Author Topic: Other Tanakhaic era books  (Read 5309 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Eliezer Ben Avraham

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1728
Other Tanakhaic era books
« on: February 03, 2008, 08:58:58 PM »
I heard that there were other books about Avraham that didn't make it into the Torah, does anyone know where these were found and what they say?
KAHANE TZADAK!

Offline Dexter

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2005
  • צֶדֶק צֶדֶק, תִּרְדֹּף
Re: Other Tanakhaic era books
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2008, 12:22:29 AM »
What about Sefer HaYessira ?
Not a foreign land we took and not with foreign possession but a land that belong to our ancestors that was occupied without a trial. And when we had the opportunity, we took our land back.
-Shimon Maccabee's answer to Antiochus VII Sidetes.

"When fighting monsters, be wary not to become one... When you gaze into the abyss, it also gazes into you."
- Friedrich Nietzsche

Offline Eliezer Ben Avraham

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1728
Re: Other Tanakhaic era books
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2008, 09:43:40 PM »
One is Sefer HaYashar.

http://www.lightcatcherprod.com/products_books_jasher.shtml

Products > Books

The Book of Jasher                                               $24.95     SALE $18.75
The Authentic Annals of The Early Hebrews     

by Wayne Simpson

A new title and a new edition of a very ancient Hebrew book. The Book of Jasher, or Sefer HaYashar in Hebrew, signifies upright or accurate. Several works exist by this title, but this volume has all the earmarks of the Book of Jasher mentioned in Joshua 10:13 and II Sam. 1:17, thought by many Bible scholars to have been lost. This enigmatic book has never really been lost. This volume includes prefaces that tell the fascinating story of the survival of the Book of Jasher down to modern times. Rich in details, it provides insights into a number of biblical episodes that are otherwise unclear, covering the period from creation through Joshua. It provides proper names and other important clues to establish links between biblical history and secular history, particularly the history of early Europe and Egypt. Its material flies in the face of traditional chronological relationships to Egyptian and European history. For those bold enough re-examine the traditional concepts of ancient and biblical history, the Book of Jasher can be a gold mine of information. Anyone who is interested in the Bible will immediately recognize the value of this volume as a parallel text.

ISBN 0-9719388-3-0
$24.95


How do we know about this book? the Torah was given at mount sinai, but where was this book given?
KAHANE TZADAK!

Offline judeanoncapta

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2080
  • Rebuild it now!!!!
Re: Other Tanakhaic era books
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2008, 11:00:02 AM »
Sefer HaYashar is a midrash written in the middle ages. People are confused and think that it is the Sefer HaYashar mentioned in the Book of Samuel.

It is not.
Post questions here for the ASK JUDEA TORAH SHOW


my blog: Yehudi-Nation






Who is truly wise? He who can see the future. I see tommorow today and I want to end it - Rabbi Meir Daweedh Kahana

Offline Eliezer Ben Avraham

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1728
Re: Other Tanakhaic era books
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2008, 11:16:58 PM »
Sefer HaYashar is a midrash written in the middle ages. People are confused and think that it is the Sefer HaYashar mentioned in the Book of Samuel.

It is not.
so most of these books are midrash and were not given at Sinai?
KAHANE TZADAK!

Offline jdl4ever

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2000
Re: Other Tanakhaic era books
« Reply #5 on: February 13, 2008, 11:32:18 PM »
Sefer HaYashar is a midrash written in the middle ages. People are confused and think that it is the Sefer HaYashar mentioned in the Book of Samuel.

