Re: The bin Ladens LEFT the USA on 9/22/01[/b]. For the THIRD time, AND renounced what bin laden
Please read my post more carefully before you go on attack mode. I said the "Saudi Royal Family" not the "Bin Ladin Family"
I'm talking about the BBQ and hand holding session he had with them (the biggest financers of terrorism on the planet) after 9-11!
He then told us the Saudis were "our friends" after they financed 9-11 (even ask Chaim...they gave the money needed for it).
If you don't question this man's sincerity after he pulls that crap then I don't see much of a point in talking to you about this.
Who cares if he "renounced what Bin Ladin did" if he just gave a pass to his financiers?!
Me....on "attack mode" PLEASE I am NOT even a moderator OR admin, and I am having to take up for these people (that have be-friended me) because in MY MESSAGES many good people want to LEAVE here because of this JUNK.
And, WHY ARE YOU BRINGING Chaim into an argument that he asked NOT to be discussed anymore? I will jump on ANYONE who keeps ATTACKING my nation- I consider this an affront on all military personnel that I have INVITED here.
So I guess you believe any criticism of Bush are not allowed now, because for some odd reason Bush="the nation
We the people are the nation Paulette. The government is supposed to be OUR servant, not the other way around.
Lubab, I think you're misinterpreting Paulette, and I think that you fail to see how insulting and damaging it is to accuse thousands of people of committing the worst evil on our own countrymen and 'blaming' islam for it. It will turn our movement into a joke, worse than the Ron paulites were a joke. These theories are in the tiny minority because they have no proof to back them up. It's insanity. People have a right to get offended by people who refuse to stop insisting on the theories. Do not twist this to mean no one can criticize bush or cheney or mccain, etc. No one is claiming that. We are talking about 9/11 "truth." I think this should be clear.
The 9/11 truthers often use this straw man to defend their lies. "but you want to muzzle criticism." No, we want to muzzle dishonest moonbattery that has been disproven and shown to be dishonest and unreliable in any number of sources, which JTF does not specialize in but certainly defers to as do most sane individuals (ie, physicists, engineers, firemen who fought the fires, etc etc who all disagree with the moon bat theories). There are tons of blogs out there who are anti- 9/11 moonbattery which anyone could look up. The evidence is overwhelming for the 9/11 tin-foil hats. Many convert out of the 9/11 cult once they are exposed to the information.
It is not JTF's job to go through it all and answer every 'question,' although I certainly plan on presenting some stuff to you on the forum that will hopefully lead to you DROPPING the subject - and this simply as a public service. A truly worthless subject and an insulting one to the American people .... It NEEDS to be dropped.
Perhaps but you have to remember that the "war on terror" is being heavily twisted for certain "agendas", why do you think Obama and Clinton support the patriot act just like Mccain and Bush do? Why infringe on constitutional rights when we could eliminate the problem by just kicking the muslims out of the country?
http://www.ontheissues.org/Barack_Obama.htmFactCheck: Promised to repeal Patriot Act, then voted for it. (Jan 2008)
Voted YES on reauthorizing the PATRIOT Act. (Mar 2006)
Did you know left wing organization the Brady Campaign is trying to ban .50 caliber sniper rifles for civilian use claiming their being marketed to terrorists? Their using the war on terror for their own agenda
http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/issues/?page=50calhttp://www.50caliberterror.com/From their own website
I quote
"The .50 Caliber Sniper Rifle puts us all at risk whenever we fly in an airplane. These powerful sniper rifles which were designed for the battlefield to puncture armor and destroy targets from long range are easier to get than a handgun in the United States.
Why should we be spending billions of dollars on homeland security when a terrorist can buy a sniper rifle that can shoot armor piercing bullets up to 2000 yards with great accuracy? Why do we permit the sale of a weapon that is powerful enough to threaten civilian airplanes taxiing on the runway or during landing and takeoff? These weapons have been listed by authorities as a serious threat against our nuclear and chemical plants. Your safety is at stake because these weapons are so readily available.
.50 Caliber sniper rifles are a terrorist's dream come true considering the death and destruction they could inflict. If you are fed up with gun manufacturers who put profits before homeland security, join our national campaign NOW! Click Here To Join >>"
Brady Campaign doesn't care about terrorists, they want to take away our 2nd amendment rights and our right to bear arms in the excuse of terrorism.
Why are we friends with Saudi Arabia and sending money to Egypt?
Sure we can say it's political correctness, but the current politicians in power have sold us down the river and have thrown the constitution down the trash.
Is that a conspiracy theory that certain people want to twist the war on terror so they can take our rights away? I think not. The problem isn't the constitution, it is terrorists and the leaders who refuse to do anything but insist on destroying our constitution by watering it down so much, we may as well not have one.