In 1967, the Lubavitcher Rebbe said that all the Arabs should be expelled immediately.
He said that leaving them there was insane. He was against ANY negotiations or pronouncements of giving up land of any kind.
He didn't say what rav kahane said should be implemented later.
He was saying they should be expelled in 1967.
I read it in yiddish myself. I know what he said.
Rabbi Kahane wanted a Torah state. I'm not entirely sure what he meant by that. But Chaim seems to talk the same. It wouldn't go as far as creating a civil war. But it'd somehow show people the greatness of a torah lifestyle.
He didn't speak about it much
see
http://www.kahane.org/meir/interview.htmIsrael’s Ayatollahs:
Meir Kahane and the Far Right in Israel.
(a leftist that interviewed him, but you get to read what he said, it's quite a deep interview)
Here you see he wanted sort kind of torah state.
He also mentioned in FANTASTIC video clip talking to some kids, he went into depth..
I must've googled for Kahana <-- note the variant spelling
that is a fantastic clip.. He explains that he wants people to keep shabbat, but he doesn't mention that so much because people wouldn't vote for him.
(no talk of forcing them to )
In another clip. i'm not sure which.. He says he's a rabbi first. You'll find that all his positions have a Torah argument. The secular arguments didn't defend those positions totally.. It caused minor problems..
For example, with theoretical questions.. sometimes he was asked 'what if the arabs were saints'. - theoretically. e.g. in the olmert kahane video clip.
In that clip he didn't quote the RAMBAM. He said it'd never happen - which was right.. but the guy kept asking 'theoretically'. He didn't get a chance to continue much 'cos it was a brief news program.
He coudl also have been asked, what if they were a minority and remained one and couldn't vote jews out..
He was asked a similar question in a radio interview online, I can't remember his answer.. And in a debate with dennis prager, he quoted the RAMBAM. It was appropriate then, 'cos it was about who represented judaism. True torah judaism.
(now prager may be more open that he's not orthodox. i don't know. He doesn't believe in torah from moses at sinai and the midbar)
the Torah position which he stated in his talk at Brandeis, is that only jews must be able to vote. He read out a few RAMBAMs in that speach, it was great.
So even if they were a minority and saints, he wouldn't allow it.
Some leftist jews were saying he was a racist.. and zionism is racist. He showed that if they are going to say that, then it's not kahane.. it's judaism. He was very smart, he knew that these jews weren't so barmy that they wanted to say judaism was racist! And left wingers can't accept that any religion is 'racist' not even islam. So his argument flawed them.
There are also fantastic radio interviews of kahane, they aren't on youtube..
Somebody should put the "kahana" chemed video on youtube. But say kahane not kahana. So people find it when searching.
In the speach at the Hilton, he said somebody, or some people shouted "KAHANE MELECH YISRAEL".. So I think he may well have hoped to be "prime minister" in secular language. But King in religious language - and that's his true position.. He is a rabbi first. Imagine Kahane king of israel, what a dream!!!
I think he mentioned that he's a rabbi not a politician, in the speech where the guy through red paint on him, where it looked like blood. The "national press club" one.