Author Topic: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration  (Read 38914 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #125 on: July 17, 2008, 10:20:02 PM »
I can google around and am familiar with the main book sites, don't worry. I don't need assistance there.

The reason why I bought ohr harayon and didn't receive it.. I thought i'd be nice and buy it from some religious book store in israel.. They sent me ein habanim smeicha, but not ohr harayon vols 1 and 2, I ask them about ein habanim smeicha and got it eventually, but asked them about ohr harayon and they just didn't respond.
The place I got it from actually had a bad rating, but since it was an israeli one and looked religious, I gave preference to it.
I could have got it from a more reliable place
 

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #126 on: July 18, 2008, 01:30:30 AM »


The disagreement between religious zionism and religious anti zionism  is on a theoretical point.  But NK (who put the satmar or anti zionist position very well), put it nicely when they say "you can't kosher a pork".


Being that I believe in reciprocation, I consider Satmarism to be 'kashered pork.'

Quote

So if they don't want to work with it, it makes sense.  But they should all agree on the arabs out.

They don't agree with that (arabs out), not even close.   And why would they according to this logic?   You don't seem to have made that point.

« Last Edit: July 18, 2008, 02:36:07 AM by Kahane-Was-Right BT »

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #127 on: July 18, 2008, 02:35:47 AM »
I also think you are mischaracterizing Rabbi Kahane and Rabbi Teichtal on the issue of going to Israel.   They did not hold that it was the solution because it was 'safe.'   Rabbi Kahane did not claim that Israel was safer than America.   He did say that America COULD BECOME unsafe, as any place could, if the economy failed or what have you, but in no way was he saying that people are *physically safer in Israel.  They were surrounded by arabs.   Of course not.   But he was saying that spiritually we are safer their as opposed to gentile nations.

And Rabbi Teichtal also did not just say oh wow look at this horror, should have gone to Israel and would have escaped it.   I haven't read his work but have seen excerpts and seen others discuss it and he specifically makes a point that the rabbis of Europe REJECTED THE LAND and that this was punishment and that if he hadn't rejected the land and made aliyah instead, he would have been spared.   It has specifically about his sin of rejecting the land, not just failing to choose to go to britain or usa or somewhere "safe."  And he also admitted to the alterior motives that affected many who were opposed to zionism/aliyah.   Implying his own guilt in that regard I think.  But explaining that positions of authority and nice wealth, status etc played a role in rabbis' opposition to zionism and staying wherever they were rather than embrace the land of Israel.   He wrote that work in some sense to atone for what he felt was a grave sin.... Not mistake but sin.   And he thought it was pride and other things that mixed people up to oppose aliyah.  This is from what I gathered.   It's not a mere calculation of "safety."   Truth is, at this point, I don't think Jews are particularly safe anywhere, except maybe america, but like the winds, that could change at any time.   All it would take is some muzzies to get brave or economy to get worse and people blame israel etc etc  you never know.    To be safe *spiritually I'd have to choose Israel.

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #128 on: July 18, 2008, 02:47:41 AM »


The disagreement between religious zionism and religious anti zionism  is on a theoretical point.  But NK (who put the satmar or anti zionist position very well), put it nicely when they say "you can't kosher a pork".


Being that I believe in reciprocation, I consider Satmarism 'kashered pork.'

Quote

So if they don't want to work with it, it makes sense.  But they should all agree on the arabs out.

They don't agree with that (arabs out), not even close.   And why would they according to this logic?   You don't seem to have made that point.



you are right. my mistake in that post you quoted.

Whether one fights back depends on whether if after
Taking the 3 oaths as applicable to us ,  one allows for self defence.

neturei karta, don't. Their website has an example of dying al kiddush hashem because of the 3 oaths.
The satmar I imagine would agree with NK on that one.

