JTF.ORG Forum
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: schrodinger's cat on August 30, 2008, 10:48:42 PM
-
http://michaelsavage.com/
McCain has thrown the election. It is clear now with his choice for Vice President that he has no desire to win in November. Why else would he chose an inexperienced woman, whose only apparent qualification is that she won a beauty pageant in the 1980s? Why else would he refuse to say Barack Hussein Obama’s middle name? Why else would he run an ad praising Obama and congratulating him for winning the nomination?
If McCain had chosen Mitt Romney, a man with real leadership ability, real charisma, and real experience, he might have stood a chance. He could have made up for his lack of energy in confronting his opponent, his useless pandering to liberals, and his refusal to expose Obama’s leftism and inexperience. Instead he trumped inexperience with more inexperience. Obama, for all his far-left socialism, picked a running mate who is perceived as giving the ticket more experience. McCain, in defiance of all logic, undermined his strong suit by selecting a political neophyte who waters down his key advantage over Obama.
Of course, I can hear the calls already. Mike, you should give her a chance, she’s a real conservative. Mike, he’s just doing this because he knows he has to pander to win. Mike, isn’t it great that he picked a woman. Wrong, wrong, wrong. Picking someone because of their sex instead of their ability is the same kind of affirmative action insanity that the Democrats have shoved down our throats. We don’t want a panderer, we want a president. If he had chosen a woman who was a real nationalist with a real resume, I would have said, “Right on, John.” But McCain has dropped the ball, thrown in the towel, and raised the white flag. And a generation of Americans will pay for his mistake.
-------
The conservative base wanted Palin. The Free Republic poll shows 70 percent of members who didn't support McCain before will now support him because of Palin. Other polls like rasmussen and Zogby has Palin with favorable ratings among conservatives and independents and a McCain boost as well. And McCain got a 7 million dollar influx of donations since he picked her.
Savage is completely wrong on this issue. He is going to lose much of his audience by bashing Palin. I am very angry with him right now.
-
Savage is a blow hard he hates Chaim too he is afraid of Chaim
-
http://michaelsavage.com/
And McCain got a 7 million dollar influx of donations since he picked her.
Savage is completely wrong on this issue. He is going to lose much of his audience by bashing Palin. I am very angry with him right now.
I'm one of the people who decided to give John McCain's campaign a donation because of the Sarah Palin selection. I wouldn't have done so if any of the other names being mentioned as McCain's running mate was chosen. Hopefully, enough people will prove Michael Savage wrong.
-
Michael Faggot has about as much stock with me as his good friend and possible significant other, Fag Buchanan. ::)
-
Michael Faggot has about as much stock with me as his good friend and possible significant other, Fag Buchanan. ::)
Well he is being a real putz right now. 90 Percent of conservatives love Palin. He will have no audience if he bashes her every day.
-
Michael Faggot has about as much stock with me as his good friend and possible significant other, Fag Buchanan. ::)
I can't stand Michael Weiner. Recently I got xm radio in my car and I listen to Rusty Humphries who is very popular in middle America. He is on the radio in the southern states. He is a zionist and is too right wing to be on any of the new york stations. Chaimfan, try to find a way to listen to his show. You will like it.
-
I was never a fan of Michael Sewage until now.
-
Savage is a blow hard he hates Chaim too he is afraid of Chaim
Has he talked about Chaim? Michael Savage has lost all credibility with being against Palin. We are in for the fight of our lives over the next few months and he just wants to have an opinion that no one expects him to have just to have higher ratings?
Maybe he never was a conservative and will come out of the closet as a liberal. It's possible his whole show is a fascade.
Medved said he thinks Michael Savage is a liberal who pretends to be conservative for money. Savage makes a dime on every possible thing. He sells hats and shirts and advertises to the gills with his website. When he had that lawsuit, he asked people to donate money to him. Every "encore presentation rerun" is the same episode where he asks for donations. He made millions and millions, his son owns Rockstar energy drinks and he wants $20 from the truckers, retail clerks and retired people for his lawsuit. I will not listen to him anymore.
