He is worse than Meretz in my opinion because he enables surrenders as they do but he does it claiming to be religious and from the right.
DownwithIslam, you have an extremely good point to make. The enemy from "within" is always more dangerous than external threats. Some examples:
--Arabs that propose a "peace process", like the PLO, are far more dangerous than those that speak openly of annihilating the Jews, such as Hamas and Hezbollah.
--Self-hating Jews are far more dangerous than Arabs.
--White leftist enablers of blacks are much more dangerous than the minorities themselves.
Lest anyone think we are only picking on Jewish leaders here, let me give you the example of a major crisis within contemporary Western Christianity. The evil postmodernist ("emergent") movement is gaining ground every day in the church. (The Emergent Church is a cult of Christianity, similar to ancient Gnosticism, that teaches that humans are incapable of figuring out pure facts because they cannot get past their own biases, and for the same reason that ancient Biblical texts [Jewish and Christian] cannot be 100% reliable, and therefore that humans must figure out their own "inner truths".)
There are secular, openly atheistic postmodernists (such as Paul Churchland and Daniel Dennett), who openly detest Christianity and consider it a primitive fairy-tale, and then there are so-called Christian postmodernists such as Brian McLaren and Nancey Murphy, who claim that Christianity and postmodern philosophy are completely compatible and that they are only showing a new aspect of the faith. Needless to say, it is the latter category that the young Christians are falling for in droves. Believers will reject a professing atheist, but will stop to listen to a false teacher claiming to be a Christian.