Author Topic: Blacks are Genetically Inferior - Watson told the truth (Read 15252 times)

Wayne Jude · « **Reply #25 on:** October 20, 2007, 11:01:16 PM »

yes friend and thats Ok!Why cant we all accept we are different not better then each other.Know what I mean?

Dr. Dan · « **Reply #26 on:** October 20, 2007, 11:40:03 PM »

Quote from: Christianwhitenation.name on October 20, 2007, 11:01:16 PM

yes friend and thats Ok!Why cant we all accept we are different not better then each other.Know what I mean?

That's more like it!

IT's apples, pears, oranges and grapes.

Sarah · « **Reply #27 on:** October 21, 2007, 04:39:30 PM »

Quote from: NewYorker on October 20, 2007, 08:16:17 PM

Jews and Anglos tie for intelligence, the Orientals (Japanese/Chinese) are more gifted in math but their creative capacity (innovation) is not on par with Jews and Anglos. These are the self evident observable trends. There are many facets to intelligence, logical reasoning, creative/innovation, mathematical/computational. I believe the strength of the Jews and Anglo intelligence is in their capacity to innovate in addition to their functional intelligence.

Imagine if you're Jewish AND Anglo.

The Shadow · « **Reply #28 on:** October 21, 2007, 05:28:32 PM »

On average the Jew is smarter than the anglo, no doubt in my mind. By smarter I mean higher IQ. I would bet on the Jew against the anglo in an IQ test. I consider the Jews, the Askenazi jews in particlar to be a white ethnic group, however not anglo. Much the way Italians are white ethnic, but not anglo.

New Yorker · « **Reply #29 on:** October 21, 2007, 05:57:35 PM »

Quote from: The Shadow on October 21, 2007, 05:28:32 PM

On average the Jew is smarter than the anglo, no doubt in my mind. By smarter I mean higher IQ. I would bet on the Jew against the anglo in an IQ test. I consider the Jews, the Askenazi jews in particlar to be a white ethnic group, however not anglo. Much the way Italians are white ethnic, but not anglo.

I dunno, I'm very impressed with the Dyson vacume cleaner.

Daniel · « **Reply #30 on:** October 21, 2007, 09:53:44 PM »

This is completely untrue and inappropriate for this forum. This is not a Jewish supremacist forum!

jdl4ever · « **Reply #31 on:** October 21, 2007, 09:59:19 PM »

Well, the title is a bit off, it should be changed to most blacks. I'm a Scientist Daniel, give me scientific facts and I'll reconsider. So far the blacks in large always score lowest on every type of test.

The Shadow · « **Reply #32 on:** October 21, 2007, 10:00:02 PM »

Look, you're not gonna restrict what we talk about here. You don't like it, tough crap

Daniel · « **Reply #33 on:** October 21, 2007, 10:04:55 PM »

Quote from: jdl4ever on October 21, 2007, 09:59:19 PM

Well, the title is a bit off, it should be changed to most blacks. I'm a Scientist Daniel, give me scientific facts and I'll reconsider. So far the blacks in large always score lowest on every type of test.

That might be true. But it's not due to racial superiority or inferiority. It's due to culture and environment. Give me scientific facts that there is some sort of genetic or biological component that makes certain races biologically superior to others. I've got no objections or disagreements with the test results. I just have a disagreement that it's somehow linked to biology or genetics.

Daniel · « **Reply #34 on:** October 21, 2007, 10:06:29 PM »

Quote from: The Shadow on October 21, 2007, 10:00:02 PM

Look, you're not gonna restrict what we talk about here. You don't like it, tough crap

I'm not trying to restrict anything. I'm just stating my opinion. As a liberal, I would never even think about restricting dissenting opinions

Ehud · « **Reply #35 on:** October 21, 2007, 10:17:45 PM »

Intelligence is mostly determined by genetics. That's why smart children nearly always have smart parents. If intelligence is mostly determined by genetics and there is a group that has large intelligence gaps demonstrated by every indicator of intelligence that we have ( IQ tests, school tests, standardized tests, LSATs, SATs, professional job tests, ASVAB military tests, as well as pure observation

it must be logically so that most of that difference is attributable to genes. Look, there's no ways around it, no if ands or buts, it's very simple. SOME of the reason for differences for intelligence is due to environment and such things like health, education, effort, etc. To say that there is no genetic component to intelligence flies in the face of all common sense!