-
i was listening to his show the other night. It's not that he hates her..he thinks that she's a fine person...However, he feels that she was the wrong pick for McCain because she's basically a nobody...
Here's my point of view where i disagree and agree with him: For those of us who are part of the big cities and surrounded by flashy lights, we would agree that paline was a terrible pick. However, for the middle class, working class, blue collar class, non lazy lower middle class, Paline is a symbol of small-town america. Someone who is an outsider. Someone who is real. Someone who is positive. Some one who has a good heart. If the majority of people in this country who vote are the middle class, workign class, non lazy lower middle class, blue collar class, who cannot stand the snobby attitudes of the democrats especially Obama and his wife, they will hands down go for palin.
Also, she looks good on camera. People feel good when they see her smile and hear her talk. She will become a somebody and everyone is fascinated with her. I think things will work out in McCain's favor because she is very likable and very hard to hate, unlike female democrats such as Hillary.
-
I hope that Palin was not picked for affirmative action reasons. If so then I don't think that was right. However she does seem to be a better candidate overall than Romney because she's much more conservative than he is. Of course I don't completely trust any politician but that's politics for you.
As for Michael Savage I don't really believe he's a liberal. I also don't really believe he's a conservative. He's a self-serving person and that's it.
-
Michael Faggot has about as much stock with me as his good friend and possible significant other, Fag Buchanan. ::)
we already know how you feel about michael savage..no need to keep repeating it.
-
Why is he opposed to Palin? I'm thrilled that McCain picked her. Also, it'll be nice to have a woman in the White House who's not a rug muncher ie Hillary.
-
I hope that Palin was not picked for affirmative action reasons. If so then I don't think that was right. However she does seem to be a better candidate overall than Romney because she's much more conservative than he is. Of course I don't completely trust any politician but that's politics for you.
As for Michael Savage I don't really believe he's a liberal. I also don't really believe he's a conservative. He's a self-serving person and that's it.
he's a cynic.. I was going back and forth with another conservative talk show host (Al Franken?)...and he had better points than Savage. He was saying about the deomcrats complaining she had no experience...errhmm...look at Obama... He went on further that the democrats put down the elderly and females...in the way they poke fun of McCain's age and his female running mate as well as the way Hillary was treated...
-
Why is he opposed to Palin? I'm thrilled that McCain picked her. Also, it'll be nice to have a woman in the White House who's not a rug muncher ie Hillary.
\
he's only opposed to her because nobody has ever heard of her. She's inexperienced.
I say, so what? She has the right idea with her politics and she will help McCain get a lot of undecided voters. It also takes the camera off of Obama's ugly face on to a much prettier face.
-
I hope that Palin was not picked for affirmative action reasons. If so then I don't think that was right. However she does seem to be a better candidate overall than Romney because she's much more conservative than he is. Of course I don't completely trust any politician but that's politics for you.
As for Michael Savage I don't really believe he's a liberal. I also don't really believe he's a conservative. He's a self-serving person and that's it.
he's a cynic.. I was going back and forth with another conservative talk show host (Al Franken?)...and he had better points than Savage. He was saying about the deomcrats complaining she had no experience...errhmm...look at Obama... He went on further that the democrats put down the elderly and females...in the way they poke fun of McCain's age and his female running mate as well as the way Hillary was treated...
Hillary really did get shafted. She should have gotten the nomination for the Democratic party.
-
I hope that Palin was not picked for affirmative action reasons. If so then I don't think that was right. However she does seem to be a better candidate overall than Romney because she's much more conservative than he is. Of course I don't completely trust any politician but that's politics for you.
As for Michael Savage I don't really believe he's a liberal. I also don't really believe he's a conservative. He's a self-serving person and that's it.
he's a cynic.. I was going back and forth with another conservative talk show host (Al Franken?)...and he had better points than Savage. He was saying about the deomcrats complaining she had no experience...errhmm...look at Obama... He went on further that the democrats put down the elderly and females...in the way they poke fun of McCain's age and his female running mate as well as the way Hillary was treated...
