Author Topic: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?  (Read 1122 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
Omar Hussein continues to bend over for islam in his latest move... Now all US security and defense documents will be edited to remove mention of Islamic Terror in its attempt to be politically correct....

IM SORRY BUT THIS IS INSANE!

If you pretend you don't know who the enemy is then how will you ever win? This is like making this country walk around like a blind man in the dark. We know who the enemy is!!! He has declared himself our enemy loudly and clearly. We cannot shut our eyes and pretend our enemy is not Islamic terrorists. Islamic terrorists are responsible for the latest attacks in Moscow and elsewhere in Russia. Islamic terrorists are killing every day in Iraq and in Afghanistan.

Is the president stupid or is he evil? I think it is clear now....


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/04/07/obama-bans-islam-jihad-national-security-strategy-document/?test=latestnews

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama's advisers will remove religious terms such as "Islamic extremism" from the central document outlining the U.S. national security strategy and will use the rewritten document to emphasize that the United States does not view Muslim nations through the lens of terror, counterterrorism officials said.

The change is a significant shift in the National Security Strategy, a document that previously outlined the Bush Doctrine of preventative war and currently states: "The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century."

The officials described the changes on condition of anonymity because the document still was being written, and the White House would not discuss it. But rewriting the strategy document will be the latest example of Obama putting his stamp on U.S. foreign policy, like his promises to dismantle nuclear weapons and limit the situations in which they can be used.

The revisions are part of a larger effort about which the White House talks openly, one that seeks to change not just how the United States talks to Muslim nations, but also what it talks to them about, from health care and science to business startups and education.

That shift away from terrorism has been building for a year, since Obama went to Cairo, Egypt, and promised a "new beginning" in the relationship between the United States and the Muslim world. The White House believes the previous administration based that relationship entirely on fighting terror and winning the war of ideas.

"You take a country where the overwhelming majority are not going to become terrorists, and you go in and say, 'We're building you a hospital so you don't become terrorists.' That doesn't make much sense," said National Security Council staffer Pradeep Ramamurthy.

Ramamurthy runs the administration's Global Engagement Directorate, a four-person National Security Council team that Obama launched last May with little fanfare and a vague mission to use diplomacy and outreach "in pursuit of a host of national security objectives."

Since then, the division has not only helped change the vocabulary of fighting terror but also has shaped the way the country invests in Muslim businesses, studies global warming, supports scientific research and combats polio.

Before diplomats go abroad, they hear from the Ramamurthy or his deputy, Jenny Urizar. When officials from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration returned from Indonesia, the NSC got a rundown about research opportunities on global warming.

Ramamurthy maintains a database of interviews conducted by 50 U.S. embassies worldwide. And business leaders from more than 40 countries head to Washington this month for an "entrepreneurship summit" for Muslim businesses.

"Do you want to think about the U.S. as the nation that fights terrorism or the nation you want to do business with?" Ramamurthy said.

To deliver that message, Obama's speechwriters have taken inspiration from an unlikely source: former President Ronald Reagan. Visiting communist China in 1984, Reagan spoke to Fudan University in Shanghai about education, space exploration and scientific research.

He discussed freedom and liberty. He never mentioned communism or democracy.

"They didn't look up to the U.S. because we hated communism," said Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes, Obama's foreign policy speechwriter.

Like Reagan in China, Obama in Cairo made only passing references to terrorism. Instead he focused on cooperation. He announced the United States would team up to fight polio with the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, a multinational body based in Saudi Arabia.

The United States and the OIC had worked together before, but never with that focus.

"President Obama saw it as an opportunity to say, `We work on things far beyond the war on terrorism,"' said World Health Organization spokeswoman Sona Bari.

Polio is endemic in three Muslim countries -- Nigeria, Pakistan and Afghanistan -- but some Muslim leaders have been suspicious of vaccination efforts, which they believed to be part of a CIA sterilization campaign. Last year, the OIC and religious scholars at the International Islamic Fiqh Academy issued a fatwa, or religious decree, that parents should have their children vaccinated.

