JTF.ORG Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Israel Chai on December 10, 2013, 02:28:54 AM

Title: Saving the dead sea
Post by: Israel Chai on December 10, 2013, 02:28:54 AM
Instead of getting the Jordan back from Jordan to flow in the dead sea as always, by ending their purposeful eco-terrorist diversion of the river to waste, Israel to work with them and spend 400 million to bring the red sea instead.

http://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-and-jordan-to-build-red-sea-dead-sea-pipeline/
Title: Re: Saving the dead sea
Post by: muman613 on December 10, 2013, 02:45:26 AM
You mean the Dead sea ain't dead yet?

I did not know that...

Title: Re: Saving the dead sea
Post by: Israel Chai on December 10, 2013, 02:54:41 AM
You mean the Dead sea ain't dead yet?

I did not know that...

ah.

Still a very serious issue. I sometimes day dream about getting the Jordan to flow back into it.
Title: Re: Saving the dead sea
Post by: muman613 on December 10, 2013, 02:57:08 AM
I realize it is a serious issue and did not mean to detract from the importance of keeping the water in the Dead Sea.
Title: Re: Saving the dead sea
Post by: Israel Chai on December 10, 2013, 02:57:59 AM
I realize it is a serious issue and did not mean to detract from the importance of keeping the water in the Dead Sea.

I wasn't implying that. We could beat Jordan for half the price.
Title: Re: Saving the dead sea
Post by: Zelhar on December 10, 2013, 05:46:35 AM
The Israeli Judenrat regime enthusiastically supports this ecologcal and geostrategic disaster as if it were the hottest thing since sliced bread.
Title: Re: Saving the dead sea
Post by: Israel Chai on December 10, 2013, 07:22:55 AM
The Israeli Judenrat regime enthusiastically supports this ecologcal and geostrategic disaster as if it were the hottest thing since sliced bread.

I understand that the best would be for the Jordan to come back, but what's ecologically wrong with this?
Title: Re: Saving the dead sea
Post by: Zelhar on December 10, 2013, 09:47:07 AM
I understand that the best would be for the Jordan to come back, but what's ecologically wrong with this?
Some researchers warn that when large quantitative of red sea waters will pour into the the dead sea the reaction might create plaster like material that would float on the surface. More power and water supply to Jordan means more Arab are going to settle and irrigate the Jordan valley and the Arava, so they will be right on Israel's doorsteps, whereas now the Jordan valley is sparsely populated.

There will be even less water supply to natural streams and the southern Jordan river itself because all these water will be used for human consumption and more waste water will flow into the Jordan river and the dead sea.

Perhaps the worst of all is that by participating in this trilateral agreement the Israeli Judenrats in fact recognize in an international teraty the Palestian claim to the Jordan Valley and most of the dead sea that isn't already occupied by Jordan. It is a very dangerous precedence.
Title: Re: Saving the dead sea
Post by: Binyamin Yisrael on December 10, 2013, 11:33:32 AM
It's treason to include the Fakies in any international agreement. The Northern part of the Western shore of the Dead Sea is what the Fakies call "the West Bank". The Arabs have no rights to control any part of Israel's border.

Title: Re: Saving the dead sea
Post by: Israel Chai on October 12, 2014, 02:33:04 AM
Boom got it we build the thing to the top of the Jordan, and then salt water will come up and they won't use it.