today wants the ability to roam at will with out question casing the joint so to speak for whatever they can rob and steal... Zimmerman's actions and the trials outcome have given people like that and their sympathizers a reason to feel less confident in the state of Florida... Not that I did not know it already but I once had a black person actually ask  me why do you think some young blacks wear the over size hoodies and baggy clothing... When I told him it was to hide their face and give them a place to conceal all the weapons and loot some of them carry he started to laugh... Let's face it some of the criminal animals of all races today go around in  warm weather with a hoodie over their heads... The liberal media and  racial  activist have tried to place the thought in peoples minds that an acquittal would mean racial unrest and trouble... The way I see it in the long run worse trouble was in store if a verdict of guilty was brought out for Zimmerman since it would have emboldened the criminal element into believing they are untouchable...
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Dan193 on July 14, 2013, 08:12:51 AM
http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2012/03/when-al-sharpton-incited-massacre-at.html
When Al Sharpton Incited a Massacre at Freddy's Fashion Mart
MARCH 28, 2012

Angelina Marrero . . . Cynthia Martinez . . . Luz Ramos . . . Mayra Rentas . . . Olga Garcia . . . Garnette Ramautar . . . Kareem Brunner their names will forever be remembered as the seven victims of the massacre at Freddy's Fashion Mart.  Their deaths can be traced to the racial incitement of one man.. the faux Reverend Al Sharpton.

It all started as a rent dispute in the summer of 1995:

The United House of Prayer, a large African-American church was also a major landlord in Harlem. They raised the rent Freddy's Fashion Mart, a Jewish-owned clothing store which had operated from the same Harlem location for over 40 years. In turn Freddy's had to raise the rent on its sub-tenant, a black-owned record store. A landlord-tenant dispute ensued. As he has done so often in his life, Al Sharpton turned this non-racial economic dispute into a racial conflict.

The Sharpton-led protests began in August and came to a head on the morning of Friday, December 8th when Roland James Smith, Jr., who had been part of the Sharpton's protests, walked into Freddy's Fashion Mart, pulled out a gun, ordered all the black customers to leave, spilled paint thinner on several bins of clothing and set them on fire -- a fire that resulted in killing 7 people plus Smith. The only African American left in the story was Freddy's security guard Kareem Brunner, 22-years-old, who was ordered to stay by the mass murderer Smith.

At the time the faux-preacher claimed he wasn't involved in the protests, he was only there to mediate. He also claimed there was no Antisemitism involved in the protests, but he has been proven to be a liar.

Soon after the massacre, the Jewish Action Alliance, a New York-based civil-rights group, released audiotapes of several of Sharpton's weekly radio show in which Morris Powell, leader of the 125th Street Vendor's Association, can be heard using racial and anti-Semitic language to encourage Harlem residents to boycott Freddy's. Learning from his Crown Heights experience Sharpton let others push the anti-Semitic hatred but it was all done on his show.

"We are going to see that this cracker suffers,"  Powell is heard telling a crowd in one broadcast on  Aug. 19.

"Reverend Sharpton is on it. We have made contact with these crackers. We don't expect a lot out of them. They haven't seen how we feel about anything yet. We are going to show them."
 He also said
They think they gonna drive this man out of business, they gotta be out of their minds. We are not gonna stand idly by and let a Jewish person come in Black Harlem and methodically drive black people out of business up and down 125th Street. If we stand for that, we'll stand for anything. Which we've been doing.
 At a rally was recorded on Sept. 9, Mr. Sharpton is heard telling a crowd:
"I want to make it clear to the radio audience and to you here that we will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business on 125th Street.

Ironically Sharpton was the interloper, he was living in Hollis Queens at around the time Freddy's opened in Harlem and living in New Jersey when Freddy's was burned down. When other white-owned businesses fled the neighborhood as the population became more African-American, Fred Harari the owner of Freddy's continued to serve the neighborhood.

On an October 21st broadcast Norman "Granddad" Reide said:
I am saying to the Jewish community and specifically to Abraham Foxman, that you come out and utter a word, accusatory remark against Reverend Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Donna Wilson, Reverend Shields, or Gary Byrd, we will boycott you and nobody loves money any more than the Jewish people. Thank you.

In court papers filed the day before the fire, Harari and two employees described weeks of protests outside the clothing store in which demonstrators threatened employees, hurled obscenities at "bloodsucking Jews" and talked of burning down the store.

