
I thought Chaim did an excellent and professional job debating
this individual who was obviously biased and reactionary,
that constantly either intentionally or perhaps unintentionally
not seeming to absorb much of anything and as Dovid_2
said; (kept interrupting,) to a certain extent ‘talking over’ as
well as tried finishing his sentences. The ‘moderator’ was
to a degree more professional and maybe ‘more’ neutral and
unbiased but even there, there was not a world of difference.
It should also be mentioned that the unmitigated chutzpah of
some people and their reactions to this great segment were biased,
ignorant, less than fair, and that Chaim and the excellent things he
stressed and points he made were once again, absolutely necessary,
had to be said and were ‘right on the money!’