Author Topic: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story  (Read 3767 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Muck DeFuslims

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1070
A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« on: September 30, 2009, 04:09:14 AM »
A secular Jew was driving his car on YK day. He had already broken the fast by eating some unkosher food moments after sundown the previous evening. He was aware it was YK and felt some remorse and trepidation over his actions. On the other hand, he felt it was hypocritical to ask for forgiveness and go 'through the motions' on the holiest of the Holy days when he really had no intention of changing his ways and becoming an observant Jew anytime soon. In fact, this Jew doesn't have absoiute faith, and could be considered an agnostic. He leans towards believing in G-d, but he's just not entirely sure.

Anyway, to continue the story, he's driving his car and he realizes he's passing by a synagogue. He looks at the parking lot for the synagogue and sees that it's full of cars. He realizes that the cars belong to the members of the congregation and knows immediately that this is a conservative or reformed Temple. Although he's secular, his limited practice, contacts and knowledge of Judaism came from an Orthodox background. He wonders about supposedly religious people driving their cars to synagogue on YK. Then he thinks, 'well, at least they're making an effort, even if it's a hypocritical and unacceptable one from an orthodox standpoint'.

Then the secular Jew thinks of his parents. They're both deceased now. Shouldn't someone say Yiska for them ? His father wouldn't have cared. He was a proud of being a Jew but was completely distant from the religion. He sent his sons to Hebrew school, probably at his wife's request, so that they would know about Judaism and always know that they were Jews. Strange, the father would eat a pork sandwich on YK, but in his own crazy way, he was a proud Jew.

His mother was secular too, but in a different way. She wouldn't keep Shabbat, wasn't kosher, but whenever a holiday like Passover rolled around, it was off to her parent's house for a seder. There the son would see his grandfather dovening at the seder table. The grandfather's shaking hand spilling Manishevitz concord grape wine all over the white table cloth as he recited the plagues. The afikomen, the four questions, the delicious food, the family. Man, those were some wonderful times, but they were long ago.

Still, shouldn't he at least make an effort to say Yiska for his mom ? She would have wanted that, and it seemed like the right thing to do.

So he pulls his car over and decides to at least walk into the Temple even though he's certainly not dressed appropriately and really doesn't know if it's a good idea.

At the door he's greeted by a well dressed young man. He's somewhat surprised that the young man is black, but he seems friendly and points to a box full of Kippas. After perfunctory greetings of 'good yontif', the secular Jew explains he's not religious at all but at least wanted to stop in and say Yiska for his mom. The young man says that they just passed that part of the services but perhaps he'd like to stay anyway and do teshuva.

The secular Jew decides not to stay. He is disappointed he didn't say Yiska for his mom, but knew this really wasn't the place for him anyway.

He gets into his car feeling some remorse and guilt. He knows that he's not a good Jew, even if he's probably a good person. But life goes on. He's a semi-professional gambler and he's on his way to a casino. He's got business to attend to there and money to try to make. Interestingly, the casino is owned by an Iranian Jew that attends the Temple he just stopped off at.

While the shofar is being blown to conclude YK, the secular Jew is eating a lavish buffet dinner, comped by the casino owned by the Iranian Jew.

I hope that the secular Jew is written into the book of life, even if he doesn't deserve it.

Because the secular Jew is me.

Thanks for reading this. I wish for every member of this forum to have a happy, healthy and productive upcoming year.

   

Offline Ulli

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10946
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2009, 04:27:36 AM »
You wrote your feelings very compressed in this short text. I feel you.

Quote
I hope that the secular Jew is written into the book of life, even if he doesn't deserve it.

May it be  :)
"Cities run by progressives don't know how to police. ... Thirty cities went up last night, I went and looked at every one of them. Every one of them has a progressive Democratic mayor." Rudolph Giuliani

Offline Dr. Dan

  • Forum Administrator
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12584
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2009, 05:57:21 AM »
Hopefully nxt year you give it a real shot.

Fyi I'm guessing u either stopped by temple israel and went off to atlantic city. Or stopped by temple sinai and went off to las vegas
If someone says something bad about you, say something nice about them. That way, both of you would be lying.

In your heart you know WE are right and in your guts you know THEY are nuts!

"Science without religion is lame; Religion without science is blind."  - Albert Einstein

Offline Manch

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1869
  • Kahane Tzadak!
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2009, 07:10:05 AM »
A secular Jew was driving his car on YK day. He had already broken the fast by eating some unkosher food moments after sundown the previous evening. He was aware it was YK and felt some remorse and trepidation over his actions. On the other hand, he felt it was hypocritical to ask for forgiveness and go 'through the motions' on the holiest of the Holy days when he really had no intention of changing his ways and becoming an observant Jew anytime soon. In fact, this Jew doesn't have absoiute faith, and could be considered an agnostic. He leans towards believing in G-d, but he's just not entirely sure.

Anyway, to continue the story, he's driving his car and he realizes he's passing by a synagogue. He looks at the parking lot for the synagogue and sees that it's full of cars. He realizes that the cars belong to the members of the congregation and knows immediately that this is a conservative or reformed Temple. Although he's secular, his limited practice, contacts and knowledge of Judaism came from an Orthodox background. He wonders about supposedly religious people driving their cars to synagogue on YK. Then he thinks, 'well, at least they're making an effort, even if it's a hypocritical and unacceptable one from an orthodox standpoint'.

Then the secular Jew thinks of his parents. They're both deceased now. Shouldn't someone say Yiska for them ? His father wouldn't have cared. He was a proud of being a Jew but was completely distant from the religion. He sent his sons to Hebrew school, probably at his wife's request, so that they would know about Judaism and always know that they were Jews. Strange, the father would eat a pork sandwich on YK, but in his own crazy way, he was a proud Jew.

His mother was secular too, but in a different way. She wouldn't keep Shabbat, wasn't kosher, but whenever a holiday like Passover rolled around, it was off to her parent's house for a seder. There the son would see his grandfather dovening at the seder table. The grandfather's shaking hand spilling Manishevitz concord grape wine all over the white table cloth as he recited the plagues. The afikomen, the four questions, the delicious food, the family. Man, those were some wonderful times, but they were long ago.

