What Rush Limbaugh said about Poverty Doubling in South Africa...

[Hail Columbia]

http://www.africancrisis.co.za/Article.php?ID=19745&

[Adriana is so very fast!! She found the link to Rush Limbaugh's talk about poverty doubling in S.Africa. Thanks Adriana! The transcripts don't mention AfricanCrisis, but those who listened said they heard it!

The key issue in this story though, is that basically, THE ANC FAILED. Its failed in EVERYTHING it campaigned on - OR CLAIMED TO BE INTERESTED IN. Now us whites have always said (and I said this in Government by Deception in 2001), that the REAL ISSUE is not about what is good or bad for blacks. It is about POWER FOR CORRUPT BLACK MARXISTS! That's the REAL GAME. They'll say anything and promise anything until they GET INTO POWER. Once they're in power... you won't get them out - not even if the BLACKS VOTE THEM OUT!! (Ask the MDC about trying to vote a corrupt Marxist Socialist bastard out! Its not possible to do!)

This is a game - a lie. Look, give the ANC credit where credit is due. Using lies and trickery, they outmanoevred everyone and they got into power and they even got foreign support and many billions of dollars!! Very nice move. I will tip my hat to the ANC! They lied, and they lied well. They put on a whole big fancy act and they pulled it off. They lied in front of TV cameras. The put on a whole big extravagant act in front OF THE WHOLE PLANET in order to screw us good.

They lied to the blacks. They got the blacks to fight for NOTHING! Their whole FIGHT. *EVERYTHING* they stood for and fought for for 33 years... Their 13 years in power now prove that it was all a complete waste.

Their only hope now is to steal it all from us whites. They still won't get much and it will still have been a worthless fight - but like Mugabe who gave the blacks farms which they couldn't handle they could pretend to have given them something that is largely worthless to them and which they can't handle anyway.

Look at it another way: If they had NOT fought Apartheid, they'd be better off today (except for Mandela who'd still be in jail). If the blacks had NOT murdered other blacks... or fought the whites or blown stuff up... things would have been better.

Go further: Imagine what this country would be like today under Apartheid, if Nelson Mandela and the communists had never started their war. Imagine how ADVANCED this country would be now if:-
1. White men were never called up to do military service. They could have studied and entered the economy and built businesses and farms.
2. Millions of highly skilled whites would have stayed.
3. Big businesses would never have moved their capital out of S.Africa to hide it overseas.
4. Perhaps many more skilled whites from Europe would have immigrated here?
5. Tens of Billions of Rands would never wasted on massive wars to fight the ANC & commies.
6. There would have been no world sanctions on SA.
7. Foreign corporations would not have disinvested from here. (Most probably they'd have pumped in more funds).

Imagine... 33 years of PROGRESS IN PEACE... No Nelson f*cking Mandela... Peace, and progress. Where would this country have been by now? Perhaps it would have been almost as rich as Australia is today?

Think about it. Think about how Nelson Mandela the commies and the ANC f*cked everything up for a generation.

Ask yourself: How well off the blacks would have been by now? Imagine the cities we could have built during 33 years of unbroken peace?

Remember MOST of SA's infrastructure was built in the days Hendrik Verwoed ruled this country. The whole highway system - most of the dams, etc. Imagine too... Hendrik Verwoed had never been assassinated. He was a brilliant leader... Ask yourself where this country would be today?

If Apartheid built the biggest hospital in the world, and it was for BLACKS ONLY... imagine what Apartheid might have done for Blacks with HIV and TB? Hey? Instead of telling the Blacks to eat beetroot and to f*ck babies... science would have come to the aid of the blacks. Don't you think things would have been better for them too?

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: History will show that the ANC was the worst thing that ever happened to this country. The only mistake I can think of is that the ANC wasn't just shot to pieces to begin with. The Whites were too nice. That was their mistake. I think that was the biggest mistake - was NOT killing them all - including Mandela himself and saving everyone a whole lot of trouble.

