Author Topic: Should JTF endorse Rick Santorum? (Read 9388 times)

jbeige · « **Reply #75 on:** January 08, 2012, 02:34:27 PM »

Quote from: Kahane-Was-Right BT on January 08, 2012, 02:27:47 PM

lol, yes exactly. Let's engage facts, not fantasy.

This was a December poll:
According to the CNN/Time/ORC poll, released on Wednesday, 25 percent of likely Iowa caucus-goers support Romney, 22 percent support Paul and 16 percent support Santorum
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL FACTS?, you of all people don't seem to know the facts or can read what's in front of you.
FACT:Polls Romney beats obama. Santorum can not be found that's how obama blows him away.

jbeige · « **Reply #76 on:** January 08, 2012, 02:44:55 PM »

Good Luck to all you Santorum supporters, you're going to need it.....
I am voting for Romney.
Thank you and goodnight.

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #77 on:** January 08, 2012, 03:31:07 PM »

One wonders why jbeige (Johnson Brown) has just now decided to start posting again.

That aside, as much as I don't want him to be, I don't really seeing anyone but Romney standing a chance.

Debbie Shafer · « **Reply #78 on:** January 08, 2012, 03:35:38 PM »

Santorum is definitely more Conservative than Romney. I believe the 2 candidates who could cause pain for the Obamanation, is Newt, Santorum, and Romney last....Do you realize how many videos the administration has on Romney Waffling? They will have a field day with this. Newt and Santorum are solid for Israel too! Newt is smart, has one lobe tied behind his back just to make it fair....Good point Gingrich brought up in the debate last night, Catholics, Christians, and Jews are under attack and being persecuted......George, Duh Stephanopolis is clueless, nobody cares about Conception! ABC moderators looked pretty rediculous...notice how they change to social issues and avoid the economy, jobs, energy, and national security to avoid making Obama look like a failure!

D2I · « **Reply #79 on:** January 09, 2012, 10:38:38 AM »

Romney is a liberal slight right of Obama and Ron Paul is a jew hating nazi bastard

So they are totally out of question,

At the moment i think Rick sanatorium would be the best president of the candidates that are left but it's a close call if i would choice Newt

Reaganukics · « **Reply #80 on:** January 09, 2012, 09:14:17 PM »

The electability of Rick Santorum is not an issue. In fact, I'd say he's more electable than Romney.

Also, Romney, Paul, Obama. Same person, different names. So yes, I personally endorse Santorum. Also, Newt is a progressive.

Kahane-Was-Right BT · « **Reply #81 on:** January 09, 2012, 09:58:53 PM »

Quote from: jbeige on January 08, 2012, 02:34:27 PM

This was a December poll:
According to the CNN/Time/ORC poll, released on Wednesday, 25 percent of likely Iowa caucus-goers support Romney, 22 percent support Paul and 16 percent support Santorum
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL FACTS?, you of all people don't seem to know the facts or can read what's in front of you.
FACT:Polls Romney beats obama. Santorum can not be found that's how obama blows him away.

What you are quoting shows Romney leading. You claimed that Romney trailed the whole way. WRONG.

Santorum gained momentum in the last week. And it was a complete upset.

Kahane-Was-Right BT · « **Reply #82 on:** January 09, 2012, 10:04:21 PM »

History shows that a "safe" candidate that appeals to moderates (which in this case is exactly how Romney is billed), always loses to the incumbent. Mark Levin was speaking about this on his show tonight, there was an article out about this today in a major media source.

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #83 on:** January 09, 2012, 10:21:23 PM »

Quote from: Kahane-Was-Right BT on January 09, 2012, 10:04:21 PM

History shows that a "safe" candidate that appeals to moderates (which in this case is exactly how Romney is billed), always loses to the incumbent. Mark Levin was speaking about this on his show tonight, there was an article out about this today in a major media source.

Then how do you explain Goldwater, the ultimate un-safe candidate?

White Israelite · « **Reply #84 on:** January 10, 2012, 01:53:39 AM »

What's his stance on guns? I don't know much about Santorum. I thought Gingrich would have been good

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #85 on:** January 10, 2012, 02:10:34 AM »

I am pretty sure Santorum is pro-gun

White Israelite · « **Reply #86 on:** January 10, 2012, 02:13:08 AM »

Quote from: Axl Rose on January 10, 2012, 02:10:34 AM

I am pretty sure Santorum is pro-gun

That's good, Romney definitely isn't pro gun.

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #87 on:** January 10, 2012, 05:05:29 AM »

He'd still be better than BHO.

Rubystars · « **Reply #88 on:** January 10, 2012, 06:30:57 AM »

There is one problem if we don't have a conservative Republican in the white house. A RINO may be able to pass 'immigration reform' AKA Amnesty much easier than a democrat would. That's something to think about.

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #89 on:** January 10, 2012, 07:36:46 AM »

Quote from: Rubystars on January 10, 2012, 06:30:57 AM

There is one problem if we don't have a conservative Republican in the white house. A RINO may be able to pass 'immigration reform' AKA Amnesty much easier than a democrat would. That's something to think about.

In theory yeah but look at what Obama is doing right now. Obama may be able to pull off amnesty by executive order.

briann · « **Reply #90 on:** January 10, 2012, 12:54:56 PM »

Quote from: Rubystars on January 10, 2012, 06:30:57 AM

There is one problem if we don't have a conservative Republican in the white house. A RINO may be able to pass 'immigration reform' AKA Amnesty much easier than a democrat would. That's something to think about.