Hillary really did get shafted. She should have gotten the nomination for the Democratic party.
Shalom Ruby, I agree with you...even though I can't stand her, I doubt if she would intentionally endanger our Country like Obama will. She is the lesser of the 2 evils.
Much lesser!
Shalom from Dox :)
-
She spent her life pandering to blacks and trying to help them with expanding their snivel rights and all she gets for it is for them to go with someone who looks like them and leave her in the dust.
-
Dan, it is an increasingly well-known fact in the conservative world that the shmo Michael Faggot is a two-bit fraud, who was a LIBERAL for most of his life, who apes conservative positions and pretends to be as shocking as possible so that he can get fat ratings and a big fat paycheck. Why can't I criticize Michael Wiener? This worm is a disgrace to the conservative movement and indeed, all of humanity.
BTW, Al Franken is a far-left commentator. I think you are thinking of some other person.
-
I hope that Palin was not picked for affirmative action reasons. If so then I don't think that was right. However she does seem to be a better candidate overall than Romney because she's much more conservative than he is. Of course I don't completely trust any politician but that's politics for you.
As for Michael Savage I don't really believe he's a liberal. I also don't really believe he's a conservative. He's a self-serving person and that's it.
Probably true..he has a unique show but if I find out he bashed Chaim or JTF I'm done with him. Chaim is so right when he says talk radio wastes resources and lets people blow off steam. Savage has done well by helping those condemned Marines, and helping stop the Dubai ports deal and the Immigration Bill. Still, he's become too wishy washy. He flipped on Israel during the Lebanese/Israel War and all of a sudden befriends these black racists who call his show. When we're in times like these, we need reliability and strength. Savage has a good show but he can't lead a mass movement and talk radio will never step up to the plate for what needs to be done. CBS/ABC and other news outlets can pull any of these guys at any time and they all know they will be out on their ass like Ken Hamblin if they say anything about Muslims.
I have a feeling only mass civil disobedience will be the answer.
-
I LOCKED THIS TILL IT IS CLEANED OUT GET THIS PIG OUT!
-
Even though I hate Michael Savage, he might have a point about Palin. I was reading an article about how she endorsed Pat Buchanus for president in the 1990's. Even Michael Weiner Savage has completely cut off all ties with Buchanus due to buchans's nazi activity. I think that we need to look into Palin further. I am not saying this is true, I just think she needs to be looked into.
-
It's safe to say that Huckabee should of been the one chosen.
-
DWI,
You're wrong. Mord provided proof that she didn't support Buchanan. Don't make assumptions.
-
I was never a fan of Michael Sewage until now.
;D Scriabin.
I am actually WITH McCain b/c of his choice. Not because she is a 'female' but she is a definite representation of what feminity SHOULD be about. IT IS MUCH NEEDED.
-
Even though I hate Michael Savage, he might have a point about Palin. I was reading an article about how she endorsed Pat Buchanus for president in the 1990's. Even Michael Weiner Savage has completely cut off all ties with Buchanus due to buchans's nazi activity. I think that we need to look into Palin further. I am not saying this is true, I just think she needs to be looked into.
I believe that she is directly sent from G-d ~FOR SUCH A TIME AS THIS.~
-
Scriabin,
Your post is an embarrassment to JTF.
Your posts about women do not represent the views of JTF in any manner.
-
Dan, it is an increasingly well-known fact in the conservative world that the shmo Michael Faggot is a two-bit fraud, who was a LIBERAL for most of his life, who apes conservative positions and pretends to be as shocking as possible so that he can get fat ratings and a big fat paycheck. Why can't I criticize Michael Wiener? This worm is a disgrace to the conservative movement and indeed, all of humanity.
BTW, Al Franken is a far-left commentator. I think you are thinking of some other person.
Go ahead and criticize him, just dont tell people what THEY should listen to. I DONT see Savage like you do, and thats all.
BTW: I couldnt answer your pm CF I was totally falling asleep!!
