Author Topic: Churchill's attitude to Jews  (Read 5711 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kahaneloyalist

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1959
"For it is through the mercy of fools that all Justice is lost"
Ramban

Din Rodef

  • Guest
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2007, 09:00:06 PM »
Churchill is often misunderstood by both sides.

Churchill believed that the same people that brought G-d (sorry about the censored) are the same people that brought the devil.

In other words, He believed that true Torah Jews were absolutely necessary and vital to the survival of the West...On the other hand, he viewed the secular Bolshevik Jews as arch enemies of Western Civilization.

He found it curious that the same people that brought the Bible...also brought Marxism.

But he also viewed Jews as alien and non-assimilating..THerefore, he was suspicious of their intentions in England. I can't blame him for this. My personal life experiences have led me to the same thoughts about Jews living in my city and country.

Many Jews seem to think that any criticism is anti-semitism..I don't blame them for feeling this way. It's not easy to be in Diaspora for 2000 years. But understand...Gentiles have their own nations and cultures to worry about and often find the majority Jewish position downright confusing or even contrary to the Gentile nations' own survival.

The Diaspora is not just punishment for the Jews...It is also punishment for their host nations. 

Redemption can only occur when the Jews return to Israel and fulfull their destiny of becoming a nation of priests.

BOTTOM LINE: Don't waste much time thinking about a British leader that's been dead for decades.....Instead, worry a little more about fulfilling the Jewish destiny of returning to the land of Israel after 2000 years in Diaspora.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2007, 09:01:55 PM by Din Rodef »

Offline Fruit of thy loins

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1228
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2007, 09:14:10 PM »
Antipathetic attitudes to Jews have been common among the 'educated' people of England, historically and today.  H G Wells wrote in his book 'A Short Outline of HIstory' that the conflict between the Carthaginians and the Romans was a kind of race-war between 'Semites and Aryans' that 'set the tone for the outcome of world events right down to our present day', which was 1922 when he wrote the first edition.  The English elite believed in Aryanism and believed that they were cousins of the Aryan Germans.  They tolerated Jews by a very slim margin - it was only English modesty against extremism that stopped them being hostile to the Jews.  (Actually an anti-immigration act was passed in 1918 in England designed to keep out 'Jews and other feeble-minded people'.)

Today, we see many petty-bourgeois people in Britain, Australia and Canada (the Anglo countries which are most attuned to traditiona Englishness) that there is a stodgy antisemitism among people who think they know better, who think they are more educated and cultured than the mass of the people.  Evidence abounds.  Their intellectual tradition is derived from the same Masonic line as H G Wells and Churchill although obviously this tradition has lost a lot of its prestige.  I also notice antisemitism especially in Scotland, the same place where young white girls are sleeping with freshly-arrived, half-starved asylum seekers with a great deal of glee.  It is meet that these nations should be so cursed that their women turn into bare-faced harlots.  :)

Every white woman deserves the black man of her dreams.  But what does every white man deserve?

Din Rodef

  • Guest
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2007, 09:22:50 PM »
Fruit of thy loins

One of the reasons that white girls are sleeping with new immigrants is because the IDENTITY OF THE WHITE GIRLS HAS BEEN THRASHED

Everytime a white person attempts to assert his own racial/cultural identity....he is immediately vilified as a Nazi...

This constant attack on white identity is at the heart of the third world invasion of the west. Jews most certainly share some of the blame for this.

« Last Edit: March 12, 2007, 09:24:33 PM by Din Rodef »

Offline Fruit of thy loins

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1228
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2007, 09:32:41 PM »


One of the reasons that white girls are sleeping with new immigrants is because the IDENTITY OF THE WHITE GIRLS HAS BEEN THRASHED






If this is the 'white nationalist' position then this is why I'm not a white nationalist.  I know for a fact that white women benefit from the culture emasculation of white men, and many white women are either consciously or subconsciously aware of it.

The first person who will scream at a white male for his intolerance will be a white woman.  She might even start becoming hysterical and crying for apparently no good reason.  The real reason she is so upset is that a self-assertive white male threatens her fun-time, her party-time. The same factors (Masonry, European Unionism, Anglo-Saxon economic values) that 'liberate' the negro and Islamify towns and cities also 'liberate' the white woman and give her access to unprecedented opportunities and resources.

White women know that their supremacy relies upon the suppression of working class white males.  I used to get treated like dirt by rich white girls at university ....
Every white woman deserves the black man of her dreams.  But what does every white man deserve?

Offline Fruit of thy loins

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1228
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2007, 10:07:43 PM »
Churchill's constituency had an influential Jewish population, and I believe they lobbied him on the then-forthcoming Immigration Act.  I cannot remember if they wanted him to be for or against it but he turned out to be for it.  Despite the immigration restriction and the history about half of Britain's Jews are thoroughly assimilated.  The blacks that have arrived since 1948 seem heeded for assimilation but at the cost of seriously damaging the prospects of many young white people.  On the other hand no one has ever argued for restricting black immigration in the entire history of Britain!
Every white woman deserves the black man of her dreams.  But what does every white man deserve?

