Poll

What are your thoughts on Roger Clemens?

Guilty
Innocent
Undecided
Would love to be his lawyer now, either way
Who's Roger Clemens?

Author Topic: Roger Clemens  (Read 1692 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline The One and Only Mo

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4963
Roger Clemens
« on: August 20, 2010, 11:20:10 AM »
As a die-hard baseball fan and Yankees fan, I do hope he is innocent, but with the new drug testing in MLB, the Steroid Era should be as good as dead with Clemens as the final dark cloud.

Offline The One and Only Mo

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4963
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2010, 11:20:55 AM »
I chose undecided because I really have no idea and he has one of the best lawyers in Rusty Hardin.

Offline דוד בן זאב אריה

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3536
  • Kahane Was Right
    • Facebook Profile
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2010, 11:31:34 AM »
I pick Guilty but either way the who steroids scandle really turned me off from Baseball I am just starting to get back into. I love my Rockies. I'm hoping for another run this year.
David Ben Ze'ev Aryeh


Offline The One and Only Mo

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4963
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2010, 12:32:55 PM »
I thought you were from Seattle

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2010, 12:52:10 PM »
I think it's pretty clear he's guilty of perjury and they're gonna string him up in the courtroom.  He is too stubborn to accept a plea deal.    But he's been implicated in many lies already.    I will be very amused to see his defense of those lies.    I would love to be the prosecution at this point.   It's a homerun.

Offline IsraelForever

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1834
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #5 on: August 20, 2010, 04:02:39 PM »
His very good -- if not "best" -- friend, Andy Pettite (great Yankee pitcher and teammate of Clemens) said, under oath, at a Congressional hearing, that Roger told him that he took steroids.  There would have been no reason for Andy to have lied about that.  There's other evidence also.  This is why I voted "Guilty".

Offline Ari Ben-Canaan

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2284
  • "The Necromancers Could Not Stand Before Moses."
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #6 on: August 20, 2010, 04:58:50 PM »
I have been unaware of any of this until I read this thread.  From 30-seconds of looking it does not look good for Roger [steroids and perjury -- ouch].  This is a bummer, he was one of my favorite baseball players [Yankee fan].  If he is guilty, he is guilty; if he is innocent he is innocent...  hopefully whatever is truth will be known and justice will occur.
"You must keep the arab under your boot or he will be at your throat" -Unknown

"When we tell the Arab, ‘Come, I want to help you and see to your needs,’ he doesn’t look at us like gentlemen. He sees weakness and then the wolf shows what he can do.” - Maimonides

 “I am all peace, but when I speak, they are for war.” -Psalms 120:7

"The difference between a Jewish liberal and a Jewish conservative is that when a Jewish liberal walks out of the Holocaust Museum, he feels, "This shows why we need to have more tolerance and multiculturalism." The Jewish conservative feels, "We should have killed a lot more Nazis, and sooner."" - Philip Klein

Offline Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23384
  • Real Kahanist
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #7 on: August 21, 2010, 07:21:36 PM »
This is an issue that causes the libertarian in me to come out. I really don't see what the big deal is. Yes, steroids are terrible drugs and extremely unhealthy, but honestly, are professional athletes moral paragons to begin with?

Offline Dr. Dan

  • Forum Administrator
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12591
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #8 on: August 21, 2010, 09:03:37 PM »
Would love to be his lawyer, make lots of money and then donate it to JTF.
If someone says something bad about you, say something nice about them. That way, both of you would be lying.

In your heart you know WE are right and in your guts you know THEY are nuts!

"Science without religion is lame; Religion without science is blind."  - Albert Einstein

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #9 on: August 22, 2010, 12:20:54 AM »
This is an issue that causes the libertarian in me to come out. I really don't see what the big deal is. Yes, steroids are terrible drugs and extremely unhealthy, but honestly, are professional athletes moral paragons to begin with?

He's being tried for perjury - a major offense.

Offline The One and Only Mo

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4963
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #10 on: August 22, 2010, 09:34:22 AM »
hmmmmm

Offline Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23384
  • Real Kahanist
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #11 on: August 22, 2010, 09:35:48 AM »
KWRBT, of course these people are moral monsters, but the fact that Congress got so involved in a nonissue to begin with is crazy. How about hearings and subpoenas about American corporate collaboration with Muslim Nazi nations and terror programs?