-
I can't believe Savage he thinks that chooseing a Die Hard Conseratative he is pandering to LIberals
-
Mord provided proof that she didn't support Buchanan.
-
I was never a fan of Michael Sewage until now.
;D Scriabin.
I am actually WITH McCain b/c of his choice. Not because she is a 'female' but she is a definite representation of what feminity SHOULD be about. IT IS MUCH NEEDED.
Interesting how she's both strong and very feminine. She blows Hillary out of the water!
-
Even though I hate Michael Savage, he might have a point about Palin. I was reading an article about how she endorsed Pat Buchanus for president in the 1990's. Even Michael Weiner Savage has completely cut off all ties with Buchanus due to buchans's nazi activity. I think that we need to look into Palin further. I am not saying this is true, I just think she needs to be looked into.
We do need to be informed about people our group endorses however I really don't see a great many red flags as far a Palin goes. The opposition is going to toss everything including the kitchen sink at Palin in hope that they get some of it to stick. McCain made a bold choice and I for one think he may have picked well. The issue with Pat Buchanan and Palin is being trumped up into something its not. Pat Buchanan has had several incarnations over the years and has shown his true colors gradually. Buchanan has basically become irrelevant he is in the category of Ross Perot and Ralph Nader.
-
If Mord provided proof that Palin didn't support buchanan then I take back that post. I read it in a few places so I thought it was sort of true. I totally take that back. Obviously I want Mccain to win as the lesser of the evils so I am happy to hear that Palin was a good choice. I still wish he chose Huckabee though.
-
If Mord provided proof that Palin didn't support buchanan then I take back that post. I read it in a few places so I thought it was sort of true. I totally take that back. Obviously I want Mccain to win as the lesser of the evils so I am happy to hear that Palin was a good choice. I still wish he chose Huckabee though.
It seems that the Jewish community in Alaska seems comfortable with Palin. They would know her best.
Lisa posted this in another thread......
Here's what Yid With A Lid has to say about Palin's connection to Buchanan:
Quote
The National Jewish Democratic Coalition issued a statement saying that Palin is a poor choice because she supported Pat Buchanan for president in 2000 and she has never been to Israel. Both are stupid argurments. Look I think Pat Buchanan is an ugly bigot. But MANY republicans supported him in 2000. If you are going to use that as a benchmark, the entire leadership of the NJDC should resign because of their blind support of the Anti-Israel Jr. Senator from Illinois.
The only real thing we can point to is her interactions with Jews in Alaska, both AIPAC and Chabad in Alaska have issued glowing statements about her interaction with Jews and personal support for Israel:
Jewish Republicans, Alaskans praise McCain's VP choice
Aug. 30, 2008
HILARY LEILA KRIEGER, JPost correspondent in DENVER , THE JERUSALEM POST
Skipping over two Jewish politicians under consideration as vice presidential running mates, John McCain selected first-term Alaska Governor Sarah Palin Friday.
Palin, who has a reputation a reformer and high approval ratings but a low national profile, is the first female vice presidential nominee for the Republican party. Presumptive Republican presidential candidate John McCain announced his selection the day after Barack Obama accepted the Democratic presidential nomination, shifting attention to the GOP ahead of its convention opening in Minneapolis Monday.
Palin's background corresponds to McCain's image as a maverick, both by his making a surprise selection and by choosing someone who was willing to buck powerful members of her own local party to clean up government. Her lack of foreign policy or national security credentials, however, contrast with McCain¹s own record of military service and government focus in those arenas.
The choice left the two Jewish congressman reported to be on the list of possible VPs - Virginia Rep. Eric Cantor and Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman - out of luck, but several politically active Alaskan Jews praised Palin's ties to the community.
"The Jewish community should be very excited that Sarah was selected. She has been very conscious of the Jewish community here in Alaska and now with the opportunity of her new position, she'll have the opportunity to look at the Jewish community globally," said Alaskan Republican Jewish Coalition member Terry Gorlick, who knows Palin well and has worked with her on several issues.
"Sarah's absolutely pro-Israel," he said, referring to conversations with her and comments she's made about Israel's security and its importance to the United States. He noted that as governor she signed a resolution honoring Israel for its 60th birthday.