This one news item proves that everything Mandela and the ANC, etc stood for was just complete junk. Of course the same can be said of Mugabe in Zimbabwe, Swapo in Namibia, Frelimo in Mozambique and the MPLA in Angola. We fought and fought and the IDIOTS, the fools who would not even be able to HELP THEMSELVES - they won! May the Lord God forgive us for losing to such rubbish evil and complete scum. Jan]

This is what Rush said about S.Africa and the rubbish ANC. I love it. He refferred to them as "a Marxist-rooted bunch, a socialist bunch". Nice!! The truth is welcome. Here's the transcript on his site:-
RUSH: "The number of South Africans living on less than one dollar a day has more than doubled in a decade since shortly after the end of apartheid. The South African Institute of Race Relations said that 4.2 million people were living on one dollar a day in 2005." Can I translate this for you? Poverty in South Africa has doubled since the ANC took control of the country, and the ANC is a Marxist-rooted bunch, a socialist bunch. Poverty has doubled, the number of people living on less than a dollar a day in South Africa has doubled since the ANC took over.

This is the story he linked to: http://www.africasia.com/services/news/newsit...

Here is the text of that story. I highlighted the reference to whites:-

Poverty doubles in S.Africa in 10 years: survey

Extreme poverty in South Africa is on the rise, a report released Monday revealed, showing that the number of people living on less than one dollar a day had doubled in about 10 years.

While the country's economy has boomed since the end of apartheid in 1994, unemployment has increased among all race groups, the survey by the South African Institute of Race Relations found.

"The number of people living on less than one US dollar per day (the measure of extreme poverty used by the World Bank) in South Africa, increased from 1.89 million in 1996 to 4.2 million in 2005," said the report.

"As a proportion of the population, this represents an increase from 4.5 percent to 8.8 percent of the population living on less than one US dollar."

While the number of people employed rose from 9.2 million to 12.4 million, a surge of 65 percent in the number of economically active people, from 9.7 million to just over 16 million, still left many unemployed.

"Although the white community had the biggest increase in unemployment, it still had the lowest rate of unemployment, at 5.7 percent. The unemployment rate for the population as a whole was 27.5 percent."

The annual South Africa Survey also found that an increase of 212 percent in deaths in the 30-34 age group between the years of 1997 and 2005, could be "largely attributable to mortality from AIDS", despite relcutancy to note AIDS as a cause of death.

South Africa's infant mortality rate had dropped from a high of 58 infant deaths per 1,000 live births in 2002, to 48 in 2006, and both cholera and malaria were being largely controlled, it said.

"The number of cholera cases in South Africa has been brought under control, from 98,059 cases in 2001, to 2,780 in 2004. Malaria has been largely controlled in South Africa following the reintroduction of DDT spraying," said the survey.

Here is the full page of Rush's site dealing with all the topics of the day:

Story #1: UAE's Aircraft Buy and the Price of Oil

RUSH: Did you know (you probably didn't) that last weekend, the United Arab Emirates had an air show, and at this air show the United Arab Emirates announced the purchase of $30 billion worth of aircraft and airliners manufactured by Airbus. Now, Airbus is not in good health. Airbus has their new A380, this big jumbo jet that holds 500 and some odd passengers if it's all coach configured, double deck, the whole fuselage, they've delivered one of them to Singapore Airlines. They're having trouble with some of their orders and delivering them on time and there's some insider trading accusations against some executives at Airbus. Yet United Arab Emirates orders $30 billion worth of aircraft from the troubled company Airbus, or consortium. At the same time, there are three things that you can actually conclude from this. One is that the airline business is measured in cycles of ten years or so. When you go out and buy a bunch of long-haul jets -- and what the emirates are trying to do is establish themselves as a global long-haul airliner hub -- you go out and you buy a bunch of long-haul jumbo jets, and you're running a business, you want to show a profit in the airline business, which is not easy, as you all know, and these cycles are ten years or more, so the margins in your predictions, your strategic marketing has to be pretty precise.

So one of the things I conclude when I read that the United Arab Emirates are buying all these $30 billion worth of jumbo jets, A, they are not concerned with energy sources. I know they're sitting on a pool of oil, but they also have to export that oil and sell it. The United Arab Emirates is one of the few Middle Eastern oil nations that actually is using that oil, their resource, to grow their country in a capitalistic economic way. Saudis are not doing that. Qatar is not doing that, but the United Arab Emirates are. So they obviously are not concerned about energy supplies. They're not concerned that they're going to buy a bunch of jets that won't be able to fly because there's not going to be any jet fuel. This is just a commonsense conclusion. We hear all this talk about how there's oil supplies and -- actually I've got a story, the crude oil prices are down because of increased supplies and discoveries, but that's for the moment. They know this.