Aftermath
Sharpton, the professional bigot criticized NYPD investigators for quickly linking the fire to the protesters. But the police evidence and the tapes from the Jewish Alliance proved him to be a liar. After first telling the press "What's wrong with calling someone a white interloper?" he apologized for using that term.  He never apologized for the Jew-hatred broadcast on his radio shows and spoken at the rallies he helped to organize.  He continues to deny that the rallies had anything to do with the firebombing

Of course Sharpton never apologized for Tawana Brawley or slandering DA Pagones by with the unfounded charge that Pagones was the rapist,
“I did what I believed….They are asking me to grovel. They want black children to say they forced a black man coming out of the hard-core ghetto to his knees….Once you begin bending, it’s ‘did you bend today?’ or ‘I missed the apology, say it again.’ Once you start compromising, you lose respect for yourself.”

..nor did he apologize for saying the "Central Park Jogger" was raped by her boyfriend and leading demonstrations calling the woman who was raped and beaten to within a hair of death a whore...

...and he certainly never apologized for the anti-Semitic Pogrom he led at Crown Heights.

Al Sharpton is a Baptist Minister who regularly breaks the ninth commandment, Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor, he has incited riots which have lead to the deaths of innocents. A real preacher would not have incited violence but called for peace. A real preacher would have waited for the truth before he incited and a real preacher would have apologized when he wrongly accused people...none of which Al Sharpton has done.

Sharpton's real business isn't preaching, his real business is being a professional agitator. In the end just like a TV detergent, Al Sharpton is selling a product...Al Sharpton. And he has been rewarded for his efforts with an undeserved halo of respectability by the press, by MSNBC, and by the President of the United States.

As you read, watch or hear the news reports about Sharpton's protests with the Trayvon Martin family, understand this context.  Sharpton couldn't give a rat's ass about Travyon, his grieving family or improving the lives of African Americans in this country.  He is only concerned with selling his product.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: TruthSpreader on July 14, 2013, 09:27:12 AM


Can you imagine how great it would have been if Obama lost?

The whole world would have gone nuts.

Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: syyuge on July 15, 2013, 12:45:40 AM
Anyhow it is a very good news.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: ChabadKahanist on July 15, 2013, 12:51:43 AM
How long before Sharpton & his ilk foment riots?
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Israel Chai on July 15, 2013, 03:41:11 AM
How long before Sharpton & his ilk foment riots?

Check LA.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Spiraling Leopard on July 15, 2013, 05:51:03 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bF-Ax5E8EJc
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Spiraling Leopard on July 15, 2013, 05:52:23 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBOkba8881U
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Spiraling Leopard on July 15, 2013, 08:12:32 AM
http://patdollard.com/2013/07/zimmerman-prosecution-whistleblower-fired/

Corrupt Zimmerman Prosecutor Angela Corey Fires Case Whistleblower

State Attorney Angela Corey fired her office’s information technology director Friday after he testified last month about being concerned prosecutors did not turn over information to George Zimmerman’s defense team in the shooting death of Trayvon Martin.

On the same day attorneys finished their closing arguments in that nationally watched trial, a state attorney investigator went to Ben Kruidbos’ home about 7:30 a.m. to hand-deliver a letter stating Kruidbos “can never again be trusted to step foot in this office.”

The letter contended Kruibos did a poor job overseeing the information technology department, violated public records law for retaining documents, and noted he was questioned in March when the office was trying to determine who had leaked personnel information obtained through a computer breach.

In an interview Friday, Kruidbos denied the allegations in the letter, which was written by Cheryl Peek, the managing director of the State Attorney’s Office.

He said he had acted in good faith about “genuine concerns.” He said he had been proud to work at the State Attorney’s Office and feared the letter would cripple his chances at finding another job to support his family, including a 4-month-old son.

“I don’t have any regrets,” he said, “but I am terrified about the future and what that will end up being.”

His attorney Wesley White — who resigned from the State Attorney’s Office in December and is a critic of Corey — said the firing was aimed at sending a message to office employees “that if they feel like there is wrongdoing,” they should not disclose it or seek legal guidance from a private attorney.

“If they do speak to an attorney, then they are dead,” he said. “The State Attorney’s Office will do whatever is necessary to not only terminate them, but destroy their reputations in the process.”

