Torah and Jewish Idea > Torah and Jewish Idea
Ask Judea Torah Show 2
judeanoncapta:
Hey, guys.
Sorry I have not been on the forum since I posted the audio for the 01/28/08 ASK JUDEA TORAH SHOW.
I had some personal business to attend to but now I am back.
Please post your questions here for this week's show.
Same rules apply as last week.
Let's start off with Chaim's question:
Was Noah righteous and pure or only righteous in comparison to the people of his generation?
In a better generation would he have been more or less righteous?
Dexter:
Shalom, Judea. You made a great show, thank you for answering my questions.
My question for this show is this:
How the Jews decide who is a great rabbi ? For exemple, the Rambam was punished with a Cherem in his life, but now he's considered to a great rabbi, how is that ?
q_q_:
hi
What were objections to the sanhedrin being reestablished back in Rav Yosef Karo`s time. Or any time in the past when there were attempts. Or no attempts.
Do any of those objections still apply today. Or have they all been cleared up? And if they have been cleared up, then how have they been cleared up?
shalom
Ulli:
Dear Judeanoncapta,
I have read a big part of the book of Hesekiel (יחזקאל). There is a long text about Tyrus.
Why is the part about one city so long? Had this city and her king a special role in gods plan?
Sincerly,
Ullrich
q_q_:
Regarding Rav Bar Hayyim`s answer to why RAMBAM did not include conquering eretz yisroel - or jewish sovereignty, as a mitzva. An answer to defend the position that the RAMBAM did want sovereingty, and he just omitted it.
Rav Bar Hayyim`s answer was that RAMBAM wrote hilchot melachim(laws concerning kings), and that implies soveregnty.
Is that a correct rendition of Rav Bar Hayyim`s answer and the position it defends?
I do not see how this answer works. Since hilchot melachim(laws concerning kings) implies sovereingty when we have a king. It does not imply sovereingty - Now.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version