Lubavitch , are non zionist, but pro defending israel. Most of them haven't heard of the 3 oaths, and those that have would all agree with self defence. (and a good lubavitch rabbi I spoke to was pro sovereignty even before we had sovereignty. so somewhat religious zionist in most books, since the core of religious zionism is sovereignty and em masse. And sovereignty even before we had sovereignty).

Agudat Yisroel, it wouldn't suprise me if they allow for self defence too. Every rabbi i've spoken to, does.. Except NK it seems.

Rabbis and jews nowadays have it drilled in that if somebody comes to kill you, kill him first.

Interestingly, after asking some rabbis,  I asked a NK guy about that one. He said it's not the halacha at all, the halacha is if somebody comes to kill you, you run away. And if that fails, you try to injure him, and if that fails, then you kill him.  

I then asked  those rabbis again, and they said "if somebody comes to kill you, kill him first".  I told them about the NK guy, and told them he said "run away". They all said the NK guy was right. And only as a last resort you kill him , they agreed 100% with the NK guy as soon as I told them what he said. Funny that.

I did read an article by rabbin binyamin kahane quoting a rashi about a burglar, that you can kill him.

so that would contradict that.

 

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #129 on: July 18, 2008, 02:50:13 AM »
Interesting.

But if it's an "active pursuer" then does the equation change or was that assuming the 'guy' who came to kill you is that?

Because I thought it was davka a mitzva to kill an active pursuer.

Or is it merely permitted?
« Last Edit: July 18, 2008, 02:52:04 AM by Kahane-Was-Right BT »

Offline DownwithIslam

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4247
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #130 on: July 18, 2008, 02:50:35 AM »


The disagreement between religious zionism and religious anti zionism  is on a theoretical point.  But NK (who put the satmar or anti zionist position very well), put it nicely when they say "you can't kosher a pork".


Being that I believe in reciprocation, I consider Satmarism 'kashered pork.'

Quote

So if they don't want to work with it, it makes sense.  But they should all agree on the arabs out.

They don't agree with that (arabs out), not even close.   And why would they according to this logic?   You don't seem to have made that point.



you are right. my mistake in that post you quoted.

Whether one fights back depends on whether if after
Taking the 3 oaths as applicable to us ,  one allows for self defence.

neturei karta, don't. Their website has an example of dying al kiddush hashem because of the 3 oaths.
The satmar I imagine would agree with NK on that one.

Lubavitch , are non zionist, but pro defending israel. Most of them haven't heard of the 3 oaths, and those that have would all agree with self defence. (and a good lubavitch rabbi I spoke to was pro sovereignty even before we had sovereignty. so somewhat religious zionist in most books, since the core of religious zionism is sovereignty and em masse. And sovereignty even before we had sovereignty).

Agudat Yisroel, it wouldn't suprise me if they allow for self defence too. Every rabbi i've spoken to, does.. Except NK it seems.

Rabbis and jews nowadays have it drilled in that if somebody comes to kill you, kill him first.

Interestingly, after asking some rabbis,  I asked a NK guy about that one. He said it's not the halacha at all, the halacha is if somebody comes to kill you, you run away. And if that fails, you try to injure him, and if that fails, then you kill him.  

I then asked  those rabbis again, and they said "if somebody comes to kill you, kill him first".  I told them about the NK guy, and told them he said "run away". They all said the NK guy was right. And only as a last resort you kill him , they agreed 100% with the NK guy as soon as I told them what he said. Funny that.

I did read an article by rabbin binyamin kahane quoting a rashi about a burglar, that you can kill him.

so that would contradict that.

 

Stop mentioning the Neturei Karta already. I am sick of hearing about those nazi muslims. Their website is much worse than a porn site.
And Lubavitch are obviously against the evil regime in Israel just as we are, but they are 100% supportive of Israel and that is why they have established themselves there(Kfar Chabad)

I am urinating on a Koran.

