Author Topic: First really scary article  (Read 477 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline zachor_ve_kavod

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2179
First really scary article
« on: October 22, 2008, 07:33:38 PM »
Quote

Russians, Syrians discuss missile shield - initially for Tartus port

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report
October 18, 2008, 9:58 PM (GMT+02:00)

The Russian-Syrian discussions in progress in both their capitals cover
the disposition of air defense S-300PMU-2 and Iskander-E missiles - to
be deployed initially around Syria's Mediterranean ports where Moscow is
building naval bases.
DEBKAfile's military and intelligence sources reveal that these two
high-powered items have not been excluded from the big Russian-Syrian
arms deal under discussion, despite appeals from Washington and Israeli
prime minister Ehud Olmert, who made a special trip to Moscow for this
purpose earlier this month.
As soon as he flew home, the foreign ministry spokesman in Moscow
maintained ambiguously on Oct. 9 that Russia would not supply air
defense systems to "volatile regions." He said such decisions are based
on regional security issues and "the need to maintain a balance of
forces" in the region.
This was taken to mean that if weapons delivered to Israel were seen by
Moscow as upsetting "the balance of forces," Moscow would think again
about withholding the S-300 and Iskander-E missiles.
Our Moscow sources disclose that the Russians now view the supply of the
advanced American FBX-T anti-missile radar system to Israel in September
and its deployment in the Negev base of Nevatim as a balance-breaker.
In the broader context of its contest with Washington, the Kremlin
regards the US radar system installed in the Negev to be an integral
part of the US missile shield deployed in the face of Russian protests
in Poland and the Czech Republic. Moscow has already indicated it may
hit back by moving nuclear-armed Iskander-E missiles to the Baltic
opposite the US batteries deployed in East Europe.
Positioning missile systems at Syrian ports would be part of Russia's
overall military payback for the array of US missile and radar
installations in Europe and the Middle East.
Therefore, DEBKAfile's military sources report, the Kremlin may decide
against handing the missiles to the Syrian army but prefer to install
them to guard the Mediterranean naval bases Russians are building at the
Syrian ports of Tartus and Latakia.
Another option would be to outfit the Russian warships to be anchored in
Syria ports with S-300 missiles, which are already part of the weapons
array of the <iPeter the Greati> missile cruiser, which carried out
maneuvers in the Mediterranean last week.
In either case, Russian fingers would be on the controls of these
batteries in the early stages of delivery.
At the same time, the big Russian arms deal in negotiation would
substantially boost and upgrade Damascus' war armory with some pretty
impressive hardware, all paid for by Tehran:
1. Mig-29 M2 fighter-bombers
2. Mig-31 fighter-bombers.
3. Su-30 Flanker bombers.
4. Mobile Tor-M1 air defense missiles, like the ones sold to Iran.  Iran
and Syria are obviously integrating their air and missile defense
systems with Russian hardware, further facilitating Moscow's military
expansion in the Middle East.
5. Pantsir-C air defense missiles.
6. Extensive Russian upgrades of Syria's antiquated T-62, T-72 and T-80
tanks.
7. Upgrades of Syrian SA-5 Gammon, S-125 and Pechora-2A missiles.
8. Advanced ATM anti-tank missiles.
Last year, too, Iran forked out for Syria's Russian arms acquisitions.
While some Israeli leaders, including president Shimon Peres, predicted
that falling oil prices would inhibit the two radical allies' arms
shopping plans, our military sources note this paradox: Iran has
scarcely been affected by the international financial crisis because
international sanctions have long isolated its financial system from
international banking and taught the Islamic republic to live with an
economy on the ropes.

[endquote]