Author Topic: JTF mentioned in,' Israeli Economists Agree with Rand Paul: End Foreign Aid'  (Read 1452 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline eb22

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4209
  • No Appeasement.or Concessions.Fakestine is a Hoax.
This is the type of publicity in the print media that can potentially significantly increase the size of JTF.    This article has been seen by many people.  Rabbi Kahane also was mentioned in the article:


http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/usnews/politics/6201-israeli-economists-agree-with-rand-paul-end-foreign-aid

Israeli Economists Agree with Rand Paul: End Foreign Aid


The question of foreign aid is one that has pitted economists against politicians, special interest groups, and foreign policy demagogues for decades. No stranger to this controversy is Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, who like his father, Texas Representative Ron Paul (both Republicans), has proposed ending U.S.foreign aid to all countries, including Israel, a decision that has earned the scorn of numerous groups on both the Left and the Right.

However, one critical aspect of the debate that has been neglected from public discourse on the topic — and that Sen. Paul may be unaware of — is the opposition of numerous Jewish and Israeli economists and religious Zionist groups to Israeli foreign aid. Like Sen. Paul, these figures believe that foreign aid is an affront against Israeli liberty and sovereignty, as well as a drain on the development of numerous sectors of the Israeli economy, such as the weapons and biotechnology industries.

Individuals including Israeli economists Ran Dagoni, Yoel Bainerman, and Alvin Rabushka, the late Rabbi Meir Kahane, as well as groups including the Jewish Task Force, the Zionist Freedom Alliance, and the Manhigut Yehudit faction of the Likud Party have long advocated for an end to U.S. foreign aid to Israel. These groups insist that Israel must develop her own economic strength and move towards more free-market economic reforms as a means of boosting national prosperity and strength.

Even Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stated that foreign aid may do more harm than good, and proposed efforts to wean Israel off of American military aid payments.

It becomes clear, therefore, that Sen. Paul’s proposal to cut foreign aid is one which is not without support from innovative Israeli and Jewish thinkers on the issue.

Manhigut Yehudit (Hebrew for “Jewish Leadership”) is considered the most right-wing and the largest sector within the Likud Central Committee. It is committed to Israeli safety, territorial integrity, and the promotion of privatization reforms and traditional Torah values. According to co-founder Shmuel Sackett, its long-term goal is to “perfect the world in the Kingdom of the Almighty.”

Chief among the group’s priorities is “a modern and open economy based on Jewish Values,” and this entails, for the group, “No financial aid from foreign countries.” As a result of this, Manhigut Yehudit member Shmuel Ben-Gad, also librarian at George Washington University, in 2007 wrote an editorial in Israel National News actually endorsing Ron Paul, saying he should be “the Zionist choice for President”:

The US puts pressure on Israel to surrender parts of the homeland. Even worse, this relationship seems to foster a mentality of dependence amongst many Israelis who, it seems, cannot imagine Israel defying the United States in any major way.

In the upcoming presidential election, however, there is a chance to change this dramatically, by electing Congressman Ron Paul, a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination. Dr. Paul favors a non-interventionist foreign policy.

Dr. Paul's position is based upon a principled, modest, non-interventionist foreign policy - not upon anti-Zionism. Indeed, in a way, his foreign policy is mirrored by his small government domestic policy. Both recognize there are real limits to what a government can usefully do.

Cutting the apron strings to the US would, I think, make Israel become more maturely self-confident, because it would be more self-reliant. Ron Paul would both end this infantilizing, and even corrupting, aid and respect Israel's national sovereignty.

In a similar argument, Rabbi Meir Kahane also advocated for an end to American foreign aid for Israel. He was the founder and leader of the Jewish Defense League, and is considered by many to be the first victim of al-Qaeda on American soil, as he was assassinated in cold blood by convicted terrorist El Sayyid Nosair, who was also involved in the 1993 World Trade Center bombings. He also led the right-wing Kach Party in Israel until his death, and once stated that foreign aid “turns Israel into a junkie looking for her fix.” In his 1990 essay "Isolation," he said the following about foreign aid, framing it in religious terms vis-à-vis the Biblical notion of a Chosen Nation:

Exile has turned the Jew of faith into one who trembles before the man of the dust. Unless we become of might and faith, and unless we ignore both the money and the honey of the United States and their empty threats and condemnation, we stand no chance. We must be a self-reliant, set-apart, and fearless nation doing the Will of the Almighty.