"We're probably entering into a whole new level of engagement between the OIC and the polio program because of the stimulus coming from the U.S. government," said Michael Galway, who works on polio eradication for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

The Centers for Disease Control also began working more closely with local Islamic leaders in northern Nigeria, a network that had been overlooked for years, said John Fitzsimmons, the deputy director of the CDC's immunization division.

Though health officials are reluctant to assign credit to any one action, new polio cases in Nigeria fell from 83 during the first quarter of last year to just one so far this year, Fitzsimmons said.

Public opinion polls also showed consistent improvement in U.S. sentiment within the Muslim world last year, although the viewpoints are still overwhelmingly negative, however.

Obama did not invent Muslim outreach. President George W. Bush gave the White House its first Quran, hosted its first Iftar dinner to celebrate Ramadan, and loudly stated support for Muslim democracies like Turkey.

But the Bush administration struggled with its rhetoric. Muslims criticized him for describing the war against terror as a "crusade" and labeling the invasion of Afghanistan "Operation Infinite Justice" -- words that were seen as religious. He regularly identified America's enemy as "Islamic extremists" and "radical jihadists."

Karen Hughes, a Bush confidant who served as his top diplomat to the Muslim world in his second term, urged the White House to stop.

"I did recommend that, in my judgment, it's unfortunate because of the way it's heard. We ought to avoid the language of religion," Hughes said. "Whenever they hear 'Islamic extremism, Islamic jihad, Islamic fundamentalism,' they perceive it as a sort of an attack on their faith. That's the world view Osama bin Laden wants them to have."

Hughes and Juan Zarate, Bush's former deputy national security adviser, said Obama's efforts build on groundwork from Bush's second term, when some of the rhetoric softened. But by then, Zarate said, it was overshadowed by the Guantanamo Bay detention center, the abuses at Abu Ghraib prison and a prolonged Iraq war.

"In some ways, it didn't matter what the president did or said. People weren't going to be listening to him in the way we wanted them to," Zarate said. "The difference is, President Obama had a fresh start."

Obama's foreign policy posture is not without political risk. Even as Obama steps up airstrikes on terrorists abroad, he has proven vulnerable to Republican criticism on security issues at home, such as the failed Christmas Day airline bombing and the announced-then-withdrawn plan to prosecute 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in New York.

Peter Feaver, a Duke University political scientist and former Bush adviser, is skeptical of Obama's engagement effort. It "doesn't appear to have created much in the way of strategic benefit" in the Middle East peace process or in negotiations over Iran's nuclear ambitions, he said.

Obama runs the political risk of seeming to adopt politically correct rhetoric abroad while appearing tone deaf on national security issues at home, Feaver said.

The White House dismisses such criticism. In June, Obama will travel to Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim country, and is expected to revisit many of the themes of his Cairo speech.

"This is the long-range direction we need to go in," Ramamurthy said.
You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline Ulli

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10946
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #1 on: April 07, 2010, 01:30:31 AM »
Yes Muman, you are right.

This renaming of things with euphemisms makes no sense. The nature of a thing is not touched by a new name. In opposite the name changes it's meaning quickly after the nature.

Remember the term "Asian" the police uses in GB after attacks to hide the fact that the perpetrators are Muslims.

Today every Britain knows that if Asian appears in an article Muslims are meant.

The same with the terms: "Südländer" = "Man from southern lands" in Germany.

If now Obama wants to please the Muslims with newspeak it will not work. I read an article before over ten years in the FAZ. It dealt with this renaming of things and came to the conclusion that it is nonsense because of the reasons I mentioned abouve.

 :)

"Cities run by progressives don't know how to police. ... Thirty cities went up last night, I went and looked at every one of them. Every one of them has a progressive Democratic mayor." Rudolph Giuliani

Offline Spiraling Leopard

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5423
  • Eternal Vigilance
    • PIGtube-channel:
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #2 on: April 07, 2010, 01:47:00 AM »
Where's Oswald when you need him?