Offline The One and Only Mo

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4963
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #12 on: August 23, 2010, 07:33:02 AM »
KWRBT, of course these people are moral monsters, but the fact that Congress got so involved in a nonissue to begin with is crazy. How about hearings and subpoenas about American corporate collaboration with Muslim Nazi nations and terror programs?

Because everybody knows all the world's problems stem from the Joos, and Obama is taking care of the "problems" while the Muslims are obviously very peaceful and pose no threat whatsoever to the free world.  :::D :::D :::D :::D :::D

Offline New Yorker

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 2694
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #13 on: August 23, 2010, 10:57:24 AM »

I'm pro-steroids, so I say innocent!  :::D
Nuke the arabs till they glow, then shoot them in the dark.

Offline IsraelForever

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1834
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #14 on: August 23, 2010, 07:10:51 PM »
This is an issue that causes the libertarian in me to come out. I really don't see what the big deal is. Yes, steroids are terrible drugs and extremely unhealthy, but honestly, are professional athletes moral paragons to begin with?
Personally, I don't care either what they take.

But the big deal is this:  It gives those who take steroids an enormous advantage over those who don't take steroids.  The steroids allows them to bounce back faster, have more stamina, have more power, have faster reaction time, etc. etc.  Baseball is big business, too, with a lot of money on the line.  If you owned a team, would you want to be playing against a team filled with steroid users?  It makes a mockery of the whole sport.  And from a health point of view, taking them over a period of years is extremely detrimental to one's health.

Offline The One and Only Mo

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4963
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #15 on: August 25, 2010, 11:24:48 AM »
This is an issue that causes the libertarian in me to come out. I really don't see what the big deal is. Yes, steroids are terrible drugs and extremely unhealthy, but honestly, are professional athletes moral paragons to begin with?
Personally, I don't care either what they take.

But the big deal is this:  It gives those who take steroids an enormous advantage over those who don't take steroids.  The steroids allows them to bounce back faster, have more stamina, have more power, have faster reaction time, etc. etc.  Baseball is big business, too, with a lot of money on the line.  If you owned a team, would you want to be playing against a team filled with steroid users?  It makes a mockery of the whole sport.  And from a health point of view, taking them over a period of years is extremely detrimental to one's health.

It doesn't help the eyes as you still have to see the ball. It does help with healing in most cases, but it doesn't add that much to homerun power. I don't think entire teams were ever filled users, but maybe 1 per team on average. It's definitely cheating and they should all be jailed, but I don't think it helps that much (in baseball) other than speeding up the healing process.

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #16 on: August 25, 2010, 11:40:01 AM »
This is an issue that causes the libertarian in me to come out. I really don't see what the big deal is. Yes, steroids are terrible drugs and extremely unhealthy, but honestly, are professional athletes moral paragons to begin with?
Personally, I don't care either what they take.

But the big deal is this:  It gives those who take steroids an enormous advantage over those who don't take steroids.  The steroids allows them to bounce back faster, have more stamina, have more power, have faster reaction time, etc. etc.  Baseball is big business, too, with a lot of money on the line.  If you owned a team, would you want to be playing against a team filled with steroid users?  It makes a mockery of the whole sport.  And from a health point of view, taking them over a period of years is extremely detrimental to one's health.

It doesn't help the eyes as you still have to see the ball. It does help with healing in most cases, but it doesn't add that much to homerun power.  

Poppycock.   Added strength in arm muscles, leg muscles, abdominals, and chest muscles, all translates to greater bat speed, and greater bat speed means the ball goes farther.   Come on man. 

Quote
I don't think entire teams were ever filled users, but maybe 1 per team on average. It's definitely cheating and they should all be jailed, but I don't think it helps that much (in baseball) other than speeding up the healing process.

You can certainly increase the velocity on your fastball by taking steroids, and that is why many marginal players who were right on the cusp of a callup to the majors would take these (like middle relievers, who are seemingly the most common to fail the drug tests).   This is likely why Roger Clemens, when his career was in decline and the Red Sox no longer wanted to pay to keep him around because of his poor performance, this is probably how he engineered a historically good Cy Young season the very next year for the Toronto Blue Jays and then somehow a "resurgence" in his late 30's and even early 40's.

