Owner of jewwatch Frank Weltner arrested for child pornography

[White Israelite]

What's with the sponge?

Back in the old days, individuals condemned to death via the electric chair would have a wet sponge put on their heads to allow the electric current to supposedly focus on the head and go straight to the heart.

There were rumors that in some cases where the executioner wanted the person to suffer, they wouldn't wet the sponge and it would start their head on fire when the switch was pulled.

[JTFenthusiast2]

I too am skeptical about this story. No other news organization, besides two blogs with the same exact story, have any mention of this.... I suspect at this time this is a gag site... I don't think it is real...

The link on both pages are invalid links...

Muman, I might believe this, he is a dirty disgusting pervert who is involved in all kinds of nefarious activities, why should this surprise us when the SS had people like this scum in it.  He also had a Jewish lover who left him because he became obsessed with Jews.  I am not totally inclined to disregard this story. 

[muman613]

I too am skeptical about this story. No other news organization, besides two blogs with the same exact story, have any mention of this.... I suspect at this time this is a gag site... I don't think it is real...

The link on both pages are invalid links...

Muman, I might believe this, he is a dirty disgusting pervert who is involved in all kinds of nefarious activities, why should this surprise us when the SS had people like this scum in it.  He also had a Jewish lover who left him because he became obsessed with Jews.  I am not totally inclined to disregard this story. 

There is absolutely no mention of the story which is mentioned on the blog. I don't disbelieve that it is possible... But there should be a report somewhere which corroborates the story. Anyone can post anything on a blog somewhere and it can be 100% BS.... Please find some link which supports this story..

[angryChineseKahanist]

gruesome way to die.

[briann]

Regardless or not if its true,  I just can't wait till this fossil kicks the bucket.  And if its in a more embarrassing and humiliating manner, that would be wonderful.

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

Could this child rapist be the same person as Uri Avnery, yimach schmo?

[Aces High]

One of the blogs said it came from a St. Louis newspaper, but that the newspaper had pulled the story

[AsheDina]

I too am skeptical about this story. No other news organization, besides two blogs with the same exact story, have any mention of this.... I suspect at this time this is a gag site... I don't think it is real...

The link on both pages are invalid links...

Muman, I might believe this, he is a dirty disgusting pervert who is involved in all kinds of nefarious activities, why should this surprise us when the SS had people like this scum in it.  He also had a Jewish lover who left him because he became obsessed with Jews.  I am not totally inclined to disregard this story. 

There is absolutely no mention of the story which is mentioned on the blog. I don't disbelieve that it is possible... But there should be a report somewhere which corroborates the story. Anyone can post anything on a blog somewhere and it can be 100% BS.... Please find some link which supports this story..

As much as I HATE this slime bucket, G-d hating heathen, Muman is right.  Credibility is important,
Yimach Shmo to the beast anyway - ASAP.

[Raulmarrio2000]

It's just funny and stupid that if he really had simply downloaded child pronography, without producing it or molesting children, just downloaded what otherd produced he would be jailed, but he has a site enticing a genocide of Jews and noone investigates him.

It is illegal to download that disgusting filth.   Illegal means if you do it, you go to jail.

I mean that, if it is constitutionally, legally and technically possible to punish for that kind of material, there is no reason why they cannot do the same with anti-Semite material on the web. It's several years we have to see that damn jewwatch site in the first places in searching machines and nobody cares to put it down or punish the owner.

[briann]

It's just funny and stupid that if he really had simply downloaded child pronography, without producing it or molesting children, just downloaded what otherd produced he would be jailed, but he has a site enticing a genocide of Jews and noone investigates him.

It is illegal to download that disgusting filth.   Illegal means if you do it, you go to jail.

I mean that, if it is constitutionally, legally and technically possible to punish for that kind of material, there is no reason why they cannot do the same with anti-Semite material on the web. It's several years we have to see that damn jewwatch site in the first places in searching machines and nobody cares to put it down or punish the owner.

