Should JTF Help Osama Win The Democratic Nomination

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

Chaim and all of my other brother/sisters:

I say yes. BHO will be the weakest of the three Democratic candidates in the general election. A certain percentage of the population will refuse to vote for a black or a Muslim--probably greater than the percentage who would refuse to vote for a female. Obama will not get the same knee-jerk fealty from airheaded women voters that Hitlery would, even though some would support him just because he is black and therefore a fellow "disadvantaged person".

It will be much easier for the GOP to effectively attack a political newbie like Obama than the dirtiest, most brutal, most experienced political hitmen in the world (the Clintons). Since Obama is shaping up to have the most backing from Hollywood, he will have one more strike against his name in the face of middle American voters.

In my opinion, Obama is the least electable Democrat, and John Edwards the most (because of his reputation as a centrist and cross-party outreacher). Although I don't doubt that many JTF members will be horrified by this thread and poll just from reading the title, an analysis of the facts on the field will demonstrate that (for now only), we should be wishing him luck at the primaries/caucuses.

Chaimfan

[Ambiorix]

I think you have a point. A black president fro the USA is something which is less likely for a lot of voters to choose for than a Hitlery.

[Ultra Requete]

Yes I agree to that his less likely to win, the Americans are not brainwashed enough to choose shvartza muSSlim, but helping this dreck in any way is wrong and  beneth our dignity. it's like helping HAMAS. 

[Kiwi]

no I think its a nutty idea.

[Dr. Dan]

What would we do if Muslims were fighting Muslims...let them kill each other..

I say let's not get involved with teh demoncrats...let them kill each other.

[mord]

I voted will have to explore more ,but on second thought i decided no help Kucinich

[Ambiorix]

I think the only thing we can do is make propaganda for the Republicans.
And hope .... hope for a change in policy....

[ramen]

Chaim and all of my other brother/sisters:

I say yes. BHO will be the weakest of the three Democratic candidates in the general election. A certain percentage of the population will refuse to vote for a black or a Muslim--probably greater than the percentage who would refuse to vote for a female. Obama will not get the same knee-jerk fealty from airheaded women voters that Hitlery would, even though some would support him just because he is black and therefore a fellow "disadvantaged person".

It will be much easier for the GOP to effectively attack a political newbie like Obama than the dirtiest, most brutal, most experienced political hitmen in the world (the Clintons). Since Obama is shaping up to have the most backing from Hollywood, he will have one more strike against his name in the face of middle American voters.

In my opinion, Obama is the least electable Democrat, and John Edwards the most (because of his reputation as a centrist and cross-party outreacher). Although I don't doubt that many JTF members will be horrified by this thread and poll just from reading the title, an analysis of the facts on the field will demonstrate that (for now only), we should be wishing him luck at the primaries/caucuses.

Chaimfan

i think it is u who may ve wrong. BO just won the first one in iowa

[Joe Schmo]

But B.O. stinks.

[judeanoncapta]

Chaim and all of my other brother/sisters:

I say yes. BHO will be the weakest of the three Democratic candidates in the general election. A certain percentage of the population will refuse to vote for a black or a Muslim--probably greater than the percentage who would refuse to vote for a female. Obama will not get the same knee-jerk fealty from airheaded women voters that Hitlery would, even though some would support him just because he is black and therefore a fellow "disadvantaged person".

It will be much easier for the GOP to effectively attack a political newbie like Obama than the dirtiest, most brutal, most experienced political hitmen in the world (the Clintons). Since Obama is shaping up to have the most backing from Hollywood, he will have one more strike against his name in the face of middle American voters.

In my opinion, Obama is the least electable Democrat, and John Edwards the most (because of his reputation as a centrist and cross-party outreacher). Although I don't doubt that many JTF members will be horrified by this thread and poll just from reading the title, an analysis of the facts on the field will demonstrate that (for now only), we should be wishing him luck at the primaries/caucuses.

Chaimfan

I completely disagree.

Hillary is less of a threat. Did you see the speeches last night?

Hillary was droning and boring and Obama was great. A great speaker.

If I was a gullible moron, I might think about voting for him. He is a much stronger candidate than Hitlery.

[Joe Schmo]

B.O.'s been studying videos of Michael King (MLK).  he speaks just like him.

[RationalThought110]

But the media won't reveal that he's Muslim and the media also refuses to reveal info about the racist church that he belongs to with Oprah. 

Although Obama's campaign is all about slogans and little substance, he has a very big following and would be able to get many people to the polls to vote for him.  I think he would win the general election in a landslide.

[RationalThought110]

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It would be almost impossible for anyone to oppose any policy proposed by him if he becomes president.  Many people have been brainwashed into believing that he's a "unifier" that would unify the country.  So that means that anyone who would oppose him on any issues would get bashed as a racist, someone who is against unifying the country, etc. 


It would be easier to oppose Hillary since she has a reputation as a polarizing politician.  Remember when she called General Petraeus a liar and also supported that ad from moveon.org? 


They're both awful but Obama would be worse.

[Lubab]

I disagree because while in the short term you may have a point, in the long run letting a black racist Muslim get so far in a presidential race paves the way for the next black racist to take power as 3rd worlders grow in numbers.

It's horrific that a Muslim should have such legitimacy in this race and that's why I think we should support Hillary. Huckabee can beat the Clintons as he proved in Arkansas.

We should be praying for Huckabee vs. Clinton, in my opinion.

[MassuhDGoodName]

I think it's an excellent strategy, providing that the primary elections turn out in a way which would justify doing it.

Let's face it:  We've got some characters on this forum whose support for anyone would be all it takes to sink their chances!   

[ramen]

But B.O. stinks.

HAHAHA like it. 

[TruthSpreader]

I think you have a point. A black president fro the USA is something which is less likely for a lot of voters to choose for than a Hitlery.

Exactly. Anything would be better than Whoerelly Clinton winning the nomination.
I have nightmares about her winning. Let's hope it doesn't come true.

[Joe Schmo]

I think that Clinton will win the nomination.

[Sarah]

Theres no need to promote Obama by doing this...but by bashing them both with Hillary even more....you could

[spiritus_persona]

Even though BHO is ahead in the Dhimmicrat polls, white people aren't going to vote for a black president.  It's like Chris Rock said, "It just sounds like a cool thing to say 'yeah Imma vote for 'im uh, heh heh'"!
Clinton is far more likely to win the Dem nominee than BHO, so it could be wiser to destroy her first, then let McCain waste BHO in the presidential election.

[eb22]

        I think the best strategy in the next few months is for the primary focus to be on defeating Barack Hussein Obama.     But at the same time,   have a secondary focus in reminding people of the massive amount of baggage that Hillary Clinton and her so called husband brings to the table.     Both Obama and Hillary need to be weakened.     The possibility exists that both will be on the 2008 Democratic ticket.     


         The bottom line is both Obama and Hillary would be an absolute disaster for the United States,   Israel,   and Western Civilization as a whole.     If one or both are elected this November,    I'm VERY CONCERNED that the damage that will be done will be permanent.