Al Qaeda Will Nuke US in Late September

[borninusa]

IS THIS SOMETHING TO WORRY ABOUT -- DOES ANYONE HERE HAVE ANY INFORMATION ON THIS


Next Attack Imminent: Muslims ordered to leave the United States {Merged}

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Muslims should leave America. We cannot stop our attack just because of the American Muslims; they must realize that American forces are killing innocent Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq; we have the right to respond back, in the same manner, in the enemy's homeland. The American Muslims are like a human shield for our enemy; they must leave New York and Washington. 

Saturday, September 16, 2006
 
Al Qaeda Will Nuke US in Late September (update)
 mypetjawa.mu.nu
Found 7 days ago
A Pakistani journalist says that his sources in al Qaeda and the Taliban are claiming that nuclear material has already been smuggled across the Mexican border into the U.S. and that an operation bigger than 9/11 will be carried out. ...

[Scriabin]

Unfortunately, we all know that this will happen eventually.

[yephora]

Re: the lead article --

"Those who cannot debate, defame."

Rabbi Meir Kahane
--
And those who will not defend, die.

Through Mexico? Only one man is responsible for keeping that border open, and it's not Vinny the Fox

[NeverMore]

they obviously couldnt smuggle an A BOMB to the US, if something, it will be a chunk of uranium placed in a street or something like that.. you wont see a nuclear blast made by al qaeda in the US thats for sure.

[yephora]

NeverMore, not a bomb but its critical parts, dissasembled, smuggled in piecemeal, to be assembled here with the rest of the parts easily purchased in the US. Instructions how to do it are or at least were on the Internet.

[NeverMore]

NeverMore, not a bomb but its critical parts, dissasembled, smuggled in piecemeal, to be assembled here with the rest of the parts easily purchased in the US. Instructions how to do it are or at least were on the Internet.

you think its so simple to assemble an a bomb? its not like buy ingrediants put some uranium and voilla! you need special facilities, extreme experts, you need to do experiments and so and so. otherwise you will only explode the explosive part of the bomb, and the nuclear mechanism wont work. its SUPER EXTREMELY complex, by far more complex than hijacking 11 planes.

[Rhuan]

As far as I know, with a uranium bomb, it's just a matter of holding the two pieces of uranium together for a few seconds and bang...

If it's beng done by a muslim who wants tp be a martyr he will could simply hold them together  with his hands.

[yephora]

Even if not an actual nuclear bomb, a "dirty bomb" that spreads nuclear contamination would be equally devastating. Think for example, what an uninhabitable midtown or lower Manhattan due to radiation contamination would do to the economy of America. It would devastate it.

[NeverMore]

Even if not an actual nuclear bomb, a "dirty bomb" that spreads nuclear contamination would be equally devastating. Think for example, what an uninhabitable midtown or lower Manhattan due to radiation contamination would do to the economy of America. It would devastate it.

sure sure, no disagreeing here.

[Rhuan]

As far as I know it really does just take two large enough lumps or uranium bein held to gether for a few seconds to create a nuclear explosion, and the size required isn't all that big.

Therefore, it really isn't complex to create a nuclear explosion if you don't mind dying in it, it's only if you want to detonate it remotely that it actually becomes complex to make, because then you have to have conventional explosives to blast the two pieces together, and make sure they touch for long enough, and of course you also need the detonation mechanism.

[NeverMore]

As far as I know it really does just take two large enough lumps or uranium bein held to gether for a few seconds to create a nuclear explosion, and the size required isn't all that big.

Therefore, it really isn't complex to create a nuclear explosion if you don't mind dying in it, it's only if you want to detonate it remotely that it actually becomes complex to make, because then you have to have conventional explosives to blast the two pieces together, and make sure they touch for long enough, and of course you also need the detonation mechanism.

dude, its a whole science its not holding two chunks of uranium bringing together and lighting up with a cigarette lighter hehe.. not at all.. the main problem is how to get enriched uranium- its virtually impossible to acquire, just look at iran, how desperately they try to enrich uranium, and with years of research they are still some years away from it. look how much time it took for manhatten project to succeed, and think that these arabs dont have the jewish brains and all the best scientists the world can offer, the most they have is osama trying to solve the equations for the bomb or something.

here is some basic knowledge:
http://science.howstuffworks.com/nuclear-bomb.htm

[Rhuan]

I knew a lot of that stuff already, but thanks anyway.

I was referring to two pieces of enriched uranium (235). I suppose I missed out a little bit, but I didn't oversimplify it by much.

[Scriabin]

As far as I know it really does just take two large enough lumps or uranium bein held to gether for a few seconds to create a nuclear explosion, and the size required isn't all that big.

Therefore, it really isn't complex to create a nuclear explosion if you don't mind dying in it, it's only if you want to detonate it remotely that it actually becomes complex to make, because then you have to have conventional explosives to blast the two pieces together, and make sure they touch for long enough, and of course you also need the detonation mechanism.

dude, its a whole science its not holding two chunks of uranium bringing together and lighting up with a cigarette lighter hehe.. not at all.. the main problem is how to get enriched uranium- its virtually impossible to acquire, just look at iran, how desperately they try to enrich uranium, and with years of research they are still some years away from it. look how much time it took for manhatten project to succeed, and think that these arabs dont have the jewish brains and all the best scientists the world can offer.

I mostly agree.  However, because of the Manhattan Project, nuclear science is now a major field...with a lot of muslims studying it.

The Manhattan Project took so long because it was NEW technology.  The technology is no longer new and is therefore MUCH easier to reproduce. 

Of course, building a nuclear bomb is VERY difficult, but I do not think impossible.

Cuba and Mexico are hostile towards us.  Cuba is in bed with Russia and Iran, and all of these countries want us dead.  Could not a device be assembled in Cuba (or Mexico), shipped to a major American port on an unassuming vessel and then detonated?   Who says that such a device will even have to touch American soil?

[Rhuan]

GEtting the enriched uranium is difficult, but after that... And the suggestion is that Osama bought a certain something in Russia...

[NeverMore]

GEtting the enriched uranium is difficult, but after that... And the suggestion is that Osama bought a certain something in Russia...

who knows maybe it was Israel who sold it to him 
if someone sold enriched uranium, iran would have got it long ago.

[Rhuan]

In an interview Osama bin Laden stated that he had nuclear weapons, he commented that for about $20000000 you could pick them up in Russia if you knew who to talk to.