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #131 on: July 18, 2008, 02:52:57 AM »
Dwi, he's only explaining their views.   They can try to kasher pork all they want but it won't work.  At least we can analyze them in the process.  and see what's wrong about it, or what's right, if anything, about, and formulate opinions on why their wrong, why we disagree or what have you. 
« Last Edit: July 18, 2008, 02:54:45 AM by Kahane-Was-Right BT »

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #132 on: July 18, 2008, 02:58:14 AM »


The disagreement between religious zionism and religious anti zionism  is on a theoretical point.  But NK (who put the satmar or anti zionist position very well), put it nicely when they say "you can't kosher a pork".


Being that I believe in reciprocation, I consider Satmarism 'kashered pork.'

Quote

So if they don't want to work with it, it makes sense.  But they should all agree on the arabs out.

They don't agree with that (arabs out), not even close.   And why would they according to this logic?   You don't seem to have made that point.



you are right. my mistake in that post you quoted.

Whether one fights back depends on whether if after
Taking the 3 oaths as applicable to us ,  one allows for self defence.

neturei karta, don't. Their website has an example of dying al kiddush hashem because of the 3 oaths.
The satmar I imagine would agree with NK on that one.

Lubavitch , are non zionist, but pro defending israel. Most of them haven't heard of the 3 oaths, and those that have would all agree with self defence. (and a good lubavitch rabbi I spoke to was pro sovereignty even before we had sovereignty. so somewhat religious zionist in most books, since the core of religious zionism is sovereignty and em masse. And sovereignty even before we had sovereignty).

Agudat Yisroel, it wouldn't suprise me if they allow for self defence too. Every rabbi i've spoken to, does.. Except NK it seems.

Rabbis and jews nowadays have it drilled in that if somebody comes to kill you, kill him first.

Interestingly, after asking some rabbis,  I asked a NK guy about that one. He said it's not the halacha at all, the halacha is if somebody comes to kill you, you run away. And if that fails, you try to injure him, and if that fails, then you kill him.  

I then asked  those rabbis again, and they said "if somebody comes to kill you, kill him first".  I told them about the NK guy, and told them he said "run away". They all said the NK guy was right. And only as a last resort you kill him , they agreed 100% with the NK guy as soon as I told them what he said. Funny that.

I did read an article by rabbin binyamin kahane quoting a rashi about a burglar, that you can kill him.

so that would contradict that.

 

Actually I'm not sure I understand this.   It seems we are confusing collective 'self defense' or 'rebellion' vs. individual acts.   If an illegal immigrant comes to rob a Jew in his home in the US, it would not have anything to do with the 3 oaths if the Jew killed him.   The oaths have to do with 'rebelling against the nations' which is a collective action, isn't it?  As in, getting a group of Jews together and marching into washington with weapons etc or making a big enclave  in the midwest and turning it into a settlement with bunkers and defense etc for the purpose of fighting the US.  That would have to do with the 3 oaths.  Self-defense is something different from this issue isn't it?  How would it be included?

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #133 on: July 18, 2008, 03:37:20 AM »
I also think you are mischaracterizing Rabbi Kahane and Rabbi Teichtal on the issue of going to Israel.   They did not hold that it was the solution because it was 'safe.'   Rabbi Kahane did not claim that Israel was safer than America.   He did say that America COULD BECOME unsafe, as any place could, if the economy failed or what have you, but in no way was he saying that people are *physically safer in Israel.  They were surrounded by arabs.   Of course not.   But he was saying that spiritually we are safer their as opposed to gentile nations.

He did not explicitly say that israel was safer than america.

But telling jews to make aliyah because america was physically dangerous. That implies that israel is safer physically.

unless he was being a bit tricky with people..
but he wouldn't have been
rabbi kahane would never have wanted to endanger jewish life.  He devoted his life to making jewish people physically and spiritually secure. Physically first, because without that, you'd be dead and  have no spiritual security e.g.. no yeshivot.