This is a very good point, and one reason I think Rinos are very dangerous. If this election WEREN'T against Obama, I would probably be campaigning against Romney for this very reason. However... Obama's removal has trumped nearly all other concerns I have.... I just want him out, ASAP.

jbeige · « **Reply #91 on:** January 10, 2012, 06:12:16 PM »

More baggage for Santorum:
The fight over the fate of Terri Schiavo, the 41-year-old Florida woman who died in 2005 after a judge ordered her life-preserving feeding tubes removed, captivated and divided the American public. Then-Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.),was one of the leading proponents of state intervention to save Schiavo's life, cosponsoring a bill to intervene in the case and even visiting Schiavo in the hospital. That aggressive advocacy helped lead to Santorum's ouster from Congress the next year.
Now all you pro lifers will be saying "he should have saved her", I don't know about you but I do not want the government telling me what to do in my personal life, we don't need big brother looking over our shoulders.
Family is a personal thing, most of you cried that out when he did the sick thing bringing his dead baby home, would he have liked if the government told him that he couldn't do a "show and tell" with his dead baby.

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #92 on:** January 10, 2012, 07:27:25 PM »

Nobody cares what you think Johnson. If you like abortion vote for Nazi Paul; I'm sure you will anyway.

jbeige · « **Reply #93 on:** January 10, 2012, 07:36:51 PM »

Quote from: Axl Rose on January 10, 2012, 07:27:25 PM

Nobody cares what you think Johnson. If you like abortion vote for Nazi Paul; I'm sure you will anyway.

Why does just crap come out of your mouth, you have no intelligent answers, this is a forum for G_ds sake people are all not suppose to agree with each other.
I guess you are mentally handicapped because you don't know by now who I'm supporting.

Lisa · « **Reply #94 on:** January 10, 2012, 08:22:42 PM »

Quote from: jbeige on January 10, 2012, 06:12:16 PM

More baggage for Santorum:
The fight over the fate of Terri Schiavo, the 41-year-old Florida woman who died in 2005 after a judge ordered her life-preserving feeding tubes removed, captivated and divided the American public. Then-Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.),was one of the leading proponents of state intervention to save Schiavo's life, cosponsoring a bill to intervene in the case and even visiting Schiavo in the hospital. That aggressive advocacy helped lead to Santorum's ouster from Congress the next year.
Now all you pro lifers will be saying "he should have saved her", I don't know about you but I do not want the government telling me what to do in my personal life, we don't need big brother looking over our shoulders.
Family is a personal thing, most of you cried that out when he did the sick thing bringing his dead baby home, would he have liked if the government told him that he couldn't do a "show and tell" with his dead baby.

Actually, that makes me like Santorum all the more.

This is not about the government meddling in people's health decisions. It's about a whoring adulterer man using the law to have his disabled wife, for whom he refused to provide necessary care, killed under the cover of the law. He wanted that insurance money. And once it came in, he stopped all care for poor Terri, and pushed aggressively to have her feeding tube removed.

As far as I'm concerned, Michael Schiavo should boil in hot oil for all eternity. Same holds true for that Judge George Greer.

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #95 on:** January 10, 2012, 08:29:49 PM »

Quote from: jbeige on January 10, 2012, 07:36:51 PM

Why does just crap come out of your mouth, you have no intelligent answers, this is a forum for G_ds sake people are all not suppose to agree with each other.
I guess you are mentally handicapped because you don't know by now who I'm supporting.

It's funny you accuse me of being "mentally handicapped" and "spewing crap" when you are the one who said Israel was behind 9/11 (on your own personal "forum").

jbeige · « **Reply #96 on:** January 11, 2012, 01:18:31 PM »

Quote from: Axl Rose on January 10, 2012, 08:29:49 PM

It's funny you accuse me of being "mentally handicapped" and "spewing crap" when you are the one who said Israel was behind 9/11 (on your own personal "forum").

Once again you can't think of the reason you are mentally handicapped so you come up with more nonsense.
I will not argue or fight with someone that is mentally handicapped, it's not fair to you so I will not respond to anything you say from now on.
Goodbye Mexicali Rose.

jbeige · « **Reply #97 on:** January 11, 2012, 01:23:43 PM »

Quote from: Lisa on January 10, 2012, 08:22:42 PM

Actually, that makes me like Santorum all the more.

This is not about the government meddling in people's health decisions. It's about a whoring adulterer man using the law to have his disabled wife, for whom he refused to provide necessary care, killed under the cover of the law. He wanted that insurance money. And once it came in, he stopped all care for poor Terri, and pushed aggressively to have her feeding tube removed.

As far as I'm concerned, Michael Schiavo should boil in hot oil for all eternity. Same holds true for that Judge George Greer.

Yes this is about government meddling, she was married to him, did she get a divorce from him?, I'm not sure I don't remember the whole case in detail but if she was still married to him it meant that she trusted him and yes that means with her life.
If you don't mind answering a question, I don't know you but if your mother was dying in pain and there was a way for you to make her die fast and painlessly would you do it? and if you wanted that is it right for the government go to congress to meddle and tell you No you can't do that.

Dr. Dan · « **Reply #98 on:** January 11, 2012, 01:29:55 PM »

Quote from: jbeige on January 11, 2012, 01:23:43 PM

Yes this is about government meddling, she was married to him, did she get a divorce from him?, I'm not sure I don't remember the whole case in detail but if she was still married to him it meant that she trusted him and yes that means with her life.
If you don't mind answering a question, I don't know you but if your mother was dying in pain and there was a way for you to make her die fast and painlessly would you do it? and if you wanted that is it right for the government go to congress to meddle and tell you No you can't do that.

No because pain is an act of fighting for life

jbeige · « **Reply #99 on:** January 11, 2012, 03:01:14 PM »

Quote from: Dr. Dan on January 11, 2012, 01:29:55 PM

No because pain is an act of fighting for life

I guess everyone sees things differently then when they have to actually go through.