I don't see what the problem is. I also think that Paul would be better than Obama. He would not meddle in Israel's business, and then phony leaders like Bibi would have no one to blame for his decisions but himself. Everyone would then see him exposed for the leftist that he is. I'm not sure why DTI has to be attacked for his opinion there.
The problem is supporting Ron Paul.
There's a tremendous difference between agreeing with Paul's domestic libertarian agenda and thinking that Paul's isolationist, anti-Israel policies would be good for America or Israel.
Again, we all agree that America shouldn't attempt to dictate policy to Israel or meddle in Israel's affairs -- but that doesn't mean that America should not support Israel or not be an ally of Israel.
But it gets very old having people come to this forum (which should be the most pro-Israel forum on the net) and profess support for an anti-semite, anti-Israel POS like Ron Paul, merely because they like his libertarian agenda or because he wouldn't be as bad as Obama.
This is not an attack on DTI. I'm sure he means well.
It's an attack on Ron Paul and an unequivocal statement that Paul's anti-semitic, anti-Israel, isolationist foreign policies would be disastrous in the fight against Islam and the well being of America and Israel.