Jackelyn Barnard, spokeswoman for Corey and the State Attorney’s Office, did not return phone calls or emails for comment.

Kruidbos, 42, had been on paid administrative leave since May 28 from his $80,892 job.

In January, he used computer software technology to extract photographs and text messages from the source file in Martin’s cellphone. Kruidbos was able to recover more information than the Florida Department of Law Enforcement obtained previously.

GETTING LEGAL ADVICE

Kruidbos said he became concerned that lead prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda might not have turned over Kruidbos’ report to defense attorneys. Kruidbos asked White in April for legal advice and described some contents of his report such as a photo of an African-American hand holding a gun, a photo of a plant resembling marijuana and a text message referring to a gun transaction.

White then contacted one of Zimmerman’s attorneys and learned the defense had not received the report generated by Kruidbos. The defense did receive the source file from the cellphone and used its own experts to extract data.

Last month, Zimmerman’s attorneys subpoenaed both White and Kruidbos during a pretrial hearing on their motion seeking sanctions against prosecutors. Circuit Judge Debra Nelson deferred a ruling until after the trial.

Before Kruidbos’ name surfaced in the Martin trial proceedings, he received a pay raise for “meritorious performance,” according to a document dated May 16 in his personnel file.

But the dismissal letter written by Peek contends he did his job poorly as information technology director and said he should have asked someone in the office about his concerns regarding the Martin case.

“Your egregious lack of regard for the sensitive nature of the information handled by this office is completely abhorrent,” Peek wrote. “You have proven to be completely untrustworthy. Because of your deliberate, wilful and unscrupulous actions, you can never again be trusted to step foot in this office.”

The letter said Kruidbos “apparently questioned the ethics” of de la Rionda, who has been an assistant state attorney since 1983. “His record as an honorable and respected attorney is unblemished and beyond reproach,” Peek wrote.

Kruidbos said the question of de la Rionda’s ethics “is not really my place to decide.”

He said he asked White for legal advice because he was concerned he could face “legal exposure” if the cellphone report wasn’t turned over to the defense before the trial started.

He said he did not feel comfortable posing that question to anyone within the office because the State Attorney’s Office had just conducted an in-house probe of whether someone was leaking personnel information.

OFFICE ‘PARANOIA’

“It felt like everyone was on heightened sensitivity,” Kruidbos said. “It felt like the paranoia in the office had gotten worse.”

In March, the office investigated a security breach involving someone hacking computers to obtain disciplinary matters and personal health information about employees, according to Peek’s letter. That investigation followed news reports in February that Corey approved using about $342,000 in taxpayer dollars to upgrade pensions for herself and de la Rionda. Kruidbos said the investigation might have stemmed from the stories about the pensions.

Kruidbos said office administrators told him that he and Richard Komando, who was executive director of the office, were suspected of improperly obtaining the information. Komando resigned April 4. Kruidbos said he does not believe Komando was involved because “it makes no sense. He worked very hard to get to where he was. He had nothing to gain from that.” Keep reading

Sanford, Florida (CNN) — An employee of the Florida State Attorney’s Office who testified that prosecutors withheld evidence from George Zimmerman’s defense team has been fired.

Ben Kruidbos had been on paid administrative leave since May 28 from his job as director of information technology for the State Attorney’s Office.

A spokeswoman for Fourth Judicial Circuit State Attorney Angela Corey said Kruidbos was no longer an employee of the office.

Zimmerman, a former neighborhood watch volunteer in Sanford, is on trial in the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin last year.

Kruidbos testified before Zimmerman’s trial began that Martin’s cell phone contained images of Martin blowing smoke, images of marijuana and deleted text messages regarding a transaction for a firearm and that those images had not been given to Zimmerman’s defense team.

He received the termination letter, dated July 11, on Friday, the same day jurors began deliberating Zimmerman’s case. The letter states: “It has come to our attention that you violated numerous State Attorney’s Office (SAO) policies and procedures and have engaged in deliberate misconduct that is especially egregious in light of your position.”

Read the termination letter

Kruidbos said that, when he printed a 900-page Florida Department of Law Enforcement report from Martin’s cell phone in late 2012 or early 2013, he noticed information was missing.

Concerned that attorneys did not have all the information they needed to prepare the case, he said, he reported his concerns to a State Attorney’s Office investigator and later to prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda.

Kruidbos said he generated a report that was more than three times the size of the one that had been handed over.