Likewise, the Jewish Task Force (JTF), a group committed to Kahane’s ideology, states among its principles a commitment to:

An immediate end to all U.S. foreign aid, even to a genuine friend and ally like Israel, which is harmed rather than helped by her counterproductive dependency on America's addictive welfare handouts.

Echoing this stance is L’ Herut Tzion (Hebrew for “Zionist Freedom Alliance”), a group committed to the ideology of Zev Jabotinsky, father of Revolutionary Zionism, also known as Revisionist Zionism. Jabotinsky was a fierce anti-communist, and opposed all forms of statism, which he labeled “Communo-Fascism.” His disciples in the Zionist Freedom Alliance also believe that foreign aid is an affront against Israeli sovereignty, and thus oppose it on ideological grounds.

The group’s founder, Yehuda HaKohen, also directs “Zionists for Ron Paul,” and has also endorsed Ron Paul for President in a radio interview with Israel National News. In addition to advocating for Israeli territorial integrity, the group supports American and Israeli withdrawal from the United Nations, and is steadfastly opposed to foreign aid for Israel, saying the following:

In addition to having no constitutional basis and being an unnecessary burden on the American tax payer, United States foreign aid has also impaired the national sovereignty of the State of Israel. The aid prevents the Jewish state from adopting economic reforms that would make her self-reliant and it creates a mindset of dependency among the Israeli people. A nation cannot be both dependent and independent. ZFA calls upon the government of Israel to stop behaving like the leaders of a vassal state and begin working towards the realization of true political and economic freedom. We also advise the US government to completely end foreign aid to all nations and to concentrate instead on rebuilding the American economy.

This is a sentiment that is corroborated by numerous economists and academicians.

In the September 1995 issue of the Middle East Quarterly, economist Joel Bainerman authored an analysis entitled, “End American Aid to Israel?: Yes, It Does Harm.” Bainerman outlines a sound economic argument for opposing aid:

Arnon Gafny, who served as governor of the Bank of Israel in 1976-1981, points out that foreign aid has caused Israel to suffer from what economists call the "Dutch Disease," a generous but temporary gift (such as oil or external aid) that brings short-term benefits but impairs a country's long-term competitiveness.

It is very difficult to prove that a rich country's bestowing bilateral aid on a poorer one actually helps the poorer economy.

Ezra Sohar, author of Israel's Dilemma: Why Israel Is Falling Apart and How to Put It Back Together, notes that the lions' share of U.S. aid to Israel in the 1970s consisted of loans to purchase military equipment. "The end result should have been known from the start," says Sohar. "There is logic in borrowing to build a factory with the anticipation of repaying the loan out of profits. But in the case of armaments, it is obvious that there cannot be any profits."

Likewise, Hoover Institution Fellow Alvin Rabushka says that aid to Israel hurts Israelis:

Free money is the scourge of Israel’s economy. It is the difference between a free, prosperous Israel and a statist, dependent Israel. Before U.S. aid began flowing, Israel’s economic performance rivaled that of the high-growth Asian Tigers. Since then, Israel’s growth rate has fallen by more than half.

An article published most recently in response to the hoopla over Sen. Paul’s announcement also articulates this belief. Ran Dagoni, in the Israeli business publication Globes wrote:

The time has come to bid goodbye to the military aid that the US extends to Israel, that generous package (currently worth $3 billion) that enables the Israeli taxpayer to share the cost of procuring equipment for the IDF with the US taxpayer. Israel should itself initiate the process of detachment from the Washington breast. It should be done gradually, on terms that will enable Israel to wean itself off this intoxicating milk, before the Americans take action, on their terms. Israel won't collapse.

Both the younger and elder Paul, as well as those opposing foreign aid in general, to Israel and all other countries, are also in the good company of none other than Benjamin Netanyahu himself. In 1996, he addressed Congress and declared his intention for an end to foreign aid, according to the Harvard Israel Review:

For their part, the members of Congress gave Netanyahu a rousing welcome, applauding him 14 times, including a standing ovation when he promised to reduce Israel's reliance on the $3.2 billion in aid the United States provides the Jewish state each year.