Still, shouldn't he at least make an effort to say Yiska for his mom ? She would have wanted that, and it seemed like the right thing to do.

So he pulls his car over and decides to at least walk into the Temple even though he's certainly not dressed appropriately and really doesn't know if it's a good idea.

At the door he's greeted by a well dressed young man. He's somewhat surprised that the young man is black, but he seems friendly and points to a box full of Kippas. After perfunctory greetings of 'good yontif', the secular Jew explains he's not religious at all but at least wanted to stop in and say Yiska for his mom. The young man says that they just passed that part of the services but perhaps he'd like to stay anyway and do teshuva.

The secular Jew decides not to stay. He is disappointed he didn't say Yiska for his mom, but knew this really wasn't the place for him anyway.

He gets into his car feeling some remorse and guilt. He knows that he's not a good Jew, even if he's probably a good person. But life goes on. He's a semi-professional gambler and he's on his way to a casino. He's got business to attend to there and money to try to make. Interestingly, the casino is owned by an Iranian Jew that attends the Temple he just stopped off at.

While the shofar is being blown to conclude YK, the secular Jew is eating a lavish buffet dinner, comped by the casino owned by the Iranian Jew.

I hope that the secular Jew is written into the book of life, even if he doesn't deserve it.

Because the secular Jew is me.

Thanks for reading this. I wish for every member of this forum to have a happy, healthy and productive upcoming year.  
G-d bless you!
Hayot Araviot Masrihot

Offline The One and Only Mo

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4963
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2009, 09:03:46 AM »
A secular Jew was driving his car on YK day. He had already broken the fast by eating some unkosher food moments after sundown the previous evening. He was aware it was YK and felt some remorse and trepidation over his actions. On the other hand, he felt it was hypocritical to ask for forgiveness and go 'through the motions' on the holiest of the Holy days when he really had no intention of changing his ways and becoming an observant Jew anytime soon. In fact, this Jew doesn't have absoiute faith, and could be considered an agnostic. He leans towards believing in G-d, but he's just not entirely sure.

Anyway, to continue the story, he's driving his car and he realizes he's passing by a synagogue. He looks at the parking lot for the synagogue and sees that it's full of cars. He realizes that the cars belong to the members of the congregation and knows immediately that this is a conservative or reformed Temple. Although he's secular, his limited practice, contacts and knowledge of Judaism came from an Orthodox background. He wonders about supposedly religious people driving their cars to synagogue on YK. Then he thinks, 'well, at least they're making an effort, even if it's a hypocritical and unacceptable one from an orthodox standpoint'.

Then the secular Jew thinks of his parents. They're both deceased now. Shouldn't someone say Yiska for them ? His father wouldn't have cared. He was a proud of being a Jew but was completely distant from the religion. He sent his sons to Hebrew school, probably at his wife's request, so that they would know about Judaism and always know that they were Jews. Strange, the father would eat a pork sandwich on YK, but in his own crazy way, he was a proud Jew.

His mother was secular too, but in a different way. She wouldn't keep Shabbat, wasn't kosher, but whenever a holiday like Passover rolled around, it was off to her parent's house for a seder. There the son would see his grandfather dovening at the seder table. The grandfather's shaking hand spilling Manishevitz concord grape wine all over the white table cloth as he recited the plagues. The afikomen, the four questions, the delicious food, the family. Man, those were some wonderful times, but they were long ago.

Still, shouldn't he at least make an effort to say Yiska for his mom ? She would have wanted that, and it seemed like the right thing to do.

So he pulls his car over and decides to at least walk into the Temple even though he's certainly not dressed appropriately and really doesn't know if it's a good idea.

At the door he's greeted by a well dressed young man. He's somewhat surprised that the young man is black, but he seems friendly and points to a box full of Kippas. After perfunctory greetings of 'good yontif', the secular Jew explains he's not religious at all but at least wanted to stop in and say Yiska for his mom. The young man says that they just passed that part of the services but perhaps he'd like to stay anyway and do teshuva.

The secular Jew decides not to stay. He is disappointed he didn't say Yiska for his mom, but knew this really wasn't the place for him anyway.

He gets into his car feeling some remorse and guilt. He knows that he's not a good Jew, even if he's probably a good person. But life goes on. He's a semi-professional gambler and he's on his way to a casino. He's got business to attend to there and money to try to make. Interestingly, the casino is owned by an Iranian Jew that attends the Temple he just stopped off at.

While the shofar is being blown to conclude YK, the secular Jew is eating a lavish buffet dinner, comped by the casino owned by the Iranian Jew.

I hope that the secular Jew is written into the book of life, even if he doesn't deserve it.

Because the secular Jew is me.

Thanks for reading this. I wish for every member of this forum to have a happy, healthy and productive upcoming year.

   

The same source (Torah) that says you're Jewish also commands you to observe everything else in the source. It's never too late. I've been shomer shabbos for a year now, so you never know. If you don't observe Torah, you are gambling on the afterlife, and it's always better to be on the safe side. You might have something inside of you that needs to be opened up.

Offline Lisa

  • Forum Administrator
  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9373
    • The Urban Grind
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2009, 10:00:24 AM »
Muck, you're a great JTF'er.  I always enjoy your posts. 

Offline secularkahanist

  • New JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2009, 02:38:15 PM »


The same source (Torah) that says you're Jewish also commands you to observe everything else in the source. It's never too late. I've been shomer shabbos for a year now, so you never know. If you don't observe Torah, you are gambling on the afterlife, and it's always better to be on the safe side. You might have something inside of you that needs to be opened up.

That's pascal's wager, and it is faulty reasoning. After all, we must consider the odds. 50/50 chance there is a God, and if so, another 50/50 chance it isn't of the deistic variety. So there is a 25% chance that we need to be reverent of a divine for our own good. If that is the case, we again have a 50/50 question of whether there is a correct religion or not. If not, we can only speculate as to the correct course. If there is, then we have no cause to believe a particular faith is more likely to be correct. That is, the odds favor Judaism no more than Hinduism or Islam, or any of the thousands of other religions. Now, considering how many faiths regard rival doctrines as even worse than atheism/agnosticism, you are more likely to suffer a worse end by practicing any faith at all.

