But is it not true that there are no 'illegal Jewish Outposts' which are built on 'Palestinian land'? If so then what he said makes perfect sense in my opinion. On the one hand, he appeals to those who are under the impression that there is really 'palestinian land' to begin with, and that Jews are illegally occupying such a land. The Levy report, which was mentioned in the article, purports that there is no 'palestinian land' which can be occupied, as the entire region is legally Jewish land...
So maybe I do not understand something or this is actually good news...