Offline Ulli

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10946
"Cities run by progressives don't know how to police. ... Thirty cities went up last night, I went and looked at every one of them. Every one of them has a progressive Democratic mayor." Rudolph Giuliani

Offline syyuge

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 7684
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #4 on: April 07, 2010, 03:14:29 AM »
I think this is the most subtle way in which the :beast: has inadvertently requested the Hashem for complete elimination of the muslamic terrorism. :camel:
There are thunders and sparks in the skies, because Faraday invented the electricity.

Offline mord

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25853
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #5 on: April 07, 2010, 06:26:02 AM »
LOL Osama high yellow husseini is a muzzie swine everyone know that already
Thy destroyers and they that make thee waste shall go forth of thee.  Isaiah 49:17

 
Shot at 2010-01-03

Offline Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23384
  • Real Kahanist
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #6 on: April 07, 2010, 06:54:09 AM »
Big surprise. The real surprise isn't that the negro-in-chief wants to avoid associating Islam with terrorism, but that most of the public is going along with this nonsense.

Offline arksis

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2150
  • Dawn
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #7 on: April 07, 2010, 07:26:46 AM »
This phony president is both stupid AND evil! Muzzies will ALWAYS be our enemy and I make that clear to everyone I talk to. >:( This is the ONLY way to deal with them. :nuke:
---Never, ever deal with terrorists. Hunt them down and, more important, mercilessly punish those states and groups that fund, arm, support, or simply allow their territories to be used by the terrorists with impunity.
Meir Kahane

Online angryChineseKahanist

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 10532
  • ☭=卐=☮
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #8 on: April 07, 2010, 08:03:38 AM »

What the hell should we call islamic terrorists now?
How about international civil rights activists?


U+262d=U+5350=U+9774

Offline syyuge

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 7684
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #9 on: April 07, 2010, 08:22:44 AM »
Promises to dismantle nuclear weapons and limit the situations in which they can be used can also be interpreted as them not being used against muslamic terrorism.

So camel survives the nuke.
There are thunders and sparks in the skies, because Faraday invented the electricity.

Offline New Yorker

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 2694
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #10 on: April 07, 2010, 12:49:25 PM »
...

IM SORRY BUT THIS IS INSANE!

...


I've lost track of all the INSANE things that this communist administration has pushed through. Government takeover of public companies, not calling muslim terrorists muslim terrorists, the "President" literally bowing to foreign leaders, allowing gays into the military, communist takeover of healthcare, cap and tax based on the global warming con, it goes on and on...

Can't wait for the 2012 election!
944 days until the OBAMANATION is OUT!
« Last Edit: April 07, 2010, 01:11:28 PM by New Yorker »
Nuke the arabs till they glow, then shoot them in the dark.

Offline Rubystars

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 18298
  • Extreme MAGA Republican
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #11 on: April 07, 2010, 12:58:45 PM »
We can just call the Muslims pedophiles then.

Online angryChineseKahanist

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 10532
  • ☭=卐=☮
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #12 on: April 07, 2010, 02:06:13 PM »
We can just call the Muslims pedophiles then.

What?? And offend Muslims?
U+262d=U+5350=U+9774

Offline MassuhDGoodName

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4542
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #13 on: April 07, 2010, 04:26:52 PM »
This latest O Hussein ban is just one more step he is using to overthrow America.

It is one of oldest tricks in the Communist handbook:

In order to more quickly expedite total authoritarianism, Marxists activists wage a "two front" assault against the electorate/citizenry -- The first assault is "from the top down", proclaiming outlandish and insane policy proclamations one after another in rapid fire succession.

This is always accompanied by its companion tactic --  a relentless series of assaults "from the bottom up" by "grass roots groups",  "movements", and "coalitions", such as ACORN, CAIR, Black Panther Party, GLBT...the list is endless.

