Homosexual Milo Yiannopoulos admits he's a gay pedophile in UNEDITED VIDEO

[Shlomo]

Pervert Milo Yiannopoulos on “The Joys of Young Boys Having Sexual Relationships With Older Men”

Will there be ANY Trumpsters that care? There is NOTHING conservative about homosexual or pedophile perverts. Breitbart, where Milo is a writer, thinks this news isn’t important and ignores it all together. CPAC cancels his appearance. Milo claims that sexual relationships between young male children and older men can be “hugely positive” in UNEDITED VIDEO.

https://jtf.org/pervert-milo-on-the-joys-of-young-boys-having-sexual-relationships-with-older-men/

[Zelhar]

Following this revelation he has been disinvited from CPAC.

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

Book deal now cancelled.

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

This brings attention to an important issue.  Many men who are "gay" as adults simply became so or convinced they were so because they were abused as a child by an adult predator.  The psychological damage is lasting.

[nessuno]

If it weren't for the Bezerkly incident.
I would have to say....Milo who?

[Lisa]

Milo is a b-s artist and an all around clown.

[Israel Chai]

I didn't support him in the first place, I'm not making a degenerate the hero of the conservative movement, and the clip where he says this is too vulgar and disgusting in the first place to watch, but this is a big lie, he didn't support pedophilia.

Quote from his facebook page.

I am a gay man, and a child abuse victim.

I would like to restate my utter disgust at adults who sexually abuse minors. I am horrified by pedophilia and I have devoted large portions of my career as a journalist to exposing child abusers. I've outed three of them, in fact -- three more than most of my critics. And I've repeatedly expressed disgust at pedophilia in my feature and opinion writing. My professional record is very clear.

But I do understand that these videos, even though some of them are edited deceptively, paint a different picture.

I'm partly to blame. My own experiences as a victim led me to believe I could say anything I wanted to on this subject, no matter how outrageous. But I understand that my usual blend of British sarcasm, provocation and gallows humor might have come across as flippancy, a lack of care for other victims or, worse, "advocacy." I deeply regret that. People deal with things from their past in different ways.

As to some of the specific claims being made, sometimes things tumble out of your mouth on these long, late-night live-streams, when everyone is spit-balling, that are incompletely expressed or not what you intended. Nonetheless, I've reviewed the tapes that appeared last night in their proper full context and I don't believe they say what is being reported.

I do not advocate for illegal behavior. I explicitly say on the tapes that I think the current age of consent is "about right."

I do not believe sex with 13-year-olds is okay. When I mentioned the number 13, I was talking about the age I lost my own virginity.

I shouldn't have used the word "boy" -- which gay men often do to describe young men of consenting age -- instead of "young man." That was an error.

I am certainly guilty of imprecise language, which I regret.

Anyone who suggests I turn a blind eye to illegal activity or to the abuse of minors is unequivocally wrong. I am implacably opposed to the normalization of pedophilia and I will continue to report and speak accordingly.

Previous statement: https://www.facebook.com/myiannopoulos/posts/851263248344905

[Zelhar]

He indeed didn't endorse pedophilia. I think some of the stuff he says is very disturbing especially about laying the responsibility on young teenage boys being abused by adult figures of authorities.  But as a matter of principle he did say he agrees to the legal age of concent and he didn't endorse pedophilia, but he he seems to have endorsed pederast relationship which is also quite problematic.

Only in his statement does he now claim to have been a victim of sex abuse, in the two resurfaced  videos he jokes about it and indeed it could be a defense mechanism. But he also said that he was the predator and that young teenagers can be predators, which actually is somewhat true only it doesn't excuse an adult and especially figure of authority and education like a priest from not engaging.

Milo is a troll provocateur and even somewhat of a bully himself, he is also highly intelectual and sharp with words. I think some of the retractions and clarifications he now states are themselves lies, namely he did refer to sex between 13 year old boys and older men, he did claim that it is sometimes ok and some boys are mature enough to engage willingly engage in this.

[GreenLightToGo]

Pervert Milo Yiannopoulos on “The Joys of Young Boys Having Sexual Relationships With Older Men”

Will there be ANY Trumpsters that care? There is NOTHING conservative about homosexual or pedophile perverts.

I support Trump and I'm not a Milo supporter. Milo is basically a British anti-Semite, and he defends promoting anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.

JTF generalizes too broadly about Trump supporters.