And Rabbi Teichtal also did not just say oh wow look at this horror, should have gone to Israel and would have escaped it.   I haven't read his work but have seen excerpts and seen others discuss it and he specifically makes a point that the rabbis of Europe REJECTED THE LAND and that this was punishment and that if he hadn't rejected the land and made aliyah instead, he would have been spared.   It has specifically about his sin of rejecting the land, not just failing to choose to go to britain or usa or somewhere "safe."  And he also admitted to the alterior motives that affected many who were opposed to zionism/aliyah.   Implying his own guilt in that regard I think.  But explaining that positions of authority and nice wealth, status etc played a role in rabbis' opposition to zionism and staying wherever they were rather than embrace the land of Israel.   He wrote that work in some sense to atone for what he felt was a grave sin.... Not mistake but sin.   And he thought it was pride and other things that mixed people up to oppose aliyah.  This is from what I gathered.   It's not a mere calculation of "safety."   Truth is, at this point, I don't think Jews are particularly safe anywhere, except maybe america, but like the winds, that could change at any time.   All it would take is some muzzies to get brave or economy to get worse and people blame israel etc etc  you never know.    To be safe *spiritually I'd have to choose Israel.

I have read the book, and anyhow, you misunderstood me about rabbi teichtal.

And you misunderstand what rabbi teichtal was trying to do.  

rabbi teichtal was not writing the book to atone. The book was so selfless. And also talked about how he went around warning jews desperately, because he wanted to save them. And they were not letting him speak there.  

He was convinced that israel was the place to go.

And that the great rabbis of his day were mistaken

He was trying to make jews physically safe, so they not be murdered..

He went travelling like jabotinsky. But religious.

I am sure he would have met with kahane had he survived!


Now, because of his theological views...
(Which were religious zionist but not named that - he would not call himself a zionist, he would not associate another ism with judaism or an ism with torah).  
Because of those views. e.g. as you said, that G-d wants religious jews to build up the land and so on.  I think it blinded him to the fact that jews could flee to other places for safety. Not just israel.

He was trying desperately to save jews..  Going around warning people. But only mentioning israel.
(He was right. , it was right for its time).

In the end he was murdered on a train , I guess to a death camp.  

He stuck up for a jew when a gentile passenger stole his bread.
He wrote in his book that a jew should be like moshe rabbaynu sticking up for his fellow jew.  I guess he thought moshe rabbaynu used the divine name :(  i'm sure he didn't beat the nazi!

Rabbi teichtal was tortured to death, and faithful people held to his request that his work be published and spread.

It is not of negative consequence that he only spoke of israel as the place to go..
If jews had gone there they would have been saved.
It was much safer than poland. The nazis never reaches israel thank G-d.

Where I see the problem though, is if that mentality, that Israel is the safest place, is carried over to today.

I hate to quote rabbi kahane to argue with rabbi kahane, but
Rabbi Kahane at a national press club conference , the 1990 one with the red paint. He said that it is inevitable that the arabs would have better weapons than israel, and as an orthodox rabbi, he believed that only by miracles, does/has israel survived.  

(And we know, he and chaim and a newspaper article I saw from the time, have given good examples of those miracles. How in 1948 america abandoned israel, britain helped arm and officered the arabs , and israel got help from stalin of all places, and survived.  And of course 1967 - as kahane said "who wins wars in 6 days?")..

My concern is that what if Israel doesn't have those miracles. And G-d gives israel the protection that he gave to Rabbi Kahane.  We don't want another holocaust.

We read in ezekiel ch 36 - which kahane used - about "Divine wrath". And as he said he doesn't want divine wrath.   Well if G-d forbid there was a nuclear holocaust in israel, what would we say?
We wouldn't be searching for "why why why". We have sinned so badly that I don't think religious jews would be searching for answers. Israel has been steeped in sin from the beginning.

There's alot of good in israel, and alot of bad.  And in Germany.. and Poland. You had alot of good, and it was wiped out with the bad, the reform/liberal jews in germany.

We have these same black hat anti zionists in israel today growing. Not open to the threat. Thinking you just learn anothe page of gemara and things will be fine.

