Author Topic: What do you think of Ron Paul? (Read 18865 times)

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #25 on:** May 16, 2007, 01:17:53 AM »

So, Hitler voiced his opinions too...

Trumpeldor · « **Reply #26 on:** May 16, 2007, 01:18:26 AM »

I hate Ron Paul.

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #27 on:** May 16, 2007, 01:27:25 AM »

I hate all Nazi fags and dykes.

MarZutra · « **Reply #28 on:** May 16, 2007, 08:50:21 AM »

Is Ron Paul Right wing or Left Wing? My liking for Paul comes not from his views towards Jews but from what I read about him being a Constitutionalist. America needs one that will sincerely try to reverse the last 60+ years of elitist/socialist federal expansionism and undermining of the Constitution. I have said that the comments you have shown concerning Ron Paul and Jews are new to me. Can he be any worse than what is in power in Israel or the Clintons in all honesty? They are all charrah and are not friends of the Jewish people. I'd argue the contra. I guess we will have to agree to disagree.

If Ron Paul is a "Right Wing" individual it is impossible for him to be a Nazi. An antisemite yes but not a Nazi as Nazism is ultra-Leftwing political/social ideology...this is what is confusing me....

You make a great point that "Hitler voiced his opinion too"....that is exactly my point. Someone like Hitler, could have been dealt with long before he took power solely due to his voiceing his views while the Clinton and Abbas's of this World publically praise while attack in private.

The fact of the matter is, it is all one big sham. There is no choice. Hunter will not be allowed to run because he is the best candidate. If Hunter did run these elitists would simply place another Republican on the ticket splitting the Right vote to allow Hillary to win. It is all one big sham...

We can agree to disagree on issues. There are many things I agree with and others I simply do not. For example this entire Oil issue. I love oil. I love nice cars. If a Nazi throws a rock through your window....does one blame the rock or the nazi that threw it? It is illogical to blame the rock no? Sorry to digress, I don't see any real canditates that would ever be allowed to run solely for the Republicans as I fear the American political system is as honest as a greasy Muslim used camel salesmen/trader....

TheCoon · « **Reply #29 on:** May 16, 2007, 09:38:12 AM »

Ron Paul is a libertarian. He doesn't believe in Israel's existence in any religious sense whatsoever. The Arabs have more financially to offer America than Israel so he would take the side of the Arabs.

RationalThought110 · « **Reply #30 on:** May 16, 2007, 11:47:05 AM »

Did any of you watch any of the debate on FoxNews?

I don't remember what the exact questions was directed at Ron Paul.

However, Paul made a statement that the US deserved the attack on 9/11 because the US had Iraq on sanctions, their people were living in bad conditions and because the US attacked Iraq. He must have been referring to when Clinton was "wagging the dog." I don't think he meant the first Gulf War because that wasn't exactly an attack on Iraq, more of defending Saudia Arabia from Iraq's advances.

Paul's statement also implies that Saddam was part of 9/11. But since Paul was against the Iraq War, he couldn't have thought Saddam was part of 9/11. So Paul also contradicted himself last night.

Giuliani immediate refuted Paul's statement.

The following below wasn't considered by Paul:

During the Cold War, the US was part of a coalition that helped end communism in Afghanistan. The mujahideens liked this. Eventually, the Taliban emerged to take control of Afghanistan. So no, that intervention did not cause the Taliban to hate the US. Ron Paul doesn't realize this.

They hate Western culture. Osama Bin-Laden wants Shiara laws imposed. Ron Paul doesn't realize this. Ron Paul doesn't realize this.

Paul also seems to blame terrorists dislike of the US on US support of Israel. Of course, he sees the "road map" as support for Israel. To Paul, the only way to not support Israel is to advocate for its destruction.

RationalThought110 · « **Reply #31 on:** May 16, 2007, 11:58:38 AM »

If you're talking about a smaller federal government, Tancredo supports that and Hunter probably does also. It's hard to get things done though. Giuliani probably does also.

Tancredo slammed McCain last night because McCain said when Republicans controlled Congress, they "spent like drunken sailors." Tancredo considered him a hypocrite because McCain voted for those bills.

Tancredo wants to get rid of the "No Child Left Behind Act" and the federal prescription drug program (I think it's part of medicare).

mord · « **Reply #32 on:** May 16, 2007, 12:00:18 PM »

I'll vote for Duncan Hunter maybe Tom tancredo.If Fred Thomson runs i'll probably vote for him

RationalThought110 · « **Reply #33 on:** May 16, 2007, 12:22:31 PM »

Quote from: mord on May 16, 2007, 12:00:18 PM

I'll vote for Duncan Hunter maybe Tom tancredo.If Fred Thomson runs i'll probably vote for him

I think Duncan Hunter has better credentials than Tancredo. Hunter has a patriotic military background; nothing like John Kerry's.

Thompson is perceived as lazy so he'll probably need to show interest if he wants to get the nomination. What do you like about Thompson? He served in the Senate for one term. I don't know much about his voting record though.