Here's Ted Cruz by the way praising anti-Semitic Rand Paul during his drone strikes filibuster, telling him: "your standing here today like a modern day Mr. Smith goes to Washington," and "my only regret is that there are not 99 of your colleagues standing with you"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J76IkSmfHmY

[Israel Chai]

I support Trump and I'm not a Milo supporter. Milo is basically a British anti-Semite, and he defends promoting anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.

JTF generalizes too broadly about Trump supporters.

Here's Ted Cruz by the way praising anti-Semitic Rand Paul during his drone strikes filibuster, telling him: "your standing here today like a modern day Mr. Smith goes to Washington," and "my only regret is that there are not 99 of your colleagues standing with you"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J76IkSmfHmY

Yeah him and his groupies troll Ben Shapiro.

Whoever decided that Cruz supports good people? We all knew he supported lots of bad guys in the past. It so happens that everything he does has been wonderful.

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

He had unwittingly exposed the epidemic of predation in the "gay" world.  Will anyone talk about it?  No, it goes against the gay is ok leftist dogma to address victims of sexual abuse by adult males.

[Israel Chai]

He had unwittingly exposed the epidemic of predation in the "gay" world.  Will anyone talk about it?  No, it goes against the gay is ok leftist dogma to address victims of sexual abuse by adult males.

The morality of this situation is complicated and I don't know the right thing to do. We don't want a homosexual as our role model, his comments are depraved and encourage evil. He fights against islam and is making liberals stop supporting them. If we sell him out, they will call the right cannibals, and it's dangerous for someone who spoke out against Islam, especially as strong as he did. Even some x-muslims aren't great people, you can't just sell them out if you don't like how they are if they help you fight Islam.

Then there's his army of Jew-hating trolls, who also don't like Islam. You don't want that hive to grow, but they're less horrible than liberals. Whatever the right thing to do here is, is complicated and I think just ruining him may not be it.

He's already against Islam, he could be forced to survive by this through being a voice against homosexual pedophilia, and he can focus on the muslim and Catholic communities he understands. Or maybe Hashem is just sick that this is our hero, or it's measure for measure for trying to destroy Ben Shapiro for doing the right thing in regards to Trump.

[Ulli]

For me is there a clear red line with homosexuals. I separate strictly from them. There is nothing good to expect.

I am not surprised. Pedophilia is one of lots of evils they are frequently associated with.  How many Nationalsocialists even in our time are known homosexuals? And additional how many homosexuals from the western world are known to travel to Muslim countries for sex holidays? And this Nazi uniforms at their parades and the drugs. This are abnormal people even if some hide a little bit.

But the main thing is their hate towards god which causes all this crimes.

[nessuno]

For me not all people that are homosexual are evil. If people go about their lives not imposing their beliefs on others....I don't have a problem with that.  I have no opinion on Milo. 

[Israel Chai]

For me is there a clear red line with homosexuals. I separate strictly from them. There is nothing good to expect.

I am not surprised. Pedophilia is one of lots of evils they are frequently associated with.  How many Nationalsocialists even in our time are known homosexuals? And additional how many homosexuals from the western world are known to travel to Muslim countries for sex holidays? And this Nazi uniforms at their parades and the drugs. This are abnormal people even if some hide a little bit.

But the main thing is their hate towards god which causes all this crimes.

I have the same line, and never promoted him, but I'm not sure that attacking him is the best thing to do in this situation. Still, you can expect bad from a stay at home Milo, but Milo fights islam which is good, I think. It's better that they all fight Islam, no?

[Israel Chai]

One thing I know is that we have people already that take down pisslam in a funny way, and are actual intellectuals instead of degenerates that want drama.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/265901/muslim-leader-says-only-beat-your-wife-if-flowers-daniel-greenfield

Muslim Leader Says Only Beat Your Wife if Flowers Don't Work
February 23, 2017
Daniel Greenfield
 

The Muslim version of Valentine's Day is just much more unpleasant.

    Muslim community leader Keysar Trad says an angry husband can beat his wife as 'a last resort'.

    The president of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils made the remarks after Sky News presenter Andrew Bolt quoted a verse from the Koran, saying: 'It is permissible for him [the husband] to beat her [the wife] light with his hands.'

    The controversial Muslim leader, who has previously called for polygamy in Australia, said he had studied the text with 'a number of Islamic scholars' to reach a conclusion about the meaning of the verse.

Trad suggested counseling and chocolates and flowers first. Before the beating.