It is not.
so most of these books are midrash and were not given at Sinai?
Nope.  The oldest Medrishim were attributed to the Tanaim, depending on the name of the Medrish.  Tanah D'vei Eliyahum is and Pirkei D'Rebbe Eliazer are the olderst Midrashim.  PDE was written in the 8th century and attributed to R' Eliezer ben Hyrcanus, the early Tanna of the first generation.  TDE was also said by a different Tana around the same time period and written down later on.  The intermediate ones are attributed to the Amoraim.  For example the Medrish Tanhuma which was said by R' Tanhuma bar Abba Israeli Amora of the 5th century.  Part of the Medrish Rabba was composed by an Amorah.  The newest ones were written much later.  Exodus Rabba, Numbers Rabbah and Esther Rabbah are believed to have been composed much after the Amoraim.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2008, 11:39:36 PM by jdl4ever »
"Enough weeping and wailing; and the following of leaders & rabbis who are pygmies of little faith & less understanding."
"I believe very much in a nation beating their swords into plowshears but when my enemy has a sword I don't want a plowshear"
-Rabbi Meir Kahane Zs'l HYD

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Other Tanakhaic era books
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2008, 09:58:09 AM »
Sefer HaYashar is a midrash written in the middle ages. People are confused and think that it is the Sefer HaYashar mentioned in the Book of Samuel.

It is not.
so most of these books are midrash and were not given at Sinai?
Nope.  The oldest Medrishim were attributed to the Tanaim, <snip>

Tenaim (It think) meaning human tape recorders.  (you may say that only refers to the way they memorised oral tradition)

do you think they midrashic books up?

I always learnt that midrashim are from sinai.
The reason why some midrashim contradict others, is because they were not as well preserved as the oral law. They emphasis was always on preserving the oral law. The rest of the oral tradition was still there though.

Infact.. I recall reading in the kuzari, he talks about a huge oral tradition including scientific knowledge... most of which was lost.


« Last Edit: February 14, 2008, 10:00:42 AM by q_q_ »

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Other Tanakhaic era books
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2008, 10:07:28 AM »
And a classic thing in the kuzari, he talks about the length of the lunar month in jewish tradition, about being a really really accurately transmitted tradition going back to king david.

29 days 12 hours 793 chalakim   (a very accurate approximation)
that`s
29 days 12 hours 44 minutes 3 and a third of a second.

If you look at that in days 29.xxxxxx  it is accurate to 4dp.

the western world did not get it that accurate until NASA sent tools up there.. (then got it even more accurate. But we use the tradition even though we know it is an approximation, same with pi).

I am not sure if the babylonians had it that accurate, I don`t think they did.  I did have a book by dr jeffrey satinover that listed all the ancient peoples, and they did not have it that accurate..

of course, it is possible that peoples used the calculation we have via jewish tradition. Some Jews had a background in astronomy because of experience with the jewish lunar calendar..


 

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Other Tanakhaic era books
« Reply #8 on: April 15, 2008, 02:42:47 AM »
And a classic thing in the kuzari, he talks about the length of the lunar month in jewish tradition, about being a really really accurately transmitted tradition going back to king david.

29 days 12 hours 793 chalakim   (a very accurate approximation)
that`s
29 days 12 hours 44 minutes 3 and a third of a second.

If you look at that in days 29.xxxxxx  it is accurate to 4dp.

the western world did not get it that accurate until NASA sent tools up there.. (then got it even more accurate. But we use the tradition even though we know it is an approximation, same with pi).

I am not sure if the babylonians had it that accurate, I don`t think they did.  I did have a book by dr jeffrey satinover that listed all the ancient peoples, and they did not have it that accurate..

of course, it is possible that peoples used the calculation we have via jewish tradition. Some Jews had a background in astronomy because of experience with the jewish lunar calendar..


 

That is impressive.  ...  But wouldn't we get more than just four decimal places if or more accurate pi if we were given this knowledge in prophesy?  Just wondering that.

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Other Tanakhaic era books
« Reply #9 on: April 15, 2008, 02:44:04 AM »
Sefer HaYashar is a midrash written in the middle ages. People are confused and think that it is the Sefer HaYashar mentioned in the Book of Samuel.

It is not.

About the midrash written in middle ages.  How does this work match up (or not) with ancient records and biblical records?