The same type of anti religious people, this time with guns.  (one anti zionist one told me, the israeli government is like the reform movement, with guns).. In terms of their divine wrath and disobeying the torah, they are.

You have a huge threat, which targets some areas more than others.  In this case, Arabs the targetting israel as number 1, and it's a small country, and they are getting better weapons.
In those days, it was Nazis. Targetting germany which they easily got, they had it any. Targetting poland - well, they killed the jews there.   Not reaching certain places.
In those days you had anti-zionists stubbornly staying in poland as the threat increased.
In these days you have religious zionists stubbornly staying in israel as the threat increases.

Israelis - they don't have EU passports or american passports, they are trapped.
Jews in poland were trapped, entry and exit points blocked.  

common sense says, go where it is safe. That was what to do during the holocaust. And it's fairly obvious that it's the safest thing to do now. Rather than rely on more miracles.. How can we rely on miracles when israel is sinning so badly.. How can we rely on emunah protecting us, if our leader, the man with the most emunah, rabbi kahane, was not protected.
(and if you say we didn't deserve him. Then again. It gets worse because by our sins in israel, are we really deserving?  Infact, rabbi kahane thought, "no". But that what we are witnessing was our return , not for our sake, but for the sake of G-d's holy name.  It's a theory that as the whole thing drags on, gets less and less likely, because as it drags on, it desecrates G-d's name. So if he was doing it for his name, then he would do it immediately.  If this theory is the reason then we are risking millions of jews on this theory. And even then. Ezekiel ch36 tha talks about it, talks about divine wrath, and - from what I remember - it talks about divine wrath being the reason why G-d exiled us, because it is better that we desecrate the exiled land than the holy land).

 

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #134 on: July 18, 2008, 03:51:35 AM »
Interesting.

But if it's an "active pursuer" then does the equation change or was that assuming the 'guy' who came to kill you is that?

Because I thought it was davka a mitzva to kill an active pursuer.

Or is it merely permitted?

AND you wrote



Actually I'm not sure I understand this.   It seems we are confusing collective 'self defense' or 'rebellion' vs. individual acts.   If an illegal immigrant comes to rob a Jew in his home in the US, it would not have anything to do with the 3 oaths if the Jew killed him.   The oaths have to do with 'rebelling against the nations' which is a collective action, isn't it?  As in, getting a group of Jews together and marching into washington with weapons etc or making a big enclave  in the midwest and turning it into a settlement with bunkers and defense etc for the purpose of fighting the US.  That would have to do with the 3 oaths.  Self-defense is something different from this issue isn't it?  How would it be included?

You have hit upon a contradiction between the 3 oaths as interpreted by satmar, and the concept of a rodef in the arab case.

I don't know how a satmar would resolve this.

Yes, killing a burglar is not rising up aginst the nations.  But killing an arab who like other arabs, is out to get us. That's rising up against the arabs.

And BTW in the case of the burglar , when I raised that point, that was nothing to do with the 3 oaths. That was all the rabbis and NK saying run away. Vs Rabbi Binyamin Kahane quoting a rashi saying don't run, kill him i.e. not as a last resort.


I can tell you that in a conversation with a NK guy, his argument completely fell apart when I said to him that the terrorists like arafat, are Rodfim.  He said they're not. The jews aren't running away.
I said they are killing jews, e.g.  innocent jews in a cafe.  They don't have a chance to run away.
If a person comes at somebody from behind with an axe, and the person doesn't noticed. Is the person not a rodef?   He didn't have a good answer to that .   He then said "well, what are they doing in a cafe?  "  (he was thinking, a cafe is evil secular western society.. they should be in yeshiva).    I said,  that's another matter, maybe they should not be there. But this does not excuse the murderer, he is persuing them, he is a rodef like the guy with the axe.  So then he said
What about the israeli government that meets with htem - do you qq defend them. I said I consider them similar to the arab murderers themselves, and in many cases, similar to the nazis.
Really, he couldn't answer that.
And he couldn't really say they are not rodfim, when I said "they are killing jews". Because he is a jew and it bothered him.. And I think he knew ther's something wrong here..


