Any of you post at freerepublic.com?

[RationalThought110]

It's a great cite of mostly true gentile conservatives.  However, they support Israel and consider Israel to be pathetic for not having finished Hezbollah off. 

I was previously banned without any warning after I called Geraldo Rivera a self-hating Jew.  However, other people referred to Rivera by worse titles.  Although most debates/posts there are rational, insulting liberals is allowed. 


Don't mention JTF there, rather the common conservative principles of JTF and Free Republic. 


"Founder's 2004 statement
As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-G-d, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and pro-America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our Constitution, and our national sovereignty."   

[Until Shiloh Comes]

Hi RationalThought110, and good day to you.

I was banned twice from FreeRepublic years ago.   At one point, during the Clinton administration, the forum was one of the most genuine, grassroots conservatives places in the Internet.  From Bush Jr.'s election to present day the forum has degenerated into a Republican mouth piece.   Any criticism of Bush or the Republicans or any of their left wing policies is grounds for immediate banning.   It's really sad to see what happened over at FR.

I highly doubt any of the users here would last at FreeRepublic very long.

[Fruit of thy loins]

I hate to say it but anyone with a creative mind is going to have a hard time on a message board run by white conservative gentile males.  These Anglos can only tolerate life if it is strictly disciplined and they get to shout at others all the time.  It is horrendous and I can understand why some misguided souls become liberal because of this level of intolerance.

[mosquewatch]

F.R. banned me, twice. No reason given.  They are the mouthpiece of the White House. Don't tote the Party Line, disagree with anything the President does, you're axed.

[MassuhDGoodName]

Re:  "...They are the mouthpiece of the White House..."

The number of media outlets which are strictly "fronts" for Republicans, as well as Democrats, is truly bewildering!

[jdl4ever]

I made one post in FR and they banned me. 

[Lisa]

I once read a thread over there where they were very critical of JTF, of Chaim, and of Jonathan Pollard. 

[cosmokramer]

FR is run like a commuinst censorship board. I was banned for saying things about the evils of Islam. My comment was posted but than taken off. The peeple on FR as far as I am concerned are brainwashed. They bragged about Moslem moderates. Well, sorry to say. FR really really sucks. I feel sorry for all the people buying into the propaganda on there. And yes most freepers are very critical of JTF.

[RationalThought110]

F.R. banned me, twice. No reason given.  They are the mouthpiece of the White House. Don't tote the Party Line, disagree with anything the President does, you're axed.

I think one of the reasons that they tend to act the way they do is because they can't stand the liberals from the mainstream media sources.  So they like to do the opposite of them. 


They don't give Bush a free pass with illegal aliens though.   

If you were to look through just about any thread on the topic on their forum, you know their unanimously against the invasion of illegal aliens. 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=immigration

I think it would be helpful if someone posts on there what Lisa already posted on this forum:

http://jtf.org/forum_english/index.php?topic=4066.0


 

[mosquewatch]

Valid point made on the illegals issue.  I'm a bit harsh of F.R. for personal reasons.

[Trumpeldor]

I've browsed the site and I'm happy to see that a lot of the posters are populists and not Rockefellers.

[RationalThought110]

I've browsed the site and I'm happy to see that a lot of the posters are populists and not Rockefellers.

They  sort of recognize the agenda of CFR but don't realize that they need to avoid certain candidates if they want any chance of defeating CFR's agenda.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1526165/posts


It's amazing that the public perceives Karl Rove as some kind of political genius.  I don't think he realizes that the top reason Bush's approval rating has hit its lowest point is because of all his open-borders talk and pandering to illegal aliens and the Mexican government.  His poll ratings will go up a little only if he listens to his base.  Bush's base on freerepublic are the top supporters of the Iraq War but they don't approve of open borders.  While he continues to appease the Mexican government, he shouldn't be surprised if his poll numbers continue to drop.


Someone post the following link there so they know about the bill to end "anchor baby" citizenship: 

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:h.r.01940:

[RationalThought110]

Is it possible to register another account there after being banned? 

They're ignorant and don't realize Fred Thompson is no better than Giuliani, who they love to smear.  Thompson is a member of CFR.