Of course, I say this as an Orthodox Jew turned Atheist. The statistical question is a logical calculation, and faith by definition is not reliant on logic, but on belief in the unverified.

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2009, 02:46:54 PM »


The same source (Torah) that says you're Jewish also commands you to observe everything else in the source. It's never too late. I've been shomer shabbos for a year now, so you never know. If you don't observe Torah, you are gambling on the afterlife, and it's always better to be on the safe side. You might have something inside of you that needs to be opened up.

That's pascal's wager, and it is faulty reasoning. After all, we must consider the odds. 50/50 chance there is a G-d, and if so, another 50/50 chance it isn't of the deistic variety. So there is a 25% chance that we need to be reverent of a divine for our own good. If that is the case, we again have a 50/50 question of whether there is a correct religion or not. If not, we can only speculate as to the correct course. If there is, then we have no cause to believe a particular faith is more likely to be correct. That is, the odds favor Judaism no more than Hinduism or Islam, or any of the thousands of other religions. Now, considering how many faiths regard rival doctrines as even worse than atheism/agnosticism, you are more likely to suffer a worse end by practicing any faith at all.

Of course, I say this as an Orthodox Jew turned Atheist. The statistical question is a logical calculation, and faith by definition is not reliant on logic, but on belief in the unverified.

This is a sad posting. Judaism is a faith which has much wisdom, much more than those 'other' religions. The prophecies of Torah have come true, unlike prophecies of 'other' religions. It is also sad that someone turns their back on Judaism, it is a way of rebellion against G-d. The Jewish people are special in G-ds eye. You have turned away and will have to deal with the judgment at the end of days.

I only hope that you do Teshuva and don't turn other Jews away from the faith because of your bad example.

PS: Hashem exists just as much as I exist, only his existence is much more real than my existence. The world would not exist if not for the creator. The world did not just happen out of chance.

And is is faulty 'logic' to believe that just because you turned away from Judaism that the nations will still not judge you as a Jew as much as you wish you weren't one...

And why would you consider yourself a Kahanist if you don't believe the Jewish people have a G-d mandated right to live in the Holy Land... It is incongruous to me.

You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline secularkahanist

  • New JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #8 on: September 30, 2009, 03:08:19 PM »


The same source (Torah) that says you're Jewish also commands you to observe everything else in the source. It's never too late. I've been shomer shabbos for a year now, so you never know. If you don't observe Torah, you are gambling on the afterlife, and it's always better to be on the safe side. You might have something inside of you that needs to be opened up.

That's pascal's wager, and it is faulty reasoning. After all, we must consider the odds. 50/50 chance there is a G-d, and if so, another 50/50 chance it isn't of the deistic variety. So there is a 25% chance that we need to be reverent of a divine for our own good. If that is the case, we again have a 50/50 question of whether there is a correct religion or not. If not, we can only speculate as to the correct course. If there is, then we have no cause to believe a particular faith is more likely to be correct. That is, the odds favor Judaism no more than Hinduism or Islam, or any of the thousands of other religions. Now, considering how many faiths regard rival doctrines as even worse than atheism/agnosticism, you are more likely to suffer a worse end by practicing any faith at all.

Of course, I say this as an Orthodox Jew turned Atheist. The statistical question is a logical calculation, and faith by definition is not reliant on logic, but on belief in the unverified.

This is a sad posting. Judaism is a faith which has much wisdom, much more than those 'other' religions. The prophecies of Torah have come true, unlike prophecies of 'other' religions. It is also sad that someone turns their back on Judaism, it is a way of rebellion against G-d. The Jewish people are special in G-ds eye. You have turned away and will have to deal with the judgment at the end of days.

I only hope that you do Teshuva and don't turn other Jews away from the faith because of your bad example.

PS: Hashem exists just as much as I exist, only his existence is much more real than my existence. The world would not exist if not for the creator. The world did not just happen out of chance.

And is is faulty 'logic' to believe that just because you turned away from Judaism that the nations will still not judge you as a Jew as much as you wish you weren't one...

And why would you consider yourself a Kahanist if you don't believe the Jewish people have a G-d mandated right to live in the Holy Land... It is incongruous to me.



Well, I would hope that as one who willingly identifies themselves in religious terms as Jewish that the faith to you is comparatively more rational and correct, as otherwise you'd have no cause to practice it. But that doesn't mean your claims are objectively valid. They aren't. Or, if they are, I'd ask that you prove them.

As to my Jewishness, I continue to identify myself publicly as a member of the tribe for the reasons stated by Professor Fred Lieberman in The Gentleman's Agreement. In response to the question of why he, being non-religious, would be open about his identity, he said it was, "because the world still makes it an advantage not to be one. Thus it becomes a matter of pride...." As long as their is anti-Semitism, which exists in great measure today, I will stand tall and defend my heritage. And I do see plenty of value in the non-religious bits of Jewish culture. For that matter, while I'm not at all a fan of the faith, I do admit its impact on world history is undeniable (though how positive a force it has been could be debated by reasonable men). With all that being said, I don't identify as religiously Jewish because I do not believe in God, or the sacred status of the Torah, and or anything else that would make such an identification appropriate. I am well aware that Jewish law prevents leaving the faith, and that if correct I'll be judged for my heresy. That is a risk I am willing to take, for I see no cause to believe.

I label myself as a Kahanist for the simple reason that, religious concerns aside, I believe his political aims were largely correct. I know enough about Islam from reading its sacred texts and studying its history to know that it is a force for evil that threatens the Jewish community and our homeland as long as it remains in our midst. Accordingly, I support population transfer and re-asserting the Jewish character of the State of Israel. And I realize that our Islamic neighbors have no desire for peace, and are not capable of it. Thus, I likewise agree with Kahane about land for peace schemes. Understand that many who supported the man were not Orthodox Jews, but were Atheists like I am, or practiced other faiths.

