Author Topic: Bailout reality check: Taxpayer exposure  (Read 696 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Americanhero1

  • Silver Star JTF Member
  • ********
  • Posts: 7617
  • I ain't going anywhere
Bailout reality check: Taxpayer exposure
« on: September 18, 2008, 03:07:59 PM »
The numbers are big. That much is certain.
The Federal Reserve has backstopped the purchase of Bear Stearns to the tune of $29 billion. It will loan $85 billion to insurer AIG. It's letting banks borrow up to $150 billion using risky mortgage-backed securities as collateral. And it's letting investment banks, which it doesn't regulate, get short-term loans using the central bank's discount window.

http://biz.yahoo.com/cnnm/080918/091808_bailout_tally_taxpayer.html?.&.pf=taxes

Offline angryChineseKahanist

  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *********
  • Posts: 10548
  • ☭=卐=☮
Re: Bailout reality check: Taxpayer exposure
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2008, 03:14:25 PM »
So, when no one else wants it, just pass it to uncle Sam?
Do we see other countries behaving like this?
 
U+262d=U+5350=U+9774

Offline Zelhar

  • Honorable Winged Member
  • Gold Star JTF Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10689
Re: Bailout reality check: Taxpayer exposure
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2008, 03:23:20 PM »
There are big differences between AIG, Bear and Fannie / Freddie.

With AIG the government basically buys a good firm at a good price, most likely they will see a nice profit. If they let AIG fall then everyone will lose much more just from the hysteria that would result.

The case of Bear is a bad dill, because the government agreed to take all the bad risky assets of Bear and let JPM to by the leftovers of Bear for a cheap price with no risk attached.

Fannie and Freddie are sick puppies back they had a historic and 'implicit' government backing, so really there was no choice but to nationalize them.