For example, Kruidbos said that 2,958 photos were in the report given to the defense but that his report contained 4,275 photos.

Kruidbos also said that he has been told to not put specific case-identifying information into internal e-mails.

Through his attorney, Wesley White, Kruidbos informed Zimmerman’s defense team that the information existed.

In court, Kruidbos testified that he was concerned that he could be held liable if all information wasn’t shared. “All the information is important in the process to ensure it’s a fair trial,” he said.

In a six-page dismissal letter, the State Attorney’s Office, Fourth Judicial Circuit, blasted Kruidbos’ assertions and motivations. Managing Director Cheryl R. Peek accused Kruidbos of having erased data from a laptop in violation of the Public Records Law and derided his concern about being held liable as “feigned and spurious” and “nothing more than shameful manipulation in a shallow, but obvious, attempt to cloak yourself in the protection of the whistleblower law.”

She concluded, “Because of your deliberate, willful and unscrupulous actions, you can never again be trusted to step foot in this office. Your have left us with no choice but to terminate your employment.”

But the defense said Kruidbos’ testimony supports its claim that the state violated the rules of discovery.

“When it takes me six months to get a color picture of my client, when the first one I get is a black and white, when I look at it and go, ‘This is off a cell phone; cell phones don’t take black-and-white pictures,’ and I ask for a color copy, that takes two months,” defense lawyer Mark O’Mara said Wednesday in an interview with CNN’s Martin Savidge.

“And then I get a pastel-colored color copy of it, and it takes me to file a motion and have a hearing set before I get the actual .jpeg, no, that’s frustrating. That should not happen. I’ve done this too long to make believe in my own mind that that’s happenstance.”

O’Mara said he learned about the missing information months after he was to have received it. “The only way that we really found out about it … and the only way that we really found out about the intensity of the failure to give us information was when a person from their own office, a whistle-blower, came forward and said, ‘I gave them that information in the middle to end of January’ and we didn’t get it until June 4th.”

He said he was “beyond” shocked. “It could have derailed the trial,” he said.

The defense said it did not get the complete report until a few days before the trial. O’Mara and co-counsel Don West argued that they needed more time to go through the information found on Martin’s phone and asked for a delay, which was denied.

Judge Debra Nelson said before the trial that the possibility of sanctions — requested by the defense — would be addressed after the verdict.

The defense team declined to comment Saturday.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: AmericanIsraeli on July 16, 2013, 01:12:23 AM
justice has been spoken. good that he is free.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Joe Gutfeld on July 16, 2013, 06:08:12 PM
How many of you noticed that not too many whites celebrated the verdict, unlike what blacks and self-hating whites did when OJ and MJ got off in their trails
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Kahane-Was-Right BT on July 16, 2013, 06:55:32 PM
How many of you noticed that not too many whites celebrated the verdict, unlike what blacks and self-hating whites did when OJ and MJ got off in their trails

According to the libs and blacks on twitter, whites were involved in a massive conspiracy to arrange this verdict and all whites are having BBQ's and parades in celebration of the non-guilty verdict.   So it really doesn't matter if whites are not celebrating - the libs and the media pretend and advertise to the world that conservatives and whites are dancing in the streets that Zimmerman is free.
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Israel Chai on July 16, 2013, 08:16:40 PM
According to the libs and blacks on twitter, whites were involved in a massive conspiracy to arrange this verdict and all whites are having BBQ's and parades in celebration of the non-guilty verdict.   So it really doesn't matter if whites are not celebrating - the libs and the media pretend and advertise to the world that conservatives and whites are dancing in the streets that Zimmerman is free.

Stevie Wonder will boycott barbeques. How is that different from "a bunch of racists with guns"?
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: Manch on July 16, 2013, 08:59:15 PM
I am really happy that George is set free. A few days ago Michael Savage went on the air and attacked George Zimmerman. His rational was that now a thug who has a gun can shoot you and claim a self-defense. Pretty idiotic argument but not without a merit in today's society. 
Title: Re: Zimmerman found not guilty
Post by: IsraelForever on July 16, 2013, 09:08:28 PM
I am really happy that George is set free. A few days ago Michael Savage went on the air and attacked George Zimmerman. His rational was that now a thug who has a gun can shoot you and claim a self-defense. Pretty idiotic argument but not without a merit in today's society.
It's better to be judged by 6 then carried by 12!