Supporting a Jewish homeland does not require that I be religious, but that I view Jews as a constituting a distinct nation as defined by the conventions of political science. And I do. Therefore, considering both that and the dangers of anti-Semitism found outside of Israel, I have ample cause to support a Jewish state. The location is not of critical importance per say, but our historic ties to the land and decades of work turning it from a desert swampland into an oasis, I am inclined to want to retain our present location. That requires dealing with the current problems of the land, which I believe are best solved by Kahanist foreign and security policy actions.

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #9 on: September 30, 2009, 03:49:43 PM »
But of course there is no imperitive for the 'Jewish State' to exist in the 'Holy Land' because as you are an atheist you don't believe anything is 'Holy'. So the Jewish state could be in Australia for all you care, so it seems. Also there is no reason to identify as a Jew because you are trying to destroy the Jewish faith, so what purpose is there in identifying as one.

Also you claim to believe in 'evil' which is very undefined if you have no belief in an ultimate being who is compassionate to the Jewish nation. Maybe the Muslims are right and the Jews are wrong... There is no right or wrong in a world without a creed, as is established with our Holy Torah which you outright rejected. Maybe your 'logical' thought would lead you to conclude that the Jewish nation is wrong and the Crusaders, or the Inquisitors, or the Muslims or Hitler was right. It is called Moral Relativism [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_relativism ] and it is very dangerous. This is what allows the Goldstone cretins to claim 'war crimes' against Israel while it acted with moral restraint in the Cast Lead operation almost a year ago. Moral Relativism is what is destroying America and American culture.

I am sorry but I have a difficult time understanding why someone would discredit their mother and father, their faith, and their people because you simply don't believe in the force which gives you life. You must have had a good upbringing and it is just sad. I have met so many good Orthodox Jews who have been Frum {Observant} from birth and they are very, very special people.

Once again... I hope that you realize, before the coming of Mashiach, that you belong to the Jewish nation and Hashem is what gives you your special features. We know that Hashem is very patient and he wants us all to receive rewards, both in this world, and in the next.
You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #10 on: September 30, 2009, 04:01:22 PM »


The same source (Torah) that says you're Jewish also commands you to observe everything else in the source. It's never too late. I've been shomer shabbos for a year now, so you never know. If you don't observe Torah, you are gambling on the afterlife, and it's always better to be on the safe side. You might have something inside of you that needs to be opened up.

That's pascal's wager, and it is faulty reasoning. After all, we must consider the odds. 50/50 chance there is a G-d, and if so, another 50/50 chance it isn't of the deistic variety. So there is a 25% chance that we need to be reverent of a divine for our own good. If that is the case, we again have a 50/50 question of whether there is a correct religion or not. If not, we can only speculate as to the correct course. If there is, then we have no cause to believe a particular faith is more likely to be correct. That is, the odds favor Judaism no more than Hinduism or Islam, or any of the thousands of other religions. Now, considering how many faiths regard rival doctrines as even worse than atheism/agnosticism, you are more likely to suffer a worse end by practicing any faith at all.

Of course, I say this as an Orthodox Jew turned Atheist. The statistical question is a logical calculation, and faith by definition is not reliant on logic, but on belief in the unverified.

Why do you impugn Pascal?   "Pascal's wager" is not faulty reasoning, it's an honest philosophical point.   Not saying that has to compel everyone to believe in G-d themselves, but I can't see how you can "disprove" something like that with math calculations.   It would seem that is missing the whole point of it.

Anyway, I do not agree with you that there is equal likelihood of all faiths being true.  THAT is faulty reasoning on your part. Torah is based on testimony of a group of people to a group experience.  You can say you don't believe it, but you cannot say its evidence is at equal weight with other hypothetical 'faiths' or religions.   It's a different kind of faith.  Skepticism allows one to disbelieve ad nauseum, even to disbelieve otherwise credible or reliable circumstantial evidence, for instance corroborated witnesses in a court of law.   Skepticism gives a person that freedom.  But that does not mean all things are equally uncertain.   A person would have to be very dogmatic to think that way.

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #11 on: September 30, 2009, 04:07:25 PM »

 he said it was, "because the world still makes it an advantage not to be one. Thus it becomes a matter of pride...." As long as their is anti-Semitism, which exists in great measure today, I will stand tall and defend my heritage.


That seems rather vindictive.

Yet sensible...   That is, until antisemitism ceases to exist, and then you could drop your "front."  In that hypothetical, your current position seems very not sensible.

Offline Masha

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1205
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #12 on: September 30, 2009, 04:11:36 PM »
Muck DeFuslims, it was a very touching story. I do hope very much that you have been written into the Book of Life (together with myself  :)).


That's pascal's wager, and it is faulty reasoning. After all, we must consider the odds. 50/50 chance there is a G-d, and if so, another 50/50 chance it isn't of the deistic variety. So there is a 25% chance that we need to be reverent of a divine for our own good. If that is the case, we again have a 50/50 question of whether there is a correct religion or not. If not, we can only speculate as to the correct course. If there is, then we have no cause to believe a particular faith is more likely to be correct. That is, the odds favor Judaism no more than Hinduism or Islam, or any of the thousands of other religions. Now, considering how many faiths regard rival doctrines as even worse than atheism/agnosticism, you are more likely to suffer a worse end by practicing any faith at all.

If you like film, I recommend very much Eric Rohmer's My Night with Maude. It's a French film from late 60ies or early 70ies that explores the topic of Pascal's wager from a very intelligent and philosophical perspective. Rohmer is a believing Catholic.

I can also relate to this story. I am a secular Jew. But I am a Zionist and believe in G-d and the Torah. I believe the prophecies will all come true. I believe that Israel should be a theocracy, and this is the only way it can prevail over its enemies. But I am non-observant because I find it very hard to reconcile Judaism with being a woman. I want to stand there and recite prayers with the men and not watch from teh gallery. I want to be able to become a yeshiva student and a rabbi (not officiating but interpreting the Torah). I am a scholar and thinker by inclination. I just can't accept the role that is allocated to women in Orthodox Judaism. And other Judaisms are fake. Also the idea of observing Judaism in diaspora feels fake. Every time I am in the temple, I feel like saying: "Liars, you are all liars. Don't pretend to be good Jews if you are not planning to go to Israel."

