Author Topic: a green burka  (Read 859 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ambiorix

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 5180
  • There is no "Istanbul"
    • Brussels Journal
a green burka
« on: April 17, 2008, 02:57:46 PM »
A green burka
http://www.uitkijk.net/milieu.php?subaction=showfull&id=1207829520&archive=&start_from=&ucat=2&
google translation.

Nuclear power is the boerka of the environmental movement. As a whole disguised wo,e's body to rage brings many, many Greens at the light when a radiant atomic adapt. Jacqueline Cramer, PvdA Minister of the Environment, showed last week that it is faithful to its roots. The minister believes that nuclear energy in Netherlands offside should stand until a safer type of nuclear power, the so-called Generation 3 or 4, has been developed.

So we know our former chairman of the Association Milieudefensie. From its friends she inherited the contract for the reintroduction of nuclear energy as long as possible. As Geert Wilders to his last breath against the nikab and boerka fights, the many politicians who are delegated by the environmental movement for us called To drive or take to represent St juttemis fight against the atom.

Ostensibly, they have a point. The use of nuclear stick because disadvantages. The radioactive nuclear waste, for instance. This is only a minimal amount and the dangers are less unmanageable than in the past claimed - it can be melted with glass and as safely stored - but the waste remains the Achilles' heel of nuclear power. The same to narrow the possibility that countries with a nuclear power (and especially a so-called researchreactor) narrow weapons can get. It is not inexhaustible uranium and a nuclear power much more expensive than an inefficient windmill. But yes, every technology has its advantages and disadvantages and advantages of nuclear power are very attractive. It is not for nothing that the  Netherlands atom-current imports from abroad. Nuclear power is safe, generates no air and water pollution, not greenhouse gases, the cheapest electricity, requires highly skilled workers and fills - such as France shows - the balance of payments. Much more plus than minus points so.

That the nuclear boerka of Cramer, shows Environment Minister - no, of environment-defense - by about security. Security! There are already fifty years of nuclear power stations. At that one tragic accident with a curiously constructed after Soviet nuclear power, there is never a dead cases as a result of the peaceful application of nuclear energy. That is not to say that the coal-fired power minister Cramer wants to build. Almost every week deposit somewhere in the world there is a coal mine in and around dozens of workers, long before they can succumb to dust longs. But these are not happy Dutch. Value Wouter Bos, now that you are polarising the greenies in your party, can  you can't you teach them a  little common sense ?
Turkey must get out of NATO. NATO must get out of Kosovo-Serbia. Croats must get out of Crajina. All muslims must get out of Christian and Jewish land. Turks must get out of Cyprus. Turks must get out of "Istanbul". "Palestinians" must get out of Israel. Israel must become independent from USA.