JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Dr. Dan on July 31, 2007, 09:50:32 PM
-
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/07/murdochs_news_c.html
Me and Lubab have done this so far.
And whomever decides to post, post as eloquently and classy as possible.
-
Perhaps Debbie can blogroll the JTF forum and the main web site, in return for us linking to her, somewhere on this site.
-
That's from July 27th. Hopefully viewers of her site will check out posts and comments from recent archives.
Also check out this recent one from yesterday and respond since it's also a recent one:
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/07/haaretz_cites_s.html#comments
One of the comments says:
"Back to the drawing board to find a competent GOP candidate to run against Hillary Cankles and Barack Obummer. I'm of the thinking that this country will have to suffer through another 4-8 years of liberal pandering and socialism because the public will, once again, let anxiety and irrational behavior override common sense.
Maybe it's time to give the running of this country back to the people and let politicians dry up and blow away..."
Post a comment and say how people should support Hunter and how he's been a real conservative for more than a decade now.
Copy/paste information from the following:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1873980/posts
If you want, you could attribute the info to pissant.
-
Perhaps Debbie can blogroll the JTF forum and the main web site, in return for us linking to her, somewhere on this site.
There are probably over 100 sites listed in her blogroll so people probably wouldn't notice JTF much, listed in the middle under J.
If she agrees to do the link, she should make a special category for JTF.
Here is her contact information: http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/contact/
Maybe Shoshana would like to contact her since she's good at writing coherent and consice letter. Or else someone else could do it.
-
Here's what i just posted:
I agree, attacking the messenger when you are unable to refute the facts is the strategy of Democrats and losers.
If you want a true conservative, Alan Keyes would have been the man if he were running. The next best, in my opinion, who tells the truth without fear of anything is Tancredo.
Unfortunately, nobody is prepared to accept what he says. Guliani is the best DEMOCRAT for the White House.
-
Here's what i just posted:
I agree, attacking the messenger when you are unable to refute the facts is the strategy of Democrats and losers.
If you want a true conservative, Alan Keyes would have been the man if he were running. The next best, in my opinion, who tells the truth without fear of anything is Tancredo.
Unfortunately, nobody is prepared to accept what he says. Guliani is the best DEMOCRAT for the White House.
Why did you ignore the link about Hunter? He has a better record than Tancredo.
-
i Don't know who hunter that well. All I know is that he does get some support from the conservative talk show hosts and that he can be a viable alternative to the left winged republicans :(. I think Tancredo will push more people more to the right of even Hunter...maybe i'm wrong, but that's my impression of Tancredo. He just needs to clarify what he's saying..too bad he isn't as eloquent as Alan Keyes.
-
i Don't know who hunter that well. All I know is that he does get some support from the conservative talk show hosts and that he can be a viable alternative to the left winged republicans :(. I think Tancredo will push more people more to the right of even Hunter...maybe i'm wrong, but that's my impression of Tancredo. He just needs to clarify what he's saying..too bad he isn't as eloquent as Alan Keyes.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
Tancredo is too polarizing.
Hunter is much more well-rounded and much better with words.
Here is some info about him:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1873980/posts
-
Done ;)
-
i Don't know who hunter that well. All I know is that he does get some support from the conservative talk show hosts and that he can be a viable alternative to the left winged republicans :(. I think Tancredo will push more people more to the right of even Hunter...maybe i'm wrong, but that's my impression of Tancredo. He just needs to clarify what he's saying..too bad he isn't as eloquent as Alan Keyes.
Sorry, but you're wrong.
Tancredo is too polarizing.
Hunter is much more well-rounded and much better with words.
Here is some info about him:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1873980/posts
I think you're right...Tancredo will speak out of his butt how he truely feels...but Hunter will have a way of saying things without offending that many people...Alan Keyes is the same way.
-
I think you're right...Tancredo will speak out of his butt how he truely feels...but Hunter will have a way of saying things without offending that many people...Alan Keyes is the same way.
So could you go back and edit your post at the following from Tancredo to Hunter (if it allows you to do so):
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/07/haaretz_cites_s.html#comments
-
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2007/09/meet_ahmadineja.html#comments