Well, I guess this posting hit a nerve.  :laugh:

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #13 on: September 30, 2009, 04:51:41 PM »
Masha,

Women can study Torah, there is no law against it. I know some Rebbetzins who are very, very knowledgable about Torah. Women and men are not the same and we should be able to accept our differences. There are things which a woman does which I am incapable of doing. There are mitzvahs a women has which a man cannot do. Each of us has special responsibilities. I know women who are very committed to Torah and Torah values. There is no point in wanting to be a man, just as there is no point in me {a man} wanting to be a woman.

There is always hope as long as one remembers where they come from and has the desire to do good in this world.

PS: The Jews were sent into Diaspora for a reason. There is no point in trying to question Hashems reason for this. While we all belong in Israel we still do much good in the world and we are working to bring Moshiach and the promises of eternal peace, the end of hunger, and bring Hashems shechina into this world.
You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #14 on: September 30, 2009, 05:13:51 PM »
Masha,

Women can study Torah, there is no law against it. I know some Rebbetzins who are very, very knowledgable about Torah. Women and men are not the same and we should be able to accept our differences. There are things which a woman does which I am incapable of doing. There are mitzvahs a women has which a man cannot do. Each of us has special responsibilities. I know women who are very committed to Torah and Torah values. There is no point in wanting to be a man, just as there is no point in me {a man} wanting to be a woman.

There is always hope as long as one remembers where they come from and has the desire to do good in this world.

PS: The Jews were sent into Diaspora for a reason. There is no point in trying to question Hashems reason for this. While we all belong in Israel we still do much good in the world and we are working to bring Moshiach and the promises of eternal peace, the end of hunger, and bring Hashems shechina into this world.


All this is true, but she basically said she wants to be a Torah scholar, not that she wants to be a man.   It just so happens that Torah scholarship was predominantly a man's role throughout the history of Judaism, while women did other things.   So I'm not sure you can say that she is trying to be like a man.   It just so happens that for most of history women weren't educated (in any culture).   So it's natural to expect that they cannot be the Torah scholars leading the Jewish people, if they don't even get a decent education.   But now that has changed and women are well-educated.    So perhaps there is room for them and room for this aspect of Judaism to change.    It's not like there is a halacha that says a woman shall not decide a halacha, or Only men shall be talmidei chachamim.   It just so happened that that is how things worked out due to circumstance, but who says its imperative?   I sympathize a lot with what Masha wrote.

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #15 on: September 30, 2009, 05:23:04 PM »
<snip>

All this is true, but she basically said she wants to be a Torah scholar, not that she wants to be a man.   It just so happens that Torah scholarship was predominantly a man's role throughout the history of Judaism, while women did other things.   So I'm not sure you can say that she is trying to be like a man.   It just so happens that for most of history women weren't educated (in any culture).   So it's natural to expect that they cannot be the Torah scholars leading the Jewish people, if they don't even get a decent education.   But now that has changed and women are well-educated.    So perhaps there is room for them and room for this aspect of Judaism to change.    It's not like there is a halacha that says a woman shall not decide a halacha, or Only men shall be talmidei chachamim.   It just so happened that that is how things worked out due to circumstance, but who says its imperative?   I sympathize a lot with what Masha wrote.

I also sympathize with her sentiment. I was trying to say that there is room for women to study. I do believe that there should be seperation between men and women during davening and I hope that is not an issue. My mother has an aversion to Judaism for this very reason also. I am very open-minded when it comes to these issues aside from my insistence on a mechitza. [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechitza ]
You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #16 on: September 30, 2009, 05:28:53 PM »
Right.   I was overlooking that part (about the davening).  I agree that there should be separation for davening.   Praying is a time to connect with G-d and not be distracted by women.   But maybe it can be made more accomodating so as to not feel like the women are in a second class seating or environment.    How, I don't know because I don't really know how they feel about it or in what way they think it's currently problematic.

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #17 on: September 30, 2009, 05:30:12 PM »
Masha, do you prefer shuls where there are two sections with a separation down the middle, and both men and women are standing but separately?   Is it just the balcony seating part of it that bothers you, or just being separate from men in general?

Offline Masha

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1205
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #18 on: September 30, 2009, 06:27:13 PM »
Masha, do you prefer shuls where there are two sections with a separation down the middle, and both men and women are standing but separately?   Is it just the balcony seating part of it that bothers you, or just being separate from men in general?

It's not the separation per se. I could accept separate synagogues for men and women, if they existed. I do understand the idea of modesty and the two sexes not being distracted during the service. I just want to have the same opportunities as men - standing at the front, wearing tallit and kippah, carrying the Torah, reciting prayers, etc. I could do it in a females-only synagogue (if they existed) - that's not a problem for me. I want to be able to be a Torah scholar, become a Talmid Haham and write authoritative opinions, just like men. That's what I want, I guess. This is what I would have been good at.

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #19 on: September 30, 2009, 06:53:38 PM »
Masha, do you prefer shuls where there are two sections with a separation down the middle, and both men and women are standing but separately?   Is it just the balcony seating part of it that bothers you, or just being separate from men in general?

It's not the separation per se. I could accept separate synagogues for men and women, if they existed. I do understand the idea of modesty and the two sexes not being distracted during the service. I just want to have the same opportunities as men - standing at the front, wearing tallit and kippah, carrying the Torah, reciting prayers, etc. I could do it in a females-only synagogue (if they existed) - that's not a problem for me. I want to be able to be a Torah scholar, become a Talmid Haham and write authoritative opinions, just like men. That's what I want, I guess. This is what I would have been good at.

Interesting.  Why wear a kippah?

Offline The One and Only Mo

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4963
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #20 on: September 30, 2009, 07:19:23 PM »


The same source (Torah) that says you're Jewish also commands you to observe everything else in the source. It's never too late. I've been shomer shabbos for a year now, so you never know. If you don't observe Torah, you are gambling on the afterlife, and it's always better to be on the safe side. You might have something inside of you that needs to be opened up.

