JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks on September 01, 2007, 03:49:50 PM
-
What do all the JTFers think of this?
Believe it or not, I forgive the guy and think he should have given the finger to the cannibals in his party and stuck this out. He was pretty stupid to plead guilty to the charges, whether or not he was, although his explanation that he just wanted to "make this go away" is logical. If he had bothered to hire a decent lawyer, it's almost certain that he could have gotten this joke of a charge kicked in a heartbeat and kept most of his supporters.
I am even willing to overlook, to a certain extent and in certain circumstances, a homosexual orientation. The guy has proven himself to be a stalwart opponent of the faggot and feminazi agenda over the years and has in general defended the Constitution at every possible turn. It's entirely possible that he hated this part of himself but could not quite overcome it.
As disgusting as (allegedly) soliciting sex from strange men in bathrooms is, we all know that this behavior in Democrats wouldn't just be tolerated, but praised as a show of "sexual diversity". We all also know that the media would rather commit mass suicide than reveal a sex scandal from a Democratic leader. Besides, I think that raping secretaries is worlds more wicked than committing consensual sodomy with fellow queers in restrooms. (Not that the latter is acceptable.)
Leaving aside the moral issues he has, do you not see a difference between the Republicans, who at the slightest whiff of blood viciously turn on their own, and the Democrats, whose remakable circling of the wagons in defense of even the most obviously guilty of their flock protects them from any consequences at all times?
If the Geriatric Old Parasites think stabbing their most loyal members in the back when they are down is going to save themselves, they have another thing coming. The Republicans are in for a total humiliation in 2008--one that will make '06 look like a bee sting or a slight cold.
PS: We all know that the vast majority of Israeli lawmakers proudly do what ex-Senator Craig is alleged to have, with Arabs.
Chaimfan
-
He allegedly made signals to an undercover male police officer that he was seeking casual gay sex in the restroom stall.
-
What Craig did was a clear homosexual act, it wasn't a mistake at all.
This particular restroom was already under investigation for previous homosexual "activities" there. Apparently it was a big homo sex spot where men would meet together and go at it in the stalls. Craig made hand signals that were typical homosexual sodomy-inviting hand signals and he also tapped the feet of the guy sitting next to him. Put one and one together, Craig must have known that this was a good place to find another homo to have sex with, and he was caught making homo gestures to the undercover cop. This is no accident. Of course he said that he only plead guilty because he wanted to get past it, do you think he would admit that he was actually making homosexual signals and is a homosexual? It's reasonable to assume that he just wanted to brush the incident under the rug because he knew that if he went to trial, they would prove definitively that he was making homosexual gestures and the trial would also get greater publicity and it would basically be a trial proving his sexuality. Of course he doesn't want that.
His strategy was effective though, there are still people out there who doubt his homosexuality.
This guy is a clear homo who is ashamed of himself and was desperate for some gay sex and got caught trying to get it.
It doesn't matter how much a homo suppresses his desires and lies to himself about his true sexuality, eventually it will overpower him and he'll go hunting for some man.
So, you think that a homosexual man who gets caught soliciting gay sex in a restroom should remain a Republican Senator? You think that's acceptable, especially in the Republican party? Here's a man who lied to his wife about his sexual orientation, then cheated on her (a man has come forth admitting that he had a homosexual encounter with Craig in a similar situation) and attempted to cheat on her with a man. Is this behavior becoming of a Senator? Forget about the fact that he broke the law, he also committed very blameworthy and immoral acts.
This would be a HUGE disgrace for the Republican party if he was allowed to remain as a Senator after this. The elections in 2008 and the reputation of the Republican party are much too important to allow this man to remain.
-
You can never trust a poo-poker. They will (in the end) side with depravity.
-
The reason Republicans turn on their own is because they have moral standards. Like with the Mark Foley scandal, behavior such as that is unacceptable to Republicans, whereas with Democrats, as it is the case with everything else, "anything goes". I'm happy that Republicans hold their party members to some kind of a moral standard.
What about the New Jersey governor who was a homosexual and resigned, did democrats vehemently oppose this? I don't remember that they did, and he ended up resigning with little opposition from Democrats. I don't think that they publicly told him to resign because that would be an embarrassment to them, but I'm sure there was some behind the scenes pressure for him to resign from fellow Democrats.
Also the black Jefferson monster who cut all those deals with African telecommunications companies. I didn't hear support from any Democrats (other than his constituency)
-
There was also something in the news a while ago about a Christian minister having to resign for being homosexual.