The bottom line, people in business who use oil as their primary fuel have to know that there's going to be plenty of it if you're in a business that measures success in cycles over ten years or so, and you're flying these jumbo jets that burn it by the pound. So, obviously, these experts at the Emirates are not concerned about future oil supplies. Number two, we can see that they are doing everything they can to get big. They are into economic growth. They are attempting to attract all kinds of capital from all over the world to invest, to be spent as leisure dollars, and so forth. Now, Boeing got a little bit of an order from United Arab Emirates, not anywhere near $30 billion, as Airbus did. By the way, I should remind you that during his speech before Congress last week, the new French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, did warn of a coming economic war. This might be something that he was talking about here, because Boeing gets a tiny little -- it's incidental compared to what Airbus got, 30 billion. Boeing's next big entry to the market, the 787 Dreamliner, not due until late next year, and it's not the kind of long-haul jet that the Emirates wanted in the first place, but Airbus has it.

But, do you think that one of the reasons for this disparity in the order amount that Airbus got versus Boeing might have to do with three words: Dubai Ports deal? Dubai, part of the United Arab Emirates, along with Abu Dhabi and a few others. Just throwing it out, you know I love Dubai Ports deal news, and I'll tell you what, you can talk about United Arab Emirates and these oil-rich states, but the way they're building up over there and the way they're expanding, attracting investment capital from all over the world, the last thing they need is some little runt like Ahmadinejad who needs a ladder to reach the urinal, running around nuking up, threatening the whole region, and trying to control it, sponsoring terrorism. They probably are not going to have any interest in joining up with the Al-Qaeda types or the state-sponsored terrorism that comes out of Iran. So we learned that Halliburton has just relocated to Dubai because they're in the oil services business, and haven't given up their headquarters here, but sent their CEO over there. Just something to think about, folks.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Story #2: Crude Oil Falls as IEA Cuts Demand Forecast

RUSH: Here's that story on crude oil: "Crude oil fell more than $3 a barrel, the biggest decline in more than three months, after the International Energy Agency cut its forecast for global demand through 2008 as record prices curb fuel use. Consumption next year will average," much less than what people thought. The numbers are long. I won't bore you with them. "'The IEA report today had a sizable decline in demand expectations for this year,' said James Ritterbusch, president of Ritterbusch & Associates, in Galena, Illinois. 'It looks like they were too optimistic about demand and didn't figure on the impact of high prices.'" Yes! "'In all of the excitement of the bull market a number of economists forgot that the price mechanism works,' said Peter Beutel, president of energy consultant Cameron Hanover Inc. in New Canaan, Connecticut. 'The price mechanism works by discouraging demand and by encouraging exploration and development of new supplies.' Petroleo Brasileiro SA, Brazil's state-controlled oil company, announced Nov. 8 that the Tupi field may hold 5 billion to 8 billion barrels.

"The field, the second-largest found in the past 20 years, may hold as much as Norway's 8.5 billion barrels of reserves, according to BP Plc. It could also boost Brazil's reserves by almost two-thirds, transforming it from a small net exporter into a major supplier to world markets." Probably, you know, the conventional wisdom, "We're running out of oil supplies! Global warming," blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. That stuff is here for a reason. It's part of creation. God intended it to be used as we're using it, and we're using it, and there's tons of it out there. I'm telling you, these oil-rich countries that are buying all these jumbo jets and planning on long-haul flights would not be investing in a business that doesn't show profit cycles over ten years, if they were worried about the supply of oil and jet fuel and the sort, down the road. They just wouldn't do it. It's common sense. I wonder, when anybody sees country X -- China -- ordering X numbers of planes from Boeing is anybody saying, "Wait a minute. How can that be? We're going to be running out of fuel. Fossil fuels are running out. We gotta do alternative energy! We gotta do wind." People who are in business who make these long-term decisions, are not going to be making these kind of investments if they think there's not going to be any fuel supply down the road to make their business investment profitable.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Story #3: Rasmussen: Gender Not a Factor for Mrs. Clinton