In his promise to eventually seek less aid from the United States, the prime minister significantly did not mention any amount that might be reduced, nor did he give a timetable for achieving Israel's "economic independence.''  The day before, at a White House news conference, he said the reduced aid policy would be "pursued over the course of the coming 10 years.'' In the next four years, we are going to begin the long-term process of gradually reducing the level of your generous economic assistance,'' Netanyahu said. "We are committed to turning Israel's economy into a free market of goods and ideas, which is the only way to bring true independence.''

“I believe that we can now say that Israel has reached childhood’s end, that it has matured enough to begin approaching a state of self-reliance…. We are going to achieve economic independence.” In stating this goal, Netanyahu had two major projects in mind: ending U.S. economic aid to Israel and reforming the Israeli economy into “a free market of goods and ideas."

This sentiment was echoed earlier by Zalman Shoval, former Israeli Ambassador to the United States and a leading figure within the Likud Party. Shoval, in 1992, told an American audience that Israel should suggest through its own initiative that the United States gradually phase out civilian economic aid.

Sen. Paul and his father are not without precedent in their proposals to cut foreign aid. Perhaps without their knowing it, they are fulfilling the policy desires of a cadre of right-wing Zionist and Jewish leaders, including Ambassador Shoval, Prime Minister Netanyahu, Rabbi Kahane, and leading economists, such as Bainerman, Rabushka, Sohar, and Dagoni.

"Israel's leaders seem to be more afraid of Obama than they are of G-d. Now we're getting to the real root of the problem. Secular politics won't save Israel. Denying the divine nature of the Jewish State has brought Israel neither stability nor peace. When that changes Israel will finally be blessed with both in abundance"-----------NormanF   ( Posted on Israel Matzav's Blog )

.....................................................................

http://jtf.org/

Offline mord

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25853
Great article i used to always read the New American my friend had a subscription to it and used to give it to me after he finished it.BTW i think the writer is an orthodox Jew
Thy destroyers and they that make thee waste shall go forth of thee.  Isaiah 49:17

 
Shot at 2010-01-03

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Great article and great sources

Offline briann

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 8038
  • Mmmm HMMMMM
Quote
Dr. Paul's position is based upon a principled, modest, non-interventionist foreign policy - not upon anti-Zionism.

That may be true, unless his positions on foreign policy differ, with different countries.

The way Ive always looked at it is 'Foregin aid' is just welfare.  Countries, like people, will become dependent on it, and it will make the recipient less competitive and less able to provide for itself, just like a person on welfare.

Offline TruthSpreader

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8754
    • http://www.youtube.com/user/WeThePeopleZeb
Great article!  :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance:
Dan - Stay calm and be brave in order to judge correctly and make the right decision

Offline mord

  • Global Moderator
  • Platinum JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 25853
That may be true, unless his positions on foreign policy differ, with different countries.

The way Ive always looked at it is 'Foregin aid' is just welfare.  Countries, like people, will become dependent on it, and it will make the recipient less competitive and less able to provide for itself, just like a person on welfare.

Yes Dr.Paul is against all foreign aid
Thy destroyers and they that make thee waste shall go forth of thee.  Isaiah 49:17

 
Shot at 2010-01-03

Offline Maccabi

  • Pro JTFer
  • *****
  • Posts: 566
a very good article great to see this.

Offline eb22

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4209
  • No Appeasement.or Concessions.Fakestine is a Hoax.
Thanks everyone for your positive feedback.     

In my conversations with Israel supporters,   the greatest obstacle is trying to convince others that Israel is better off w/o Foreign Aid.