There's about 500,000 of THEM.
-
Newman, that was completely uncalled for.
-
My opinion of LC is unchanged. As vile as what he did is (if true--I know it does not look good but I want to give the guy some benefit of the doubt), it does not compare to faggots who engage in homosexual acts and defend them and are proud of them. Look at Barney Frank (D-MA), who was caught running a bathhouse in his own home and basically bragged about it. The entire Democratic Party backed him up and today he is more popular than ever.
As for the notion of a trial unquestionably proving his guilt, I do not know that. This was an extremely minor charge, for a crime that the majority of the public probably cares little about, and it's unfathomable that any district attorney would put his heart and soul into getting a conviction. Legally, what he did is somewhere between a DUI and getting a bad speeding ticket. Any competent attorney would be able to convince many jurors that he was nervously tapping or reaching down to get his papers or tie his shoe or whatever. And no, I normally do not like seeing guilty people get off, if he is, but if Mel Reynolds got off (actually, was pardoned, but same idea) for having sex with fifteen-year-old campaign volunteers and Clinton (ys"vz) got away with raping at least one and probably many secretaries (Juanita Broddrick), I sure as heck want to see some Republicans develop the equal nerve.
I would be for expelling Larry Craig if the Democrats who do similar things received the same treatment from their party and the press. Sorry guys, but "honor" doesn't cut it here. Fairness and getting what is coming to you and your party do. This is a man whose voting record shows he abhorred faggotry, even if he could not overcome it himself.
-
Here's a re-enactment of what happened for anyone who's interested. The events and words are directly out of the official police report filed by the undercover officer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZKKAqM-q-k
-
Craig tried to sweep this event under the rug. He didn't tell the Senate about it, his family, or anyone he knew. He really expected that it would just go away. As to whether it's an "extremely minor charge", it's a misdemeanor, just like a DUI. There probably wouldn't be any jail time for either one. People go to trial every day to fight infractions, which are less severe than misdemeanors. There's no reason why a conviction would not be sought in this case. People go to trial every day to fight charges such as these. Since he's a Senator, it's reasonable to assume that the district attorney would not drop the case because it would be seen as favoritism and it would cause a controversy for the DA. He more than likely wouldn't put his career on the line like that in what would turn out to be a very public trial. No competent attorney would be able to prove that what he did was accidental. No reasonable jury would decide based on the facts that what he did was accidental. Craig looked into the stall for minutes before he entered, then he tapped his foot next to the foot of the man next to him, which is a recognized homosexual gesture. He then took his left hand, reached it across the stall and waved it under the bottom of the divider three times. There's no way it was accidental. In the interrogation, Craig tried to claim that his palm was facing down, but the officer saw his palm up, three different times.
In the trial, the typical gestures of homosexuals who seek out partners would be revealed and given to the jury. Since the typical gestures match really well with what Craig did, it would be very difficult to convince the jury that it was circumstantial.
-
Newman, that was completely uncalled for.
Read the papers. Look at ALL the mainstream, non-evangelical churches. They're awash with queers. It's a major talking point when you find a straight one these days.
The evangelical, pro-Israel lot don't have those problems. I wonder if there's a connection.
-
Newman, that was completely uncalled for.
The following is a quote of newman from a different website responding to a christian who had said they were struggling with their faith:I'm not surprised carpenter worship didn't work for you. It's a complete fraud.
You're right in what you say. What's with all this 'love everybody' , 'turn the other cheek', 'love/ bless your enemy' crap?
They expect you to love a child mollester, a nazi, a mass muderer, a terrorist or muslims who will cut off your head, rape your wife and circumcise your daughter???? Bless the guy who breaks into your house to kill you and rape your children at 3AM??? It's a giant crock of shite!
They took the Hebrew bible that made perfect sense and chopped out this, added that....put in Greco-roman paganism and the alledged rantings of a derranged carpenter and VIOLA!........total, convoluted, cotradictory rubbish.
I WAS a christian, too. I was lucky enough to get wise and listen to those Red Sea pedestrians who have survived 2000 years without a country with everyone trying to kill them.
Dump jesus h the nutty carpenter by all means.....but give some thought to keeping G_d.
Don't be so surprised when he jumps to criticise our faith, he seams to practically live for it from my experience of him.