I think it was more than just 1 per roster.    There are 25 men on a roster.  The very top sluggers did it to add some juice to their homerun power, marginal players for that added boost so they could earn a callup, bench job, etc, and power pitchers to increase their... power, on their fastball.

We'll never know how many players took steroids.   Some former players claim it was rampant.

Offline TheViper

  • Senior JTFer
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
  • HOLA MI GENTE!
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #17 on: August 25, 2010, 11:43:17 AM »
This is an issue that causes the libertarian in me to come out. I really don't see what the big deal is. Yes, steroids are terrible drugs and extremely unhealthy, but honestly, are professional athletes moral paragons to begin with?
Personally, I don't care either what they take.

But the big deal is this:  It gives those who take steroids an enormous advantage over those who don't take steroids.  The steroids allows them to bounce back faster, have more stamina, have more power, have faster reaction time, etc. etc.  Baseball is big business, too, with a lot of money on the line.  If you owned a team, would you want to be playing against a team filled with steroid users?  It makes a mockery of the whole sport.  And from a health point of view, taking them over a period of years is extremely detrimental to one's health.

It doesn't help the eyes as you still have to see the ball. It does help with healing in most cases, but it doesn't add that much to homerun power. I don't think entire teams were ever filled users, but maybe 1 per team on average. It's definitely cheating and they should all be jailed, but I don't think it helps that much (in baseball) other than speeding up the healing process.

HGH speeds up healing not steroids.
Steroids does make you more powerful which makes you able to hit the ball further and harder.
☞I'm the best there is at what I do, but what I do best isn't very nice☜

Offline The One and Only Mo

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4963
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #18 on: August 26, 2010, 05:01:22 AM »
Right, I was referring to HGH which is also a banned substance. Steroids may help , but in baseball, its effects are minimal compared to other sports. Like I said, you still have to be able to see the ball and make contact with it. As a pitcher, even if you throw consistently 100 mph, you're still going to get hit unless you truly know how to pitch. I'm not downplaying its effects, but any regular guy can take steroids and still have absolutely no added talent. It's not like you juice up and start hitting 50 HR a year. Even A-rod's numbers with Texas weren't that crazy when he claimed he did steroids. Bonds was a Hall of Famer before he supposedly started juicing. Clemens was a CY Young pitcher before he supposedly started using as well. The game is more than just power and velocity. In other sports, I think it does more, but in baseball, where even the littlest guys have power, it might just increase average productivity by a little bit. We will never know, and if it were up to me they would all be jailed.

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #19 on: August 26, 2010, 12:58:56 PM »
Right, I was referring to HGH which is also a banned substance. Steroids may help , but in baseball, its effects are minimal compared to other sports. 

Tell that to Barry Bonds, Alex Rodriguez, Pudge Rodriguez et al.

It turned Barry Bonds from a star player, and one of the best current stars in baseball, into the greatest hitter of all time, the likes of which baseball has never seen in its entire history.

Barry Bonds homerun totals -

age 25-29: 175

age 30-34: 186

age 35-39: 258

The late 30's are notoriously the years of decline for a homerun hitter.   Not only did Barry not decline significantly, and even maintain his previous homerun hitting ability into his late 30's - itself a rare feat - he did something unprecedented.   He hit homeruns at age 35-39 at a rate at which he never came close to hitting them in the prime of his career.   If you look at other metrics such as OBP, SLG, OPS, and their astronomical rise in these years of his career, you can only conclude that Barry Bonds somewhere along the way found the fountain of youth.   To deny the power of steroids to enhance homerun hitting ability is to look at these numbers and insist that I believe the world is flat.


Quote
Like I said, you still have to be able to see the ball and make contact with it. As a pitcher, even if you throw consistently 100 mph, you're still going to get hit unless you truly know how to pitch. I'm not downplaying its effects, but any regular guy can take steroids and still have absolutely no added talent. 

This is why I pointed out that marginal players are the most likely to use steroids, if they are just on the brink of making the majors with their ability level, to give them that slight added boost that will hopefully land them on some major league team's bench, or if their a journeyman middle reliever, that 2 or 3 added miles per hour (or more) on their fastball that will allow them to hang around a major league roster for a few extra years, or make a few extra million.   

