First of all, both of these guys are
undoubtedly smart and make some good
points. Mosab however shows a clearer,
more “ in depth” understanding of this
matter perceiving it through a considerably
more “morally sound,” righteous lens” as
well as having more tangible experience in
the region. Conversely, Cenk, perhaps tries
to convey or project a “limited degree” of
“neutrality” in the context of conjuring
up a so called feasible solution to this issue/topic.
What Cenk does not ‘appear’ to acknowledge
here is not only matters such as the 1929 Hebron
massacres having absolutely nothing to do
with any so called disputes over land and
furthermore, that this concept of a so called
“Fakestinian State” or such a so called ‘people’
is a complete falsehood with no historical validity.
It appears as though Cenk, possibly intentionally
or not, tries to apply “moral equivalency” to this
matter and it ‘appears’ as though Mosab does not
and is right not to because Israel does take the
“moral high ground” and justifiably so. This is an
interesting commentary/debate and people should
watch it!
Topic: The best argument for Israel to destroy Hamas (Read 1360 times)