 
« Last Edit: July 18, 2008, 03:53:09 AM by q_q_ »

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #135 on: July 18, 2008, 04:03:06 AM »
The rabbi  I learned with a while back must hold by Rashi because he said when there is a rodef it's a mitzvah to kill him, you must kill him.

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #136 on: July 18, 2008, 04:09:18 AM »
That was an interesting post about the danger in Israel.
I want to make aliyah, but it is hard to ignore these realities.   What can a person say to their kids or grandkids if they choose to go there and end up getting them after their born in Israel, stuck in a shoah-like situation G-d forbid.   And they went to fulfill the mitzvah. 
But then there is also a line of reasoning that in the redemption the 'doors will close.'   Maybe this kind of fear is just one factor of those 'doors closing' to aliyah.?  And this fear then would only grow and grow as time goes on to make it more and more of a challenge to actually make aliyah (doors closing in a sort of psychological sense rather than merely physical).   Who knows?  Who can really predict....
« Last Edit: July 18, 2008, 04:17:20 AM by Kahane-Was-Right BT »

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #137 on: July 18, 2008, 04:13:51 AM »
The rabbi  I learned with a while back must hold by Rashi because he said when there is a rodef it's a mitzvah to kill him, you must kill him.

actually I or we may be merging 2 issues here.

Somebody coming to kill you.

And A trying to kill B, B running away.
So you C can kill Rodef A

They may be the same issue.. I am not sure.

But it is an obligation for C to kill Rodef A.  
Notice that if B is running away, then it's a rodef.
According to the rabbis and NK.

But here is an example of where B isn't running away.
Chaim in a brilliant ask jtf,
gave an interesting case of an innocent Rodef that we kill and G-d will deal with any mitigating circumstances.
For example. A foetus in the mother's womb. endangering the mother's life.  He is innocent but he is a rodef. And we kill the foetus. (permitted? obligated? I tihnk he prob said obligated).
That assumes that the posek that decided that got it right! And wasn't overgeneralising or anything.  How firm that position is. It is an ancient law applied to something new, and it could get subjective on the posek's part maybe.









Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #138 on: July 18, 2008, 04:18:40 AM »
Hmm, but what does the "innocence" of the rodef have to do with whether or not person B is running away?   Seems maybe a stretch, or maybe just worded the wrong way and would make sense.  Maybe I'm just not understanding it, I'm getting tired.

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #139 on: July 18, 2008, 04:21:33 AM »
That was an interesting post about the danger in Israel.
I want to make aliyah, but it is hard to ignore these realities.   What can I say to my kids or grandkids if I choose to go there and then leave them in a shoah-like situation G-d forbid.   And I just want to go and fulfill the mitzvah.  But then there is also a line of reasoning that the 'doors will close.'   Maybe this kind of fear is just one factor of those 'doors closing' to aliyah.?  And this fear then would only grow and grow as time goes on to make it more and more of a challenge to actually make aliyah (doors closing in a sort of psychological sense rather than merely physical).   Who knows?  Who can really predict....


Regarding the shoa risk.. A nuke is instant, so I would have said that yeah you can get out if you have a passport. Yourt kids would have a passport too probably 'cos their parent is from that country. But would that be quick enough? maybe not.

Regarding the argument that if you don't go to israel now, maybe soon the doors might close.
This is some strange idea, I guess it was going around years ago.. But if you look at it sensibly.
Why would aliya to israel be impossible?
Either things change in the diaspora overnight so dramatically as to defy common sense.
That doesn't happen overnight.

Or
Israel closes its doors.

If israel closes its doors, then israel would probably be in some terrible trouble, like maybe they got rid of the law of return! Which I don't think would happen. But if they did, then israel would be in trouble and not the safe place to be.