Alaska¹s AIPAC chairman, David Gottstein, said that he had spoken to the governor about arranging a trip to Israel, but scheduling conflicts had kept it from happening to date.
"She has ties and interests in the Holy Land," said Gottstein, and also described her as someone who could be effective across party lines, noting that he worked well with her despite being a Democrat.
But the National Jewish Democratic Coalition used the fact that Palin hasn't been to Israel to attack her familiarity with the country and the crucial foreign policy issues connected to the region.
"In Governor Sarah Palin, McCain chooses a running mate with zero foreign policy experience," said NJDC executive director Ira Forman.
"For a party which claims it is trying to reach out to the Jewish community, McCain's pick is particularly strange. Prior to today's selection Palin apparently has never spoken publicly about Israel."
And Obama surrogate Robert Wexler, a Jewish US representative from Florida, lambasted her for endorsing Pat Buchanan in 2000.
But in a letter she wrote to the editor of a local newspaper at the time, she explained that she was willing to wear a Buchanan button "as a polite gesture of respect" during a visit, as she would for any visiting presidential candidate, but that it shouldn¹t be seen as an endorsement.
Another news report from then lists her as serving on the leadership team for Steve Forbes, a free market conservative who ran along with Buchanan as well as McCain for the presidential nomination.
Her conservative credentials have drawn plaudits from many on the Right, including many religious constituencies who were pleased that McCain chose a staunch opponent of abortion after suggesting he might tap someone who is pro-choice.
Many analysts have argued that Palin¹s selection, perceived as stemming in part from an effort to attract voters who backed Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary away from Obama, wouldn¹t succeed because of Palin¹s stance on abortion.
Clinton herself issued a statement on the historic occasion.
"We should all be proud of Governor Sarah Palin's historic nomination, and I congratulate her and Senator McCain," she said. "While their policies would take America in the wrong direction, Governor Palin will add an important new voice to the debate."
Jewish Democratic political operative Steve Rabinowitz said that "wrong direction" would alienate Jewish voters.
"Sarah Palin is completely unknown to the American Jewish community. There is no Jew outside of Alaska who has a relationship with her," he charged. "They supposedly vetted Eric Cantor, pretended Joe Lieberman was on the short list, and in the end chose someone who could not be more different from them."
But the Republican Jewish Coalition defended the pick. "Senator Lieberman and Representative Cantor would also have been excellent choices," said RJC spokeswoman Suzanne Kurtz, but stressed that McCain¹s nominee was just a good.
"They¹ll make a great team," she said.
The RJC put out a statement on Friday saying that, "Palin has a proven track record of experienced and principled leadership. Palin has been a leader on the critical issue of energy independence and lessening our need to buy oil from nations not sharing America and Israel's foreign policy interests."
And she received praise from other Jewish quarters, including from Anchorage Chabad Rabbi Yosef Greenberg. He recalled Palin's support for a Jewish museum he is building there and her hora lessons at the annual Jewish gala she has attended the last two years.
He also spoke of her reaction to giving birth to a child with special needs.
"She said, G-d doesn¹t give you something you can't handle," he said. "It was straight out of the Lubavitch book."
-
DWI,
You're wrong. Mord provided proof that she didn't support Buchanan. Don't make assumptions.
The way you answered DWI and Scriabin wasn't called for.
-
BTW: I couldnt answer your pm CF I was totally falling asleep!!
No worries.
-
If Mord provided proof that Palin didn't support buchanan then I take back that post. I read it in a few places so I thought it was sort of true. I totally take that back. Obviously I want Mccain to win as the lesser of the evils so I am happy to hear that Palin was a good choice. I still wish he chose Huckabee though.
DownwithIslam, unfortunately many people have, over the years, supported Buchanus for a while because they were only aware of his social-conservative views (which are all phony) and didn't know about his real substance. I do think Palin is better than Huckabee, because Huck said in January 2007 that we should care about the Fakestinians too, because they were moved from their land through no fault of their own, and later that year he said that ypu are un-Christian if you disagree with giving benefits to illegal aliens. We don't need individuals like that.
