Who was the most evil player of the holocaust? And who is it today?

[zachor_ve_kavod]

I'd like your opinions about this.  It seems to me, that the most evil person in the nazi regime was not Hitler (ym"sh), though I think he would finish a close second, but Julius Streicher (ym"sh).  Streicher was the editor of Der Sturmer.  As the leader of this anti-Semitic, pornographic rag, it was Streicher who did more to convince the German people that the Jews were subhuman.  Hitler was the leader and policy maker.  But Streicher brainwashed an entire nation to evil.  Maybe the question of who was more evil is not the right question.  Maybe the question should be, "How important a role did an evil media monopoly play in the holocaust?"

Fast forward to today...

These are some question that we need to ask ourselves:

Q:  Is there a media monopoly today?

A:  There is, for all intents and purposes.  Not to the same extent as in nazi Germany.  We have "conservative" talk shows on the radio, but people have to seek it out.  The media that comes into our homes is monopolized by a particular view.

Q:  Are people aware of this single sided view?

A:  No way.  I don't even think that most people ask themselves such a question.

Q:  What is the media's agenda?

A:  In the broadest sense, power, real power.  The power to shape men's minds.  In a narrower sense, the vilification of righteous Americans, the vilification of Israel, the vilification of Christianity.  Any left wing agenda you can think of

Q:  What happens if they are successful?

A:  They've already succeeded.  Listen to the discourse among ordinary people.  You'll see how crazy and upside down things have become.

Q:  Is there any hope for righteousness?

A:  There is, but alternative voices must become much more present.  That is what we are all about (at least that's how I see it).  That's what many evangelical Christians are trying to do.

In sum, the media played the single greatest role in the holocaust (in my opinion).  The media of today is playing the greatest role in this election.  A narrow minded media with a single objective is a serious problem.  There are movements like ours who are trying to oppose this, but it is anyone's guess whether we can make a difference in time.  Probably the most frightening example of an evil monolithic media may be found in Israel, who are actually trying to bring destruction upon not just Israel, but themselves.

[Xoce]

I disagree that people are not aware of the one-sided media.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2008/10/23/nearly-8-1-voters-say-journalists-want-obama-win

By Nearly 8-to-1, Voters Say Journalists Want Obama to Win
By Brent Baker
October 23, 2008 - 17:23 ET


“Voters overwhelmingly believe that the media wants Barack Obama to win the presidential election,” a Pew Research Center for the People and the Press survey released Wednesday discovered. Specifically: “By a margin of 70%-9%, Americans say most journalists want to see Obama, not John McCain, win on Nov. 4. Another 8% say journalists don't favor either candidate, and 13% say they don't know which candidate most reporters support.”
----------------------------------
Please click link above for full article.
This survey of course includes both McCain and Obama supporters, and yet over 70% see the bias.  Of the 8 percent who claim the media favors neither candidate, most of those I would guess are they themselves obama supporters.  Likewise with many of the 13% who claim they don't know.  In any case, 70% is a very high number.

[zachor_ve_kavod]

I disagree that people are not aware of the one-sided media.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2008/10/23/nearly-8-1-voters-say-journalists-want-obama-win

By Nearly 8-to-1, Voters Say Journalists Want Obama to Win
By Brent Baker
October 23, 2008 - 17:23 ET


“Voters overwhelmingly believe that the media wants Barack Obama to win the presidential election,” a Pew Research Center for the People and the Press survey released Wednesday discovered. Specifically: “By a margin of 70%-9%, Americans say most journalists want to see Obama, not John McCain, win on Nov. 4. Another 8% say journalists don't favor either candidate, and 13% say they don't know which candidate most reporters support.”
----------------------------------
Please click link above for full article.
This survey of course includes both McCain and Obama supporters, and yet over 70% see the bias.  Of the 8 percent who claim the media favors neither candidate, most of those I would guess are they themselves obama supporters.  Likewise with many of the 13% who claim they don't know.  In any case, 70% is a very high number.

So if they know that they are being lied to, why do they not seek out the truth?

[Xoce]

First of all, I most definitely agree with your assertion of the danger and power of the disgusting media, in encouraging and enabling the Holocaust and in influencing other events in history.

With regards to voters knowing that the media is completely biased but still 'not seeking the truth'

I think they are seeking out the truth but they are not vocal about it for fear of being called racist or "uncool" (the biggest fear for young people).  That is why we do not hear about it.

and even if people were reporting that they are considering mccain, the media would under-report or not report this at all, as it does not serve their agenda.  Which is another possibility for why we do not hear about it.

For an example, the number of views of anti-obama videos on youtube (which is used mostly by young people) shows that there is a huge interest in the other side of obama, the true side that is hidden by the regular media.

I believe this will be manifested by a McCain/Palin victory in November.  The only caveat: the immense democrat voter fraud could be to the extent of creating an artificial obama win.  But on real, eligible, human votes, I still predict a McCain/Palin win.  This may sound crazy.