That comes from the President of the Australian Federation of Islamic Councils who is still apparently seeking Wife No. 2.

    WHEN his wife was away in Lebanon for several months with their six children, Keysar Trad was lonely and considered taking a second wife.

Well obviously. Sadly the search doesn't seem to be going so well.

    From emotional 'love poetry' to brutal instant messages - a Muslim leader has opened up about the 'heartbreak' he has felt in his search for a second wife.

    But the prominent Islamic community spokesman has been left crushed by two women who he courted - but eventually rejected him.

    'You wouldn't believe how heartbreaking it is,' he said. 'It’s always very very devastating.'

The whole thing is probably a little more heartbreaking for Wife No. 1.

    'It's like they've beaten me to a pulp, every single one of them,' Mr Trad said.


You can't blame them. They did it before he could do it to them.

[Lewinsky Stinks, Dr. Brennan Rocks]

I have the same line, and never promoted him, but I'm not sure that attacking him is the best thing to do in this situation. Still, you can expect bad from a stay at home Milo, but Milo fights islam which is good, I think. It's better that they all fight Islam, no?

StørmFrønt "fights Islam" too. We know how sincere they are about that when they side with the Fakestinians and Iranians over Israel. So no, these WN-types who are supposedly equally against Islam and Judaism are absolutely zero improvement over those who openly love Islam.

[Israel Chai]

StørmFrønt "fights Islam" too. We know how sincere they are about that when they side with the Fakestinians and Iranians over Israel. So no, these WN-types who are supposedly equally against Islam and Judaism are absolutely zero improvement over those who openly love Islam.

I agree completely, and it helps expose the issue, StørmFrønt doesn't say they're on our side and Milo kind of by association does. Now that I think of it, you really want young conservatives hearing Milo speak at an event that purports to have speeches with conservative values? This was a mercy of Hashem it happened now, but lots of conservatives declare we'll look the worst.

We need like a B-league for the crazies I think. It can be focused on liberals, and we keep them away from us, but they hurt liberals and might produce a conservative here and there. We can't just declare them to be complete animals if they tried to fight for our causes for a bit, we need to be able to say "oh he's a schmaserviative, they fight for a specific good cause but don't represent us", instead of "he should live in the sewers".

[Binyamin Yisrael]

But isn't he Jewish? According to Wikipedia, his mother's mother was Jewish.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milo_Yiannopoulos

[Israel Chai]

But isn't he Jewish? According to Wikipedia, his mother's mother was Jewish.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milo_Yiannopoulos

Please just shh, we have enough chilul Hashem... he's religiously Catholicish athiest.

[Binyamin Yisrael]

That guy's all over the place. It says he had a black Muslim boyfriend. He also said he opposed "gay rights" and homosexuals belong in the closet. So he takes part in activities in which he criticizes (Islam and homosexuality).

[Kahane-Was-Right BT]

The morality of this situation is complicated and I don't know the right thing to do. We don't want a homosexual as our role model, his comments are depraved and encourage evil. He fights against islam and is making liberals stop supporting them. If we sell him out, they will call the right cannibals, and it's dangerous for someone who spoke out against Islam, especially as strong as he did. Even some x-muslims aren't great people, you can't just sell them out if you don't like how they are if they help you fight Islam.

Then there's his army of Jew-hating trolls, who also don't like Islam. You don't want that hive to grow, but they're less horrible than liberals. Whatever the right thing to do here is, is complicated and I think just ruining him may not be it.

He's already against Islam, he could be forced to survive by this through being a voice against homosexual pedophilia, and he can focus on the muslim and Catholic communities he understands. Or maybe Hashem is just sick that this is our hero, or it's measure for measure for trying to destroy Ben Shapiro for doing the right thing in regards to Trump.

I'm not really interested in "ruining him."  If he sticks with that belief system, he ruins himself.  Which is probably why he already denounced it and trying to say he didnt mean it like that.

But reality is, he pointed to a major problem and it fuels the "gay community" since it is full of abused people who rationalize what happened to them and then come to think it is ok.  And they victimize others who get mentally destroyed and now join their "community."   There is a man boy abuse epidemic in gay society and no one will talk about it because it will be seen as antigay hate to do so.  Even Milo will not address this issue not because of PC reasons but probably his mind is so warped that he thinks it's ok.

[Nachus]

                                                                                                        

 Once again, dor ha kelev. This shows the depravity and twisted madness of this PC
 era.The moral decay that exists in today's world is worse than ever.