Offline Fruit of thy loins

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1228
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2007, 10:14:17 PM »
I apologize, I think it was the 1905 Aliens Act (against Jewish immigrants).  I am digging up old university material.  I wish I could still get access to my old uni's library.
Every white woman deserves the black man of her dreams.  But what does every white man deserve?

Offline Fruit of thy loins

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1228
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2007, 10:21:31 PM »
This is the 1905 Act that Churchill supported.  It sums up very nicely the British mindset.

By 1905, sixty per cent of all ‘aliens’ (i.e. Jewish immigrants) lived in London, and tended to live close to each other so as to form their own distinct communities.   By living close to others from the same background and in similar circumstances, the incentive to assimilate with the host population was thereby diminished.  This created the impression of, so to speak, an ‘alien invasion’ detrimental to the indigenous population: it was argued that the aliens were able to pay higher rents (thus causing a general inflation of rent prices) because of their greater willingness to ‘crowd together’; as a consequence of this overcrowding, the presence of immigrants was associated with disease and squalor; it was argued that they were willing to work longer and for less pay, thereby driving down the conditions and wages for indigenous workers; and it was also argued that the aliens had customs, language, ways of dressing, religion, morals and mores which were incompatible with the British way of life.   A further trait of these Jewish immigrants, perhaps unique to the circumstances of the time, was their perceived political persuasions; they tended to be of a socialist or anarchist disposition, values considered antithetical to traditional British ‘liberalism’, intensifying and consolidating the image of the immigrant as holding on to a cultural outlook irreconcilable with British customs.  The culmination of all these factors, specifically, opposition from the working class on the grounds of competition in the labour market, opposition from the middle classes on political grounds, and the generally perceived differences of culture and way of life, were to see the 1905 Aliens Act put into place with the explicit purpose of restricting and controlling economic migration to the UK.   In brief, a convergence of elite and working class opinion paved way for a tough stance on immigration.
Every white woman deserves the black man of her dreams.  But what does every white man deserve?

Offline Fruit of thy loins

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1228
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2007, 10:34:00 PM »
I believe that these Jewish immigrants numbered around 200,000 at the time.  The British found their presence to be intolerable, not because of the stretch on resources, but because they were jealous of the Jewish culture and were antisemitic.  London now has over THREE MILLION immigrants living in it (mostly from the Turd World) and it is presently illegal to protest about that.  This is why I say that Britain is cursed for its antisemitism.  It would not tolerate 200,000 Jews so it is now having to 'tolerate' the prospect of having 20 million immigrants living in its borders by 2050.
Every white woman deserves the black man of her dreams.  But what does every white man deserve?

Offline MassuhDGoodName

  • Ultimate JTFer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4542
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2007, 11:49:48 PM »
Fruit:  "...Britain is cursed for its antisemitism..."

100% correct, Fruit!

Exactly as the same curse is descending with haste on the United States of America, as she turns from G-d, and chooses to support terrorists in exchange for an oil supply; betraying the Jews.

Each passing day sees further degeneration in every aspect of life in the U.S....like watching the Fall Of Rome; "live and in living color".

I fully expect to soon see the Chinese Reds sail right into San Francisco, L.A., & New York, & take over without so much as firing a single shot.

Just think, Fruit...each and every morning at sunrise, 1950's style "squawk-box"-style horn & driver public address speakers, set 20 ft. high atop cheap rusty scaffolds, will begin blaring "The East Is Red"!...electronically amplified and transmitted directly from an original, well-worn, 78rpm shellac record; played with a 2lb brass tone arm tipped with a sharpened steel nail stylus.

Then follows the voice of the Commisar -- Comrade Colonel Ch'eng L'iau Pu:  "YeeeeeeeeeeeeeeyyyuuuuuuuuuuuuuuUUU!!!!
Yan-keee Dogs!!!...Aaruu bow down Chya-Ma'N Mao!!!" 

Offline Fruit of thy loins

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1228
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2007, 11:53:43 PM »
Fruit:  "...Britain is cursed for its antisemitism..."

100% correct, Fruit!

Exactly as the same curse is descending with haste on the United States of America, as she turns from G-d, and chooses to support terrorists in exchange for an oil supply; betraying the Jews.

Each passing day sees further degeneration in every aspect of life in the U.S....like watching the Fall Of Rome; "live and in living color".

I fully expect to soon see the Chinese Reds sail right into San Francisco, L.A., & New York, & take over without so much as firing a single shot.

Just think, Fruit...each and every morning at sunrise, 1950's style "squawk-box"-style horn & driver public address speakers, set 20 ft. high atop cheap rusty scaffolds, will begin blaring "The East Is Red"!...electronically amplified and transmitted directly from an original, well-worn, 78rpm shellac record; played with a 2lb brass tone arm tipped with a sharpened steel nail stylus.

Then follows the voice of the Commisar -- Comrade Colonel Ch'eng L'iau Pu:  "YeeeeeeeeeeeeeeyyyuuuuuuuuuuuuuuUUU!!!!
Yan-keee Dogs!!!...Aaruu bow down Chya-Ma'N Mao!!!" 