Interestingly,  earlier today someone named conspr33 responded to comments I made on a ZooTube video 2 years ago.   conspr33 is convinced that Israel needs American Foreign Aid to survive.    And he act likes Likud is an extreme right wing party:



"Israel's leaders seem to be more afraid of Obama than they are of G-d. Now we're getting to the real root of the problem. Secular politics won't save Israel. Denying the divine nature of the Jewish State has brought Israel neither stability nor peace. When that changes Israel will finally be blessed with both in abundance"-----------NormanF   ( Posted on Israel Matzav's Blog )

.....................................................................

http://jtf.org/

Offline dbenshlomo

  • New JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
I am the author of that article. Yes, I am Orthodox/frum, and am committed to Zionist non-intervention/realism in foreign policy, which leads me to believe that the Establishment in this country, including neoconservatives, aren't really pro-Israel, as evident in their support for democracy-building in Arab countriem, which is bad for Israel. I support  less government, more personal responsibility, and with G-d's help, a better world, the motto of the John Birch Society. America has not been a blessing to Israel, and a clean break is needed, so that Israeli sovereignty can be restored, land for peace and a globalist-mandated 2-state "solution" (sic) can be rejected, and so Israel can rise to the national greatness G-d has destined for her, without kowtowing to the gentile nations of the earth. Anyone who thinks Obama, Bush I, Bush II, Clinton, or even Reagan were good for Israel are misinformed. Am Yisrael Chai.

Offline Shlomo

  • Administrator
  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5212
  • SAVE ISRAEL!
I am the author of that article. Yes, I am Orthodox/frum, and am committed to Zionist non-intervention/realism in foreign policy, which leads me to believe that the Establishment in this country, including neoconservatives, aren't really pro-Israel, as evident in their support for democracy-building in Arab countriem, which is bad for Israel. I support  less government, more personal responsibility, and with G-d's help, a better world, the motto of the John Birch Society. America has not been a blessing to Israel, and a clean break is needed, so that Israeli sovereignty can be restored, land for peace and a globalist-mandated 2-state "solution" (sic) can be rejected, and so Israel can rise to the national greatness G-d has destined for her, without kowtowing to the gentile nations of the earth. Anyone who thinks Obama, Bush I, Bush II, Clinton, or even Reagan were good for Israel are misinformed. Am Yisrael Chai.

That was an amazing article written with truth and elegance. May Hashem bless you and your family for spreading the truth.
"In the final analysis, for the believer there are no questions, and for the non-believer there are no answers." -Chofetz Chaim

Offline muman613

  • Platinum JTF Member
  • **********
  • Posts: 29958
  • All souls praise Hashem, Hallelukah!
    • muman613 Torah Wisdom
I am the author of that article. Yes, I am Orthodox/frum, and am committed to Zionist non-intervention/realism in foreign policy, which leads me to believe that the Establishment in this country, including neoconservatives, aren't really pro-Israel, as evident in their support for democracy-building in Arab countriem, which is bad for Israel. I support  less government, more personal responsibility, and with G-d's help, a better world, the motto of the John Birch Society. America has not been a blessing to Israel, and a clean break is needed, so that Israeli sovereignty can be restored, land for peace and a globalist-mandated 2-state "solution" (sic) can be rejected, and so Israel can rise to the national greatness G-d has destined for her, without kowtowing to the gentile nations of the earth. Anyone who thinks Obama, Bush I, Bush II, Clinton, or even Reagan were good for Israel are misinformed. Am Yisrael Chai.

I am concerned because what we all wonder is whether Rand Paul cares about Israel and will be committed to helping Israel keep secure in the land. This doesn't require giving Israel money but it does require diplomatic assurances that America will make sure that Israel remains safe in the region. I cannot even remotely back Rand Paul at this moment because his father and he are perceived as an antisemitic, because he has taken so much money from well known antisemitic sources {at least this is what I believe}.

Thank you

You shall make yourself the Festival of Sukkoth for seven days, when you gather in [the produce] from your threshing floor and your vat.And you shall rejoice in your Festival-you, and your son, and your daughter, and your manservant, and your maidservant, and the Levite, and the stranger, and the orphan, and the widow, who are within your cities
Duet 16:13-14

Offline Dr. Dan

  • Forum Administrator
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12593
The greatest mitzva and blessing is when Israel says, "no thanks" and less of a blessing when the US initiates it.
If someone says something bad about you, say something nice about them. That way, both of you would be lying.

In your heart you know WE are right and in your guts you know THEY are nuts!

