Depends on definition of race. A standard line is that there's only one race, the human race.
of course though, it's not just skin colour, and generally speaking, there are other phsyical and mental differences. Slight variations.
There was a fairly shallow dicussion on the radio. A christian anti evolutionist on the host end. Somebody called claiming an example of evolution, saying that there's a new type of mouse on the london underground (btw, in britain we also call london underground "the tube").
The christian guy thought that was hilarious.. And insisted it's still a mouse. It can still breed with other mice. So, not a new species.
So by that reasoning. Even if there are big differences , we're all the human race.
Though it was a shallow discussion, because it wrongly assumes that you can't breed between species. Though you can
horses and zebras (it seems)
turkeys and ducks.
It's problematic to say blacks and whites are a difference race. Because one could say there's only one race, the human race.
But we could say different peoples.
everybody would agree on that.
i'm sure not all blacks consider themselves a nation,
jews would certainly consider themselves a nation.
rabbis try to build jews into a torah nation.
rabbi kahane nicely said "religio-nation" (slightly different to religious nation. irreligious jews are still jews. )
nation as oppose to nationality.
I haven't really given the race thing much thought.. but to say blacks and whites and asians and so on are different races suggests a mentality that they should stay separate and not breed. That's very racialist, (not necessarily racist) but still not a JTF line)
But I wouldn't say different races, for blacks whites chinese e.t.c.
infact i'm sure most people admire the chinese culture. Many well behaved decent people.. as chaim has said.