Recent Posts1
General Discussion / Re: It's morally wrong to vote for Ramaswamy
« Last post by Rubystars on Today at 11:17:34 AM »Yes, Ramaswamy would probably be better than Biden. However, it is certainly possible to regulate the sexual behavior of adults. For example, sodomy used to be a felony in every state, and at one time punishable by death in Virginia. The Supreme Court has upheld sodomy laws in the past. The Constitution can be interpreted various ways depending on who the judges are. At one time the Supreme Court said there's a constitutional right to abortion, and thankfully now there's not. The way the American legal system is set up, laws can be reversed one way or the other. So the obstacle is not the Constitution, that's just a convenient cop-out. The obstacle is that people like Ramaswamy and his cult of Rama Swama Ding Dongs are moral cowards and just don't care enough to stand up for what's right. They don't have the will or the stomach to push for it. They don't want to lose the respect of modern-day weirdos. Populism is not conservative. It's the same thing as being a Democrat, except it's not quite as far down the slippery slope to Sodom as today's Democrats. But the end result is the same. If you defend faggots in the bedroom today, tomorrow you won't be able to defend children in the bathroom.
(Ram770, I realize you don't speak much English. So if you read this thread, don't worry. You're not the Ram in the Rama Swama Ding Dong. I'm not trying to insult you indirectly.)
I don't agree with homosexual behavior but I'm not sure if modern society is willing to regulate private behavior between adults at this point.
I do think you are right though that we do have to be wary of a slippery slope. That's how they got a lot of their agenda pushed through. They did it in little steps that seemed somewhat reasonable and added on to it. I don't think we're anywhere near the bottom of the slope either if things keep sliding the wrong direction.