RUSH: We've got a poll out: "Most Americans reject the charge that other presidential candidates are 'piling on' Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, according to a new Fox 5/The Washington Times/Rasmussen Reports poll. Only 25 percent of voters said recent criticism of Mrs. Clinton constitutes piling on, the survey found, and of those, less than half said she was the target because she is a woman. 'The vast majority of Americans are treating Senator Clinton as a front-running presidential candidate, not as a women who happens to be running for president,' said pollster Scott Rasmussen... But the new poll says most aren't convinced -- with 57 percent disagreeing and another 18 percent not sure about the piling on charge. Many of the 25 percent who do agree with the charge don't agree that it's because she's a woman." So, that flopped, folks. It flopped! This whole mess of "piling on" and being "piled on" (which is not a pleasant vision), all that flopped.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Story #4: Writers Strike Could Spread to CBS News

RUSH: : You know this writers strike? It may spread to CBS News. CBS News writers could be joining their entertainment colleagues on the picket lines. The writers are members of the Writers Guild of America East. They are expected to vote unanimously Thursday to authorize the strike on both the national and local levels. They've been working without a contract since April of 2005. "It doesn't mean there will be a strike immediately, but it gives us the authority to call one," said the guild's spokeswoman, Sherry Goldman. Oh, this is a shocker to me. I thought CBS had guys like Bill Burkett writing their news stories. Well, Burkett cannot possibly be a member of the union, so they still have his services, unless he went over to HDNet with Dan Rather. But how's this going to affect the reporters?

Is this not an eye-opening thing? Stop and think about this for a second. You have all these highly paid and really high-reputation talk show hosts, comedy guys, funny men. I don't need to mention the names, you know who they are. Their shows have gone into reruns because they don't have any writers. I know some of it is respect and not wanting to cross picket lines and so forth, but really, wouldn't it make more sense to have people who can talk without writers to do a talk show? We don't have writers here at the EIB Network. It really is kind of interesting to me. Everybody has these impressions of these guys who show up and tell the jokes. "Wow, how funny are these guys," blah, blah, blah. I guess it's not a big secret. Johnny Carson had like 12 or 18 writers to do a ten-minute monologue every night. I mean, I know it's tough, don't misunderstand.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Story #5: Liberal, Blue State Social Programs Fail Again

RUSH: The Pew Research Center is reporting that a growing number of African-Americans believe that they are worse off than they were five years ago, which is not a surprise given the doom-and-gloom coverage of racial issues these past years from the Drive-By Media. "Less than half of African-Americans think their future is going to be any brighter. Two-thirds of African-Americans say that there's a growing difference of values between poor and middle class blacks. Most believe there's widespread discrimination, especially when applying for a job or seeking housing." But here's an interesting tidbit that's not going to get much press. "The majority of African-Americans, 53%, say that they themselves are mainly responsible for their position in life. This acknowledgment that they make has marked a new trend that has emerged in the last decade, according to Pew." Why do these people feel the way they do. Who do they vote for? Who's telling them their life sucks? Who's telling them they've got no future because they're discriminated against? The people they vote for, and, of course, it's reinforced by the Drive-By Media, when, in fact, these tax form studies show something just the opposite is possible because it's happening in this country.

Then the Brookings Institution has a survey, a study on incomes. "Minorities are hardest hit even though incomes rose for blacks and whites on average." Income rose most for white women and black women. White men suffered income stagnation and the income among black men actually dropped. Now, the reasons cited for lack of progress among blacks are familiar, African-Americans get inferior education from inferior government schools in Democrat-controlled cities, the majority they live in. They face workplace discrimination in these blue cities and there are too many single-parent families in the blue city homes that they live in. So what we have here, we have another report card on liberal blue state social policies, and once again we've got failing grades. All these programs designed to produce wealth, income increases, not working for the people who subscribe to liberalism.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Story #6: Poverty Has Doubled in South Africa after Apartheid

RUSH: "The number of South Africans living on less than one dollar a day has more than doubled in a decade since shortly after the end of apartheid. The South African Institute of Race Relations said that 4.2 million people were living on one dollar a day in 2005." Can I translate this for you? Poverty in South Africa has doubled since the ANC took control of the country, and the ANC is a Marxist-rooted bunch, a socialist bunch. Poverty has doubled, the number of people living on less than a dollar a day in South Africa has doubled since the ANC took over.
Source URL: http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111307/content/01125104.guest.html

Posted By: Jan
AfricanCrisis Webmaster
Author of: Government by Deception