Author Topic: Poll.... who is the most displeasing to look at? (Read 7151 times)

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #25 on:** October 25, 2012, 08:16:31 AM »

Quote from: bullcat3 on October 25, 2012, 08:04:40 AM

Would you like all middle aged or post middle aged women to disappear, Brennanfan?
Your point would be better made if you didn't insult half the women in the world.

Most post middle-aged women aren't strutting around in bikinis, especially most that are presenting themselves as right-wing leaders. While Geller is just plain ugly, her behavior is inappropriate for anybody.

There are older women that can pull off a bikini, unlike Geller, but is it right for them to parade around in one either?

nessuno · « **Reply #26 on:** October 25, 2012, 08:51:56 AM »

Quote from: Brennanfan on October 25, 2012, 08:16:31 AM

Most post middle-aged women aren't strutting around in bikinis, especially most that are presenting themselves as right-wing leaders. While Geller is just plain ugly, her behavior is inappropriate for anybody.

There are older women that can pull off a bikini, unlike Geller, but is it right for them to parade around in one either?

I'm not defending Pam Gellar's right to wear a bikini. I'm not defending her. I just think her age is irrelevant. When you bring age up, in the way you did, it is insulting to women. Age is not something you can control, it is not a behavior. Yes, it helps if a person, man or women, ages with grace and dignity. You have a strong enough argument, there is no need to alienate women older than 40 making it.

Pam Gellars 'hook' is her looks, so she uses them. She is not hideous. I just think she looks a bit plastic.
She is stupid for not aligning herself with JTF. It shows she has no backbone.

TruthSpreader · « **Reply #27 on:** October 25, 2012, 09:03:57 AM »

Helen Thomas is the ugliest piece of drek I ever saw. The First Chimp-Lady, Michelle Obama is a close second.

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #28 on:** October 25, 2012, 09:19:32 AM »

Quote from: bullcat3 on October 25, 2012, 08:51:56 AM

I'm not defending Pam Gellar's right to wear a bikini. I'm not defending her. I just think her age is irrelevant. When you bring age up, in the way you did, it is insulting to women. Age is not something you can control, it is not a behavior. Yes, it helps if a person, man or women, ages with grace and dignity. You have a strong enough argument, there is no need to alienate women older than 40 making it.

Pam Gellars 'hook' is her looks, so she uses them. She is not hideous. I just think she looks a bit plastic.
She is stupid for not aligning herself with JTF. It shows she has no backbone.

There is nothing wrong with pointing out that someone who hasn't aged well (and I cited the reasons for this) has no business strutting around like the whore they are. Nobody should act like that, but it really shows she has no sense.

nessuno · « **Reply #29 on:** October 25, 2012, 09:24:39 AM »

She has a lot of sense, in a way. People are talking about her.

Rubystars · « **Reply #30 on:** October 25, 2012, 02:37:58 PM »

She's not forcing anyone to look at her picture. I haven't even seen the bikini picture in question. I don't think that's the best way to promote conservatism but at the same time it's one example that it's a free country and not a Muslim dictatorship. I want people to be able to be free to wear bikinis if they want to even if they don't look good in them (subjective). Personal responsbility and freedom are conservative values even if immodesty isn't. There are slutty bikinis and relatively modest ones too.

nessuno · « **Reply #31 on:** October 25, 2012, 06:48:01 PM »

Great post, Rubystars!

Quote from: Rubystars on October 25, 2012, 02:37:58 PM

She's not forcing anyone to look at her picture. I haven't even seen the bikini picture in question. I don't think that's the best way to promote conservatism but at the same time it's one example that it's a free country and not a Muslim dictatorship. I want people to be able to be free to wear bikinis if they want to even if they don't look good in them (subjective). Personal responsbility and freedom are conservative values even if immodesty isn't. There are slutty bikinis and relatively modest ones too.

Rubystars · « **Reply #32 on:** October 25, 2012, 08:18:25 PM »

Quote from: bullcat3 on October 25, 2012, 06:48:01 PM

Great post, Rubystars!

Thank you

drlmg · « **Reply #33 on:** October 25, 2012, 09:14:40 PM »

What an elegant lady!!!!

It disgusts me when I hear media folks talk about how beautiful she is and how elegant.... "the modern day Jackie O"...... absolutely absurd. No one in their right mind could actually think such nonsense. They are unintentionally patronizing..... she looks as if she should be holding a basketball or a pro football player..... or a zoo exhibit.

JTFenthusiast · « **Reply #34 on:** October 26, 2012, 09:37:14 AM »

Quote from: briann on October 24, 2012, 11:47:36 AM

I totally disagree with the generalizations of Pamela Geller. She isnt an athiest.... and many religious conservatives are fans Atlas Shrugs.