That's pascal's wager, and it is faulty reasoning. After all, we must consider the odds. 50/50 chance there is a G-d, and if so, another 50/50 chance it isn't of the deistic variety. So there is a 25% chance that we need to be reverent of a divine for our own good. If that is the case, we again have a 50/50 question of whether there is a correct religion or not. If not, we can only speculate as to the correct course. If there is, then we have no cause to believe a particular faith is more likely to be correct. That is, the odds favor Judaism no more than Hinduism or Islam, or any of the thousands of other religions. Now, considering how many faiths regard rival doctrines as even worse than atheism/agnosticism, you are more likely to suffer a worse end by practicing any faith at all.

Of course, I say this as an Orthodox Jew turned Atheist. The statistical question is a logical calculation, and faith by definition is not reliant on logic, but on belief in the unverified.

I mean assuming you believe you're Jewish. If you don't believe in the existence of Judaism, then obviously there is nothing to talk about on that subject.

Offline secularkahanist

  • New JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #21 on: September 30, 2009, 07:21:23 PM »
But of course there is no imperitive for the 'Jewish State' to exist in the 'Holy Land' because as you are an atheist you don't believe anything is 'Holy'. So the Jewish state could be in Australia for all you care, so it seems. Also there is no reason to identify as a Jew because you are trying to destroy the Jewish faith, so what purpose is there in identifying as one.

Also you claim to believe in 'evil' which is very undefined if you have no belief in an ultimate being who is compassionate to the Jewish nation. Maybe the Muslims are right and the Jews are wrong... There is no right or wrong in a world without a creed, as is established with our Holy Torah which you outright rejected. Maybe your 'logical' thought would lead you to conclude that the Jewish nation is wrong and the Crusaders, or the Inquisitors, or the Muslims or Hitler was right. It is called Moral Relativism [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_relativism ] and it is very dangerous. This is what allows the Goldstone cretins to claim 'war crimes' against Israel while it acted with moral restraint in the Cast Lead operation almost a year ago. Moral Relativism is what is destroying America and American culture.

I am sorry but I have a difficult time understanding why someone would discredit their mother and father, their faith, and their people because you simply don't believe in the force which gives you life. You must have had a good upbringing and it is just sad. I have met so many good Orthodox Jews who have been Frum {Observant} from birth and they are very, very special people.

Once again... I hope that you realize, before the coming of Mashiach, that you belong to the Jewish nation and Hashem is what gives you your special features. We know that Hashem is very patient and he wants us all to receive rewards, both in this world, and in the next.


I believe I already spoke to your first point, but once again, I need not consider land or the founding of a state holy to support rebuilding the Jewish state inside its historical borders. As I said, there is nothing per say special about Israel that makes necessary we locate ourselves there. Still, given the HISTORIC connection and the time and resources INVESTED in developing it into a first world nation, I believe we have created due cause to be particular about keeping our state there rather than relocating to Australia.

If you claim that I have no reason to identify as a Jew, you either failed to read my previous post, or you willfully ignored its point. Essentially, I identify as Jewish in non-religious terms as a matter of pride and in the interest of combating anti-semitism. Believe it or not, there are many people who see value in a Jewish identity outside of its religious origins. I happen to be in that camp, and will therefore continue to identify myself as I presently do. I have no interest in destroying Judaism, even in religious terms. What other people wish to practice is their own business. And so long as I am free to not behave in accordance with religious Jewish standards, I have no reason to begrudge my neighbor the opportunity to obey Jewish law if he so chooses.

I am well aware of what moral relativism is, and equally aware that I essentially endorsed it. That is not so much because the outcomes thrill me, since as you pointed out, there are certain negatives that come from particular moral systems, but because nobody has yet been able to prove a particular moral code correct to me. I therefore take a libertarian approach to politics and morality. And largely speaking, this is preferable, for all of those instances of violence you cited came from people who were rather certain it was they, not their enemy, that was morally correct.

The problems in America come not from moral relativism but from a combination of religious fundamentalism, anti-market socialist economic tendencies, and overbearing nanny state that has forgotten its constitutional limitations, and an uneducated public that can't be motivated to fight against the aforementioned issues. None of that, insofar as I can tell, is an issue of morality, at least in the way you see to define it.

As to discrediting my parents, I'm not sure how I've managed that, as neither of them were ever, at any point, observant of Jewish law. Indeed, when I became an Orthodox Jew for a couple of years, it was the first time in three generations that a member of my family did more than go to temple a couple of times a year and avoid eating ham. Both of my parents are Atheists who respected my choice to become Orthodox, and later to abandon that. To discredit my faith, I would need to have one. Jewish law deems me Jewish, but I do not recognize it as a valid legal code, therefore meaning that I have no practical ties to it.

Finally, as to your divine invocations and what essentially amounts to a suggestion that I return to the faith, ignoring the fact that it is essentially an inviable proposition since I view religion generally as a negative force, I would point out that the fairly antagonistic tone you've taken doesn't do much in terms of compelling somebody such as myself to rejoin the faithful.



The same source (Torah) that says you're Jewish also commands you to observe everything else in the source. It's never too late. I've been shomer shabbos for a year now, so you never know. If you don't observe Torah, you are gambling on the afterlife, and it's always better to be on the safe side. You might have something inside of you that needs to be opened up.

That's pascal's wager, and it is faulty reasoning. After all, we must consider the odds. 50/50 chance there is a G-d, and if so, another 50/50 chance it isn't of the deistic variety. So there is a 25% chance that we need to be reverent of a divine for our own good. If that is the case, we again have a 50/50 question of whether there is a correct religion or not. If not, we can only speculate as to the correct course. If there is, then we have no cause to believe a particular faith is more likely to be correct. That is, the odds favor Judaism no more than Hinduism or Islam, or any of the thousands of other religions. Now, considering how many faiths regard rival doctrines as even worse than atheism/agnosticism, you are more likely to suffer a worse end by practicing any faith at all.

Of course, I say this as an Orthodox Jew turned Atheist. The statistical question is a logical calculation, and faith by definition is not reliant on logic, but on belief in the unverified.

Why do you impugn Pascal?   "Pascal's wager" is not faulty reasoning, it's an honest philosophical point.   Not saying that has to compel everyone to believe in G-d themselves, but I can't see how you can "disprove" something like that with math calculations.   It would seem that is missing the whole point of it.