The Shadow · « **Reply #36 on:** October 21, 2007, 10:19:02 PM »

Jewish Supremacy! Jewish Power all the way!! Arabs out of Israel !!

The Shadow · « **Reply #37 on:** October 21, 2007, 10:24:07 PM »

Zev, you are right on the money as always, you are irrefutable. Some of these black defenders on JTF are real ignoramuses. Its like unbelievable.

judeanoncapta · « **Reply #38 on:** October 22, 2007, 02:41:25 PM »

I don't understand why we have this knee jerk "Genetics have nothing to do with intelligence" reaction to any discussion of the subject.

Is it possible that Watson who discovered DNA might know a little more about Genetics than Daniel and dannycookie57?

I think that is possible.

Anyone agree with me?

Dexter · « **Reply #39 on:** October 22, 2007, 03:43:37 PM »

Quote from: judeanoncapta on October 22, 2007, 02:41:25 PM

I don't understand why we have this knee jerk "Genetics have nothing to do with intelligence" reaction to any discussion of the subject.

Is it possible that Watson who discovered DNA might know a little more about Genetics than Daniel and dannycookie57?

I think that is possible.

Anyone agree with me?

Nazi scientist knew much more than you and I, and they said we are filth and the most "Inferior" "Race". So because they are scientist we should think they word is the absolute truth ? The only absolute truth I know exists in math (like 1+1=2).

Lets not forget he is a known racist therefor all his "scientific" claims about race issues are very un-reliable as the Nazis scientific claims, just because he is a racist and they were Nazis.

White Israelite · « **Reply #40 on:** October 22, 2007, 03:48:09 PM »

Quote from: Dexter on October 22, 2007, 03:43:37 PM

Quote from: judeanoncapta on October 22, 2007, 02:41:25 PM
I don't understand why we have this knee jerk "Genetics have nothing to do with intelligence" reaction to any discussion of the subject.

Is it possible that Watson who discovered DNA might know a little more about Genetics than Daniel and dannycookie57?

I think that is possible.

Anyone agree with me?
Nazi scientist knew much more than you and I, and they said we are filth and the most "Inferior" "Race". So because they are scientist we should think they word is the absolute truth ? The only absolute truth I know exists in math (like 1+1=2).

Lets not forget he is a known racist therefor all his "scientific" claims about race issues are very un-reliable as the Nazis scientific claims, just because he is a racist and they were Nazis.

When did nazi scientists call Jews "filth"? Source?

Calling someone "filth" isn't fact.

What did Nazi Scientists statistically prove regarding Jews?

There is statistical proof out there showing Africans as being inferior, and it shows for it's self. If you can't see this, then you are blind and ignorant.

Dexter · « **Reply #41 on:** October 22, 2007, 03:51:42 PM »

Quote from: Cohen on October 22, 2007, 03:48:09 PM

Quote from: Dexter on October 22, 2007, 03:43:37 PM
Quote from: judeanoncapta on October 22, 2007, 02:41:25 PM
I don't understand why we have this knee jerk "Genetics have nothing to do with intelligence" reaction to any discussion of the subject.

Is it possible that Watson who discovered DNA might know a little more about Genetics than Daniel and dannycookie57?

I think that is possible.

Anyone agree with me?
Nazi scientist knew much more than you and I, and they said we are filth and the most "Inferior" "Race". So because they are scientist we should think they word is the absolute truth ? The only absolute truth I know exists in math (like 1+1=2).

Lets not forget he is a known racist therefor all his "scientific" claims about race issues are very un-reliable as the Nazis scientific claims, just because he is a racist and they were Nazis.

