judeanoncapta, as you've raised the issue, bring it, prove that Christianity is wrong from your knowledge of Hebrew and the tanakh.
Here we go. There are plenty of examples but I will start with one of the most important ones to Christianity. Isaiah 7:14.
Here is how the King James translates it.
14Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
Sounds pretty good for christianity. G-d is showing us a sign. A virgin birth and the child is called Immanuel which means G-d is with us.
Perfect!!!!
Not quite.
King James mistranslates two key words “a virgin”. The word for a virgin in Hebrew is Bethulah. The words actually used in this verse are HaAlmah. This means THE young woman. Before you say that young woman and virgin are the synonymous, look at Proverbs 30:19. I’ll quote the verse before and the verse after for the sake of context.
18 There are three things which are too wonderful for me, yea, four which I know not:
19 The way of an eagle in the air; the way of a serpent upon a rock; {N}
the way of a ship in the midst of the sea; and the way of a man with a young woman.
20 So is the way of an adulterous woman; {N}
she eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith: 'I have done no wickedness.'
The young woman word here is again Almah. The same word from Isaiah 7:14. Quoted in a sexual context as in the way of a man with a young woman. So is the way of an adulterous woman. Obviously Almah is not synonymous with virgin.
Now before I said the King James mistranslated two words. Turning the young woman into a virgin. Well, what is the word “the” doing there. If it is a woman 6 or 7 hundred years in the future as Christianity believes, the specificity of “the” would be a problem, so King James deletes “the” and replaces it with “a”.
So, why is the “the” in there?
Because “the woman” is the wife of Ahaz.
Let’s look at the full context line by line:
1 And it came to pass in the days of Ahaz the son of Jotham, the son of Uzziah, king of Judah, that Rezin the king of Aram, and Pekah the son of Remaliah, king of Israel, went up to Jerusalem to war against it; but could not prevail against it.
I think we can see the picture here. Israel was split into two kingdoms, Judah and Israel. Ahaz was king of Judah and Pekah was king of Israel. Pekah hooks up with Rezin king of Aram to attack Judah kingdom which is based in Jerusalem.
2 And it was told the house of David, saying: 'Aram is confederate with Ephraim.' And his heart was moved, and the heart of his people, as the trees of the forest are moved with the wind.
Ephraim was the largest of the tribes of the Kingdom of Israel and therefore is used euphemistically as Israel. And the house of David ie. King Ahaz was frightened of them and so were the people of Judah.
3 Then said the LORD unto Isaiah: 'Go forth now to meet Ahaz, thou, and Shear-jashub thy son, at the end of the conduit of the upper pool, in the highway of the fullers' field;
Ok, Isaiah goes to meet Ahaz as G-d tells him. He goes with his son Shear Jashub. This is more very important context. Shear Jashub means “a remnant will return.” This is our first example of a child’s name being a symbol of things to come. Symbolic of prophetic happenings. This is used a lot in Hosea and in the next couple of chapters of Isaiah as we will see.
4 and say unto him: Keep calm, and be quiet; fear not, neither let thy heart be faint, because of these two tails of smoking firebrands, for the fierce anger of Rezin and Aram, and of the son of Remaliah.
Simple. Don’t be afraid of Rezin king of Aram and Pekah son of Remaliah king of Israel.
5 Because Aram hath counselled evil against thee, Ephraim also, and the son of Remaliah, saying: 6 Let us go up against Judah, and vex it, and let us make a breach therein for us, and set up a king in the midst of it, even the son of Tabeel.
Simple. Aram and Israel want to attack and take over Judah and set up a puppet government run by a lackey of theirs “the son of Tabeel”.
7 thus saith the Lord GOD: It shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass.
A prophecy that Rezin and Pekah will not succeed in their plan.
8 For the head of Aram is Damascus, and the head of Damascus is Rezin; and within threescore and five years shall Ephraim be broken, that it be not a people; 9 And the head of Ephraim is Samaria, and the head of Samaria is Remaliah's son. If ye will not have faith, surely ye shall not be established.'
A little terse. But you can get the basic point that Ephraim, meaning Israel will cease to be a people ie. the Ten Lost Tribes will be lost as they still are.
10 And the LORD spoke again unto Ahaz, saying: 11 'Ask thee a sign of the LORD thy God: ask it either in the depth, or in the height above.'
G-d speaking through Isaiah tells Ahaz to request a sign from him.
12 But Ahaz said: 'I will not ask, neither will I try the LORD.'
Ahaz suddenly become very faithful and decides he doesn’t want to trouble G-d with providing him a sign.
13 And he said: 'Hear ye now, O house of David: Is it a small thing for you to weary men, that ye will weary my God also?
Isaiah says not only do you “weary men” meaning reject prophetic sayings, but now you “weary my God also”. Meaning you reject G-d willingness to provide a sign for you.
14 Therefore the Lord Himself shall give you a sign: behold, the young woman shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
If this is referring to a woman 6 or 7 hundred years in the future as the New Testament maintains, it is a completely useless sign for Ahaz to request. He would be dead for six hundred years before the sign would materialize.
No, the young woman is the wife of Ahaz and Immanuel would be the name of his son.