Another possiblity is moshiach comes and he closes the doors!!!
But accepting the kahanist/rabbi bar hayyim view, the RAMBAM view, about moshiach fighting the wars of G-d. This is not going to be a big overnight suprise.

Somebody will arise. people will be presuming he is moshiach, he will be fulfilling the requirements.
This is not going to be an overnight phenomena.  There will be enough opportunity to come to israel while that happens, if you think it's worth the bet, and you can always leave if you want.

note- there is a theological trap..  according to ketuvot 111A, (3 oaths are 110B-111A)  once you go there you aren't meant to leave.  It says that just after the 3 oaths.


« Last Edit: July 18, 2008, 04:43:22 AM by q_q_ »

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #140 on: July 18, 2008, 04:23:21 AM »
Why do they make a point of having that statement?

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #141 on: July 18, 2008, 04:24:49 AM »
Why do they make a point of having that statement?

it's very pro living in israel

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #142 on: July 18, 2008, 04:27:36 AM »
NK say, only the most religious person is holy enough to live in israel without defiling it.

RAMBAM, RAMBAN, the greatest of the generation.

And they say that the generation from when the temple was destroyed was greater than us ('cos you know charedim think every generation before was greater.. they may be right).

strong arugment.

One answer, assuming they were greater, is that relative to their time, they might not be greater.  We are far from ever having had the temple, so we are not judged as harshly, they were nearer to great times so should have known better.

Offline judeanoncapta

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 2080
  • Rebuild it now!!!!
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #143 on: July 18, 2008, 04:31:58 AM »
note- listening to rabbi bar hayyim,(I don't listen to him much, but if judea refers me to one or a point in one, then I listen)  One does hear him describing situations from a psychological perspective , and it makes sense. It sounds like ridicule.. Maybe they deserve it,  or it's just the truth, and if it comes out that way then so be it.  But it really hits the nail on the head.

You just reminded me.

Within the next few days, I will post Rav Bar Hayim's shiurim on the works of Shabbetai Ben Dov, one of the greatest Jewish minds in Jewish history.
Post questions here for the ASK JUDEA TORAH SHOW


my blog: Yehudi-Nation






Who is truly wise? He who can see the future. I see tommorow today and I want to end it - Rabbi Meir Daweedh Kahana

Offline Kahane-Was-Right BT

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12581
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #144 on: July 18, 2008, 04:38:48 AM »
Why do they make a point of having that statement?

it's very pro living in israel

Um, ok.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2008, 04:48:05 AM by Kahane-Was-Right BT »

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #145 on: July 18, 2008, 04:39:09 AM »
note- listening to rabbi bar hayyim,(I don't listen to him much, but if judea refers me to one or a point in one, then I listen)  One does hear him describing situations from a psychological perspective , and it makes sense. It sounds like ridicule.. Maybe they deserve it,  or it's just the truth, and if it comes out that way then so be it.  But it really hits the nail on the head.

You just reminded me.

Within the next few days, I will post Rav Bar Hayim's shiurim on the works of Shabbetai Ben Dov, one of the greatest Jewish minds in Jewish history.

that will be interesting, I look forward to it.. I recall you asking chaim about him.

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #146 on: July 18, 2008, 04:41:03 AM »
Why do they make a point of having that statement?

it's very pro living in israel


I am referring to the talmud having that statement about not leaving israel. And it is after the 3 oaths.
 Very pro living in israel in that sense.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2008, 04:42:55 AM by q_q_ »

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #147 on: July 18, 2008, 05:14:50 AM »
note- listening to rabbi bar hayyim,(I don't listen to him much, but if judea refers me to one or a point in one, then I listen)  One does hear him describing situations from a psychological perspective , and it makes sense. It sounds like ridicule.. Maybe they deserve it,  or it's just the truth, and if it comes out that way then so be it.  But it really hits the nail on the head.

You just reminded me.

Within the next few days, I will post Rav Bar Hayim's shiurim on the works of Shabbetai Ben Dov, one of the greatest Jewish minds in Jewish history.