Anyway, I do not agree with you that there is equal likelihood of all faiths being true.  THAT is faulty reasoning on your part. Torah is based on testimony of a group of people to a group experience.  You can say you don't believe it, but you cannot say its evidence is at equal weight with other hypothetical 'faiths' or religions.   It's a different kind of faith.  Skepticism allows one to disbelieve ad nauseum, even to disbelieve otherwise credible or reliable circumstantial evidence, for instance corroborated witnesses in a court of law.   Skepticism gives a person that freedom.  But that does not mean all things are equally uncertain.   A person would have to be very dogmatic to think that way.

I question Pascal because his wager is  a faulty one. It works when there are but two equally reasonable choices. But if many thousands exist, his conclusion loses all merit. And indeed his does, for your claim of a group experience in terms of religious testimony may just as fairly be applied to Islam and Christianity. So even then, we have at least three choices in terms of viable faiths if we accept the existence of the divine, and a final judgement by standards outlined in a major faith. Given that in any such tradition practicing the others is essentially a sentence for hell (or gehenom as the case may be), none is a more compelling wager than Atheism.

As to your point about certainty and lack thereof, it is true not all things are equally suspect. For instance, it is far more likely that Obama was born outside of the US than it is you'll contract AIDS without being sexually active, a drug abuser, or receiving a blood transfusion, as the former is reasonably probable and the latter essentially impossible. But in the context of our discussion, I am equally skeptical of all religions because I see no evidence that indicates I should feel otherwise.


 he said it was, "because the world still makes it an advantage not to be one. Thus it becomes a matter of pride...." As long as their is anti-Semitism, which exists in great measure today, I will stand tall and defend my heritage.


That seems rather vindictive.

Yet sensible...   That is, until antisemitism ceases to exist, and then you could drop your "front."  In that hypothetical, your current position seems very not sensible.

Anti-Semitism is a constant, thus rendering your point irrelevant. But that aside, I hardly consider it a front. I was born of Jewish parents, I have a reasonable grasp of Hebrew, I went to Jewish schools, I eat Jewish foods, I have taken college courses on Jewish history, and have by all accounts embraced the secular aspects of my heritage. I simply am not religious, and thus have no cause to tie myself to Judaism by that particular metric.

Offline Spectator

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1234
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #22 on: September 30, 2009, 07:22:24 PM »
Masha, do you prefer shuls where there are two sections with a separation down the middle, and both men and women are standing but separately?   Is it just the balcony seating part of it that bothers you, or just being separate from men in general?

It's not the separation per se. I could accept separate synagogues for men and women, if they existed. I do understand the idea of modesty and the two sexes not being distracted during the service. I just want to have the same opportunities as men - standing at the front, wearing tallit and kippah, carrying the Torah, reciting prayers, etc. I could do it in a females-only synagogue (if they existed) - that's not a problem for me. I want to be able to be a Torah scholar, become a Talmid Haham and write authoritative opinions, just like men. That's what I want, I guess. This is what I would have been good at.

This is indeed not an easy question. Here is the article that can give an insight into the role of woman in Judaism:
http://www.chabad.org/theJewishWoman/article_cdo/aid/376141/jewish/I-Am-Woman.htm
Do not put your trust in princes, nor in a son of man, in whom there is no help (Psalms 146:3)

Offline The One and Only Mo

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4963
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #23 on: September 30, 2009, 07:23:13 PM »


The same source (Torah) that says you're Jewish also commands you to observe everything else in the source. It's never too late. I've been shomer shabbos for a year now, so you never know. If you don't observe Torah, you are gambling on the afterlife, and it's always better to be on the safe side. You might have something inside of you that needs to be opened up.

That's pascal's wager, and it is faulty reasoning. After all, we must consider the odds. 50/50 chance there is a G-d, and if so, another 50/50 chance it isn't of the deistic variety. So there is a 25% chance that we need to be reverent of a divine for our own good. If that is the case, we again have a 50/50 question of whether there is a correct religion or not. If not, we can only speculate as to the correct course. If there is, then we have no cause to believe a particular faith is more likely to be correct. That is, the odds favor Judaism no more than Hinduism or Islam, or any of the thousands of other religions. Now, considering how many faiths regard rival doctrines as even worse than atheism/agnosticism, you are more likely to suffer a worse end by practicing any faith at all.

Of course, I say this as an Orthodox Jew turned Atheist. The statistical question is a logical calculation, and faith by definition is not reliant on logic, but on belief in the unverified.

This is a sad posting. Judaism is a faith which has much wisdom, much more than those 'other' religions. The prophecies of Torah have come true, unlike prophecies of 'other' religions. It is also sad that someone turns their back on Judaism, it is a way of rebellion against G-d. The Jewish people are special in G-ds eye. You have turned away and will have to deal with the judgment at the end of days.

I only hope that you do Teshuva and don't turn other Jews away from the faith because of your bad example.

PS: Hashem exists just as much as I exist, only his existence is much more real than my existence. The world would not exist if not for the creator. The world did not just happen out of chance.

And is is faulty 'logic' to believe that just because you turned away from Judaism that the nations will still not judge you as a Jew as much as you wish you weren't one...

And why would you consider yourself a Kahanist if you don't believe the Jewish people have a G-d mandated right to live in the Holy Land... It is incongruous to me.



Well, I would hope that as one who willingly identifies themselves in religious terms as Jewish that the faith to you is comparatively more rational and correct, as otherwise you'd have no cause to practice it. But that doesn't mean your claims are objectively valid. They aren't. Or, if they are, I'd ask that you prove them.

As to my Jewishness, I continue to identify myself publicly as a member of the tribe for the reasons stated by Professor Fred Lieberman in The Gentleman's Agreement. In response to the question of why he, being non-religious, would be open about his identity, he said it was, "because the world still makes it an advantage not to be one. Thus it becomes a matter of pride...." As long as their is anti-Semitism, which exists in great measure today, I will stand tall and defend my heritage. And I do see plenty of value in the non-religious bits of Jewish culture. For that matter, while I'm not at all a fan of the faith, I do admit its impact on world history is undeniable (though how positive a force it has been could be debated by reasonable men). With all that being said, I don't identify as religiously Jewish because I do not believe in G-d, or the sacred status of the Torah, and or anything else that would make such an identification appropriate. I am well aware that Jewish law prevents leaving the faith, and that if correct I'll be judged for my heresy. That is a risk I am willing to take, for I see no cause to believe.