-
Don'nt feel to bad he said evangelical i rather use the word [fundementalist] don'nt have the problem.Reform deformed 'rabbis' are also molesters.Reform Jews are friends with mainstream Christians
-
Don't be so surprised when he jumps to criticise our faith, he seams to practically live for it from my experience of him.
I was not attcking anyone's FAITH but highlighting a problem with CLERGYMEN.
Secondly..........
DON'T BE BRINGING IN POSTS OF MINE FROM OTHER FORUMS, YOU LITTLE SHNOOK!
-
Newman, that was completely uncalled for.
The following is a quote of newman from a different website responding to a christian who had said they were struggling with their faith:I'm not surprised carpenter worship didn't work for you. It's a complete fraud.
You're right in what you say. What's with all this 'love everybody' , 'turn the other cheek', 'love/ bless your enemy' crap?
They expect you to love a child mollester, a nazi, a mass muderer, a terrorist or muslims who will cut off your head, rape your wife and circumcise your daughter???? Bless the guy who breaks into your house to kill you and rape your children at 3AM??? It's a giant crock of shite!
They took the Hebrew bible that made perfect sense and chopped out this, added that....put in Greco-roman paganism and the alledged rantings of a derranged carpenter and VIOLA!........total, convoluted, cotradictory rubbish.
I WAS a christian, too. I was lucky enough to get wise and listen to those Red Sea pedestrians who have survived 2000 years without a country with everyone trying to kill them.
Dump jesus h the nutty carpenter by all means.....but give some thought to keeping G_d.
Don't be so surprised when he jumps to criticise our faith, he seams to practically live for it from my experience of him.
FTF - Why bring up what was written on another forum.
I think Newman - on a whole - has been very respectful of the fact that there are many Christian posters here.
If you are strong in your faith - why let someone else's opinion shake you?
There is a lot to question today within the Christian religions - I'm a Catholic - but I have to admit that.
-
Yeah, it's not fair game to post what newman or anyone else has written in other forums, or anywhere else for that matter, especially publicly on the JTF forum. newman ensures that nothing he says on the JTF forum is offensive and to post something that he deliberately did NOT post here FOR THAT REASON is an attack and a violation on his right to make comments in other places that would not be suitable on JTF. Things like that should not be allowed into JTF. I say things in other places that would be highly offensive on this forum and I know that, so I refrain from making those sorts of comments on the forum. For you to post what he has said somewhere else is a transgression of his freedom.
Just remember, newman didn't post that here, YOU DID. newman did not just violate JTF policy, YOU DID, with the knowledge that it would and possibly the intent to inflame Christians on the forum. That's a direct violation of JTF policy.
-
OK, so if he committed a crime... he should be punished!
If he is a Homo... his punishment will be set by G-d! In today's world Homosexuality is not a criminal offense... As it should be!
-
I'll have to agree with Ze'ev. It's not right to bring up what Newman posted on another website here. It only serves to put members here at each others throats, and that's not right.
FTF if you have a quarrel with Newman, use the private messaging feature, but don't bring this into the forum. It's like tattle tailing.
-
Newman, that was completely uncalled for.
Read the papers. Look at ALL the mainstream, non-evangelical churches. They're awash with queers. It's a major talking point when you find a straight one these days.
The evangelical, pro-Israel lot don't have those problems. I wonder if there's a connection.
Perhaps this is true, but you weren't clear about who you meant.
BTW some Catholics are pro-Israel and some so-called evangelicals hate Israel. Look at the staff of that rag Satanism Today.
-
Just remember, newman didn't post that here, YOU DID. newman did not just violate JTF policy, YOU DID, with the knowledge that it would and possibly the intent to inflame Christians on the forum. That's a direct violation of JTF policy.
I agree, I did not like what Newman said the first time, but at least he clarified. There was no reason for FTF to do what he did.
-
Ze'ev,
Depending on how much money you have to shell out for a good (-lying) lawyer, you can make almost anything disappear. Look at Michael Fagson and Robert Blake, who had far more stacked against them than the word of a single vice cop. The truth is that 99% of offenses of this nature would disappear if every schmo had the bucks to hire Alan Dershowitz or Gloria Allred. Think about it... some poor sap is busted for .08 or .09 alcohol (above the legal limit but not by much). A good attorney will rail against the calibration of the breathalyzer, the character of the highway patrolman who pulled the wino over, bring up racial bias (if the drunkard is a schvartze or cucaracha), etc. Of course none of these assertions will be true, but the trump card that the defense always has in any trial is that the average IQ of jurors is inevitably trumped by that of chimps and seals.