I wasn't getting anything on google..

this transliteration gets it

Shabtai Ben Dov

Offline Tzvi Ben Roshel1

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3006
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #148 on: July 18, 2008, 05:18:11 PM »
That was an interesting post about the danger in Israel.
I want to make aliyah, but it is hard to ignore these realities.   

 The reality is that it is safer for Jews to be in Israel then in Galut. Yes Israel will and is experiencing big Milhamot, but we need not be afraid of anyone or anything besides G-d. IF something has to happen it could happen anywhere and we have to understand we cant run anywhere. + even if one dies, death is not the worse thing and it can come anywhere whether one is in America, europe or Israel, G-d decides.
The Academy of Elijah taught, whoever studies the laws (of the Torah) every day, (he) is guaranteed to have a share in the World to Come.

‏119:139 צִמְּתַתְנִי קִנְאָתִי כִּישָׁכְחוּ דְבָרֶיךָ צָרָי
My zeal incenses me, for my adversaries have forgotten Your words.
‏119:141 צָעִיר אָנֹכִי וְנִבְזֶה פִּקֻּדֶיךָ, לֹא שָׁכָחְתִּי.
 I am young and despised; I have not forgotten Your precepts.

" A fool does not realize, and an unwise person does not understand this (i.e. the following:) When the wicked bloom like grass, and the evildoers blossom (i.e. when they seem extremly successful), it is to destroy them forever (i.e. they are rewarded for their few good deeds in this World, and they will have no portion in the World to Come!)

Please visit: (The Greatest lectures on Earth).
http://torahanytime.com/
http://www.torahanytime.com/Rabbi/Yossi_Mizrachi/
http://www.torahanytime.com/Rabbi/Zecharia_Wallerstein/

Offline q_q_

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3819
Re: Idiot from Shas please don't show Beirut celebration
« Reply #149 on: July 19, 2008, 10:21:08 PM »
That was an interesting post about the danger in Israel.
I want to make aliyah, but it is hard to ignore these realities.   

 The reality is that it is safer for Jews to be in Israel then in Galut. Yes Israel will and is experiencing big Milhamot, but we need not be afraid of anyone or anything besides G-d. IF something has to happen it could happen anywhere and we have to understand we cant run anywhere. + even if one dies, death is not the worse thing and it can come anywhere whether one is in America, europe or Israel, G-d decides.

It is not safer. It is not safe to take a bus. There are so many car accidents..
And furthermore, from what I understand, healthcare in israel is bad. May be good for some specialist things, but pretty bad.   Maybe the totalitarian/Socialism aspect makes things run badly.

Don't force me into possibly doing the sin of the spies(in tenach - as described by rabbi teichtal) by talking badly about the situation of israel. But life is in danger going there..  More danger than in america.  Don't hide that.

The only reason to go to israel is religious. Any other reason and you need your head examined.
Infact, i'm sure rabbi kahane in one of the radio shows even admitted that!!! That america is a great country, and only because he is a religious jew, and G-d wants jews in israel, only because of that, he does what he does.

And given the muslim threat. Britain and America are really very safe for jews.
Firstly, the threat here is minimal, and if one really wanted to run away from it, there are many parts of britain and america with hardly any muslims at all, one can always go there. (though it may be hard to find a minyan if you move too far out, ).
Secondly, we have a police force, and jews are only in real danger from an evil regime. At the moment, the press and media, though left wing, are aware of the real bogeyman that is muslims. They are so focussed on "understanding islam" and this nonsense, they are FAR FAR FAR from blaming jews for everything bad in the world. We are VERY FAR from the conditions that led to the holocaust, VERY FAR.  A jew should keep his political antennae sharp.   

When I was in a muslim area, I walked proudly through the arab market a few times with my kippa on. Dressed for shabbat.  I was fine. Hordes of muslims aren't running rampage. The odd muslim hoodlum might be a problem, but the most you get from hordes is a debate. I can debate 10 at a time if I have to.