"Science without religion is lame; Religion without science is blind."  - Albert Einstein

Offline serbian army

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2326
I am the author of that article. Yes, I am Orthodox/frum, and am committed to Zionist non-intervention/realism in foreign policy, which leads me to believe that the Establishment in this country, including neoconservatives, aren't really pro-Israel, as evident in their support for democracy-building in Arab countriem, which is bad for Israel. I support  less government, more personal responsibility, and with G-d's help, a better world, the motto of the John Birch Society. America has not been a blessing to Israel, and a clean break is needed, so that Israeli sovereignty can be restored, land for peace and a globalist-mandated 2-state "solution" (sic) can be rejected, and so Israel can rise to the national greatness G-d has destined for her, without kowtowing to the gentile nations of the earth. Anyone who thinks Obama, Bush I, Bush II, Clinton, or even Reagan were good for Israel are misinformed. Am Yisrael Chai.
You seem to know much about the Austrian school of economics that Jews like Ludwig Von Misses shaped in many ways. I wish you to continue great work.  :dance:
Serbia will never surrender Kosovo to the breakaway province's ethnic Albanian majority or trade its territory for European Union or NATO membership,

Offline eb22

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4209
  • No Appeasement.or Concessions.Fakestine is a Hoax.
I am the author of that article. Yes, I am Orthodox/frum, and am committed to Zionist non-intervention/realism in foreign policy, which leads me to believe that the Establishment in this country, including neoconservatives, aren't really pro-Israel, as evident in their support for democracy-building in Arab countriem, which is bad for Israel. I support  less government, more personal responsibility, and with G-d's help, a better world, the motto of the John Birch Society. America has not been a blessing to Israel, and a clean break is needed, so that Israeli sovereignty can be restored, land for peace and a globalist-mandated 2-state "solution" (sic) can be rejected, and so Israel can rise to the national greatness G-d has destined for her, without kowtowing to the gentile nations of the earth. Anyone who thinks Obama, Bush I, Bush II, Clinton, or even Reagan were good for Israel are misinformed. Am Yisrael Chai.


Thank you very much for your efforts with the article.   
"Israel's leaders seem to be more afraid of Obama than they are of G-d. Now we're getting to the real root of the problem. Secular politics won't save Israel. Denying the divine nature of the Jewish State has brought Israel neither stability nor peace. When that changes Israel will finally be blessed with both in abundance"-----------NormanF   ( Posted on Israel Matzav's Blog )

.....................................................................

http://jtf.org/

Offline dbenshlomo

  • New JTFer
  • *
  • Posts: 7
What would one call those with a JTF foreign policy, which I would say is similar to what Lawrence Auster, Srdja Trifkovic, Debbie Schlussel, and Leon Hadar say? Since you don't support an agenda of democracy-building, you wouldn't be a neocon. I call myself a realist and Zionist noninterventionist, but I wonder what others out there identify their foreign policy as.

And, also, I am not married, so I don''t yet have a family, but I daven for an appropriatr shidduch everyday, and I would appreciate it if others can be mispallel me. (Sorry for the yeshivish-type sentence structure, lol.)

Offline briann

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 8038
  • Mmmm HMMMMM
What would one call those with a JTF foreign policy, which I would say is similar to what Lawrence Auster, Srdja Trifkovic, Debbie Schlussel, and Leon Hadar say? Since you don't support an agenda of democracy-building, you wouldn't be a neocon. I call myself a realist and Zionist noninterventionist, but I wonder what others out there identify their foreign policy as.

And, also, I am not married, so I don''t yet have a family, but I daven for an appropriatr shidduch everyday, and I would appreciate it if others can be mispallel me. (Sorry for the yeshivish-type sentence structure, lol.)

We are not non-interventionists, not in the least.  But we all of course know that 'spreading democracy' in the middle east is a complete waste of time, resources, and human beings.  I don't have to go down the list of how this type of 'democracy building' always tends to backfire in the Muslim world.

Intervening is incredibly important when a Muslim country is a threat to our existence.  That doesnt mean, going to Iran and 'spreading democracy'... it means bombing Iran into the stone age.  To ignore these threats based upon an 'ideology of non-intervention' is the same kind of thinking that led the holocaust.