Why do Syrian Jews hate converts so much?

[muman613]

what is your point? i am sure that if a great scientist today would claim that the arabs are sub human you wouldn't mind that.or pehaps you will go and dfened the arabs with dr. bernnan fan

Hmm.  What does this comment mean exactly?   

And you say "you wouldn't mind" "or perhaps you will go defend the Arabs"

That's like saying "you'll say yes, or you'll say no."  I'm not sure what point you are trying to make to Muman (or how it's relevant to the discussion).


Muman points out that indeed biases existed amongst scientists in the so-called "pure" era you refer to.  Are you suggesting that believing Jews are subhuman is not inherently incorrect (and therefore it is merely the product of a bias)?  Or are you saying something else?

KWRBT,

You have not experienced normal atheist. This specimen is a Jewish White Nationalist who has some of the wildest racist theories... Dont even get involved...

[Ben m]

what is your point? i am sure that if a great scientist today would claim that the arabs are sub human you wouldn't mind that.or pehaps you will go and dfened the arabs with dr. bernnan fan

Hmm.  What does this comment mean exactly?   

And you say "you wouldn't mind" "or perhaps you will go defend the Arabs"

That's like saying "you'll say yes, or you'll say no."  I'm not sure what point you are trying to make to Muman (or how it's relevant to the discussion).


Muman points out that indeed biases existed amongst scientists in the so-called "pure" era you refer to.  Are you suggesting that believing Jews are subhuman is not inherently incorrect (and therefore it is merely the product of a bias)?  Or are you saying something else?

KWRBT,

You have not experienced normal atheist. This specimen is a Jewish White Nationalist who has some of the wildest racist theories... Dont even get involved...

so you are against wn? perhaps you hate the white race? if so what are you doing in the forum?

[Ben m]

oh almost forgot.and pehaps you are supporting this guy?

[Chai]

I am saying, and there is ample evidence, that Nazi scientists were considered some of the most brilliant scientists of the era.

Now you're saying something different.  But by referring to German scientists as "nazi scientists," you conflate different issues.  Not all German scientists were Nazis.  In fact, some of the greatest German scientists of that era, who transformed the entire modern world, were Jews!

There is no disputing that the german scientists were and still are respected around the world as some of the best and brightest of scientists... 

Good so far

And these were scientists who may have been involved with using Jews in horrible experiments. 

  Now you've entered into unsubstantiated territory with this last bit.  You cannot document this with a citation or source because it is patently ridiculous!   The German scientists who are praised are the ones who did good science!   Horrific and sadistic experiments on humans for racial purposes is not considered "good science" by anyone except maybe neo-nazis.  No one holds dr. mengele in high esteem as a researcher.  He was moreso a horrificly cruel sadistic animal than a scientist by any rational account.  It is time you stop labeling the entire discipline of science as the boogeyman. 


Bringing a quote about operation paperclip says something about the CIA, not about "modern science."

KWRBT,

I am not making any statement about good science in my posts... I was simply trying to show, originally to NA who was attempting to use some scientific racial evidence..

"actually the 19th century reaserches are the best beacuse they weren't contaminated by politically correct bias."

I wanted to make clear that just because 'science' occured in the 19th and 20th centuries that it too may be biased for a variety of reasons. Most obvious was the use of 'science' by the Nazis to brand Jews as sub-humans and psuedo-genetics which proved Jews to be inferior..



 

Again. There is such a thing as a poor research. .old. .done in a bad school. Biased. Bad Dr.etc etc didn't see anything good

 

N

actually the 19th century reaserches are the best beacuse they weren't contaminated by politically correct bias.

what is your point? i am sure that if a great scientist today would claim that the arabs are sub human you wouldn't mind that.or pehaps you will go and dfened the arabs with dr. bernnan fan

Well no actually I would disagree the problem is Islam not the semetic race all the greatest jews from Abraham to Daniel Nd ezikel were semetic. Oh yea ur an athiest. Ur not really pro Jewish from your handle u think we r nuts for believing the Seasplit in Exodus. .we aren't racist..but you are

[Ben m]

I am saying, and there is ample evidence, that Nazi scientists were considered some of the most brilliant scientists of the era.

Now you're saying something different.  But by referring to German scientists as "nazi scientists," you conflate different issues.  Not all German scientists were Nazis.  In fact, some of the greatest German scientists of that era, who transformed the entire modern world, were Jews!

There is no disputing that the german scientists were and still are respected around the world as some of the best and brightest of scientists... 

Good so far

And these were scientists who may have been involved with using Jews in horrible experiments. 

  Now you've entered into unsubstantiated territory with this last bit.  You cannot document this with a citation or source because it is patently ridiculous!   The German scientists who are praised are the ones who did good science!   Horrific and sadistic experiments on humans for racial purposes is not considered "good science" by anyone except maybe neo-nazis.  No one holds dr. mengele in high esteem as a researcher.  He was moreso a horrificly cruel sadistic animal than a scientist by any rational account.  It is time you stop labeling the entire discipline of science as the boogeyman. 


Bringing a quote about operation paperclip says something about the CIA, not about "modern science."

KWRBT,

I am not making any statement about good science in my posts... I was simply trying to show, originally to NA who was attempting to use some scientific racial evidence..

"actually the 19th century reaserches are the best beacuse they weren't contaminated by politically correct bias."

I wanted to make clear that just because 'science' occured in the 19th and 20th centuries that it too may be biased for a variety of reasons. Most obvious was the use of 'science' by the Nazis to brand Jews as sub-humans and psuedo-genetics which proved Jews to be inferior..



 

Again. There is such a thing as a poor research. .old. .done in a bad school. Biased. Bad Dr.etc etc didn't see anything good

 

N

actually the 19th century reaserches are the best beacuse they weren't contaminated by politically correct bias.

what is your point? i am sure that if a great scientist today would claim that the arabs are sub human you wouldn't mind that.or pehaps you will go and dfened the arabs with dr. bernnan fan

Well no actually I would disagree the problem is Islam not the semetic race all the greatest jews from Abraham to Daniel Nd ezikel were semetic. Oh yea ur an athiest. Ur not really pro Jewish from your handle u think we r nuts for believing the Seasplit in Exodus. .we aren't racist..but you are

i am nuts? at least i didn't defended any arab or negroes like some of us did.

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

what is your point? i am sure that if a great scientist today would claim that the arabs are sub human you wouldn't mind that.or pehaps you will go and dfened the arabs with dr. bernnan fan

Hmm.  What does this comment mean exactly?   

And you say "you wouldn't mind" "or perhaps you will go defend the Arabs"

That's like saying "you'll say yes, or you'll say no."  I'm not sure what point you are trying to make to Muman (or how it's relevant to the discussion).


Muman points out that indeed biases existed amongst scientists in the so-called "pure" era you refer to.  Are you suggesting that believing Jews are subhuman is not inherently incorrect (and therefore it is merely the product of a bias)?  Or are you saying something else?

KWRBT,

You have not experienced normal atheist. This specimen is a Jewish White Nationalist who has some of the wildest racist theories... Dont even get involved...

Now I understand especially seeing the rest of the thread. Thanks, Muman.