Howard Zinn: Ultimate Self-Hating Jew

[Binyamin Yisrael]

This animal was also opposed to bombing Germany in World War II when he was a soldier.

This is the piece of trash he left in this World when he went to a warm place.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_People%27s_History_of_the_United_States

[muman613]

Ick.... This guy is a clearly a commie and a communist agitator. Good thing he died 3 years ago... I am also happy to say he died the week of my birthday... Good riddance to bad rubbish... What a Jew hater...

[Binyamin Yisrael]

I found out about him in college. Luckily I never had to read his book. But the teacher brought it up. I think he used the book in his American History class but I didn't have that teacher for that class. I had him in Vietnam War class and a Historiography class that was required for all History majors. The latter class was like the History of History or theory of History. It was learning about History rather than about a particular subject in History.

[Binyamin Yisrael]

I wrote this in the class I mentioned.

Zinn, Howard. “The Use and Abuse of History”. Declarations of Independence. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

Howard Zinn, born August 24, 1922, is an American Jewish Liberal activist and professor of history. He is best known for his controversial book A People's History of the United States. His “philosophy incorporates ideas from Marxism, anarchism, and socialism” [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Zinn] and has been in involved with the civil rights and anti-war movements in the United States since the 1960’s. In “The Use and Abuse of History”, Zinn talks of how he is not interested in being an “objective” historian and wants to work to change what he views as the injustices in the world. As an honest historian, he should be discussing both sides and not merely teach his left wing point of view.

True objectivity is something lacking in the academic study of history. Historians will usually write the left wing version of an event and present it as a fact rather than attribute it to the people espousing those views. Yet when they write of right wing people, they do attribute the views to those they are speaking of. An honest historian should be a narrator quoting different views, not choosing one side over the other. Sadly, in mainstream academia today, the dominant trend it to write a left wing history as if speaking in the first person while pretending they are presenting a third person point of view.