I mean this purely as a refutation and not as a personal affront, but the idea that a DA would (as you yourself said) put his career on the line and make a national case out of an offense that pretty much amounts to a glorified speeding ticket? Get outta here! It's really not difficult to attack and discredit district attorneys if you have good-enough counsel and are determined enough and have enough credibility in the community to be believed by a good chunk of the public. Look at the white lacrosse players who successfully went after that black tuchis-kissing Mark Nifong (or the Tawana Brawley monkeys who destroyed the life of that Greek D.A. in New York).
If DNA evidence is no longer likely to win convictions for crimes (much more serious than soliciting consensual sex), the testimony of people regarding the meanings of so-called gay hand gestures, even if they really do mean what the cop would say they did, is going to carry a WHOLE lot less weight. Without video, he has almost nothing to back him up; this trial would have boiled down to a he-said, she-said (the "she" being Larry Craig ;D :laugh:, but I digress), and that alone is a very dangerous place to prosecute an offense. One officer versus one of the most esteemed leaders pn Capitol Hill--not a pleasant place for any DA. Any bigshot lawyer would be able to call upon countless "witnesses" and "experts" from the gay community that would dispute or offer contrary explanations over what the gay hand gestures meant and turn the vice cop's claims into Swiss cheese.
When this is said and done, a DA's office that insisted in continuing this prosecution with full force would itself be the subject of a certain degree of snickers and mockery. How was Kenneth Starr treated, who had infinitely more smoking guns to use against Clinton than the Minnesota airport police had against Craig?
After all this, is it really reasonable to expect that ALL twelve members of a typical jury would be sufficiently fired-up over an offense that is more comical than anything else, and so determined to see a senator fry over this, that they would sacrifice another three to five days of their jobs or free time in deliberations?
Larry Craig slit his own throat by giving up, pleading guilty, and thinking he could forget about this. He was stupid, period, and probably would still be in his exact position today if he made even a token effort to fight this.
-
While I believe the leftists are unfairly handling this, I still believe Craig was interested in a homosexual act which is disgusting. I am sick of republicans also, not just democrats. I don't know much about Craig but I can guarantee their is a lot of truth in the accusations against him.
-
I bet the accusations are true, but I am still shocked at how easily the Republicans roll over and turn on their weakest members in times like this. The Democrats stand behind even rapists and murderers like Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy (ys"vz).
-
i don't believe anything that goes on and is reported in the media... i'll wager he is innocent of all charges and nothing is ever as it seems... or appears to be on the outside... he probably wasn't cooperating with the slime in their nwo bid and so they found a convienient way to despose of him... furthermore everyone should go out and buy alex jones' dvd called "dark secrets from bohemian grove" where you will learn that virtually all of the world slime-elite worship nimrod's moloch-cult of fire and sun worship and all of them are a bunch of perverted faggots... (literally)... nik. in disgust out...
-
Nik, Alex Jones is a Nazi who defends Muslim Nazi reichs such as Iran and who teaches that the Mossad and so-called "Israeli settlers" are responsible for world terrorism.
This animal believes Jews committed 9-11.
YIMACH SCHMO VEZICHRO, this pig will burn in the lake of fire forever.
-
i know that the slime-nazi mossad was in with the slime-nazi cia to do 9/11... as were the slime-nazi saudis and the slime-nazi everyone else... all in it together... so what is your point...? nik.
-
The point is that Jones argues that Muslim Nazi countries like Iran are innocent and that Jews ("settlers") are doing bad things.
Face the facts. The man is a Nazi pig.
Chaim talked about him during one Ask JTF. Did you not hear it?
-
i now that the slime-nazi mossad was in with the slime-nazi cia to do 9/11... as were the slime-nazi saudis and the slime-nazi everyone else... all in it together... so what is your point...? nik.
Are you actually saying that the Mossad and the CIA had a part in 9/11? I can't tell if you're being facetious or not.
-
nikmatdam: "...i now that the slime-nazi mossad was in with the slime-nazi cia to do 9/11... as were the slime-nazi saudis and the slime-nazi everyone else... all in it together... so what is your point...?..."
Show us the proof that your accusations are true.
-
cosmokramer: "...Alot of republicans are sex freaks just like democarts. I am starting to notice that. Time for a revalution..."
Our troubles are over!
Bush has just appointed a new Conservative Republican to be the Senator!
Let's all give a big "Conservative Welcome" to:
Senator Peter C. Pulling!
