General Category > General Discussion

Churchill's attitude to Jews

(1/4) > >>

kahaneloyalist:
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2007/03/churchills-jewish-papers.html

Din Rodef:
Churchill is often misunderstood by both sides.

Churchill believed that the same people that brought G-d (sorry about the censored) are the same people that brought the devil.

In other words, He believed that true Torah Jews were absolutely necessary and vital to the survival of the West...On the other hand, he viewed the secular Bolshevik Jews as arch enemies of Western Civilization.

He found it curious that the same people that brought the Bible...also brought Marxism.

But he also viewed Jews as alien and non-assimilating..THerefore, he was suspicious of their intentions in England. I can't blame him for this. My personal life experiences have led me to the same thoughts about Jews living in my city and country.

Many Jews seem to think that any criticism is anti-semitism..I don't blame them for feeling this way. It's not easy to be in Diaspora for 2000 years. But understand...Gentiles have their own nations and cultures to worry about and often find the majority Jewish position downright confusing or even contrary to the Gentile nations' own survival.

The Diaspora is not just punishment for the Jews...It is also punishment for their host nations. 

Redemption can only occur when the Jews return to Israel and fulfull their destiny of becoming a nation of priests.

BOTTOM LINE: Don't waste much time thinking about a British leader that's been dead for decades.....Instead, worry a little more about fulfilling the Jewish destiny of returning to the land of Israel after 2000 years in Diaspora.

Fruit of thy loins:
Antipathetic attitudes to Jews have been common among the 'educated' people of England, historically and today.  H G Wells wrote in his book 'A Short Outline of HIstory' that the conflict between the Carthaginians and the Romans was a kind of race-war between 'Semites and Aryans' that 'set the tone for the outcome of world events right down to our present day', which was 1922 when he wrote the first edition.  The English elite believed in Aryanism and believed that they were cousins of the Aryan Germans.  They tolerated Jews by a very slim margin - it was only English modesty against extremism that stopped them being hostile to the Jews.  (Actually an anti-immigration act was passed in 1918 in England designed to keep out 'Jews and other feeble-minded people'.)

Today, we see many petty-bourgeois people in Britain, Australia and Canada (the Anglo countries which are most attuned to traditiona Englishness) that there is a stodgy antisemitism among people who think they know better, who think they are more educated and cultured than the mass of the people.  Evidence abounds.  Their intellectual tradition is derived from the same Masonic line as H G Wells and Churchill although obviously this tradition has lost a lot of its prestige.  I also notice antisemitism especially in Scotland, the same place where young white girls are sleeping with freshly-arrived, half-starved asylum seekers with a great deal of glee.  It is meet that these nations should be so cursed that their women turn into bare-faced harlots.  :)

Din Rodef:
Fruit of thy loins

One of the reasons that white girls are sleeping with new immigrants is because the IDENTITY OF THE WHITE GIRLS HAS BEEN THRASHED

Everytime a white person attempts to assert his own racial/cultural identity....he is immediately vilified as a Nazi...

This constant attack on white identity is at the heart of the third world invasion of the west. Jews most certainly share some of the blame for this.

Fruit of thy loins:

--- Quote from: Din Rodef on March 12, 2007, 09:22:50 PM ---

One of the reasons that white girls are sleeping with new immigrants is because the IDENTITY OF THE WHITE GIRLS HAS BEEN THRASHED




--- End quote ---



If this is the 'white nationalist' position then this is why I'm not a white nationalist.  I know for a fact that white women benefit from the culture emasculation of white men, and many white women are either consciously or subconsciously aware of it.

The first person who will scream at a white male for his intolerance will be a white woman.  She might even start becoming hysterical and crying for apparently no good reason.  The real reason she is so upset is that a self-assertive white male threatens her fun-time, her party-time. The same factors (Masonry, European Unionism, Anglo-Saxon economic values) that 'liberate' the negro and Islamify towns and cities also 'liberate' the white woman and give her access to unprecedented opportunities and resources.

White women know that their supremacy relies upon the suppression of working class white males.  I used to get treated like dirt by rich white girls at university ....

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page