Author Topic: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign  (Read 880 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EffIran

  • Junior JTFer
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
« on: January 25, 2009, 11:08:05 AM »
Who is the first private citizen/group Kirsten Gillibrand met with after being appointed senator?  That's right, you got it....Al Sharpton! 

Offline DownwithIslam

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4247
Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2009, 02:54:24 PM »
I am not surprised. This swine is just a typical traitor democrat.
I am urinating on a Koran.

Offline Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23384
  • Real Kahanist
Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2009, 04:06:33 PM »
Give her a break guys. Every single NY state politician is a disgusting whore, from both parties. They are no different from the California Republican Party, which is now supporting tax increases as part of a "comprehensive solution" to close our state's budget gap.

Offline briann

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 8038
  • Mmmm HMMMMM
Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2009, 05:36:05 PM »
Give her a break guys. Every single NY state politician is a disgusting whore, from both parties. They are no different from the California Republican Party, which is now supporting tax increases as part of a "comprehensive solution" to close our state's budget gap.

Isnt she supposed to be moderate?? I heard she was supportive of the 2nd ammendmant.. is this true?

Offline Americanhero1

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 7617
  • I ain't going anywhere
Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2009, 05:50:26 PM »
Give her a break guys. Every single NY state politician is a disgusting whore, from both parties. They are no different from the California Republican Party, which is now supporting tax increases as part of a "comprehensive solution" to close our state's budget gap.

Isnt she supposed to be moderate?? I heard she was supportive of the 2nd ammendmant.. is this true?


Yes she supports the 2nd amendment
The Dems have already attacked her for her stance on the 2nd amendment

Offline Abben

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1345
  • Down with obama!
Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2009, 09:16:49 PM »
A gun supporter is good in my book.

Offline Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23384
  • Real Kahanist
Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2009, 09:58:33 PM »
A gun supporter is good in my book.
Yeah but she's horrible on all other issues. She is like Jolene Unsoeld (sp?) of Washington, who was a fanatical leftist but pro-gun.

Offline Abben

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1345
  • Down with obama!
Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2009, 10:25:29 PM »
A gun supporter is good in my book.
Yeah but she's horrible on all other issues. She is like Jolene Unsoeld (sp?) of Washington, who was a fanatical leftist but pro-gun.

I didn't know that. Thanks for that info CF.

Offline nessuno

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 5533
Re: Sen. Gillibrand = not a good sign
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2009, 10:37:00 PM »
A gun supporter is good in my book.
Yeah but she's horrible on all other issues. She is like Jolene Unsoeld (sp?) of Washington, who was a fanatical leftist but pro-gun.
C.F. is right.  I heard her speak when she was running for office. 
Be very CAREFUL of people whose WORDS don't match their ACTIONS.