He's promised to "clean out every public men's room in America!"
"I'll get those ho'muh'sex'yuh's outa' public men's rooms, if I have to jam broomsticks up they butts and make 'em all run back'n'forth sweepin' up the floors!" announced newly appointed Senator Peter Pulling.
-
I do have a problem with a Republican who is gay and gets caught trying to engage in obscene behavior. That person does not deserve to be in office. Having said that, at least Craig isn't proud of his behavior and he doesn't vote in the interest of gays. Contrast that with liberals, for which behavior like this is a badge of honor. A high-ranking ACLU member was caught engaging in activity that the ACLU promotes--having pictures of children being violently raped. I view the ACLU member as much worse.
When has the ACLU ever promoted or engaged in having pictures of children being violently raped?
-
Larry Craig was caught with his pants down (both literally and figuratively). If there's a double standard here, it's not between democrat vs. republican. It's a double standard that punishes sexual transgressions of a homosexual nature while forgiving sexual transgressions of a heterosexual nature.
This morning on This Week with George Stephanopolis, he was talking with Mike Hucabee who stated that it was better for the republican party for Craig to resign now rather than to wait for "the other shoe to drop" to which Stephanopolis chuckled at Hucabee's unintentional pun :)
-
my proof... "the terror conspiracy" by jim marrs... at the end of which is an essay by a barbara honegger entitled "the pentagon attack papers"... who brings out the fact that rummy-baby held a press conference on 9/10 where he admitted to the defense dept. missing 2.3 trillion dollars from its budget... yes you are reading correctly... that's trillion with a t... totally unaccounted for and in need of being "found" which he announced was then in the process of being tracked by the office of army auditors... and lo and behold by some "strange" freak-act of nature davka these people were amazingly out of the blue the one's to die in the next day's "terrorist" attacks and all trace of evidence disappeared and went up in smoke with the destruction of all their computer terminals... and voila!!! presto!!! ipso facto... no more pesky investigations into all that swiped loot...
also if you examine the footage contained in the now famous lossechange 9/11 documentary you will hear pointed out how that retaining wall on the west side of the building was the only wall re-inforced a few weeks earlier and you will also see and hear mentioned the fact that a line was chalked into the lawn outside that wing which also by some stupendous coincidence and wild random chance just happened to be pointing directly along the trajectory of the flight of the missle which hit that very spot and no other on the entire outer surface of even that very west wing of the pentagon itself...
now if this was indeed a conspiracy... why would they leave a mark on the ground for us to find and wonder about and question them aloud...? we would go to war over any spot where the pentagon would be struck... so why leave behind for us any evidence that this was actually an "inside job..."?
because they couldn't leave it to pure chance and luck... they needed a precise strike and therefore they had to risk leaving proof of their complicity behind and hope that either we wouldn't notice it or if we did catch it that we wouldn't put up too much of a fuss over it and clamour for an explanation...
now how do i know that the cia and the mossad are both involved...? firstly... 2 words... one slang phrase... "black ops..." that's what this was and so the cia's m.o. and fingerprints are all over this one... secondly... whenever and wherever arabs/muslims are used worldwide and especially inside israel to carry out terrorist attacks their handlers are israelis... i.e. the mossad...
if you read "the vatican assassins" by eric jon phelps... you will learn that all intelligence organizations are one and the same slime group all working together though they portray themselves to be working against one another... they are all tied-in to the nwo and they all have the very same taskmaster... the jesuit general in rome... this is the reason why though each spook org. claims to be acting in concert with and on behalf of the true welfare of their own home countries... none of the nefarious deeds which they perpetrate have anything even remotely to do with enhancing their own peoples' national security or even simply their real national interest... all which they do goes to further the goals of the elitist-slime worldwide who form the top-crust and comprise the upper-echelon of the world spread around the globe who all work together to accomplish their mutual sick and twisted agenda of achieving a one world government with them at the helm as its masters and all the rest of us "refuse" as their serfs... their worker bees or ants... their utter and abject slaves... (forever)...
and so there you have it... this is why israel is going down the tubes because nothing the government ever does is for our benefit or to protect and further the goals of realizing a truly jewish state... and instead israel sends out its agents all over the world to do the bidding of the nwo slime rulers and tyrants... nik. out...