I label myself as a Kahanist for the simple reason that, religious concerns aside, I believe his political aims were largely correct. I know enough about Islam from reading its sacred texts and studying its history to know that it is a force for evil that threatens the Jewish community and our homeland as long as it remains in our midst. Accordingly, I support population transfer and re-asserting the Jewish character of the State of Israel. And I realize that our Islamic neighbors have no desire for peace, and are not capable of it. Thus, I likewise agree with Kahane about land for peace schemes. Understand that many who supported the man were not Orthodox Jews, but were Atheists like I am, or practiced other faiths.

Supporting a Jewish homeland does not require that I be religious, but that I view Jews as a constituting a distinct nation as defined by the conventions of political science. And I do. Therefore, considering both that and the dangers of anti-Semitism found outside of Israel, I have ample cause to support a Jewish state. The location is not of critical importance per say, but our historic ties to the land and decades of work turning it from a desert swampland into an oasis, I am inclined to want to retain our present location. That requires dealing with the current problems of the land, which I believe are best solved by Kahanist foreign and security policy actions.

LOL, but the whole concept of Judaism comes from the Torah which comes from G-d. If there's no G-d, then there's no Torah, and no Jews.

Offline secularkahanist

  • New JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 22
Re: A Secular Jew's Yom Kippor Story
« Reply #24 on: September 30, 2009, 07:26:25 PM »


The same source (Torah) that says you're Jewish also commands you to observe everything else in the source. It's never too late. I've been shomer shabbos for a year now, so you never know. If you don't observe Torah, you are gambling on the afterlife, and it's always better to be on the safe side. You might have something inside of you that needs to be opened up.

That's pascal's wager, and it is faulty reasoning. After all, we must consider the odds. 50/50 chance there is a G-d, and if so, another 50/50 chance it isn't of the deistic variety. So there is a 25% chance that we need to be reverent of a divine for our own good. If that is the case, we again have a 50/50 question of whether there is a correct religion or not. If not, we can only speculate as to the correct course. If there is, then we have no cause to believe a particular faith is more likely to be correct. That is, the odds favor Judaism no more than Hinduism or Islam, or any of the thousands of other religions. Now, considering how many faiths regard rival doctrines as even worse than atheism/agnosticism, you are more likely to suffer a worse end by practicing any faith at all.

Of course, I say this as an Orthodox Jew turned Atheist. The statistical question is a logical calculation, and faith by definition is not reliant on logic, but on belief in the unverified.

This is a sad posting. Judaism is a faith which has much wisdom, much more than those 'other' religions. The prophecies of Torah have come true, unlike prophecies of 'other' religions. It is also sad that someone turns their back on Judaism, it is a way of rebellion against G-d. The Jewish people are special in G-ds eye. You have turned away and will have to deal with the judgment at the end of days.

I only hope that you do Teshuva and don't turn other Jews away from the faith because of your bad example.

PS: Hashem exists just as much as I exist, only his existence is much more real than my existence. The world would not exist if not for the creator. The world did not just happen out of chance.

And is is faulty 'logic' to believe that just because you turned away from Judaism that the nations will still not judge you as a Jew as much as you wish you weren't one...

And why would you consider yourself a Kahanist if you don't believe the Jewish people have a G-d mandated right to live in the Holy Land... It is incongruous to me.



Well, I would hope that as one who willingly identifies themselves in religious terms as Jewish that the faith to you is comparatively more rational and correct, as otherwise you'd have no cause to practice it. But that doesn't mean your claims are objectively valid. They aren't. Or, if they are, I'd ask that you prove them.

As to my Jewishness, I continue to identify myself publicly as a member of the tribe for the reasons stated by Professor Fred Lieberman in The Gentleman's Agreement. In response to the question of why he, being non-religious, would be open about his identity, he said it was, "because the world still makes it an advantage not to be one. Thus it becomes a matter of pride...." As long as their is anti-Semitism, which exists in great measure today, I will stand tall and defend my heritage. And I do see plenty of value in the non-religious bits of Jewish culture. For that matter, while I'm not at all a fan of the faith, I do admit its impact on world history is undeniable (though how positive a force it has been could be debated by reasonable men). With all that being said, I don't identify as religiously Jewish because I do not believe in G-d, or the sacred status of the Torah, and or anything else that would make such an identification appropriate. I am well aware that Jewish law prevents leaving the faith, and that if correct I'll be judged for my heresy. That is a risk I am willing to take, for I see no cause to believe.

I label myself as a Kahanist for the simple reason that, religious concerns aside, I believe his political aims were largely correct. I know enough about Islam from reading its sacred texts and studying its history to know that it is a force for evil that threatens the Jewish community and our homeland as long as it remains in our midst. Accordingly, I support population transfer and re-asserting the Jewish character of the State of Israel. And I realize that our Islamic neighbors have no desire for peace, and are not capable of it. Thus, I likewise agree with Kahane about land for peace schemes. Understand that many who supported the man were not Orthodox Jews, but were Atheists like I am, or practiced other faiths.

Supporting a Jewish homeland does not require that I be religious, but that I view Jews as a constituting a distinct nation as defined by the conventions of political science. And I do. Therefore, considering both that and the dangers of anti-Semitism found outside of Israel, I have ample cause to support a Jewish state. The location is not of critical importance per say, but our historic ties to the land and decades of work turning it from a desert swampland into an oasis, I am inclined to want to retain our present location. That requires dealing with the current problems of the land, which I believe are best solved by Kahanist foreign and security policy actions.

LOL, but the whole concept of Judaism comes from the Torah which comes from G-d. If there's no G-d, then there's no Torah, and no Jews.

I don't dispute that the origin of Jewish identity lies in religion. But cultures are not static. They evolve over time. And the Jewish people grew from a confederation of co-religionists into a developed nation with a distinct language, culture, ethnic identity, and genetic tendency. In other words, it has broadened in scope over time to include secular aspects that individuals like me can readily identify with and support.