I honestly doubt it.  If anything China would invade Russia which will be severely depopulated in a few decades' time.  Latin Americans have fire and passion, they would jealously guard their new North American assets from the Chinese.
Every white woman deserves the black man of her dreams.  But what does every white man deserve?

Offline Fruit of thy loins

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1228
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2007, 11:55:32 PM »
Do you think I'm joking when I say that Britain will be more than 1/3rd non-British by 2050?  Actually that's a conservative estimate and doesn't take into account the fact that many of the remaining two-thirds are British only by birth and not by blood-line to the Anglo-Saxon invaders from centuries ago.
Every white woman deserves the black man of her dreams.  But what does every white man deserve?

Din Rodef

  • Guest
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #12 on: March 13, 2007, 12:21:47 PM »
If this is the 'white nationalist' position then this is why I'm not a white nationalist.  I know for a fact that white women benefit from the culture emasculation of white men, and many white women are either consciously or subconsciously aware of it.

The first person who will scream at a white male for his intolerance will be a white woman.  She might even start becoming hysterical and crying for apparently no good reason.  The real reason she is so upset is that a self-assertive white male threatens her fun-time, her party-time. The same factors (Masonry, European Unionism, Anglo-Saxon economic values) that 'liberate' the negro and Islamify towns and cities also 'liberate' the white woman and give her access to unprecedented opportunities and resources.

White women know that their supremacy relies upon the suppression of working class white males.  I used to get treated like dirt by rich white girls at university ....

Yeah, rich white girls treated me like dirt at the University too...man I hated those stuck up snots :)

But, what you're describing is good old fashioned "feminism" that crosses all racial and ethnic boundaries. Certainly, Jewish men suffer as much from feminism as white men do.

You're correct: I described the "white nationalist" position. The reason white women go with black savages has to do with the loss of white identity. Feminism may have played a role but it is not the main reason. THe main reason for the destruction of white identity is linked to the memory of the Holocaust. Any assertion of white cultural idenity is immediately branded as NAZI. Jews certainly share some blame in this.

Don't worry, I'm not a white nationalist. But I certainly agree with them on this position because my personal experience has never been any different.

Thankfully, Chaim and JTF exist...otherwise there would probably be no alternative to StørmFrønt for a white guy in the West. JTF seems to have found the compromise....whites can assert their cultural identity and preserve their own nations while Jews can return to Israel and fulfill their destiny of becoming a nation of priest. JTF's position is a win/win solution for both Jews and white gentiles.


Offline Fruit of thy loins

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1228
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #13 on: March 13, 2007, 02:45:40 PM »

Yeah, rich white girls treated me like dirt at the University too...man I hated those stuck up snots :)

But, what you're describing is good old fashioned "feminism" that crosses all racial and ethnic boundaries. Certainly, Jewish men suffer as much from feminism as white men do.


Black women hate non-black men.  This is something that white women are mostly into.  There is a book, which can be found at www.geocities.com/neurotic_peacock, written before the Shoah, which talks about white females lusting after black men.

Every white woman deserves the black man of her dreams.  But what does every white man deserve?

Din Rodef

  • Guest
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #14 on: March 13, 2007, 03:07:29 PM »


Black women hate non-black men. 



Sorry man...but my life experience is otherwise

I went to a black high school and couldn't keep the sistas' hands off of me...it was only the brothers that gave me problems.

Chaim seems to share some similar views...I remember hearing past episodes of Take Back America when he described situations that black women would congregate around him on the subway rather than sit near other black men.
« Last Edit: March 13, 2007, 03:10:51 PM by Din Rodef »

Offline Fruit of thy loins

  • Master JTFer
  • ******
  • Posts: 1228
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #15 on: March 14, 2007, 06:25:10 AM »
Sorry man...but my life experience is otherwise

I went to a black high school and couldn't keep the sistas' hands off of me...it was only the brothers that gave me problems.

Chaim seems to share some similar views...I remember hearing past episodes of Take Back America when he described situations that black women would congregate around him on the subway rather than sit near other black men.



HELLO MR WHITE MAN!  CAN I MARRY YOU AND GET A VISA TO COME LIVE IN DIS COUNTRY PLEASE?  I ONLY AM HIV POSITIVE I DON'T HAVE AIDS JUST YET!  WE STILL HAVE TIME TO HAVE SEVENTEEN BEAUTIFUL CHILDREN!
Every white woman deserves the black man of her dreams.  But what does every white man deserve?

Din Rodef

  • Guest
Re: Churchill's attitude to Jews
« Reply #16 on: March 14, 2007, 10:13:36 AM »
HELLO MR WHITE MAN!  CAN I MARRY YOU AND GET A VISA TO COME LIVE IN DIS COUNTRY PLEASE?  I ONLY AM HIV POSITIVE I DON'T HAVE AIDS JUST YET!  WE STILL HAVE TIME TO HAVE SEVENTEEN BEAUTIFUL CHILDREN!

ooh ...you're exactly right.....that's exactly what it's like

Nothing makes me sicker than geeky white guys who marry foreigners and bring their whole third world family to the USA.

Trust me...I NEVER touched any sistas in high school.  But they did help protect me from the roaming black gangsters in the hallway.