Shalom Chaim,
No need for you to read this aloud on your broadcast.
The following is just something for you to think about:
When Spitzer wanted to give driver's licenses to illegals, most people (I think close to 80%) opposed it--with that high of a percentage, it means that many liberals were also opposed. And Spitzer's approval rating went down.
At around the same time, Hillary was taking multiple positions on the issue within a few days and the media criticized her a little.
But the media protected Obama. Like Bill Richardson (who is no longer a candidate), the governor of NM who signed a bill into law a while ago to give driver's licenses to illegals (and is proud of it), Obama supports giving driver's licenses to illegals.
Yet, there's been no backlash against Obama the way there was against Spitzer.
The idea was so unpopular nation-wide that I think some other states (NM is an exception that I mention below) that previously had laws to give licenses to illegals, revoked that law in their state.
Liberals who rejected Spitzer's proposal probably support Obama.
So among people who support Obama, it seems like there's not much that could be said in terms of policy, to convince them to no longer support him.
About a month ago, I posted a thread on the front page of the forum about how Obama's campaign is like a cult.
His supporters are hypnotized by him. All he has to do is say the words "change" or "hope" and they support him.
All presidential campaigns offer some type of "change" in their platform. Yet, Obama thinks he owns the term "change" and that everyone who wants some type of "change" wants the same type as him, which is clearly false. For example, many people want the borders secured and doing something to stop illegal aliens. That's not the type of change that Obama would offer.
Maybe Ron Paul's supporters could somehow get into a fight with Obama's supporters, with the resulting effect being that some people might get turned off from Obama. After all, Paul's supporters have a slogan "Ron Paul Revolution" and Revolution is definitely "change."
I'm not sure what would be the most effective methods in decreasing support for Obama.
Maybe some of the independent voters who have been considering Obama could be swayed by substance.