-
Dan, it is an increasingly well-known fact in the conservative world that the shmo Michael Faggot is a two-bit fraud, who was a LIBERAL for most of his life, who apes conservative positions and pretends to be as shocking as possible so that he can get fat ratings and a big fat paycheck. Why can't I criticize Michael Wiener? This worm is a disgrace to the conservative movement and indeed, all of humanity.
BTW, Al Franken is a far-left commentator. I think you are thinking of some other person.
i'm saying you critized mike savage enough for us to know how you feel...no need to be repetative..offer up something new...
as far as Al Franken..i'm getting him mixed up with someone else..does anyone here from ny know the name of a right wing talk show host on radio that comes on at the same time as Michael Savage?
-
If Mord provided proof that Palin didn't support buchanan then I take back that post. I read it in a few places so I thought it was sort of true. I totally take that back. Obviously I want Mccain to win as the lesser of the evils so I am happy to hear that Palin was a good choice. I still wish he chose Huckabee though.
DownwithIslam, unfortunately many people have, over the years, supported Buchanus for a while because they were only aware of his social-conservative views (which are all phony) and didn't know about his real substance. I do think Palin is better than Huckabee, because Huck said in January 2007 that we should care about the Fakestinians too, because they were moved from their land through no fault of their own, and later that year he said that ypu are un-Christian if you disagree with giving benefits to illegal aliens. We don't need individuals like that.
I think that Huckabee has changed big time for the better though. He took a trip to Israel a week or two ago and took absolutely kahanist positions. I really do believe he is a bible believing christian. Also thanks for your support earlier in the thread CF. I don't think Rationalthought was being mean or anything but I know you were quick to my defense so I thank you for that CF.
-
Dan, it is an increasingly well-known fact in the conservative world that the shmo Michael Faggot is a two-bit fraud, who was a LIBERAL for most of his life, who apes conservative positions and pretends to be as shocking as possible so that he can get fat ratings and a big fat paycheck. Why can't I criticize Michael Wiener? This worm is a disgrace to the conservative movement and indeed, all of humanity.
BTW, Al Franken is a far-left commentator. I think you are thinking of some other person.
i'm saying you critized mike savage enough for us to know how you feel...no need to be repetative..offer up something new...
as far as Al Franken..i'm getting him mixed up with someone else..does anyone here from ny know the name of a right wing talk show host on radio that comes on at the same time as Michael Savage?
Shalom, is Rush Limbaugh's show on the air in NY? Rush is a great alternative.
Shalom from Dox
-
Dan, it is an increasingly well-known fact in the conservative world that the shmo Michael Faggot is a two-bit fraud, who was a LIBERAL for most of his life, who apes conservative positions and pretends to be as shocking as possible so that he can get fat ratings and a big fat paycheck. Why can't I criticize Michael Wiener? This worm is a disgrace to the conservative movement and indeed, all of humanity.
BTW, Al Franken is a far-left commentator. I think you are thinking of some other person.
i'm saying you critized mike savage enough for us to know how you feel...no need to be repetative..offer up something new...
as far as Al Franken..i'm getting him mixed up with someone else..does anyone here from ny know the name of a right wing talk show host on radio that comes on at the same time as Michael Savage?
Shalom, is Rush Limbaugh's show on the air in NY? Rush is a great alternative.
Shalom from Dox
I think he is in the morning or afternoon in NY..the guy i'm talking about is in the evening after Sean Hannity.
-
Dan, it is an increasingly well-known fact in the conservative world that the shmo Michael Faggot is a two-bit fraud, who was a LIBERAL for most of his life, who apes conservative positions and pretends to be as shocking as possible so that he can get fat ratings and a big fat paycheck. Why can't I criticize Michael Wiener? This worm is a disgrace to the conservative movement and indeed, all of humanity.
