Author Topic: Baby had to be frozen for 4 days to save his life  (Read 606 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Dr. Dan

  • Forum Administrator
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12593
Baby had to be frozen for 4 days to save his life
« on: February 15, 2013, 12:55:47 PM »
Breaks my heart...anyone who has kids on this forum could really only understand this situation.

http://news.yahoo.com/save-newborn-doctors-freeze-baby-120423990--abc-news-health.html;_ylt=A2KJ2Uj0dR5RbxAAZafQtDMD

When Claire Ives was seven months pregnant with her third child, she used a handheld device to listen to her unborn son's heartbeat. As she turned the machine on, she thought something had malfunctioned.
"I thought I wasn't listening right or something," Ives, a nurse in London, told ABCNews.com. "I didn't believe his [heart] rate could be that fast."
Ives' son had a heart rate of about 300 beats per minute, nearly double the normal 160.
After doctors were alerted to the baby's elevated heart rate, Ives delivered her son, Edward Ives, five weeks early via emergency cesarean at the University College London Hospital.
Edward Ives was born with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and was given a five percent chance of survival. SVT is caused by improper electrical impulses in the heart that leads to an irregular rapid heartbeat heart, which then can lead to heart failure or affect internal organs. When the heart beats too quickly, it can't fill up properly and then distribute blood to vital organs correctly.
"I just thought he was going to die," said Ives.
A few hours after Edward was born, his heart started to race again. Doctors attempted to reset his heart rate by shocking his heart and giving him different medications, but when that failed they were left without many options except one they had never tried for SVT: They would lower Edward's body temperature to protect his vital organs and slow his heart rate.
"We'd gone through all the usual maneuvers that usually work in babies, giving drugs … trying to shock the heart, the baby and get [a healthy heart rate back]," said Dr. Nicola Robertson, who works in the neonatal unit at the University College London Hospital.
Over a period of hours the doctors used a cold gel blanket to lower Edward's body temperature to approximately 91 degrees, which both protected his organs and slowed the electrical circuit in his heart. Unfortunately, over the next day, as Edward was warmed up, his heart began to race again. So the team again cooled his body temperature, three days after they had initially lowered it.
"That was one of the worst nights," recalled Ives. "I asked one of the nurses if he was going to die and she said he might."
Ives was sent out of the room when the doctors again attempted to slow his heart rate down by not only cooling but administering medication. Eventually they came to tell her that his heart rate had slowed, although he would again need to be warmed up to see if his heart rate was stable.
"It was really strange highs and lows because he was doing extremely poorly," said Ives. "But, oh, thank God! It worked."
Doctors then began the slow process of warming Edward, this time going at a slower rate as they carefully raised his temperature only half a degree every 12 hours. This time his heart rate remained stable.
It wasn't until 10 days after giving birth that Claire Ives was able to hold her son. A month later she and her husband, Phillip Ives, were able to bring Edward home to join his two older siblings.
Now a healthy six-month old, Edward has an excellent prognosis and is unlikely to need further hospitalizations for SVT although he is being closely monitored to see if the irregular heartbeat returns.
"It's made me appreciate all the small things about my children," said Claire Ives, who is planning to run a half-marathon to raise awareness about neonatal SVT. "It's the best thing ever to bring him home."
If someone says something bad about you, say something nice about them. That way, both of you would be lying.

In your heart you know WE are right and in your guts you know THEY are nuts!

"Science without religion is lame; Religion without science is blind."  - Albert Einstein

Offline Dr. Dan

  • Forum Administrator
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12593
Re: Baby had to be frozen for 4 days to save his life
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2013, 01:23:54 PM »
I get tears in my eyes thinking about this since I have a baby of my own. 
If someone says something bad about you, say something nice about them. That way, both of you would be lying.

In your heart you know WE are right and in your guts you know THEY are nuts!

"Science without religion is lame; Religion without science is blind."  - Albert Einstein

Offline briann

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 8038
  • Mmmm HMMMMM
Re: Baby had to be frozen for 4 days to save his life
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2013, 01:42:08 PM »
Yes, I still have flashbacks of having to deal with medical emergencies with my own kids... it really pushes you to the limits.

Offline angryChineseKahanist

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 10545
  • ☭=卐=☮
Re: Baby had to be frozen for 4 days to save his life
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2013, 05:34:50 PM »
very sad. glad the baby is alive.
U+262d=U+5350=U+9774

Offline Rubystars

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 18307
  • Extreme MAGA Republican
Re: Baby had to be frozen for 4 days to save his life
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2013, 05:46:57 PM »
It's amazing to me how on the one hand doctors can work so hard and so skillfully to save a baby like this and yet if you asked some of those same doctors if a child at the same stage of development that hadn't been delivered 5 weeks early but was still in his mother's womb was a viable human being with human rights, they might say no and that it was ok for the mother to choose to kill them. Or in certain European countries if a baby was born with defects and the parents decided they didn't want to care for a disabled child they could choose to let them dehydrate/starve.

When are people going to realize that life is worth something? Obviously this baby's life was worth a lot of effort, worth a lot of care, etc. and yet so many other babies at the same stage are allowed to die or outright killed by the medical establishment.

Offline cjd

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 8996
Re: Baby had to be frozen for 4 days to save his life
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2013, 04:01:51 AM »
The baby needed to have the Arctic Sun medical device that's now all the rage here in the United States... It seems treating some heart patients by lowering their body temperature to 91 degrees during treatment helps save the other organs of the body from being damaged... The treatment sounds like some sort of torture but it seems to be saving seriously ill heart patients that normally would not have made it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arctic_Sun

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peCV5UuLZCA
He who overlooks one crime invites the commission of another.        Syrus.

A light on to the nations for 60 years


Offline USAReturn2GodNow1776

  • Pro JTFer
  • *****
  • Posts: 764
  • proud christian & kahanist
    • the urban grind
Re: Baby had to be frozen for 4 days to save his life
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2013, 05:15:11 AM »
I must admit that when I first saw the title, I was hoping that "frozen" would be a bit more literal. Still, cool story.