Why do so many people claim that Ron Nazi Paul is the "only" candidate telling the "truth" about limited government and a return to Constitutional roots? I don't buy it that he means ANY of that (I think his real dream would be a fascist dictatorship), but even if he were, why is he thought to be the only candidate out there espousing such views?
Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo both advocate, sincerely, a traditional, constitutionalist, no-nonsense governmental style that secures our nation's borders and cities but leaves lawful citizens with a high degree of freedom. Neither favor, like Paul does, kissing up to Muslim Nazis or forming alliances with them. Since these two candidates do not have white-supremacist views, they would be immensely more popular than Paul if their message had the same amount of visibility that he does. But the media paints Paul as the outsider and hero because they want a nutty anti-Semite to be the most visible and popular and to make true conservatives look bad.
Why aren't more forum members here into Duncan Hunter? It is true that as of now he has zero chance, but if he were touted as the alternative GOP candidate instead of Paul, he would be vastly bigger than that Nazi worm.