-
Funny Larry Craig video
Olbermann- Larry Craig Reenactment:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=PZKKAqM-q-k
-
Larry Craig was caught with his pants down (both literally and figuratively). If there's a double standard here, it's not between democrat vs. republican. It's a double standard that punishes sexual transgressions of a homosexual nature while forgiving sexual transgressions of a heterosexual nature
Then how do you explain Barney Fag, oops, sorry, meant to say Barney Frank (D-MA)?
-
Larry Craig was caught with his pants down (both literally and figuratively). If there's a double standard here, it's not between democrat vs. republican. It's a double standard that punishes sexual transgressions of a homosexual nature while forgiving sexual transgressions of a heterosexual nature
Then how do you explain Barney Fag, oops, sorry, meant to say Barney Frank (D-MA)?
Barney Frank never pled guilty to anything.
Why do you defend Craig? Isn't it hypocritical to be a senator to oppose gays and then engage in gay activities and isn't it hypocritical to condemn dems who engage in this but defend the repugs who engage in the same activities? We should be consistent in our positions across the board regardless of political party affiliation.
-
No, he had the guts and common sense to plead not guilty, and he beat a charge that was far more convincing than what Craig was busted for.
What double standard do you see? Craig proved with his life's work that he hates fags and the faggot lifestyle. He may have not been able to beat his own demons but he certainly fought them on the national scale. Barney Fag on the other hand was a proud queer AND he dedicates his life to fighting for queers.
-
I personally think it's worse and a lot more hypocritical to fight against something and then engage in the very things you claim to be against than it is to be honest with yourself and others about who you are.
-
His two adult children were on the news this morning and they defended him. They say the cop misinterpreted what occurred and was just looking to charge someone with a crime.
-
Ha ha ha!
I can't take it anymore!
Bathroom-gate!
-
I finally decided to look up this guy.
I just saw the police report on the smoking gun website.
He was stairing at the cop in the crapper for two minutes while there were several empty stalls.
He shouldn't have given the cop his I am the senator attitute to begin with, but even though he did, he still had plenty of chances to comply quietly.
I know the feeling, I've been to public bathrooms where faggots would look at my manhood and making it difficult for me to go my business.
If I had a baseball bat or one of those large maglite flashlights!
-
He allegedly made signals to an undercover male police officer that he was seeking casual gay sex in the restroom stall.
What's wrong with this is that he was arrested because the policeman thought Larry Craig intended to commit a crime, no crime was committed; He was arrested for intent, he was tapping his shoes and reaching under the edge of a bathroom stall, is there even a law against that? Intending a lewd act in public, signaling that you are interested in a lewd act in public, is not a lewd act in public. This is a bad prescident, you can now be arrested for someone thinking you intend to commit a crime? So if I'm looking at a watch in the window of store that's closed I can be arrested for intending to steal that watch?
That said, I'm a realist, I think the guy was cruising for gay sex.
-
I finally decided to look up this guy.
I just saw the police report on the smoking gun website.
He was stairing at the cop in the crapper for two minutes while there were several empty stalls.
Ewww! Y'know, I don't even want to look at a hot woman on the crapper. Jeez that'd just ruin it for me. Some people! ::)
-
Oh, I can't stop!
(http://fusionplant.com/news/pic/2007_09_larry_craig.jpg)
-
He still won't leave the senate and now he has gay groups defending him.
-
He allegedly made signals to an undercover male police officer that he was seeking casual gay sex in the restroom stall.
What's wrong with this is that he was arrested because the policeman thought Larry Craig intended to commit a crime, no crime was committed; He was arrested for intent, he was tapping his shoes and reaching under the edge of a bathroom stall, is there even a law against that? Intending a lewd act in public, signaling that you are interested in a lewd act in public, is not a lewd act in public. This is a bad prescident, you can now be arrested for someone thinking you intend to commit a crime? So if I'm looking at a watch in the window of store that's closed I can be arrested for intending to steal that watch?
I don't know about that but he plead guilty. So either (a) he's the biggest moron in the world to plead guilty to something like that (would you ever plead guilty to cruising for gay sex in a public place? me neither!), or (b) he's guilty.
I think politically it's completely nonconsequential because Idaho is one of the most solidly Republican states in the country and he'll be replaced with another Republican, so it's a wash.
-
Why?
Did they take away his key to the Senatorial Men's Room?
-
Why?
Did they take away his key to the Senatorial Men's Room?
He's preparing to elope with Barney Frank.
-
Why?
Did they take away his key to the Senatorial Men's Room?
He's preparing to elope with Barney Frank.
Barney Frank wants young boys he has no interest in an old geezer like that ::)