BTW, Al Franken is a far-left commentator. I think you are thinking of some other person.
i'm saying you critized mike savage enough for us to know how you feel...no need to be repetative..offer up something new...
as far as Al Franken..i'm getting him mixed up with someone else..does anyone here from ny know the name of a right wing talk show host on radio that comes on at the same time as Michael Savage?
Shalom, is Rush Limbaugh's show on the air in NY? Rush is a great alternative.
Shalom from Dox
Rush Limbaugh is garbage also. He supported the dubai ports deal and thinks its great that we are dependent on the mideast for oil. I think that Rusty Humphries and G gordon Liddy are the only real conservatives left on the air. I know you meant well Dox :)
-
It was Mark Levin; Not Al Franken...for some reason i get them mixed up...
-
Dan, it is an increasingly well-known fact in the conservative world that the shmo Michael Faggot is a two-bit fraud, who was a LIBERAL for most of his life, who apes conservative positions and pretends to be as shocking as possible so that he can get fat ratings and a big fat paycheck. Why can't I criticize Michael Wiener? This worm is a disgrace to the conservative movement and indeed, all of humanity.
BTW, Al Franken is a far-left commentator. I think you are thinking of some other person.
i'm saying you critized mike savage enough for us to know how you feel...no need to be repetative..offer up something new...
as far as Al Franken..i'm getting him mixed up with someone else..does anyone here from ny know the name of a right wing talk show host on radio that comes on at the same time as Michael Savage?
Shalom, is Rush Limbaugh's show on the air in NY? Rush is a great alternative.
Shalom from Dox
Rush Limbaugh is garbage also. He supported the dubai ports deal and thinks its great that we are dependent on the mideast for oil. I think that Rusty Humphries and G gordon Liddy are the only real conservatives left on the air. I know you meant well Dox :)
Thank you :)
-
Dan, it is an increasingly well-known fact in the conservative world that the shmo Michael Faggot is a two-bit fraud, who was a LIBERAL for most of his life, who apes conservative positions and pretends to be as shocking as possible so that he can get fat ratings and a big fat paycheck. Why can't I criticize Michael Wiener? This worm is a disgrace to the conservative movement and indeed, all of humanity.
BTW, Al Franken is a far-left commentator. I think you are thinking of some other person.
i'm saying you critized mike savage enough for us to know how you feel...no need to be repetative..offer up something new...
as far as Al Franken..i'm getting him mixed up with someone else..does anyone here from ny know the name of a right wing talk show host on radio that comes on at the same time as Michael Savage?
Shalom, is Rush Limbaugh's show on the air in NY? Rush is a great alternative.
Shalom from Dox
Rush Limbaugh is garbage also. He supported the dubai ports deal and thinks its great that we are dependent on the mideast for oil. I think that Rusty Humphries and G gordon Liddy are the only real conservatives left on the air. I know you meant well Dox :)
I doubt that that you actually listen to Rush.
He has been devoting his entire show to exposing the Obama myth.
-
If Mord provided proof that Palin didn't support buchanan then I take back that post. I read it in a few places so I thought it was sort of true. I totally take that back. Obviously I want Mccain to win as the lesser of the evils so I am happy to hear that Palin was a good choice. I still wish he chose Huckabee though.
And she received praise from other Jewish quarters, including from Anchorage Chabad Rabbi Yosef Greenberg. He recalled Palin's support for a Jewish museum he is building there and her hora lessons at the annual Jewish gala she has attended the last two years.
He also spoke of her reaction to giving birth to a child with special needs.
"She said, G-d doesn¹t give you something you can't handle," he said. "It was straight out of the Lubavitch book."
Excellent quote!
I have much more confidence in what a Chabad Rabbi has to say than these Leftists, who have caused more damage to Israel with their positions than have helped Israel. The same Leftists who are supporting a candidate who is a Muslim and was in a Racist / Anti- Semitic so called church for 20 years. Who attended the Racist / Anti- Semitic Louis Farrakhan's million man march in 1995, travelling from Illinois to Washington DC., in order to do so.