But the other group that is the most likely to use are the superstar players.   Because they Already have the immense level of talent, what they need to understand the game well, hit the various types of pitches, the mechanics to do so with the proper form, the concentration and good eye, pitch recognition, etc - they already have all of these things, and now, with steroids, they will be adding distance to all their fly balls, which by the law of averages means that more of the flyballs they hit will go out of the park rather than staying in.   This increases their homerun total, which might already have been a decent total, and takes them to the next level as a hitter. 

Quote
It's not like you juice up and start hitting 50 HR a year. Even A-rod's numbers with Texas weren't that crazy when he claimed he did steroids. 

He DID start to hit 50 homeruns per year, and actually the numbers were pretty crazy.   The 3 years in Texas saw his greatest homerun production of his career.  He hit 156 homeruns over that span.

Here is a quote from wikipedia:  "2001–02: Record-breaking seasons

Rodriguez's power hitting numbers improved with his move to Texas. In his first season with the Rangers, Alex produced one of the top offensive seasons ever for a shortstop, leading the American League with 52 HR, 133 runs scored, and 393 total bases. He became the first player since 1932 with 50 homers and 200 hits in a season, just the third shortstop to ever lead his league in homers, and was just the second AL player in the last 34 seasons (beginning 1968) to lead the league in runs, homers, and total bases; his total base figure is the most ever for a major league shortstop. His 52 homers made him the sixth youngest to ever reach 50 homers and were the highest total ever by a shortstop, surpassing Ernie Banks' record of 47 in 1958, and also the most ever for an infielder other than a 1st baseman, breaking Phillies 3B Mike Schmidt's mark of 48 in 1980..."

And "He followed that with a major league-best 57 HR, 142 RBIs and 389 total bases in 2002, becoming the first player to lead the majors in all three categories since 1984."

And "His 109 home runs in 2001-02 are the most ever by an American League right-handed batter in consecutive seasons. "

And then:  "In 2003, his last season with Texas, Rodriguez led the American League in home runs, runs scored, and slugging percentage, and won his second consecutive Gold Glove Award. He also led the league in fewest at bats per home run (12.9) and became the youngest player to hit 300 homers.

Following five top-10 finishes in the AL Most Valuable Player voting between 1996 and 2002, Rodriguez won his first MVP trophy. "



Sounds pretty crazy to me.

You also don't know when he began taking them (I highly doubt it was ONLY during that one time when he tested positive - you see how these players incessantly lie about it and only admit to what they got caught with or sometimes don't even admit that), he could have started taking them earlier on in his career, and he certainly could have continued taking them with the Yankees for the first few years before a solid testing regimen was really in place.    2003 testing was just to "test the waters" so to speak before all the revelations came out and the mlb was forced by congress to put in a reliable testing mechanism to rid baseball of steroids.   There were a couple of years where the same evasion continued.
 

Quote
Bonds was a Hall of Famer before he supposedly started juicing.

Certainly, but he became the greatest hitter of all time, and he did that from age 35-39.   He was NOT the greatest hitter of all time (or anywhere near it) before steroids and before bulking up like he did.

Quote
Clemens was a CY Young pitcher before he supposedly started using as well.

But his career was in the decline with the Red Sox and clearly his statistics reflect that.  That is why they got rid of him or didn't pay to keep him around.  Until suddenly he became the best pitcher in baseball again, and went on to win 4 more Cy Young's in his late 30's - early 40's.

Quote
The game is more than just power and velocity. In other sports, I think it does more, but in baseball, where even the littlest guys have power, it might just increase average productivity by a little bit. We will never know, and if it were up to me they would all be jailed.

See above.

But why do you want them in jail?   These substances were legal in baseball at the time.
« Last Edit: August 26, 2010, 01:05:03 PM by Kahane-Was-Right BT »

Offline FreedomFighter08

  • Senior JTFer
  • ****
  • Posts: 309
Re: Roger Clemens
« Reply #20 on: September 06, 2010, 10:46:23 AM »
Steroids don't have huge side effects if you know what you're doing. If we're paying like 200 bucks for a seat in the stadium, they better take all they possible can to be their best, because baseball is entertainment.