I HATE anti-jew material, but I just dont like the idea of someone 'policing' the internet for stupidity.  unless you can trace that stupidity to violence or some sort of planning of violence.  I guess Im a first amendment kinda guy.

ESPECIALLY if the only kinda policing is for anti-jew opinions.  this would have a HUGE backlash from other religious groups.

[Raulmarrio2000]

It's just funny and stupid that if he really had simply downloaded child pronography, without producing it or molesting children, just downloaded what otherd produced he would be jailed, but he has a site enticing a genocide of Jews and noone investigates him.

It is illegal to download that disgusting filth.   Illegal means if you do it, you go to jail.

I mean that, if it is constitutionally, legally and technically possible to punish for that kind of material, there is no reason why they cannot do the same with anti-Semite material on the web. It's several years we have to see that damn jewwatch site in the first places in searching machines and nobody cares to put it down or punish the owner.

I HATE anti-jew material, but I just dont like the idea of someone 'policing' the internet for stupidity.  unless you can trace that stupidity to violence or some sort of planning of violence.  I guess Im a first amendment kinda guy.

ESPECIALLY if the only kinda policing is for anti-jew opinions.  this would have a HUGE backlash from other religious groups.

I, ideollogically, also oppose speech censorship because I am a libertarian. But that filthy site is not just like a simple hatefull comment by someone or a simple blog made by a stupid harmless anti-Semite. It's a whole site devoted to spread hate towards the Jews, and certainly enticing to violence, even if not openly and directly. BTW, why had Kahane.org been listed as a violent site, and now noone cares about that scum nazi jewwatch site?

[MassuhDGoodName]

One has to be careful with this type of "story"...

The laws against libel might enable that S.O.B. to successfully sue someone for reprinting, copying, or otherwise disseminating anything which could be proven in court to damage a person's reputation or ability to earn a livelihood.

Further...the law allows litigation aginst those who damage another's livelihood or reputation even if the information they spread is true !

As long as the litigant can prove in court that their life was damaged in some way they can sue for libel.

The more notorious in the public eye or famous someone is, the lesser the chances they have of a successful suit, but nevertheless such cases happen every day where very famous and rich people sue magazines and reporters who say things about them.

Best to leave that drek and others like him alone, in order to avoid finding yourself "snared in a trap deliberately set".

[Raulmarrio2000]

One has to be careful with this type of "story"...

The laws against libel might enable that S.O.B. to successfully sue someone for reprinting, copying, or otherwise disseminating anything which could be proven in court to damage a person's reputation or ability to earn a livelihood.

Further...the law allows litigation aginst those who damage another's livelihood or reputation even if the information they spread is true !

As long as the litigant can prove in court that their life was damaged in some way they can sue for libel.

The more notorious in the public eye or famous someone is, the lesser the chances they have of a successful suit, but nevertheless such cases happen every day where very famous and rich people sue magazines and reporters who say things about them.

Best to leave that drek and others like him alone, in order to avoid finding yourself "snared in a trap deliberately set".

What does S.O.B. stand for? And yes, I agree. If there may be a chance of breaking the law by re-publishing that news, better avoid it.
And that pice of drek is not even worthy of receiving an insult. What worse insult can we say to him, if he admits the worst of all about himself- that he is an anti-Semite-?

[Raulmarrio2000]

BTW, possesing, reading or downloading a Hadith through the Web. Would it be considered a crime related to child pronography?

[muman613]

S.O.B. = Son Of a B*I*T*C*H

[Spiraling Leopard]

I found this article which is true                                http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=170701595   











Missouri Shuts Down Alleged White Supremacist Soliciting Katrina Donations Online

A Missouri judge ordered several Web sites shuttered, after the state's Attorney General charged they were being run illegally and would only channel funds to white hurricane victims.

By Gregg Keizer
TechWeb News
September 8, 2005 02:55 PM

A judge in Missouri ordered several Web sites shuttered Wednesday after the state's Attorney General accused a St. Louis man -- an alleged racist and anti-Semite -- of illegally soliciting donations for Katrina relief efforts. It was the first known case of an official crackdown on Web scams taking advantage of the disaster in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama.