-
Dan, it is an increasingly well-known fact in the conservative world that the shmo Michael Faggot is a two-bit fraud, who was a LIBERAL for most of his life, who apes conservative positions and pretends to be as shocking as possible so that he can get fat ratings and a big fat paycheck. Why can't I criticize Michael Wiener? This worm is a disgrace to the conservative movement and indeed, all of humanity.
BTW, Al Franken is a far-left commentator. I think you are thinking of some other person.
i'm saying you critized mike savage enough for us to know how you feel...no need to be repetative..offer up something new...
as far as Al Franken..i'm getting him mixed up with someone else..does anyone here from ny know the name of a right wing talk show host on radio that comes on at the same time as Michael Savage?
Shalom, is Rush Limbaugh's show on the air in NY? Rush is a great alternative.
Shalom from Dox
Rush Limbaugh is on WABC 770 AM in New York from 12:00pm to 3:00pm, Monday to Friday. I'm not sure if he's on tomorrow, being that its Labor Day in the United States.
-
Savage is a phony. I wonder which candidate would be "Savage-approved"
-
Even though I hate Michael Savage, he might have a point about Palin. I was reading an article about how she endorsed Pat Buchanus for president in the 1990's. Even Michael Weiner Savage has completely cut off all ties with Buchanus due to buchans's nazi activity. I think that we need to look into Palin further. I am not saying this is true, I just think she needs to be looked into.
We do need to be informed about people our group endorses however I really don't see a great many red flags as far a Palin goes. The opposition is going to toss everything including the kitchen sink at Palin in hope that they get some of it to stick. McCain made a bold choice and I for one think he may have picked well. The issue with Pat Buchanan and Palin is being trumped up into something its not. Pat Buchanan has had several incarnations over the years and has shown his true colors gradually. Buchanan has basically become irrelevant he is in the category of Ross Perot and Ralph Nader.
The DemonRat Party is going to go for Sarah's throat, Sarah has a good soul and she is tough....I believe G-d will help her through these vicious attacks.
The irony of this whole thing is the only ones who deserve to be attacked, are the attackers themselves. The Demon Rat Party became evil ...the democrats of yesteryear are long gone.
May G-d bless the United States of America and Long Live Israel !!!
Shalom from Dox
P.S. McCain & Palin 08 G-d willing !!! Please
-
I think she is a good pick. Let's face it no one was excited about any of the other potenitial ones that they were predicting for McCain.
-
Let the liberal smear campaign begin
-
This whole Bucchannan endorsement thing is already getting blown out of proportion. Palin's accusers are not bothering to investigate the details of her support for Bucchannan, only that she supported him. How do we know that she supported him? And if she did, why did she? Could it be that Bucchannan is pro-life like her? No, everybody has to jump to the conclusion that Palin secretly shares Bucchannan's anti-Semitism. The democrats are scared and desperate. It's dirt digging time. After Obama's speech, there was a sense of excitement for the democrats, which lasted until Palin was revealed as the VP nominee. I think McCain now has a significant advantage going into the election. I gather the democrats feel the same way or there wouldn't be this hysterical obsession with finding dirt on her. The problem for the democrats is (I believe) she's clean and uncorrupted.
-
Michael Savage is right and sooner or later we will see it!
-
Michael Savage is right and sooner or later we will see it!
Better hope he doesn't change his mind till then. Because he seems to have a habit of flip-flopping which renders Savage unreliable.
-
I just heard Michael Savage's opening remarks from today's program. He's continuing to rip John McCain for his VP choice of Sarah Palin. To the extent that he wants Palin to withdraw from the V.P. slot. In my opinion, he's causing considerable damage to McCain's chances of being elected President. Savage is saying that he's an Independent and is an independent thinker.
Last year, I was one of Michael Savage's biggest fans. Though I appreciate his support for the Serb people, I regret buying some of his products ( books, hat, etc. ). It took me longer than many other JTFers to see the light about Savage. I'm deeply disturbed by his commentary about McCain and Palin. Hopefully, a true Conservative will take over his time slot sooner rather than later.
-
does any one expect better from this two faced liberal ? i mean come on ::)