15 Curd and honey shall he eat, when he knoweth to refuse the evil, and choose the good.
He, the prince will eat expensive nice food like Curd and honey when he knows to refuse evil and choose good. Basically around the time he begins to speak. As we will see in Isaiah 8:4.
16 Yea, before the child shall know to refuse the evil, and choose the good, the land whose two kings thou hast a horror of shall be forsaken.
So, the sign is that before the child reaches this age where he begins to speak and knows to refuse evil and choose good, The land of Aram and Israel will be forsaken.
17 The LORD shall bring upon thee, and upon thy people, and upon thy father's house, days that have not come, from the day that Ephraim departed from Judah; even the king of Assyria.'
This is the prophecy that the king of Assyria will destroy Ephraim, which is exactly what happened.
18 And it shall come to pass in that day, that the LORD shall hiss for the fly that is in the uttermost part of the rivers of Egypt, and for the bee that is in the land of Assyria.
The Bee of Assyria and the Fly of Egypt are a reference to the way that the armies will swarm in like bees and flies. That is the metaphor.
19 And they shall come, and shall rest all of them in the rugged valleys, and in the holes of the rocks, and upon all thorns, and upon all brambles.
When these armies come, the people of the Kingdom of Israel will be hiding in rugged valleys and holes in rocks from fear.
20 In that day shall the Lord shave with a razor that is hired in the parts beyond the River, even with the king of Assyria, the head and the hair of the feet; and it shall also sweep away the beard. {P}
The shaving metaphor is one of destruction and humiliation for the kingdom of Israel.
Now let’s move on to Chapter 8:
1 And the LORD said unto me: 'Take thee a great tablet, and write upon it in common script: The spoil speedeth, the prey hasteth;
Which in Hebrew is Maher-shalal-hashbaz.
2 and I will take unto Me faithful witnesses to record, Uriah the priest, and Zechariah the son of Jeberechiah.'
Two witnesses as it says in the Torah, Bishnaim o sheloshah edim yaqum davar. With two or three witnesses shall a matter be established. For some reason this prophecy had to be witnessed. I’m don’t know exactly why. I don’t know everything.
3 And I went unto the prophetess; and she conceived, and bore a son.
The prophetess means Isaiah’s wife. Now G-d is going to tell Isaiah to name his son a prophetic symbol.
Then said the LORD unto me: 'Call his name Maher-shalal-hashbaz.
Which means “The spoil speedeth, the prey hasteth”, as it says in verse 1.
Remember the context and understand how it relates to the name Immanuel. Immanuel is one of three children’s names mentioned in Chapter 7 and 8 OF Isaiah that are prophetic symbols, Shear-Jashub(Isaiah’s first son mentioned which means “a remnant will return”), Immanuel(Ahaz’s son, meaning G-d is with us) and Maher-halal-hashbaz(Isaiah’s second son mentioned, The spoil speedeth, the prey hasteth) With this context and with the overall context of the story, you will see that Immanuel G-d is with us, means G-d is with us, the Kingdom of Judah against the Kingdom of Israel and Aram.
Not, G-d forbid to say that G-d took a physical form and is now with us, walking around on the earth with us, as Christianity maintains. But in the way that is repeated all throughout the Torah and Prophets, that G-d is with us and is helping us against our enemies.
4 For before the child shall have knowledge to cry: My father, and: My mother, the riches of Damascus and the spoil of Samaria shall be carried away before the king of Assyria.'
Like I said before the sign is that before the child can speak and say “Mommy” and “Daddy”, Assyria will destroy and plunder Aram and Israel. The sign of Immanuel is repeated here with Maher-halal-hashbaz. The same exact sign is repeated here. That is clear.
5 And the LORD spoke unto me yet again, saying: 6 Forasmuch as this people hath refused the waters of Shiloah that go softly, and rejoiceth with Rezin and Remaliah's son;
Those who support Rezin and Pekah will receive the following fate:
7 Now therefore, behold, the Lord bringeth up upon them the waters of the River, mighty and many, even the king of Assyria and all his glory; and he shall come up over all his channels, and go over all his banks;
The River metaphor is used for the King of Assyria and his army FLOODING the lands of Israel and Aram.
8 And he shall sweep through Judah overflowing as he passeth through he shall reach even to the neck; and the stretching out of his wings shall fill the breadth of thy land, O Immanuel.
The King of Assyria will sweep into Judah “reaching even to the neck”. Get the metaphor? The “flood” of Assyria will reach Judah’s neck, but Judah will not be destroyed by the Assyrians. This is what actually happened in the days of Hezekiah. Assyria laid siege on Jerusalem and were destroyed by a miracle. The Assyrian army woke up dead one morning.
But look how the verse ends “Oh Immanuel”. Speak euphemistically to the yet unborn boy about the events that his name arose for.
In conclusion, the sign is not a virgin birth. It is that the events prophecied will happen so quickly that the child won’t even learn how to speak before it happens. That is the sign.
The idea that it’s talking about a child born 6 or 7 hundred years after all of the events that the sign is meant to signify, is COMPLETELY WRONG. Any honest person can see that.
I have many more examples of mistranslated and misinterpreted verses that the New Testament uses. But I chose to start with this one for it’s obvious importance. After you’re done digesting this one, we can move on to Zachariah 12,13 Psalm 22, 110 etc. If you have anything you want to challenge me on, write me a personal message and we can go over all of it together.