Early Wednesday, Attorney General Jay Nixon filed an injunction asking the court to shut down 10 sites, all which fed to a central hub at internetdonations.org, that were asking for donations to Katrina relief. Nixon also asked that all funds collected be returned.

"Among other things, the sites were concealing the fact that none were registered as a charitable organization," said Jim Gardner, a spokesman for Attorney General Nixon.

Nixon's lawsuit also claimed that the man behind internetdonations.org -- who had recently registered several sites, among them katrinafamilies.com, kartrinafund.name, donate-kartrina.com, and katrina-donations.com -- "support white supremacy and that the money raised from the consumers will be only for use to help white victims of the hurricane."

SMBs are getting the analytical capabilities to drive faster decisions based on better data
BI For the Small-Medium Business

"This is a horrendous use of the victims of Hurricane Katrina to the benefit of a hate group," Nixon said at a news conference. He added that Weltner is associated with the National Alliance, which his office described as "listed by the Southern Poverty Law Center as one of the nation's most active neo-Nazi hate groups."

The National Alliance Web site currently features a large ad-style link on its home page that reads "Katrina: The Aftermath / Help White Victims."

Weltner also operates jewwatch.com, an anti-Semitic site that was in the news last year when Google listed it as the top-ranked hit on searches using the word "jew." The site is now ranked No. 2, behind an entry in Wikpedia.

"This was political motivated," said Weltner, contacted at his home in St. Louis. "They just want to stomp on people based on their political views. This whole thing is a misunderstanding. Every penny was going to tax-exempt charities like the Red Cross and the Salvation Army."

Weltner denied any connection with the National Alliance, and said he was not a racist or anti-Semite.

"I'm a racial egalitarian. Jewwatch.com is absolutely not an anti-Semitic site. It's actually a library of information about the history of Jews that's been hidden from people," Weltner said. "It's a clipping library, I'm a librarian."

Jewwatch.com's front page features a photo of Lenin posed facing a photo of Michael Chertoff, the head of the Department of Homeland Security, and collects links under such subject headings as "Jewish Controlled Press" and "Jewish Zionist-Soviet Anti-American Spies."

"The Bolsheviks were basically Russian Jews in exile living in New York," claimed Weltner during the interview.

The donation-collecting sites, as well as the internetdonations.org hub, are now offline. On Wednesday afternoon St. Louis Circuit Judge Julian Bush issued a temporary restraining order requiring Weltner to stop seeking contributions.

Weltner wasn't even sure who took down his sites. "I didn't take them down. Someone else may have done it."

"I may contest some of [the lawsuit]," said Weltner, "but I don't intend to do battle with the state of Missouri. I could have stood on the corner with a cup and collected money and there wouldn't have been any problem, but now I've been slandered and accused of collecting money for racist groups."

As far as he knew, Weltner said, he had not managed to collect any monies before the sites were shut down. "But if I had, I've said I would have written a check to the Attorney General.

"I just tried to help people," he said.

Like blacks are going to give aidmoney. White aidmoney should help whites first. Blacks can go to the government for help.

[Rubystars]

BTW, possesing, reading or downloading a Hadith through the Web. Would it be considered a crime related to child pronography?

That would make it harder for us non-Muslims to expose the evil of Islam

[angryChineseKahanist]

He's either ill informed or just has a sloppy website.
His list of Jews is just inconsistant.
Like names listed twice. Or a Jew name that starts with Ha Rav. Maybe he respects Rabbis after all.

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

He's either ill informed or just has a sloppy website.
His list of Jews is just inconsistant.
Like names listed twice. Or a Jew name that starts with Ha Rav. Maybe he respects Rabbis after all.

 

[JTFenthusiast2]

Have you ever seen this man's teeth or his hideously ugly face?  Not that looks mean anything, but in his case they are a window to his rotten soul.  As a librarian he had access to dental care, yet he chooses to present himself to the world with a rotting mouth.  There is something more than symbolic about this.

[MasterWolf1]

I hope this disgusting POS drops dead to be honest with you all