When did nazi scientists call Jews "filth"? Source?

Calling someone "filth" isn't fact.

What did Nazi Scientists statistically prove regarding Jews?

There is statistical proof out there showing Africans as being inferior, and it shows for it's self. If you can't see this, then you are blind and ignorant.

Source ? hehe, you don't know the Nazis well enough ?
The Nazis published many "proofes" for their claims as a tool to justify what they are doing.

Who said we can trust those "statistical proofs" ?

judeanoncapta · « **Reply #42 on:** October 22, 2007, 03:57:48 PM »

Dexter, your comparison of Watson to Nazis is untrue and unfair.

By the fact that you are part of this forum, YOU are a "known racist".

It doesn't mean automatically that what you say is incorrect.

Dr. Dan · « **Reply #43 on:** October 22, 2007, 03:58:41 PM »

saying that africans or anyone else is genetically inferior is blindness!!!

Dexter · « **Reply #44 on:** October 22, 2007, 04:01:17 PM »

Quote from: judeanoncapta on October 22, 2007, 03:57:48 PM

Dexter, your comparison of Watson to Nazis is untrue and unfair.

By the fact that you are part of this forum, YOU are a "known racist".

It doesn't mean automatically that what you say is incorrect.

Unfair ? why is that ?

There is a diffrent between being in a forum, which will contein a gather of opinion, between being a indevidual that holds spacific opinions.

angryChineseKahanist · « **Reply #45 on:** October 22, 2007, 04:01:49 PM »

I see this guy put Germans right under Jews.
I guess they were just jealous of being a step under the
Jews in the early 1900s.

And what is this American race?

White Israelite · « **Reply #46 on:** October 22, 2007, 04:02:46 PM »

Quote from: dannycookie57 on October 22, 2007, 03:58:41 PM

saying that africans or anyone else is genetically inferior is blindness!!!

Genetically flawed and genetically inferior are two different things. Many of us are flawed in our genetics in some ways or another, more prone to certain diseases, obesity, certain conditions, etc.

angryChineseKahanist · « **Reply #47 on:** October 22, 2007, 04:12:59 PM »

Quote from: MassuhDGoodName on October 20, 2007, 09:24:03 PM

Re: "...the Chinese are very book smart but not creative..."

Communism stifles innovation, as there is no profit motive
for creative individuals to improve and innovate.

Yes.
For those who live in NYC, just go to pearl river mart on Broadway, just below Greenwich Village and above City Hall.
Notice how slow the (older) Chinese workers are. They are the products of Communist China.

It takes hard work to be smart and productive; it's a mighty struggle.
It doesn't take much to make you dumb and slow.

Sarah · « **Reply #48 on:** October 22, 2007, 04:14:05 PM »

Quote from: Cohen on October 22, 2007, 04:02:46 PM

Quote from: dannycookie57 on October 22, 2007, 03:58:41 PM
saying that africans or anyone else is genetically inferior is blindness!!!

Genetically flawed and genetically inferior are two different things. Many of us are flawed in our genetics in some ways or another, more prone to certain diseases, obesity, certain conditions, etc.

Because of the adaptations to our environment and lifestyle! These are weaknesses but not in terms of Intellectual ability, only physical things.

White Israelite · « **Reply #49 on:** October 22, 2007, 04:16:47 PM »

Quote from: Sarah on October 22, 2007, 04:14:05 PM

Quote from: Cohen on October 22, 2007, 04:02:46 PM
Quote from: dannycookie57 on October 22, 2007, 03:58:41 PM
saying that africans or anyone else is genetically inferior is blindness!!!

Genetically flawed and genetically inferior are two different things. Many of us are flawed in our genetics in some ways or another, more prone to certain diseases, obesity, certain conditions, etc.

Because of the adaptations to our environment and lifestyle! These are weaknesses but not in terms of Intellectual ability, only physical things.

We are referring to mental, not physical.

Many of us have already admitted that Blacks are superior in many ways physically to the white man.