When utilized together, they purpose to completely debilitate and exhaust a citizenry's moral judgement and political will.

Using this exact playbook, Communists have subverted and overthrown governments and societies across the globe since 1918.

*In my humble opinion, there will be no help forthcoming from the "Republican Party", should they win the November elections by a landslide.  This is because their platform differs so little from the Democrats as to be laughable.  Both Republicans and Democrats support the following policies:

1 - Fighting endless and unsustainable wars abroad while
2 - using the "war of terror" as an excuse for destroying The Constitution and Bill of
     Rights at home
3 - socialist medicine, educational, and housing schemes
4 - increased taxation and increased regulation
5 - unlimited invasion by illegal aliens, followed by complete and total amnesty
6 - increasing the size and power of the Federal government
7 - consolidation of business corporations into supra-national "sub-states" with no
     allegiances governments or borders
8 - the use of "outsourcing of labor", which is really a code word for a new form of   
     "International Feudalism", whereby employment is cheap, temporary, and given
      to whomever works the quickest, cheapest, and without benefits or rights

Offline TruthSpreader

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8753
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/WeThePeopleZeb
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #14 on: April 07, 2010, 04:40:32 PM »
This doesn't surprise me at all. You mean we cannot associate Islam with terrorism? That's PC for ya.
Dan - Stay calm and be brave in order to judge correctly and make the right decision

Offline HiWarp

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1867
Re: Obama bans use of the term islamic terrorism, who is the enemy?
« Reply #15 on: April 08, 2010, 06:17:33 AM »
This latest O Hussein ban is just one more step he is using to overthrow America.

It is one of oldest tricks in the Communist handbook:

In order to more quickly expedite total authoritarianism, Marxists activists wage a "two front" assault against the electorate/citizenry -- The first assault is "from the top down", proclaiming outlandish and insane policy proclamations one after another in rapid fire succession.

This is always accompanied by its companion tactic --  a relentless series of assaults "from the bottom up" by "grass roots groups",  "movements", and "coalitions", such as ACORN, CAIR, Black Panther Party, GLBT...the list is endless.

When utilized together, they purpose to completely debilitate and exhaust a citizenry's moral judgement and political will.

Using this exact playbook, Communists have subverted and overthrown governments and societies across the globe since 1918.

*In my humble opinion, there will be no help forthcoming from the "Republican Party", should they win the November elections by a landslide.  This is because their platform differs so little from the Democrats as to be laughable.  Both Republicans and Democrats support the following policies:

1 - Fighting endless and unsustainable wars abroad while
2 - using the "war of terror" as an excuse for destroying The Constitution and Bill of
     Rights at home
3 - socialist medicine, educational, and housing schemes
4 - increased taxation and increased regulation
5 - unlimited invasion by illegal aliens, followed by complete and total amnesty
6 - increasing the size and power of the Federal government
7 - consolidation of business corporations into supra-national "sub-states" with no
     allegiances governments or borders
8 - the use of "outsourcing of labor", which is really a code word for a new form of   
     "International Feudalism", whereby employment is cheap, temporary, and given
      to whomever works the quickest, cheapest, and without benefits or rights

Thank you MassuhDGoodName. I couldn't have said it any better.

This is why I'm not particularly enthusiastic about the November elections and potential losses by the Democrats. To what end? So instead of the Democrats' Marxist/Socialist agenda we will have the Republicans' Socialist Lite agenda?

As long as the American public is hell bent on retaining the two-party sideshow that we currently have, this country is doomed.

As far as the question posed in the subject of this thread is concerned, the answer is simple. Since the use of such terms as Jewish right-wing extremists and Christian right-wing militias by the media and the government is perfectly fine, the enemy is you!
"When the people fear their government, there is tyranny;
when the government fears the people, there is liberty.”
---Thomas Jefferson