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Other Tanakhaic era books
« Reply #10 on: April 15, 2008, 09:29:46 AM »
And a classic thing in the kuzari, he talks about the length of the lunar month in jewish tradition, about being a really really accurately transmitted tradition going back to king david.

29 days 12 hours 793 chalakim   (a very accurate approximation)
that`s
29 days 12 hours 44 minutes 3 and a third of a second.

If you look at that in days 29.xxxxxx  it is accurate to 4dp.

the western world did not get it that accurate until NASA sent tools up there.. (then got it even more accurate. But we use the tradition even though we know it is an approximation, same with pi).

I am not sure if the babylonians had it that accurate, I don`t think they did.  I did have a book by dr jeffrey satinover that listed all the ancient peoples, and they did not have it that accurate..

of course, it is possible that peoples used the calculation we have via jewish tradition. Some Jews had a background in astronomy because of experience with the jewish lunar calendar..


 

That is impressive.  ...  But wouldn't we get more than just four decimal places if or more accurate pi if we were given this knowledge in prophesy?  Just wondering that.

note- it was not in prophesy, it was transmitted by sinai... That doesn't change anything, But anyhow..

Since the torah's purpose is not to transmit mathematics, we would only need/use an approximation.

Infact, for example, in halacha, I think we use Pi=3 , which is of course an approximation. But it is what we use even if we have it more accurately. (I think the RAMBAM says that.. And I think the written torah has a calculation that uses it as 3)

I am not sure the purpose of such an exact measure of a lunar month is. Even as accurate as we have it (within a second!).   Since we count months in complete days.
Maybe in the days pre fixed(automated) calendar.  the sanhedrin used it somehow to check that the testimony of the witnesses was consistent with what is possible astronomically/mathematically.
Or maybe hillel made use of it to make the fixed(automated) calendar.  Over many years a difference between solar and lunar builds up, so an accurate figure for the month, is important for making predictions decades or hundreds of years in the future.

Offline Eliezer Ben Avraham

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1728
Re: Other Tanakhaic era books
« Reply #11 on: April 28, 2008, 11:05:10 PM »
And a classic thing in the kuzari, he talks about the length of the lunar month in jewish tradition, about being a really really accurately transmitted tradition going back to king david.

29 days 12 hours 793 chalakim   (a very accurate approximation)
that`s
29 days 12 hours 44 minutes 3 and a third of a second.

If you look at that in days 29.xxxxxx  it is accurate to 4dp.

the western world did not get it that accurate until NASA sent tools up there.. (then got it even more accurate. But we use the tradition even though we know it is an approximation, same with pi).

I am not sure if the babylonians had it that accurate, I don`t think they did.  I did have a book by dr jeffrey satinover that listed all the ancient peoples, and they did not have it that accurate..

of course, it is possible that peoples used the calculation we have via jewish tradition. Some Jews had a background in astronomy because of experience with the jewish lunar calendar..


 

That is impressive.  ...  But wouldn't we get more than just four decimal places if or more accurate pi if we were given this knowledge in prophesy?  Just wondering that.

note- it was not in prophesy, it was transmitted by sinai... That doesn't change anything, But anyhow..

Since the torah's purpose is not to transmit mathematics, we would only need/use an approximation.

Infact, for example, in halacha, I think we use Pi=3 , which is of course an approximation. But it is what we use even if we have it more accurately. (I think the RAMBAM says that.. And I think the written torah has a calculation that uses it as 3)

I am not sure the purpose of such an exact measure of a lunar month is. Even as accurate as we have it (within a second!).   Since we count months in complete days.
Maybe in the days pre fixed(automated) calendar.  the sanhedrin used it somehow to check that the testimony of the witnesses was consistent with what is possible astronomically/mathematically.
Or maybe hillel made use of it to make the fixed(automated) calendar.  Over many years a difference between solar and lunar builds up, so an accurate figure for the month, is important for making predictions decades or hundreds of years in the future.
what was pi used for? why was it mentioned in the torah? Maybe it had to do with the temple and the precise measurements
KAHANE TZADAK!