But I agree I dont like her dissing JTF and she should not be showing off her body in a bikini. As Drew Carry once said.... if you have a body like mine.... cover it the F*** up.

Do we have to keep posting pictures of the Christian conception of Satan here?

HiWarp · « **Reply #35 on:** October 26, 2012, 10:28:54 AM »

Quote from: JTFenthusiast on October 26, 2012, 09:37:14 AM

Do we have to keep posting pictures of the Christian conception of Satan here?

That is hideous! And you do realize that by including the photo in your response, you're contradicting your own post.

briann · « **Reply #36 on:** October 26, 2012, 10:29:21 AM »

Quote from: JTFenthusiast on October 26, 2012, 09:37:14 AM

Do we have to keep posting pictures of the Christian conception of Satan here?

Dont you just love that picture?!?!

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #37 on:** October 26, 2012, 07:03:20 PM »

Bullcat I never said that bikinis should be outlawed. I said that they are not appropriate for conservatives to be parading around in regardless of how attractive they are. Scamela looks particularly bad in one, but that is really besides the point.

drlmg · « **Reply #38 on:** October 26, 2012, 11:47:19 PM »

OK.... take this!!!!

Retribution for posting Helen Thomas over and over..... ha ha!!

The One and Only Mo · « **Reply #39 on:** October 27, 2012, 07:32:06 PM »

I have to say that I never found Michelle Obama as ugly as the others you posted here. Golda Meir was ugly. Janet Reno, ugly. I don't think I know enough politics to bring out any more names (though Hillary is pretty ugly). Compared to the rest, Michelle ain't so bad. One of my lesbian profs, who just told us that she has a son and a partner, is really ugly.

drlmg · « **Reply #40 on:** October 28, 2012, 01:39:37 PM »

OK.... due to many requests....

The fine looking lady 3 posts up is Donatella Versace...... no I don't have her phone number...... and yes, she is married.

I'm sorry if I broke anyone's heart!

Debbie Shafer · « **Reply #41 on:** October 28, 2012, 04:59:44 PM »

Moochelle wins on this one!

Debbie Shafer · « **Reply #42 on:** October 28, 2012, 05:02:14 PM »

Pamella Geller is pleasant to the eye....Helen Thomas is the other scary one!

JTFenthusiast · « **Reply #43 on:** November 05, 2012, 11:55:03 PM »

Quote from: The One and Only Mo on October 27, 2012, 07:32:06 PM

I have to say that I never found Michelle Obama as ugly as the others you posted here. Golda Meir was ugly. Janet Reno, ugly. I don't think I know enough politics to bring out any more names (though Hillary is pretty ugly). Compared to the rest, Michelle ain't so bad. One of my lesbian profs, who just told us that she has a son and a partner, is really ugly.

Some lesbians don't seem to take good care of themselves physically

JTFenthusiast · « **Reply #44 on:** November 05, 2012, 11:57:45 PM »

Quote from: LKZ on October 24, 2012, 02:29:33 AM

I strongly disagree. And do you think she really knew anything about JTF when she made that comment in the first place?

Maybe, but then if she were truly intelligent and moral, she would have said, "I don't know."

Rubystars · « **Reply #45 on:** November 06, 2012, 03:53:32 AM »

Quote from: JTFenthusiast on November 05, 2012, 11:55:03 PM

Some lesbians don't seem to take good care of themselves physically

Maybe those are the butch ones who see caring for their apperance as being too feminine, as some men do.

Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks · « **Reply #46 on:** November 06, 2012, 03:56:55 AM »

Quote from: Debbie Shafer on October 28, 2012, 05:02:14 PM

Pamella Geller is pleasant to the eye....Helen Thomas is the other scary one!

Scamela is disgusting. She might be attractive next to Helen Thomas or Madeleine Albright but who isn't? Moochelle is better-looking than Scamela.

Zelhar · « **Reply #47 on:** November 06, 2012, 07:54:33 AM »

Quote from: drlmg on October 26, 2012, 11:47:19 PM

OK.... take this!!!!

Retribution for posting Helen Thomas over and over..... ha ha!!

What the hell is that, she is semi roasted unless it's photoshopped.

Irish Zionist · « **Reply #48 on:** November 06, 2012, 08:03:03 AM »

Everyone in this thread doesn't even come close to Catherine Ashton

Zelhar · « **Reply #49 on:** November 06, 2012, 08:13:50 AM »

She is proof that neanderthals interbred with homo sapience.