Again, we obviously didn't have near the murder rates previous to 1968 that we do now yet are gun laws are even more strict. Maybe it's because decent law abiding citizens can't arm themselves.
Correct me if I am wrong America has a culture belonging to the wild west, where the "law abiding citizens" slang a gun on there hips. And quite franky most of America has not advanced too much from that.
And yet even than many refused to carry a weapon.
And the logic was not to be afraid of a gun just be afraid of the shooter.
There was laws then, and many killings too. Did it prevent crime because you carried a gun? No it made little difference.
Why you ask?
Because as I have been trying to get you to think about was the men back then are far different to the men now.
A gun back then was a tool, something to be used, it rank as important as a good saddle and a horse.
Now a days it is seen as a measure of your manhood. Which is wrong.
Regardless of gun or not, the man standing in front of you must not be different at any stage.
Proof of this a good soldier can fight with what ever they can lay there hands on, or even bare handed.
Their gun is only a tool which they can use, and ranks in importance as their helmet, knife, pac.
Can you see the difference, I am saying you need to be more than just someone who carries a gun.
We spoke about C18, those guys are nothing with a weapon, do you want to be like them. You want Jews to have a false belief in weapons, instead of their own abilities.
Weapons in the hands of brainless twats are dangerous but easy to over power, weapons in the hands of skilled focused people are unstoppable.
You can only become skilled and learned if you are taught, and structured.
Not willy nilly gun ownership.