The standard solutions being proposed by the signs on the streets in Jerusalem for the massacre are "this is some type of punishment of the community because we haven't been Charedi enough".
The argument between the street signs is what particular violation of Charediism is the cause. Is it I-phones, or is it Jews ascending to the Temple Mount etc. etc.?
So on the one hand Litvak in-fighting is a step in the right direction because it is looking for something that "we" (the Charedi public), should change, rather than just what "they" (the non-Charedi public) should change.
However,it still is a diversion or a smoke screen preventing the Charedi community from considering Kahanist explanations of the Har Nof tragedy.