Thanks q_q_
From what you said, you can try to be nice when there is a misunderstanding but when they obviously don't care and do everything they can to undermine you and make you look bad in front of your boss, then do the same to them. Respectability is great until people see it as weakness.They can get all upset when you fight back but many companies do have an HR department or hotline where you can call and let your adversaries know you mean business with them when they get investigated by the company.
you make a very good point.
Very likely that the HR dept would deal with the problem very effectively.
Rabbi Kahane defended the concept of counter-terrorism (he wouldn't say he supports it, because of legal ramifications, it -wouldn't be smart-). Here's the key though, his defence was "what are we supposed to do?". The ruling power have an army and could deal with the arabs far more effectively (if they wanted to), but they aren't dealing with it. They are aware of the problem , and aren't dealing with it.
HR would whisper a stern warning to the other person, and it can all get fixed very neatly behind the scenes!
Another thing you could do is stare at her eyeball to eyeball and tell her - something.. along the lines of criticising her behaviour. But you have really, and since she is willing to go up and complain about you. There is absolutely no problem going up and complaining about her. And you can tell HR that you -have- spoken to her about it and it has had no effect. (they'll like the fact that you tried to deal with it sensibly yourself)..
It's worth noting that by even responding to her, you obeyed rule number one not to get trodden on.. She didn't respond to that so you go further, HR. You have to play the game, responding in a smart way..
Meir Kahane knew how to work systems, he studied law for a
reason. He was grateful that arabs are stupid enough to produce
propaganda that jews are evil geniuses, beause it'd frighten the arabs into not attacking
I saw a video of Robert Aumann (the Orthodox jewish nobel prize winner in game theory).. game theory seems to be about treating a situation like a game - not a joke game, but a game, what are the right moves to make.. He talked about how more weapons can prevent war , since they deter it.. He talked about the bible verse about changing swords into ploughshares, and explained how it doesn't mean do it now.. I recall Kahane saying "I'm all for turning swords into ploughshares , but if my enemy has a sword, I don't want a ploughshare".
Kahane was all about playing the game and responding in a smart way.
Without crazy rules like thinking you have to be "nice".. more moral than everybody else e.t.c. If you were to swear at that woman , I don't think Kahane would have said you were a nasty person for doing that. But he would have said it - wasn't smart-, because you have a more effective option.