Homosexuals seem to be just so aggressive these days. I often times read about them viciously attacking straights who oppose them and not necessarily those Westoboro Baptist freaks.
I don't even really think those Westboro people are for real. They're just a little TOO much the stereotype of the "Extremist" right winger. It's not enough for liberals that you remain neutral or tolerate gays without persecuting them. To please them you have to actively be in favor of the gay agenda and to consider their affliction to be both completely normal and healthy. Children's books are considered to be an ok place to talk about homosexuals now because homosexuality itself is no longer considered to be offensive or shocking.
As much as liberals try to say they are for women's rights, they are almost always anti-woman. For example, they refused to support Hillary Clinton when she was running for president. They rejected her completely in favor of Obama, a half-black male, who in spite of being male, had a higher place on the diversity totem pole than Hillary did. They attacked Sarah Palin viciously, even though she had a decent chance of being the first female vice president. They care nothing for the women who are coerced through threats of violence or financial abandoment to have abortions. They care nothing for the infant girls murdered in the third world for being girls, the women beaten and murdered by Muslim societies, the women forced to have abortions under the communist government of China, or the girls and women in Africa and the Middle East and other places that are forced to be genitally mutilated. We're supposed to see other cultures as being equal to our own after all, and to see them as inferior is "anthropocentric".
I think with all this to say that women are preferred more than blacks is false.
Topic: Women, The New Negroes (Read 2012 times)