Under Einstein's Relativity, which is the prevalent theory which presumably you agree with, you are OBLIGED to accept the geocentric theory as being an EQUALLY valid model, as much as I am the heliocentric theory.
What part of Einstein's quote don't you understand?!:
"The struggle, so violent in the early days of science, between the views of Ptolemy and Copernicus would then be quite meaningless. Either CS could be used with equal justification. The two sentences, 'the sun is at rest and the earth moves,' or 'the sun moves and the earth is at rest,' would simply mean two different conventions concerning two different CS." (Einstein and Infeld, The Evolution of Physics, p.212 1938).
If you have disproved Relativity, and shown that there is a favored non-moving location or aether in the universe, in an absolute sense, then you will get a Nobel Prize.
If you disagree with Relativity, as do some scientists, then how do you explain the Michelson-Morley result?