JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Bodhi on September 30, 2007, 04:06:01 AM
-
Everyone, please read this article at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_white_woman_syndrome
Then please join me in demanding that wikipedia delete this garbage.
Thank you.
-
I don't really have any disagreement with this. It's generally true. I saw an example of it just today on FOX. If you haven't noticed this then you must not watch enough American News.
-
I don't really have any disagreement with this. It's generally true. I saw an example of it just today on FOX. If you haven't noticed this then you must not watch enough American News.
Yup that's true; And frankly wasting my time on don Kichote's quest to improve WIKIPEDIA is last on my prioritate list; we must stop waste our limited resource on such invinable causes and post some coments on YUTUBE JTF nad other anti jihadist videos instead.
-
I agree, it's practically impossible to make much of a difference at wikipedia, it't fairly complicated, and the person who came up with this psuedoscience would probably just repost it the next day anyway.
-
I once saw a bunch of pictures of missing children on the back of a milk carton some years ago and I noticed that the black children's rewards for finding them was way less than the rewards for finding the white kids. This isn't right in my view; all children are equally precious.
-
I agree, Babies are babies.God Jesus loves them all...
-
Another thing that bothers me is that in the USAToday (a national paper) they have these little postage stamp sized pictures of missing children (one per paper) that include the name and age, etc., of the child, which is good.
But the thing is is that those tiny pics are way back on around page 14 of section D, while some over-paid dork that hits a ball with a stick is given a big write-up along with his pic on the front page!
To my way of thinking that seems like crummy priorities. >:(
-
Wikipedia posting an article on this brilliant concept doesn't mean that they endorse it. Wikipedia is just describing the claims and concepts created by certain individuals the same way it reports on conspiracy theories, Scientology, John Edward, and any other fictitious crap. It's not an endorsement, just a report. Should wikipedia remove these articles as well?
-
I see it kind of liike anti semitism or holocost denial, and I personally think it has no place in what is supposed to be an objective forum where people go to reasearch facts, of course I suppose it;s up to them to decide what's credible, but to put racist views in a psuedo-scientific article to me is a little too much to stomach....I agree that race shouldn't be a factor when it copmes to things like this, but unfortunately as long as there are beings like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and the 'nation of islam" these kind of articles are everywhere......maybe I'm wrong, I don't watch a lot of US news anymore.....(why would I want to?)....but the idea of an article that is stated as some kind of a syndrome.....I just think it's too much......I guess if I'm all alone on this one that's OK but, I really think this is wrong.....
-
The White Slave trade is still very active today. White women are taken and sold on the ME and Russia.
The Australian Government has been working for years to try and stop it. Sad fact is over 100,000 people a year in Australia go missing and mainly they are white women between the ages of 12 and 25 years.
Any International Womens Rights Movements will confirm the networks involved.
And in the states that also does not surpirse me. The population is so vast how can they keep a track of it.