MarZutra · « **Reply #34 on:** May 16, 2007, 02:20:54 PM »

You are all more informed on this Paul fellow than I am. I had only read that he was a Constitutionalist like the JB'ers but apparently I'm wrong. I do like Tancredo and Hunter. G-d willing the elitists that rule America will allow a fair election with the best representatives and not split the vote. I do hope something good comes out of the elections as I see America has been bent over and railed ever since FDR or even Woodrow Wilson. Here's hoping for the best...

petre · « **Reply #35 on:** May 16, 2007, 11:00:52 PM »

There are 2 main reasons the Arabs killed themselves to attack Americans:
Occupation of Muslim Holy Sites in Saudi Arabia.
One sided support for Israel.
Withdraw troops from Arabia and find a different energy source. Cut all foreign aid from Israel so it doesn't appear that the US is funding its wars against the Arabs.
This is Paul's position. With that and his belief in securing the border, how do you think he'll make the US less safe? I can't see how nation building is the better option.

Trumpeldor · « **Reply #36 on:** May 16, 2007, 11:04:57 PM »

Quote from: petre on May 16, 2007, 11:00:52 PM

There are 2 main reasons the Arabs killed themselves to attack Americans:

Actually, there is just one: The Koran.

How does Paul intend to reconcile bloodthirsty maniacs with our national security?

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #37 on:** May 16, 2007, 11:10:52 PM »

Petre, why are you a member of this forum if you are against Israel?

petre · « **Reply #38 on:** May 16, 2007, 11:38:08 PM »

I am for Israel. I just don't think all Muslims are murderous thieves. It's just that Islamic culture is imcompatible with Western culture. That is why the west needs to separate from Islam. A Ron Paul presidency will far more easily achieve that effect than that of Newt Gingrich, John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson etc.
I also believe that since Israel is part of the west, it will eventually have to give many of the Palestinians of the West Bank independence instead of ruling over them while denying them citizenship and voting rights at the same time.
I am Jewish by the way.

petre · « **Reply #39 on:** May 16, 2007, 11:40:20 PM »

Also, don't you think Ron Paul is great for America, regardless of Israel?
He is for more federalism and states rights, as mandated by the 9th and 10th amendments. He is for libertarian principles here and abroad. He will allow Jews and Christians in the US to adhere to their faith not hindered by government interference and excessive taxation.
He will crack down on illegals and allow white Euro-Americans to retain their majority status if they so choose.

Trumpeldor · « **Reply #40 on:** May 16, 2007, 11:47:13 PM »

Quote from: petre on May 16, 2007, 11:38:08 PM

I also believe that since Israel is part of the west, it will eventually have to give many of the PLO/Hamas Arab Muslim Nazis of the West Bank independence instead of ruling over them while denying them citizenship and voting rights at the same time.
I am Jewish by the way.

You are barking up the wrong tree, my Jewish friend. Search this site for Rabbi Kahane e-books, read at least one chapter of each, and post something that makes sense.

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #41 on:** May 16, 2007, 11:54:21 PM »

You are kidding yourself if you think Paul will do any of the sort. His only goal is to help the Muslim Nazis take over the world.

Trumpeldor · « **Reply #42 on:** May 17, 2007, 12:03:32 AM »

Quote from: Chaimfan on May 16, 2007, 11:54:21 PM

You are kidding yourself if you think Paul will do any of the sort. His only goal is to help the Muslim Nazis take over the world.

Exactly. He is nothing more than a modern day, considerably less handsome version of Lindbergh.

petre · « **Reply #43 on:** May 17, 2007, 12:12:43 AM »

I read Rabbi Kahane. You can think Israel can rule over a majority population that has no voting rights or rights in court ad infinitum? What else do you propose?

As for Paul:
www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul-arch.html
www.antiwar.com/paul

Ron Paul is a libertarian. He gives each and everyone of us individual choice. He is against the Iraq war which is good. He is against illegal immigration, which is good. He is against social security which is good. if you don't believe me, read up on him on the websites I posted.

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #44 on:** May 17, 2007, 12:20:34 AM »

Ron Paul is the redneck Pat Buchanan.

Zionist Revolutionary · « **Reply #45 on:** May 17, 2007, 12:28:19 AM »

Quote from: petre on May 17, 2007, 12:12:43 AM

I read Rabbi Kahane. You can think Israel can rule over a majority population that has no voting rights or rights in court ad infinitum? What else do you propose?

Rav Kahane ztz''l already gave us the ultimate answer: throw them out.

MarZutra · « **Reply #46 on:** May 17, 2007, 12:29:50 AM »

Trump... I agree 100%. Rabbi Kahane is very blunt on his transfering the Arab Muslim fifth column. As a matter of fact Dr. Eugene Narrett's latest book "WW3 the War on the Jews" is fantastic and he takes it to the next step past Rabbi Kahane. Www.IsraelEndTimes.Com. He will be on Dr. Stanley Monteith's Radio Liberty next week as well for interview...

or_ly · « **Reply #47 on:** May 17, 2007, 12:32:39 AM »

who is he?

MarZutra · « **Reply #48 on:** May 17, 2007, 12:38:26 AM »

Eugene Narrett is a Right Wing Orthodox Jew who teaches in a liberal University in Mass some place. He is often a guest on Israel National Radio. He is a friend of mine. He wrote 3 books so far and man academic papers. His books are: "Jerusalem Surrounded", "Israel and the End Times" and "WW3 the War on the Jews". I just finnished his latest work and it is quite well written and packed full of factual information...

Trumpeldor · « **Reply #49 on:** May 17, 2007, 12:58:34 AM »

Quote from: petre on May 17, 2007, 12:12:43 AM

I read Rabbi Kahane. You can think Israel can rule over a majority population that has no voting rights or rights in court ad infinitum? What else do you propose?

Throw them out. Let them go to one of the 22 other Arab countries. They're no longer our problem. Right now they're guests. And they're not welcome in the house of the Lord.